Minutes of SUSY meeting Wedns 15th Dec 1999 

Frank Hoelldorfer: brief update on the slepton searches
There are now 18 stau candidates at 196 with an expectation of 11.2, 2 more after the reprocessing. Frank will check if this is new data or the events have changed enough to pass the cuts.  He also showed E12 distributions vers phi for each endcap, these were fine with one noisy HCAL channel that had to be masked. The inefficiency numbers were a little higher than last year (7-9 %), dropping with energy. See the transparencies for the table.

Mario Antonelli and Giacomo Sguazzoni: the stable and quasi stable stops
If you assume that delta M is small (stop->c chi, or even if that is forbidden stop->u chi) then stop may have long lifetime. Two searches have been developed: one for two very heavy charged tracks, one for one track with a high d0. Both have efficiencies of 10-20%, so limits are about 77-87 GeV for differing lifetime assumptions. However there is still a corridor at delta M of about 2 GeV for cases where the life time is too short to always decay outside the detector, but to long to give only one kink. This is being worked on and may improve, also only 189 and 192 data have been used so far.

Jean-Baptiste de Vivie: Higgs Boson Searches and the mass limits on the lightest neutralino.
First he reminded us that Higgs searches are indeed very constraining. This has been shown inthe 183 GeV Chargino/Neutralino paper. However, before this year, they could not contribute to improve the absolute lower bound on the LSP mass. With the new limit on mH (mH>105.6 GeV), and taking into account new corrections in the theoretical calculations, the tanb range [0.8,1.8] is excluded, in the improved benchmarks. Assuming the effect of more general scans is to shrink this range to [1,1.5] this simply translates into a improved LSP mass limit from 36.5 (set at tanb = 1) to 44  GeV (set at tanb = 1.5) (assuming low sfermions masses lead to similar  limit at high tanb). Nevertheless, there exist very fine-tuned
configurations where stops are light and Higgs boson decays into stops. Since no analysis exists to deal with stable or metastable stops in Higgs decays, no constrains can be obtained in those cases. This was already present at 183 GeV, but "solved" by making the further hypothesis (reasonable as soon as it is clearly stated) that Dm = m(stop)-m(LSP) > 2-5 GeV. Such situation may also decrease the LSP mass limit obtained from charginos since they also decay into stop, and there is no missing energy (the basic quantity) in the final state. The conclusion of all this is that Higgs constraints should at least be quoted, even if an assumption on Dm has to be made. Moreover, as soon as Mario and Giacomo manage to close the Dm < 5 GeV region in direct searches for stop (see above), the stop loophole will disappear.

Dominique Fouchez: RPV results
Still running reprocessed data. Also the code to generated RPV ntuples is being merged to have one "mega"-ntuple (this does include chaminou for the RPC people).

David Hutchcroft (that's me by the way): RPV status
183 GeV data has been published, the 189 GeV data should have a draft ready by ALEPH week in January 2000. A conference note will be written on the 192-202 GeV data taken this year for the winter conferences, however this will be combined with data taken next year for a final paper, tentatively planned for January 2001.  On the RPV status for LLE and LQD, there are several new events in 192 that should have been passed in the old reprocessing. These are concentrated into a three runs, I'm trying to find out why they did not pass/were not run last time. The 4 lepton excess went up by one at 200 GeV and there are no events in any cuts at 204 GeV.

Luke Jones: chi -> slepton lepton (slepton with lifetime)
This is the GMSB case of neutralino-> lepton slepton -> l l Gravitino. The sleptons are assumed to have a lifetime corresponding to the size of the detector. The pure selectron and smuon cases are finished, these were relatively simple. The two stau case is much harder as the higher multiplicity and softer final tracks are much more like the detector effect high d0 objects. Luke has written code to identify and eliminate:
- nuclear interactions
- photon conversions  - ECAL splashbacks (tracks created by particles interacting in the ECAL and coming back into the TPC).
- ITC-TPC track breaks
- Other reconstruction errors
- Cosmics
 Three data events which show these feature were shown. The 2 stau case is now almost complete and the mixed cases should be quick. A preliminary note is hoped for the beginning of February. If it is ready in time this may be part of a GMSB note for la Thuile (see the publication strategy at the end).

 Marcello Maggi: chargino searches with lifetime (the transparencies were in Italian, apologies where mistakes are made). With very very low delta-M the ratio of hadronic to leptonic decays changes quickly as a function of delta M and the number of pions produced also varies. Tagging ISR photons was shown to be not sensitive to delta-M and has a higher efficiency.

 Gerardo Ganis: LEPSUSY working group status report
It has been agreed with the PDG to include the LEP combined data. The results from each collaboration must have a CERN/EP number and have been accepted by the Journal. So any results not in that state by January 31st (possibly stretched to February) will not be included. L3 and Delphi's results are all already in this state, OPAL does not have any photon results and ALEPH may have photon results. All of the slepton and squark results are ready.

All together: Plans for publications and winter conferences
Then there was a general discussion about publications.
Situation 189 GeV data:
MSSM slepton and squarks published
MSSM chargino and neutralino not published: plans are to have a draft with the 192-202 GeV data included, ready by the end of January beginning of February (should this also include the impact of the higgs exclusion on LSP limit ?) .
GMSB published
RPV draft 0 ready by end of January
Situation 192-202 GeV data:
MSSM slepton and squarks: conference note will be ready in January. If the work on stable stops is finalized soon, it would deserve a publication (which should naturally include all slepton and squark results at 192-202 GeV).
MSSM charginos and neutralinos: included together with the 189 GeV results in a publication.
GMSB sleptons and photons: the plans are to have a winter conference note with typical GMSB topologies. If cascade topologies with lifetime are finalized a publication on GMSB with this year data is possible. If not maybe worth to wait for next year data before to have a final publication (including scan).
AMSB (charginos at very small delta-M): This is a new analysis and would deserve a separate publication when ready.
RPV note for winter  (and summer) conference. Wait for next year data for publication.

All this will be reviewed in January anyway, when more analyses will be nearly finished. There was some support for the idea that the scans etc should only be published with next years data.



Submitted by: David Hutchcroft