The ratios of branching fractions $\mathcal{R}(D^{*})\equiv\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}\to D^{*}\tau^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\tau})/\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}\to D^{*}\mu^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\mu})$ and $\mathcal{R}(D^{0})\equiv\mathcal{B}(B^{-}\to D^{0}\tau^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\tau})/\mathcal{B}(B^{-}\to D^{0}\mu^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\mu})$ are measured, assuming isospin symmetry, using a sample of proton-proton collision data corresponding to 3.0 fb${ }^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity recorded by the LHCb experiment during 2011 and 2012. The tau lepton is identified in the decay mode $\tau^{-}\to\mu^{-}\nu_{\tau}\bar{\nu}_{\mu}$. The measured values are $\mathcal{R}(D^{*})=0.281\pm0.018\pm0.024$ and $\mathcal{R}(D^{0})=0.441\pm0.060\pm0.066$, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. The correlation between these measurements is $\rho=-0.43$. Results are consistent with the current average of these quantities and are at a combined 1.9 standard deviations from the predictions based on lepton flavor universality in the Standard Model.
Distributions of (left) $m^2_{\rm miss}$ and (right) $ E^{*}_{\mu}$ in the highest $ q^{2}$ bin (above 9.35 $\text{ Ge V} ^2 /c^4$ ) of the (top) $ D ^0$ $\mu ^-$ and (bottom) $ D ^{*+}$ $\mu ^-$ signal data, overlaid with projections of the fit model. |
Fig1a.pdf [41 KiB] HiDef png [351 KiB] Thumbnail [281 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig1b.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [223 KiB] Thumbnail [239 KiB] *.C file |
||
Distributions of (left) $m^2_{\rm miss}$ and (right) $ E^{*}_{\mu}$ in each $ q^{2}$ bin of the $ D ^{*+}$ $\mu ^-$ signal data, overlaid with projections of the fit model. Below each panel differences between the data and fit are shown, normalized by the summed statistical uncertainty of the data and simulation samples. |
FigA1a.pdf [248 KiB] HiDef png [871 KiB] Thumbnail [936 KiB] *.C file |
|
FigA1b.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [223 KiB] Thumbnail [239 KiB] *.C file |
||
Distributions of (left) $m^2_{\rm miss}$ and (right) $ E^{*}_{\mu}$ in each $ q^{2}$ bin of the $ D ^0$ $\mu ^-$ signal data, overlaid with projections of the fit model. Below each panel differences between the data and fit are shown, normalized by the summed statistical uncertainty of the data and simulation samples. |
FigA2a.pdf [95 KiB] HiDef png [893 KiB] Thumbnail [954 KiB] *.C file |
|
FigA2b.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [223 KiB] Thumbnail [239 KiB] *.C file |
||
Projections of the fit in (left) missing mass squared, (center) lepton energy, and (right) $ q^{2}$ in the (top) $ D ^* \mu ^- $ and (bottom) $ D ^0 \mu ^- $ region with exactly one extra pion consistent with the $ B $ vertex. |
FigB3a.pdf [46 KiB] HiDef png [221 KiB] Thumbnail [160 KiB] *.C file |
|
FigB3b.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [49 KiB] Thumbnail [43 KiB] *.C file |
||
FigB3c.pdf [31 KiB] HiDef png [229 KiB] Thumbnail [175 KiB] *.C file |
||
FigB3b.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [49 KiB] Thumbnail [43 KiB] *.C file |
||
Projections of the fit in (left) missing mass squared, (center) lepton energy, and (right) $ q^{2}$ in the (top) $ D ^* \mu ^- $ and (bottom) $ D ^0 \mu ^- $ region with exactly two extra opposite-sign pions consistent with the $ B $ vertex. |
FigB4a.pdf [46 KiB] HiDef png [236 KiB] Thumbnail [186 KiB] *.C file |
|
FigB4b.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [49 KiB] Thumbnail [43 KiB] *.C file |
||
FigB4c.pdf [31 KiB] HiDef png [229 KiB] Thumbnail [176 KiB] *.C file |
||
FigB4b.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [49 KiB] Thumbnail [43 KiB] *.C file |
||
Projections of the fit in (left) missing mass squared, (center) lepton energy, and (right) $ q^{2}$ in the (top) $ D ^* \mu ^- $ and (bottom) $ D ^0 \mu ^- $ region with at least one kaon of either sign and no restrictions on the number of additional tracks consistent with the $ B $ vertex. |
FigB5a.pdf [47 KiB] HiDef png [229 KiB] Thumbnail [186 KiB] *.C file |
|
FigB5b.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [49 KiB] Thumbnail [43 KiB] *.C file |
||
FigB5c.pdf [49 KiB] HiDef png [224 KiB] Thumbnail [176 KiB] *.C file |
||
FigB5b.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [49 KiB] Thumbnail [43 KiB] *.C file |
||
Animated gif made out of all figures. |
PAPER-2022-039.gif Thumbnail |
Summary of calculations of $\mathcal{R}(D)$ and $\mathcal{R}( D ^* )$ as compiled by the HFLAV collaboration [10]. For consistency with HFLAV this Letter uses the same average value $\mathcal{R}(D) = 0.298\pm 0.004$, $\mathcal{R}( D ^* ) =0.254\pm 0.005$ when making comparisons with the Standard Model. |
Table_1.pdf [63 KiB] HiDef png [144 KiB] Thumbnail [66 KiB] tex code |
|
Absolute uncertainties in the extraction of $\mathcal{R}( D ^0 )$ and $\mathcal{R}( D ^* )$ . The model uncertainties are divided into those included directly in the fit likelihood and those determined via supplemental studies. |
Table_2.pdf [100 KiB] HiDef png [150 KiB] Thumbnail [66 KiB] tex code |
Created on 27 April 2024.