The decays of the $ B ^+ $ meson to the final state $ D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ are studied in proton-proton collision data collected with the LHCb detector at centre-of-mass energies of 7, 8, and 13 $\text{ Te V}$ , corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 9 $\text{ fb} ^{-1}$ . The ratio of branching fractions of the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ and $ B ^0 \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s $ decays is measured to be $0.173\pm 0.006\pm 0.010$, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. Using partially reconstructed $ D ^{*+}_ s \rightarrow D ^+_ s \gamma$ and $ D ^+_ s \pi ^0 $ decays, the ratio of branching fractions between the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^{*+}_ s \pi ^+ $ and $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ decays is determined as $1.31\pm 0.07\pm 0.14$. An amplitude analysis of the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ decay is performed for the first time, revealing dominant contributions from known excited charm resonances decaying to the $ D ^{*-} \pi ^+ $ final state. No significant evidence of exotic contributions in the $ D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ or $ D ^{*-} D ^+_ s $ channels is found. The fit fraction of the scalar state $ T_{ c \overline s 0}^{\ast}(2900)^{++} $ observed in the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^- D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ decay is determined to be less than 2.3% at a 90% confidence level.
Definition of the helicity angles in the (a) $ B ^+ \rightarrow \overline{ D } ^{**0}(\rightarrow D ^{*-} \pi ^+ ) D ^+_ s $, (b) $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} T_{c\bar{s}}^{++}(\rightarrow D ^+_ s \pi ^+ )$, and (c) $ B ^+ \rightarrow \overline{T}_{c\bar{c} s}^0(\rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s )\pi ^+ $ decay chains. Here $T_{c\bar{s}}^{++}$ and $\overline{T}_{c\bar{c} s}^0$ are the hypothetical tetraquark-like states decaying to $ D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ and $ D ^{*-} D ^+_ s $ final states, respectively, following the nomenclature suggested in Ref. [18]. |
Fig1a.pdf [99 KiB] HiDef png [425 KiB] Thumbnail [323 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig1b.pdf [133 KiB] HiDef png [395 KiB] Thumbnail [301 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig1c.pdf [99 KiB] HiDef png [451 KiB] Thumbnail [339 KiB] *.C file |
||
Invariant-mass distributions of (a) $ D ^{*-} D ^+_ s $ and (b) $ D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ combinations and the results of the fits used to obtain the yields of the $ B ^0 \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s $, $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ and $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^{*+}_ s \pi ^+ $ decays. The inset in the plot (a) shows a zoomed region with the contribution of the $ B ^0_ s \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s $ decay component. |
Fig2a.pdf [185 KiB] HiDef png [546 KiB] Thumbnail [511 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig2b.pdf [177 KiB] HiDef png [543 KiB] Thumbnail [476 KiB] *.C file |
||
Distribution of $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ candidates in data: (a) projection onto the Dalitz plot variables $m^2( D ^{*-} \pi ^+ )$ and $m^2( D ^+_ s \pi ^+ )$, (b) projection onto angular variables $\cos\theta_D$ and $\phi_D$ . The solid red line indicates the phase-space boundaries. |
Fig3a.pdf [183 KiB] HiDef png [438 KiB] Thumbnail [518 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig3b.pdf [211 KiB] HiDef png [450 KiB] Thumbnail [285 KiB] *.C file |
||
Projections of the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ efficiency profile averaged over trigger categories for (a,c) Run 1 and (b,d) Run 2 onto (a,b) $m^2( D ^{*-} \pi ^+ )$ and $m^2( D ^+_ s \pi ^+ )$ pair, and (c,d) $\phi_D$ and $\cos\theta_D$ pair. |
