cern.ch

Measurement of the $Z$ boson production cross-section in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5.02$ TeV

[to restricted-access page]

Information

Tools

Abstract

The first measurement of the $Z$ boson production cross-section at centre-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s} = 5.02 $TeV in the forward region is reported, using $pp$ collision data collected by the LHCb experiment in year 2017, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $100 \pm 2 \rm{pb^{-1}}$. The production cross-section is measured for final-state muons in the pseudorapidity range $2.0<\eta<4.5$ with transverse momentum $p_{\rm{T}}> 20 \rm{GeV/}\it{c}$. The integrated cross-section is determined to be \[ \sigma_{Z \rightarrow \mu^{+}\mu^{-}} = 39.6 \pm 0.7 (\rm{stat}) \pm 0.6 (\rm{syst}) \pm 0.8 (\rm{lumi}) \rm{pb} \] for the di-muon invariant mass in the range $60<M_{\mu\mu}<120 \rm{GeV/}\it{c^{2}}$. This result and the differential cross-section results are in good agreement with theoretical predictions at next-to-next-to-leading order in the strong coupling. Based on a previous LHCb measurement of the $Z$ boson production cross-section in $p$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02$ TeV, the nuclear modification factor $R_{p\rm{Pb}}$ is measured for the first time at this energy. The measured values are $1.2^{+0.5}_{-0.3} (\rm{stat}) \pm 0.1 (\rm{syst})$ in the forward region ($1.53<y^*_{\mu}<4.03$) and $3.6^{+1.6}_{-0.9} (\rm{stat}) \pm 0.2 (\rm{syst})$ in the backward region ($-4.97<y^*_{\mu}<-2.47$), where $y^*_{\mu}$ represents the muon rapidity in the centre-of-mass frame.

Figures and captions

Mass distribution of the $ Z \rightarrow \mu ^+\mu ^- $ signal candidates. The data are overlaid with model of the signal and background models. The signal component is scaled such that the sum of the signal and background matches the integral of the data.

Fig1.pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [190 KiB]
Thumbnail [174 KiB]
*.C file
Fig1.pdf

Final state radiation correction estimated for the (top-left) $ y^{{Z}}$ , (top-right) $ p_{\mathrm{T}}^{Z}$ , and (bottom) $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ differential cross-section measurements. The error bars represent the total (statistical and systematic) uncertainties.

Fig2a.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [63 KiB]
Thumbnail [37 KiB]
*.C file
Fig2a.pdf
Fig2b.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [65 KiB]
Thumbnail [39 KiB]
*.C file
Fig2b.pdf
Fig2c.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [63 KiB]
Thumbnail [38 KiB]
*.C file
Fig2c.pdf

(Left) Measured single differential cross-section as a function of $ y^{{Z}}$ , $ p_{\mathrm{T}}^{Z}$ and $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ compared with different theoretical predictions. (Right) Ratio of theoretical predictions to measured values, with the horizontal bars showing the uncertainty from the PDFs. The green band, centered at unity, shows the uncertainty of the measurement.

Fig3a.pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [217 KiB]
Thumbnail [186 KiB]
*.C file
Fig3a.pdf
Fig3b.pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [241 KiB]
Thumbnail [200 KiB]
*.C file
Fig3b.pdf
Fig3c.pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [194 KiB]
Thumbnail [181 KiB]
*.C file
Fig3c.pdf
Fig3d.pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [207 KiB]
Thumbnail [180 KiB]
*.C file
Fig3d.pdf
Fig3e.pdf [16 KiB]
HiDef png [192 KiB]
Thumbnail [174 KiB]
*.C file
Fig3e.pdf
Fig3f.pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [208 KiB]
Thumbnail [181 KiB]
*.C file
Fig3f.pdf

Comparison of the integrated cross-section, $\sigma_{ Z \rightarrow \mu ^+\mu ^- }$, between data and theoretical predictions. The bands correspond to the data, with the inner band corresponding to the statistical uncertainty and the outer bands corresponding to the systematic uncertainty and total uncertainty.

Fig4.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [216 KiB]
Thumbnail [188 KiB]
*.C file
Fig4.pdf

Measured $\sigma_{ Z \rightarrow \mu ^+\mu ^- }$ for $pp$ collisions, as a function of $\sqrt{s}$. The uncertainty on the data is smaller than the marker size. The data are overlaid with a curve showing the theoretical prediction.

Fig5.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [84 KiB]
Thumbnail [66 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5.pdf

Invariant mass distributions of heavy-flavour samples with (left) PV fit quality $\chi^2 > 95$ and (right) $I_{\mu}< 91\%$ applied to both muons. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Fig6a.pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [154 KiB]
Thumbnail [134 KiB]
*.C file
Fig6a.pdf
Fig6b.pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [150 KiB]
Thumbnail [130 KiB]
*.C file
Fig6b.pdf

Muon tracking, identification and trigger efficiency as a function of pseudorapidity, estimated from the data and simulation at 5.02 $\text{ Te V}$ and 13 $\text{ Te V}$ .

Fig7a.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [57 KiB]
Thumbnail [34 KiB]
*.C file
Fig7a.pdf
Fig7b.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [60 KiB]
Thumbnail [36 KiB]
*.C file
Fig7b.pdf
Fig7c.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [58 KiB]
Thumbnail [35 KiB]
*.C file
Fig7c.pdf

Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross-section measurements as functions of (top-left) $ y^{{Z}}$ , (top-right) $ p_{\mathrm{T}}^{Z}$ and (bottom) $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ .

