DSA2.3.3 - Periodic QA and QC Reports

A report on the compliance with and results of the quality assurance process is produced monthly by the activity manager and is reported every twelve months to the EC [month 24]
This is an update of DSA2.3.2 (M12) and DSA1.3.2 (M10)

P1 external reviewers' report on D4.3.2 Periodic QA Reports (M12)
This deliverable provides a further update on the status of the EMI project’s performance against its quality metrics. The main change described in here is the change in terminology to help improve internal communication and thus cohesion.

P1 external reviewers' report on D3.3.2 Software Maintenance Quality Control Report (M10)
This deliverable builds on the work described in D3.3.1. More detail is now available and the document offers a more convincing, though still limited, read than before. The security testing approach is elaborated but because FPVA is a manual technique, and therefore relies heavily on the background and experience of those using it, the work carried out so far, whilst undoubtedly following the prescribed approaches defined in the FPVA methodology, appears to be both ad hoc and incomplete. A significant indicator of this would be the 100% success rate achieved during the testing of the first two components. Useful lessons learned from the release of EMI 0 are included in the discussion. The project should benefit from these lessons to ensure good project cohesion.

Review tracking

• 23/05/12 Claudio sent v1.0 for review
• 23/05/12 Jon sent his review
• 24/05/12 Florida sent her review
• 24/05/12 Andrea sent his review
• 25/05/12 v1.1 available
• 25/05/12 v1.2 available
• 26/05/12 Jon accepted v1.2
• 26/05/12 Florida provisional accepted v1.2 pending removal of sec assessment text.
• 26/05/12 Andrea accepted v1.2
• Final pdf uploaded to CDS
• VOMS and WMS security assessment uploaded to CDS

Reviewers

• Jon K. Nilsen (UIO,JRA1)
• Andrea Ceccanti (INFN, SA1)
• Florida Estrella (CERN, NA1)

-- FloridaEstrella - 04-May-2012