Deliverable Review Form
Identification of the deliverable or milestone |
Project: EMI |
Deliverable or milestone identifier: Dx.y.z |
Title: ______________________ |
Doc. identifier: EMI-DXXX-CDSREF-Title-vx.x |
Author(s): __________________ |
Due date: __ |
Identification of the reviewer |
Name: _____________________ |
Affiliation: ____ |
EMI Activity/External project or Institute: ______ |
Review date |
mm/dd/yyyy |
Author(s) revision date |
mm/dd/yyyy |
Reviewer acceptance date |
mm/dd/yyyy |
Attach the reviewed document to the deliverable page, put here a link
General comments
@Alberto, my initial comments:
* Suggest to change Chapter 4 to Conclusion (even if work was largely QC related). This is a QA and QC deliverable, after all.
* Suggest to add a chapter on Outlook and post-EMI plans.
* Executive summary: "Following the advice of the Reviewers the information already reported in the previous deliverables, describing the policies and metrics, has been reduced and replaced to very short summaries and references to the complete information." Suggest to simply say Policies and metrics which have not changed in the third year are summarized and references to the complete information is included. Reviewers have asked us, on one hand not to repeat information, and on another hand, to give a complete document with all information included.
Additional recommendations (not affecting the document content, e.g. recommendation for future work)
Detailed comments on the content
Note 1: The reviewers must list here any observation they want to track explicitly and that require interaction with the authors
Alternatively all changes must be listed in the document itself using Word change tracking features (if you use Word)
Note 2: These comments have to be explicitly addressed by the authors and the action taken must be clearly described
N° |
Page |
Section |
Observations and Replies |
Is Addressed? |
1 |
xx |
x.y |
Sequence of comments and replies separated by twiki signature and date |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Any other modification, spelling or grammatical corrections, etc must be done directly in the document using tracked changes or similar mechanisms that allows the authors to identify which correction is suggested.
--
AlbertoDiMeglio - 12-Jul-2010
Topic revision: r2 - 2013-05-22
- unknown