Fig8a.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [120 KiB]
Thumbnail [108 KiB]
*.C file
Fig8a.pdf
Fig8b.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [130 KiB]
Thumbnail [114 KiB]
*.C file
Fig8b.pdf
Fig8c.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [127 KiB]
Thumbnail [110 KiB]
*.C file
Fig8c.pdf

Correlation matrices for the efficiency uncertainties as functions of (top-left) $ y^{{Z}}$ , (top-right) $ p_{\mathrm{T}}^{Z}$ and (bottom) $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ .

Fig9a.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [146 KiB]
Thumbnail [124 KiB]
*.C file
Fig9a.pdf
Fig9b.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [154 KiB]
Thumbnail [131 KiB]
*.C file
Fig9b.pdf
Fig9c.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [138 KiB]
Thumbnail [113 KiB]
*.C file
Fig9c.pdf

Animated gif made out of all figures.

PAPER-2023-010.gif
Thumbnail
thumbnail_PAPER-2023-010.gif

Tables and captions

Summary of the background composition in the $ Z \rightarrow \mu ^+\mu ^- $ data sample of candidates satisfying the signal selection.

Table_1.pdf [64 KiB]
HiDef png [78 KiB]
Thumbnail [37 KiB]
tex code
Table_1.pdf

The uncertainties for the integrated $ Z \rightarrow \mu ^+\mu ^- $ cross-section measurement.

Table_2.pdf [64 KiB]
HiDef png [79 KiB]
Thumbnail [38 KiB]
tex code
Table_2.pdf

Final state radiation correction used in the $ y^{{Z}}$ cross-section measurement. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Table_3.pdf [51 KiB]
HiDef png [235 KiB]
Thumbnail [112 KiB]
tex code
Table_3.pdf

Final state radiation correction used in the $ p_{\mathrm{T}}^{Z}$ cross-section measurement. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Table_4.pdf [59 KiB]
HiDef png [201 KiB]
Thumbnail [96 KiB]
tex code
Table_4.pdf

Final state radiation correction used in the $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ cross-section measurement. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Table_5.pdf [58 KiB]
HiDef png [194 KiB]
Thumbnail [92 KiB]
tex code
Table_5.pdf

The muon tracking, muon identification and trigger efficiency in each pseudorapidity bin.

Table_6.pdf [52 KiB]
HiDef png [161 KiB]
Thumbnail [74 KiB]
tex code
Table_6.pdf

Systematic uncertainties on the single differential cross-sections in bins of $ y^{{Z}}$ , presented in percentage.

Table_7.pdf [47 KiB]
HiDef png [135 KiB]
Thumbnail [66 KiB]
tex code
Table_7.pdf

Systematic uncertainties on the single differential cross-sections in bins of $ p_{\mathrm{T}}^{Z}$ , presented in percentage.

Table_8.pdf [56 KiB]
HiDef png [91 KiB]
Thumbnail [41 KiB]
tex code
Table_8.pdf

Systematic uncertainties on the single differential cross-sections in bins of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ , presented in percentage.

Table_9.pdf [54 KiB]
HiDef png [112 KiB]
Thumbnail [55 KiB]
tex code
Table_9.pdf

Measured single differential cross-sections in bins of $ y^{{Z}}$ . The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is from the uncertainty on the integrated luminosity.

Table_10.pdf [66 KiB]
HiDef png [153 KiB]
Thumbnail [81 KiB]
tex code
Table_10.pdf

Measured single differential cross-sections in bins of $ p_{\mathrm{T}}^{Z}$ . The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Table_11.pdf [67 KiB]
HiDef png [119 KiB]
Thumbnail [62 KiB]
tex code
Table_11.pdf

Measured single differential cross-sections in bins of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ . The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Table_12.pdf [66 KiB]
HiDef png [113 KiB]
Thumbnail [61 KiB]
tex code
Table_12.pdf

Statistical correlation matrix for the one-dimensional $ y^{{Z}}$ measurement.

Table_13.pdf [29 KiB]
HiDef png [77 KiB]
Thumbnail [26 KiB]
tex code
Table_13.pdf

Statistical correlation matrix for the one-dimensional $ p_{\mathrm{T}}^{Z}$ measurement.

Table_14.pdf [29 KiB]
HiDef png [64 KiB]
Thumbnail [32 KiB]
tex code
Table_14.pdf

Statistical correlation matrix for the one-dimensional $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Table_15.pdf [29 KiB]
HiDef png [68 KiB]
Thumbnail [30 KiB]
tex code
Table_15.pdf

Correlation matrix for the efficiency uncertainty of the one-dimensional $ y^{{Z}}$ measurement.

Table_16.pdf [29 KiB]
HiDef png [79 KiB]
Thumbnail [32 KiB]
tex code
Table_16.pdf

Correlation matrix for the efficiency uncertainty of the one-dimensional $ p_{\mathrm{T}}^{Z}$ measurement.

Table_17.pdf [29 KiB]
HiDef png [69 KiB]
Thumbnail [34 KiB]
tex code
Table_17.pdf

Correlation matrix for the efficiency uncertainty of the one-dimensional $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Table_18.pdf [29 KiB]
HiDef png [74 KiB]
Thumbnail [34 KiB]
tex code
Table_18.pdf

Created on 27 April 2024.