Fig4a.pdf [178 KiB] HiDef png [915 KiB] Thumbnail [617 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig4b.pdf [178 KiB] HiDef png [912 KiB] Thumbnail [616 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig4c.pdf [136 KiB] HiDef png [331 KiB] Thumbnail [432 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig4d.pdf [136 KiB] HiDef png [334 KiB] Thumbnail [441 KiB] *.C file |
||
(a--e) One-dimensional projections of the distribution of $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ candidates in the invariant mass range $5.31<m( D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ )<5.60$ $\text{ Ge V}$ (upper $ B ^+ $ invariant-mass sideband), results of its density estimated with ANN, and, except for (a), results of the extrapolation of its density to the signal region with $m( D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ ) = m_{ B ^+ }$. (f--i) Two-dimensional projections of the estimated density of $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ candidates in the upper $ B ^+ $ mass sideband. |
Fig5legend.pdf [35 KiB] HiDef png [70 KiB] Thumbnail [78 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig5a.pdf [164 KiB] HiDef png [311 KiB] Thumbnail [394 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig5b.pdf [131 KiB] HiDef png [485 KiB] Thumbnail [458 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig5c.pdf [165 KiB] HiDef png [474 KiB] Thumbnail [446 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig5d.pdf [195 KiB] HiDef png [377 KiB] Thumbnail [475 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig5e.pdf [195 KiB] HiDef png [416 KiB] Thumbnail [453 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig5f.pdf [172 KiB] HiDef png [688 KiB] Thumbnail [522 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig5g.pdf [173 KiB] HiDef png [1 MiB] Thumbnail [739 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig5h.pdf [172 KiB] HiDef png [1 MiB] Thumbnail [717 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig5i.pdf [196 KiB] HiDef png [452 KiB] Thumbnail [591 KiB] *.C file |
||
(a--d) One-dimensional projections of the distribution of $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ candidates in the $ D ^+_ s $ sideband region and the results of its density estimation using ANN. (e, f) Two-dimensional projections of the estimated non-$ D ^+_ s $ background density. |
Fig6a.pdf [131 KiB] HiDef png [355 KiB] Thumbnail [413 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig6b.pdf [165 KiB] HiDef png [360 KiB] Thumbnail [424 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig6c.pdf [194 KiB] HiDef png [256 KiB] Thumbnail [368 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig6d.pdf [194 KiB] HiDef png [272 KiB] Thumbnail [389 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig6e.pdf [173 KiB] HiDef png [1006 KiB] Thumbnail [569 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig6f.pdf [196 KiB] HiDef png [465 KiB] Thumbnail [592 KiB] *.C file |
||
Results of the fit of the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ distribution with the baseline model. Figures (a) and (b) show the $m( D ^{*-} \pi ^+ )$ projection, with (a) zoomed in to illustrate the contributions from all the resonances while (b) shows the projection near the $D_1(2420)$ resonance. The $m( D ^+_ s \pi ^+ )$, $m( D ^{*-} D ^+_ s )$, $\cos\theta_{D}$ and $\phi_{D}$ projections are shown in (c), (d), (e) and (f), respectively. |
Fig7a.pdf [140 KiB] HiDef png [617 KiB] Thumbnail [476 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig7b.pdf [135 KiB] HiDef png [430 KiB] Thumbnail [395 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig7c.pdf [169 KiB] HiDef png [444 KiB] Thumbnail [406 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig7d.pdf [169 KiB] HiDef png [430 KiB] Thumbnail [390 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig7e.pdf [196 KiB] HiDef png [415 KiB] Thumbnail [396 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig7f.pdf [196 KiB] HiDef png [447 KiB] Thumbnail [398 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig7legend.pdf [164 KiB] HiDef png [115 KiB] Thumbnail [101 KiB] *.C file |
