
\documentclass[border=5pt,multi=true]{standalone}
\usepackage{standalone}
\usepackage{ifthen}
\usepackage{enumerate}
\usepackage{bm}
\usepackage{siunitx}
\usepackage{collcell}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{microtype}
\usepackage{lineno}
\usepackage{xspace}
\usepackage{caption}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\usepackage{hyperxmp}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{todonotes}
\usepackage{footmisc}
\usepackage{hypcap}
\usepackage{xspace}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\usepackage{cite}
\usepackage{mciteplus}
\usepackage{xspace}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\usepackage{cleveref}

\begin{document}
\begin{tabular}{lc}
\hline
Source &  Systematic uncertainty  (\%)  \\
 \hline
 Signal decay template shape&   1.8 \\
Signal decay efficiency&   0.9 \\
Fractions of signal $\tau\xspace^+\xspace$ decays & $0.3$\\
Possible contributions from other $\tau\xspace^+\xspace$ decays & 1.0  \\
Fixing the $\kern 0.18em\overline{\kern -0.18em  D\xspace}\xspace\xspace^{**}\tau\xspace^+\xspace \nu\xspace\xspace_\tau\xspace$ and $D_s^{**+} \tau\xspace^+\xspace \nu\xspace\xspace_\tau\xspace$ fractions & $^{+1.8}_{-1.9}$ \\
Normalization mode PDF choice & 1.0 \\
Knowledge of the $D_s^+ \rightarrow\xspace 3\pi X$ decay model & 1.0\\
~~~~Specifically the $ D\xspace\xspace^+_ s\xspace\xspace\xspace \rightarrow\xspace a_1 X$ fraction & $1.5$ \\
$B\rightarrow\xspace D^{*-}D_s^+(X)$ template shapes& 0.3\\
$B\rightarrow\xspace D^{*-}D^0(X)$ template shapes&  1.2 \\
$B \rightarrow\xspace D^{*-}D^+(X)$ template shapes & $^{+2.2}_{-0.8}$\\
Fixing $B\rightarrow\xspace  D\xspace\xspace^{*-}\xspace  D\xspace\xspace^+_ s\xspace\xspace\xspace (X)$ bkg model parameters & $1.1$ \\
Fixing $B\rightarrow\xspace D^{*-}D^0 (X)$ bkg model parameters & $1.5$ \\
$B \rightarrow\xspace D^{*-}3\pi X$ template shapes & 1.2\\
Combinatorial background normalization& $^{+0.5}_{-0.6}$\\
PID efficiency&  0.5\\
Kinematic reweighting & 0.7 \\
Vertex error correction & 0.9 \\
Normalization mode efficiency~(modeling of $m(3\pi)$)&  1.0 \\
Preselection efficiency & 2.0 \\
Signal efficiency~(size of simulation sample) & 1.1 \\
Normalization efficiency (size of simulation sample) & 1.1 \\
Empty bins in templates& 1.3 \\ 
PDF shapes uncertainty (size of simulation sample) &  2.0 \\
\hline
Total systematic uncertainty & $^{+6.2}_{-5.9}$  \\
\hline
Total statistical uncertainty & 5.9  \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{document}
