cern.ch

Observation of the Mass Difference Between Neutral Charm-Meson Eigenstates

[to restricted-access page]

Information

Tools

Abstract

A measurement of mixing and $C P$ violation in neutral charm mesons is performed using data reconstructed in proton-proton collisions collected by the LHCb experiment from 2016 to 2018, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 5.4$\textrm{fb}^{-1}$. A total of $30.6$ million $D^{0}\rightarrow K^{0}_{\mathrm{S}}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ decays are analyzed using a method optimized for the measurement of the mass difference between neutral charm-meson eigenstates. Allowing for $C P$ violation in mixing and in the interference between mixing and decay, the mass and decay-width differences are measured to be $x_{C P} = \left[3.97\pm0.46\textrm{(stat)}\pm 0.29\textrm{(syst)}\right]\times10^{-3}$ and $y_{C P} = \left[4.59\pm1.20\textrm{(stat)}\pm0.85\textrm{(syst)}\right]\times10^{-3}$, respectively. The $C P$-violating parameters are measured as $\Delta x = \left[-0.27\pm0.18\textrm{(stat)}\pm0.01\textrm{(syst)}\right]\times10^{-3}$ and $\Delta y = \left[0.20\pm0.36\textrm{(stat)}\pm0.13\textrm{(syst)}\right]\times10^{-3}$. This is the first observation of a nonzero mass difference in the $D^0$ meson system, with a significance exceeding seven standard deviations. The data are consistent with $C P$ symmetry, and improve existing constraints on the associated parameters.

Figures and captions

Depiction of the interference of mixing and decay if a $ D ^0 $ and a $\overline{ D } {}^0 $ meson decay to a common final state $f$.

Fig1.pdf [3 KiB]
HiDef png [27 KiB]
Thumbnail [15 KiB]
*.C file
Fig1.pdf

"Binning" of the $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^0_{\mathrm{S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ Dalitz plot. Colors indicate the absolute value of the bin index $b$.

Fig2.pdf [405 KiB]
HiDef png [379 KiB]
Thumbnail [260 KiB]
*.C file
Fig2.pdf

Distribution of $\Delta m $ for the selected $ D ^{*+} \rightarrow D ^0 (\rightarrow K ^0_{\mathrm{S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- )\pi ^+ $ candidates. The projection of the fit result is superimposed.

Fig3.pdf [41 KiB]
HiDef png [184 KiB]
Thumbnail [170 KiB]
*.C file
Fig3.pdf

(Top) $ C P$ -averaged yield ratios and (bottom) differences of $ D ^0$ and $\overline{ D } {}^0$ yield ratios as a function of $t/\tau$, shown for each Dalitz-plot bin with fit projections overlaid.

Fig4a.pdf [27 KiB]
HiDef png [301 KiB]
Thumbnail [281 KiB]
*.C file
Fig4a.pdf
Fig4b.pdf [25 KiB]
HiDef png [252 KiB]
Thumbnail [256 KiB]
*.C file
Fig4b.pdf

Dalitz plot of background-subtracted $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^0_{\mathrm{S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ candidates.

Fig5.pdf [1 MiB]
HiDef png [1 MiB]
Thumbnail [539 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5.pdf

Animated gif made out of all figures.

PAPER-2021-009.gif
Thumbnail
thumbnail_PAPER-2021-009.gif

Tables and captions

Fit results of $ x_{ C P }$ , $ y_{ C P }$ , $\Delta x$ , and $\Delta y$ . The first contribution to the uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic.

Table_1.pdf [68 KiB]
HiDef png [43 KiB]
Thumbnail [19 KiB]
tex code
Table_1.pdf

Point estimates and 95.5% confidence-level (CL) intervals for $x$, $y$, $|q/p|$ and $\phi$. The uncertainties include statistical and systematic contributions.

Table_2.pdf [69 KiB]
HiDef png [56 KiB]
Thumbnail [27 KiB]
tex code
Table_2.pdf

Uncertainties in units of $10^{-3}$. The total systematic uncertainty is the sum in quadrature of the individual components. The uncertainties due to the external inputs and detection asymmetry calibration samples are included in the statistical uncertainty. These are also reported separately, along with the contributions due to the limited sample size, to ease comparison with other sources.

Table_3.pdf [49 KiB]
HiDef png [125 KiB]
Thumbnail [57 KiB]
tex code
Table_3.pdf

Supplementary Material [file]

This ZIP file contains supplementary material for the publication LHCb-PAPER-2021-099. The files are: Supplementary-LHCb-PAPER-2021-099.pdf : An overview of the extra figures *.pdf, *.png, *.eps, *.C : The figures in various formats

Fig10.pdf [1 MiB]
HiDef png [369 KiB]
Thumbnail [256 KiB]
*C file
Fig10.pdf
Fig11.pdf [73 KiB]
HiDef png [92 KiB]
Thumbnail [72 KiB]
*C file
Fig11.pdf
Fig12.pdf [840 KiB]
HiDef png [533 KiB]
Thumbnail [315 KiB]
*C file
Fig12.pdf
Fig13a.pdf [15 KiB]
HiDef png [205 KiB]
Thumbnail [153 KiB]
*C file
Fig13a.pdf
Fig13b.pdf [15 KiB]
HiDef png [226 KiB]
Thumbnail [165 KiB]
*C file
Fig13b.pdf
Fig13c.pdf [15 KiB]
HiDef png [194 KiB]
Thumbnail [141 KiB]
*C file
Fig13c.pdf
Fig13d.pdf [15 KiB]
HiDef png [215 KiB]
Thumbnail [146 KiB]
*C file
Fig13d.pdf
Fig13e.pdf [15 KiB]
HiDef png [368 KiB]
Thumbnail [210 KiB]
*C file
Fig13e.pdf
Fig13f.pdf [15 KiB]
HiDef png [268 KiB]
Thumbnail [163 KiB]
*C file
Fig13f.pdf
Fig14a.pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [142 KiB]
Thumbnail [126 KiB]
*C file
Fig14a.pdf
Fig14b.pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [150 KiB]
Thumbnail [132 KiB]
*C file
Fig14b.pdf
Fig5.pdf [32 KiB]
HiDef png [137 KiB]
Thumbnail [76 KiB]
*C file
Fig5.pdf
Fig6.pdf [48 KiB]
HiDef png [233 KiB]
Thumbnail [408 KiB]
*C file
Fig6.pdf
Fig7a.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [117 KiB]
Thumbnail [70 KiB]
*C file
Fig7a.pdf
Fig7b.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [121 KiB]
Thumbnail [70 KiB]
*C file
Fig7b.pdf
Fig8a.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [153 KiB]
Thumbnail [118 KiB]
*C file
Fig8a.pdf
Fig8b.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [177 KiB]
Thumbnail [137 KiB]
*C file
Fig8b.pdf
Fig8c.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [145 KiB]
Thumbnail [113 KiB]
*C file
Fig8c.pdf
Fig8d.pdf [13 KiB]
HiDef png [151 KiB]
Thumbnail [117 KiB]
*C file
Fig8d.pdf
Fig9a.pdf [16 KiB]
HiDef png [259 KiB]
Thumbnail [172 KiB]
*C file
Fig9a.pdf
Fig9b.pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [244 KiB]
Thumbnail [153 KiB]
*C file
Fig9b.pdf
LHCb-P[..].pdf [2 MiB]
HiDef png [458 KiB]
Thumbnail [298 KiB]
*C file
LHCb-PAPER-2021-009-supplementary.pdf

Created on 20 April 2024.