Identification of jets originating from beauty and charm quarks is important for measuring Standard Model processes and for searching for new physics. The performance of algorithms developed to select $b$- and $c$-quark jets is measured using data recorded by LHCb from proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV in 2011 and at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV in 2012. The efficiency for identifying a $b(c)$ jet is about 65(25) with a probability for misidentifying a light-parton jet of 0.3 for jets with transverse momentum $p_{\rm T} > 20$ GeV and pseudorapidity $2.2 < \eta < 4.2$. The dependence of the performance on the $p_{\rm T}$ and $\eta$ of the jet is also measured.
SV-tagger algorithm $ {\rm BDT}(b|c)$ versus $ {\rm BDT}(bc|udsg)$ distributions obtained from simulation for (left) $b$, (middle) $c$ and (right) $\rm light -parton$ jets. |
Fig1a.pdf [16 KiB] HiDef png [152 KiB] Thumbnail [152 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig1b.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [164 KiB] Thumbnail [165 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig1c.pdf [17 KiB] HiDef png [174 KiB] Thumbnail [175 KiB] *.C file |
||
Efficiencies and mistag probabilities obtained from simulation for the SV-tagger and TOPO algorithms for (top) $b$, (middle) $c$ and (bottom) $\rm light -parton$ jets. The left plots show the dependence on $p_{\rm T}$ for $2.2 < \eta < 4.2$, while the right plots show the dependence on $\eta$ for $ p_{\rm T} > 20\mathrm{ Ge V} $ (see text for details). The "loose" label for the TOPO refers to the BDT requirement used in the trigger for SVs that contain muon candidates. |
Fig2a.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [134 KiB] Thumbnail [130 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig2b.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [138 KiB] Thumbnail [134 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig2c.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [146 KiB] Thumbnail [138 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig2d.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [151 KiB] Thumbnail [143 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig2e.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [155 KiB] Thumbnail [156 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig2f.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [158 KiB] Thumbnail [160 KiB] *.C file |
||
Efficiencies for SV-tagging a $(b,c)$-jet versus mistag probability for a $\rm light -parton$ jet from simulation. The curves are obtained by varying the $ {\rm BDT}(bc|udsg)$ requirement. |
Fig3.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [207 KiB] Thumbnail [169 KiB] *.C file |
|
SV-tagger BDT fit results for the $B+$jet data sample with $10 < p_{\rm T} ({\rm jet}) < 100\mathrm{ Ge V} $: (top left) distribution in data; (top right) two-dimensional template-fit result; and (bottom) projections of the fit result with the $b$, $c$, and $\rm light -parton$ contributions shown as stacked histograms. |
Fig4a.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [103 KiB] Thumbnail [60 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig4b.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [98 KiB] Thumbnail [58 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig4c.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [105 KiB] Thumbnail [91 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig4d.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [109 KiB] Thumbnail [97 KiB] *.C file |
||
Same as Fig. 4 for the $D+$jet data sample. |
Fig5a.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [95 KiB] Thumbnail [57 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig5b.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [90 KiB] Thumbnail [54 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig5c.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [119 KiB] Thumbnail [105 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig5d.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [113 KiB] Thumbnail [99 KiB] *.C file |
||
Same as Fig. 4 for the $\mu(b,c)+$jet data sample. |
Fig6a.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [104 KiB] Thumbnail [61 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig6b.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [96 KiB] Thumbnail [56 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig6c.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [121 KiB] Thumbnail [107 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig6d.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [108 KiB] Thumbnail [94 KiB] *.C file |
||
Two-dimensional $M_{\rm cor}$ versus SV track multiplicity fit results for (top) $B+$jet, (middle) $D+$jet and (bottom) $\mu(b,c)+$jet data samples. The left plots show the projection onto the $M_{\rm cor}$ axis, while the right plots show the projection onto the track multiplicity. The highest $M_{\rm cor}$ bin includes candidates with $M_{\rm cor} > 10\mathrm{ Ge V} $. |
Fig7a.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [118 KiB] Thumbnail [103 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig7b.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [106 KiB] Thumbnail [92 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig7c.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [110 KiB] Thumbnail [94 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig7d.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [109 KiB] Thumbnail [97 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig7e.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [116 KiB] Thumbnail [102 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig7f.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [111 KiB] Thumbnail [97 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fits to the TOPO BDT distribution in (left) $B+$jet, (middle) $D+$jet and (right) $\mu(b,c)+$jet data samples with $10 < p_{\rm T} ({\rm jet}) < 100\mathrm{ Ge V} $. |