||
Pulls of the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ Dalitz-plot distribution for the fits with (a) the baseline model and (b) the model including $ D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ components. |
Fig8a.pdf [200 KiB] HiDef png [262 KiB] Thumbnail [337 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig8b.pdf [200 KiB] HiDef png [262 KiB] Thumbnail [340 KiB] *.C file |
||
Comparison of the fit results of the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ distribution with the baseline model and with the model that includes $ D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ components. The $m( D ^{*-} \pi ^+ )$, $m( D ^+_ s \pi ^+ )$, $m( D ^{*-} D ^+_ s )$, $\cos\theta_{D}$ and $\phi_{D}$ projections are shown in (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e), respectively. The requirement $m( D ^{*-} \pi ^+ )>2.5\text{ Ge V} $ is applied to the distributions shown in plots (b)--(e). |
Fig9a.pdf [135 KiB] HiDef png [374 KiB] Thumbnail [352 KiB] *.C file |
|
Fig9b.pdf [167 KiB] HiDef png [382 KiB] Thumbnail [345 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig9c.pdf [167 KiB] HiDef png [372 KiB] Thumbnail [338 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig9d.pdf [197 KiB] HiDef png [403 KiB] Thumbnail [374 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig9e.pdf [197 KiB] HiDef png [387 KiB] Thumbnail [320 KiB] *.C file |
||
Fig9legend.pdf [163 KiB] HiDef png [172 KiB] Thumbnail [198 KiB] *.C file |
||
Animated gif made out of all figures. |
PAPER-2024-001.gif Thumbnail |
The angular dependencies for the $ B ^+ \rightarrow \overline{ D } ^{**0}(\rightarrow D ^{*-} \pi ^+ ) D ^+_ s $ partial-wave terms $\mathcal{H}_n^{( D ^* \pi)}$. |
Table_1.pdf [76 KiB] HiDef png [64 KiB] Thumbnail [25 KiB] tex code |
|
The angular dependencies for the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} T_{c\bar{s}}^{++}(\rightarrow D ^+_ s \pi ^+ )$ partial-wave terms $\mathcal{H}_n^{( D _s\pi)}$. |
Table_2.pdf [76 KiB] HiDef png [74 KiB] Thumbnail [33 KiB] tex code |
|
Yields of signal and background components for the $ D ^{*-} D ^+_ s $ invariant-mass fit in range 5.15--5.60 $\text{ Ge V}$ . |
Table_3.pdf [61 KiB] HiDef png [53 KiB] Thumbnail [27 KiB] tex code |
|
Yields of signal and background components for the $ D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ invariant-mass fit in range 4.80--5.60 $\text{ Ge V}$ and in the signal box $|m( D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ )-m_{ B ^+ }|<30\text{ Me V} $. |
Table_4.pdf [55 KiB] HiDef png [58 KiB] Thumbnail [29 KiB] tex code |
|
Resonances considered in the baseline amplitude model and their parameters. |
Table_5.pdf [68 KiB] HiDef png [107 KiB] Thumbnail [53 KiB] tex code |
|
Fit fractions (in %) for the components of the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ amplitude. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty related to the amplitude model. |
Table_6.pdf [72 KiB] HiDef png [129 KiB] Thumbnail [64 KiB] tex code |
|
Relative systematic uncertainties on the $\mathcal{R}^{(*)}$ measurements. |
Table_7.pdf [63 KiB] HiDef png [107 KiB] Thumbnail [50 KiB] tex code |
|
Fit results for the baseline and selected alternative $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ amplitude models. |
Table_8.pdf [77 KiB] HiDef png [290 KiB] Thumbnail [135 KiB] tex code |
|
Fitted complex values $f_i$ of the $1^+$ S-wave amplitudes at the spline knots of the QMI model. |
Table_9.pdf [60 KiB] HiDef png [70 KiB] Thumbnail [36 KiB] tex code |
|
Absolute systematic uncertainties on the fit parameters and fit fractions for the baseline model |
Table_10.pdf [73 KiB] HiDef png [352 KiB] Thumbnail [153 KiB] tex code |
|
Absolute systematic uncertainties on the fit parameters and fit fractions for the baseline model (continued) |
Table_11.pdf [74 KiB] HiDef png [385 KiB] Thumbnail [173 KiB] tex code |
Created on 17 May 2024.