SPACE-CHARGE COMPENSATION BY REST GAS

IONISATION ON THE BEAM FROM THE LASER ION SOURCE

N. Lisi, R. Scrivens - October 1997

Introduction

The current of the ion beam extracted from the Laser Ion Source is typically 60 mA of a mixture of high charge-states. Beams of such high current undergo a large self space-charge effect, which can lead to a rapid expansion of the beam (space-charge blow-up). Taylor et al. [1] have shown space-charge cross-over in non-uniform beams, causing highly-aberrated beams.

A zero emittance beam consisting of 60 mA (of uniform current density) starting with an initial diameter of 3 cm, will grow to a diameter of 20 cm after a drift space of 1 m (at 7 keV/u). Equation (1) gives the expansion of a single charge-state, zero emittance uniform beam, where r is the beam radius, ro is the initial beam radius, z is the charge-state, I the beam current, mi the ion mass, vb the beam velocity and t the time.

(1)

High velocity ions in a vacuum can cause ionisation of the rest-gas molecules, resulting in separate positive and negative charges. The electrons can be used to compensate for the space-charge of the ion beam (see [2,3]). There are two important time constants that must be considered to allow for the compensation of the beam. Firstly enough residual molecules must be ionised for the effect to take place. This can be estimated from the cross-section for beam induced rest-gas ionisation, such that

(2)

where n is the particle density of the gas, s is the cross-section and v is the velocity. The sum must be performed over each gas type in the vacuum. Taking reasonable values for the cross sections for N2 ionisation by protons, this indicates that not enough molecules can be ionised to provide full space-charge compensation, but some degree could be possible.

The second effect is for the time required rest-gas ion to leave the potential well of the ion beam. Considering the field in a uniform beam, the transit time for a charged ion of mass number A to leave a beam of current I and radius r0, is given by

(3)

where vb is the beam velocity and mp the atomic mass unit. This can be written more usefully as:

(4)

Therefore one can estimate that for a 60 mA beam of 5 cm diameter the transit time is of the order of 0.54 ms for N2+, but reduces to 0.1 ms for H1+. It is therefore theoretically possible to produce some degree of space-charge compensation within the 5 ms beam from the LIS.

Although full compensation of the beam appears to be unlikely, it may be possible for the compensation degree of the beam to vary greatly along its longitudinal position. When trapped within the potential well of the ion beam, electrons will undergo oscillations in the transverse direction. Near a beam focus a longitudinal electric field will also exist, the strength of which can be estimated by the solution of the following integral,

(5)

Figure 1. Full line - longitudinal electric field strength for a 60 mA ion beam about a beam focus of 1.5 cm radius and 100 mrad half divergence. Dotted curve - beam radius.

This gives the longitudinal field component shown in Figure 1, where a beam with the radius given ro=(rf2+a2l2)1/2 (c.f. equation (1)) has been used where rf is the beam waist radius and a is the divergence angle. From this figure one can estimate that an electron can travel a distance of 10 cm to the focus in less than 0.5 µs, but will oscillate around this position. If a large number of electrons are available, they will all oscillate around the focal position and lead to a reduction of the space-charge in this region. This effect may also lead to an enhancement of the space-charge in regions away from the focus where the residual-gas ion are left.

Experiments

To assess the effect of residual-gas space-charge compensation, the plasma from the Laser Ion Source was extracted at 60 kV using an accel-decel system (with the puller electrode at -10kV [4]) with apertures of 20 mm and a distance between the first two electrodes of 20 mm. In previous experiments an average current of 38 mA (in the time interval from 3 - 8 µs) had been measured with a Faraday cup 120 mm after extraction. The first solenoid (see Figure 2) was used to provide focusing and therefore a measurable spot size at the phosphor screen (P47) detector. A pepper-pot, (which was isolated and held at ­240 V and capacitively backed) was used to reduce the beam intensity and avoid damaging the phosphor screen.

Figure 2. Schematic of the layout of the LIS single solenoid LEBT used for the residual gas compensation experiments.

To increase the rest-gas concentration, N2 was bled in through a valve. As the gas bleed, pumping group and pressure gauges are all close, a residual gas analyser (located on the opposite side of the main expansion tank from the pumping group) was used to measure the background gas pressure.

The light intensity from the phosphor screen was captured with a gatable CCD camera. The camera was gated over the known high charge state group at 3-8 ms after the laser pulse. From the images the FWHM beam size and the beam intensity at the spot centre were recorded from an average of three shots.

The solenoid was used at two different fields (1700 A and 1900 A solenoid currents). Due to the problems producing reliable simulation - experiment, it is not known where the focus lies for these solenoid settings. The results are shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3. a) Ion beam width measured after the solenoid for different gas pressures, for two different solenoid field settings. b) Peak intensity of the spot under the same conditions.

Discussion

The ion beam diameter can clearly be seen to change as a function of the residual gas pressure. Conventional theory would suggest that the ion beam should decrease in size with higher compensation, whereas the data shows an increase in beam size with increasing pressure. This could be primarily due to two possible reasons:

  1. Decompensation of the beam directly after the second solenoid by rest-gas ions, where the electrons move towards the ion beam focus or to the positive charge on the pepper-pot.
  2. If the focal plane of the solenoid is near the detection plane for the full space-charge case, then reducing the space-charge will move the focus upstream, then a larger diameter beam would be recorded.

The two cases have been investigated using simple simulations of the beam through a solenoid, with different beam currents. Only one charge-state may be considered.

For the first case, compensation and decompensation degrees of around 20% only lead to a 5% variation of beam size.

For the second case, a uniform reduction in the beam current was assumed and the resulting beam widths at the detection plane is shown in Figure 4. A radially symmetric beam was used with linear space-charge and the focal length of the solenoid was estimated from the formula f~4p2/q2B2L where p is the ion momentum, q is the ion charge, B is the average magnetic field on axis and L is the solenoid length.

Figure 4. Simulated beam width under different space-charge conditions for two different solenoid filed settings.

Variation of the beam width up to 50% can be seen, which is comparable with the experimental case. However, for both solenoid conditions to give increasing beam size with background pressure, the compensation degree must be of the order of 50% or more throughout the beam, which appears to be unlikely. The crossover in beam size of the two distributions for 1700 A and 1900 A in Figure 3, occurs in Figure 4 at a higher beam current than was measured experimentally.

Conclusion

Initial measurements have been performed of the effect of rest-gas pressure on the dimension of the Laser Ion Source beam. The results show that there may be an effect due to partial space-charge compensation. Simple models of the beam expansion and focusing give qualitative suggestions that the compensation must be along a high longitudinal proportion of the beam, and is not just due to effects after the solenoid and before the detector.

Further work should concentrate on modelling non-uniform charge-density beams and testing further cases (in particular for simple drift space) experimentally.

References
  1. C.S. Taylor, A.J. Davies, P. Tanguy, Non-linear space-charge effects in beam dynamics, CERN MPS/LIN 69-15, (1969).
  2. Large ion beams : fundamentals of generation and propagation, AT Forrester, New York, Wiley, (1988).
  3. J. Sherman, E. Pitcher, R. Stevens, P. Allison, H- beam neutralization measurements in a solenoidal beam transport system, AIP-Conference-Proceedings (USA), no.287, p.686-94, (1994).
  4. J. Collier et al. Laser ion source development at CERN, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67 (3), p1337-1339, March (1996).