Fig8a.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [113 KiB] Thumbnail [100 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig8b.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [123 KiB] Thumbnail [113 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig8c.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [118 KiB] Thumbnail [105 KiB] *.C file |
||
Results of $\chi^2_{\mathrm{IP}}$ calibration using $W +$jet data for $10 < p_{\rm T} ({\rm jet}) < 100\mathrm{ Ge V} $. The tail out to large $\chi^2_{\mathrm{IP}}$ values in the $\rm light -parton$ -jet sample is largely due to strange particle decays. |
Fig9.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [112 KiB] Thumbnail [93 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fits to the $\chi^2_{\mathrm{IP}}$ distribution in (top left) $B+$jet, (top right) $D+$jet and (bottom) $\mu(b,c)+$jet data samples. |
Fig10a.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [113 KiB] Thumbnail [98 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig10b.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [124 KiB] Thumbnail [107 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig10c.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [117 KiB] Thumbnail [102 KiB] *.C file |
||
(top) SV-tagger two dimensional BDT fit results projected onto the (left) $ {\rm BDT}(bc|udsg)$ and (right) $ {\rm BDT}(b|c)$ axes and (bottom) $\chi^2_{\mathrm{IP}}$ fit results for the $B+$muon-jet subsample with $10 < p_{\rm T} ({\rm jet}) < 100\mathrm{ Ge V} $. |
Fig11a.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [107 KiB] Thumbnail [94 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig11b.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [101 KiB] Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig11c.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [113 KiB] Thumbnail [99 KiB] *.C file |
||
Same as Fig. 11 but for the $D+$muon-jet data sample. |
Fig12a.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [107 KiB] Thumbnail [93 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig12b.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [113 KiB] Thumbnail [101 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig12c.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [127 KiB] Thumbnail [112 KiB] *.C file |
||
Same as Fig. 11 but for the $\mu(b,c)+$muon-jet data sample. |
Fig13a.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [114 KiB] Thumbnail [101 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig13b.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [103 KiB] Thumbnail [90 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig13c.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [123 KiB] Thumbnail [107 KiB] *.C file |
||
Efficiencies of the SV-tagger algorithm measured in data relative to those obtained from simulation for $2.2 < \eta < 4.2$: (top left) results from the (closed markers) highest- $p_{\rm T}$ track and (open markers) muon-jet samples; (top right) the combined results assuming the scale factors are the same for semileptonic and inclusive $(b,c)$-hadron decays; and (bottom left) the combined results for $(b,c)$-jet using the highest- $p_{\rm T}$ -track approach assuming the scale factors are the same for $b$ and $c$ jets. The absolute efficiencies corresponding to the combined $(b,c)$-jet results (bottom right). |
Fig14a.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [170 KiB] Thumbnail [144 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig14b.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [117 KiB] Thumbnail [104 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig14c.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [76 KiB] Thumbnail [41 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig14d.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [108 KiB] Thumbnail [96 KiB] *.C file |
||
TOPO algorithm $(b,c)$-tagging efficiencies, using the "loose" BDT requirement, in data relative to those obtained in simulation. |
Fig15.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [116 KiB] Thumbnail [102 KiB] *.C file |
|
SV-tagger algorithm BDT distributions for backward and too-long-lived SVs in the $W +$jet data sample: (top left) distribution in data; (top right) two-dimensional template-fit result; and (bottom) projections of the fit result with the $b$, $c$, and $\rm light -parton$ contributions shown as stacked histograms. |
Fig16a.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [98 KiB] Thumbnail [57 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig16b.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [80 KiB] Thumbnail [49 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig16c.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [114 KiB] Thumbnail [103 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig16d.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [108 KiB] Thumbnail [93 KiB] *.C file |
||
Ratio of $\rm light -parton$ -jet mistag probabilities observed in data to those in simulation for the (left) SV-tagger and (right) TOPO algorithms. |
Fig17a.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [96 KiB] Thumbnail [91 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig17b.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [94 KiB] Thumbnail [85 KiB] *.C file |
||
Animated gif made out of all figures. |
PAPER-2015-016.gif Thumbnail |
Summary of relative systematic uncertainties ($-$ denotes negligible). Systematic uncertainties that dependent on jet type and $p_{\rm T}$ are marked by a $*$ (see text for details). |
Table_1.pdf [39 KiB] HiDef png [55 KiB] Thumbnail [24 KiB] tex code |
|
SV-tagger algorithm $(b,c)$-tagging efficiencies measured in data compared to those obtained in simulation. The $b$ and $c$ results are obtained by combining the highest- $p_{\rm T}$ track and muon-jet results under the assumption that the scale factors are the same for semileptonic and inclusive $(b,c)$-hadron decays. The $(b,c)$ results are obtained by fitting the highest- $p_{\rm T}$ -track sample under the assumption that the scale factors are the same for $b$ and $c$ jets. The absolute efficiencies observed in data are provided using the "$(b,c)$ jets" results. |
Table_2.pdf [38 KiB] HiDef png [66 KiB] Thumbnail [31 KiB] tex code |
Created on 27 April 2024.