
\documentclass[border=5pt,multi=true]{standalone}
\usepackage{standalone}
\usepackage{ifthen}
\usepackage{footmisc}
\usepackage{microtype}
\usepackage{lineno}
\usepackage{xspace}
\usepackage{caption}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{hypcap}
\usepackage{xspace}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\usepackage{cite}
\usepackage{mciteplus}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{mathtools}

\begin{document}
  
  
  \begin{tabular}{l c c c c}
    \hline
    Source & Uncertainty (\%) \\
    \hline
    Modelling of the $q^{2}$ distribution\rule{0pt}{2.6ex} &  7.9  \\
        Modelling of the $ p\xspace\xspace{}\pi\xspace\xspace^-\xspace$ mass distribution&  7.7  \\
    Effect of the partially reconstructed background fit shape &  6.9  \\
    Choice of BDT efficiency proxy&  5.6  \\
    Finite size of the simulated sample &  4.4  \\
    Statistical uncertainty on  $\Lambda\xspace^0_ b\xspace\xspace\xspace\!\rightarrow\xspace   { J\xspace\mskip -3mu/\mskip -2mu\psi\xspace\mskip 2mu} p\xspace\xspace\pi\xspace\xspace^-\xspace$ \xspace yield & 4.0\\
    Trigger efficiency &  3.4    \\
    Fit bias & 2.2 \\
     $\Lambda\xspace^0_ b\xspace\xspace\xspace\!\rightarrow\xspace   p\xspace\xspace K\xspace\xspace^-\xspace\mu\xspace^+\mu\xspace^-\xspace$ \xspace contamination &  1.6  \\
    Simulation corrections&  1.3  \\
    PID efficiency  &  1.0  \\
    \hline
    Total \rule{0pt}{2.6ex} & 16.1 \\\hline
  \end{tabular}
  
\end{document}
