cern.ch

Amplitude analysis and branching fraction measurement of $B^{+} \to D^{*-}D_{s}^{+}\pi^{+}$ decays

[to restricted-access page]

Information

Tools

Abstract

The decays of the $ B ^+ $ meson to the final state $ D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ are studied in proton-proton collision data collected with the LHCb detector at centre-of-mass energies of 7, 8, and 13 $\text{ Te V}$ , corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 9 $\text{ fb} ^{-1}$ . The ratio of branching fractions of the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ and $ B ^0 \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s $ decays is measured to be $0.173\pm 0.006\pm 0.010$, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. Using partially reconstructed $ D ^{*+}_ s \rightarrow D ^+_ s \gamma$ and $ D ^+_ s \pi ^0 $ decays, the ratio of branching fractions between the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^{*+}_ s \pi ^+ $ and $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ decays is determined as $1.31\pm 0.07\pm 0.14$. An amplitude analysis of the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ decay is performed for the first time, revealing dominant contributions from known excited charm resonances decaying to the $ D ^{*-} \pi ^+ $ final state. No significant evidence of exotic contributions in the $ D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ or $ D ^{*-} D ^+_ s $ channels is found. The fit fraction of the scalar state $ T_{ c \overline s 0}^{\ast}(2900)^{++} $ observed in the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^- D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ decay is determined to be less than 2.3% at a 90% confidence level.

Figures and captions

Definition of the helicity angles in the (a) $ B ^+ \rightarrow \overline{ D } ^{**0}(\rightarrow D ^{*-} \pi ^+ ) D ^+_ s $, (b) $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} T_{c\bar{s}}^{++}(\rightarrow D ^+_ s \pi ^+ )$, and (c) $ B ^+ \rightarrow \overline{T}_{c\bar{c} s}^0(\rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s )\pi ^+ $ decay chains. Here $T_{c\bar{s}}^{++}$ and $\overline{T}_{c\bar{c} s}^0$ are the hypothetical tetraquark-like states decaying to $ D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ and $ D ^{*-} D ^+_ s $ final states, respectively, following the nomenclature suggested in Ref. [18].

Fig1a.pdf [99 KiB]
HiDef png [425 KiB]
Thumbnail [323 KiB]
*.C file
Fig1a.pdf
Fig1b.pdf [133 KiB]
HiDef png [395 KiB]
Thumbnail [301 KiB]
*.C file
Fig1b.pdf
Fig1c.pdf [99 KiB]
HiDef png [451 KiB]
Thumbnail [339 KiB]
*.C file
Fig1c.pdf

Invariant-mass distributions of (a) $ D ^{*-} D ^+_ s $ and (b) $ D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ combinations and the results of the fits used to obtain the yields of the $ B ^0 \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s $, $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ and $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^{*+}_ s \pi ^+ $ decays. The inset in the plot (a) shows a zoomed region with the contribution of the $ B ^0_ s \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s $ decay component.

Fig2a.pdf [185 KiB]
HiDef png [546 KiB]
Thumbnail [511 KiB]
*.C file
Fig2a.pdf
Fig2b.pdf [177 KiB]
HiDef png [543 KiB]
Thumbnail [476 KiB]
*.C file
Fig2b.pdf

Distribution of $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ candidates in data: (a) projection onto the Dalitz plot variables $m^2( D ^{*-} \pi ^+ )$ and $m^2( D ^+_ s \pi ^+ )$, (b) projection onto angular variables $\cos\theta_D$ and $\phi_D$ . The solid red line indicates the phase-space boundaries.

Fig3a.pdf [183 KiB]
HiDef png [438 KiB]
Thumbnail [518 KiB]
*.C file
Fig3a.pdf
Fig3b.pdf [211 KiB]
HiDef png [450 KiB]
Thumbnail [285 KiB]
*.C file
Fig3b.pdf

Projections of the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ efficiency profile averaged over trigger categories for (a,c) Run 1 and (b,d) Run 2 onto (a,b) $m^2( D ^{*-} \pi ^+ )$ and $m^2( D ^+_ s \pi ^+ )$ pair, and (c,d) $\phi_D$ and $\cos\theta_D$ pair.

Fig4a.pdf [178 KiB]
HiDef png [915 KiB]
Thumbnail [617 KiB]
*.C file
Fig4a.pdf
Fig4b.pdf [178 KiB]
HiDef png [912 KiB]
Thumbnail [616 KiB]
*.C file
Fig4b.pdf
Fig4c.pdf [136 KiB]
HiDef png [331 KiB]
Thumbnail [432 KiB]
*.C file
Fig4c.pdf
Fig4d.pdf [136 KiB]
HiDef png [334 KiB]
Thumbnail [441 KiB]
*.C file
Fig4d.pdf

(a--e) One-dimensional projections of the distribution of $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ candidates in the invariant mass range $5.31<m( D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ )<5.60$ $\text{ Ge V}$ (upper $ B ^+ $ invariant-mass sideband), results of its density estimated with ANN, and, except for (a), results of the extrapolation of its density to the signal region with $m( D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ ) = m_{ B ^+ }$. (f--i) Two-dimensional projections of the estimated density of $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ candidates in the upper $ B ^+ $ mass sideband.

Fig5legend.pdf [35 KiB]
HiDef png [70 KiB]
Thumbnail [78 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5legend.pdf
Fig5a.pdf [164 KiB]
HiDef png [311 KiB]
Thumbnail [394 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5a.pdf
Fig5b.pdf [131 KiB]
HiDef png [485 KiB]
Thumbnail [458 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5b.pdf
Fig5c.pdf [165 KiB]
HiDef png [474 KiB]
Thumbnail [446 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5c.pdf
Fig5d.pdf [195 KiB]
HiDef png [377 KiB]
Thumbnail [475 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5d.pdf
Fig5e.pdf [195 KiB]
HiDef png [416 KiB]
Thumbnail [453 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5e.pdf
Fig5f.pdf [172 KiB]
HiDef png [688 KiB]
Thumbnail [522 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5f.pdf
Fig5g.pdf [173 KiB]
HiDef png [1 MiB]
Thumbnail [739 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5g.pdf
Fig5h.pdf [172 KiB]
HiDef png [1 MiB]
Thumbnail [717 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5h.pdf
Fig5i.pdf [196 KiB]
HiDef png [452 KiB]
Thumbnail [591 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5i.pdf

(a--d) One-dimensional projections of the distribution of $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ candidates in the $ D ^+_ s $ sideband region and the results of its density estimation using ANN. (e, f) Two-dimensional projections of the estimated non-$ D ^+_ s $ background density.

Fig6a.pdf [131 KiB]
HiDef png [355 KiB]
Thumbnail [413 KiB]
*.C file
Fig6a.pdf
Fig6b.pdf [165 KiB]
HiDef png [360 KiB]
Thumbnail [424 KiB]
*.C file
Fig6b.pdf
Fig6c.pdf [194 KiB]
HiDef png [256 KiB]
Thumbnail [368 KiB]
*.C file
Fig6c.pdf
Fig6d.pdf [194 KiB]
HiDef png [272 KiB]
Thumbnail [389 KiB]
*.C file
Fig6d.pdf
Fig6e.pdf [173 KiB]
HiDef png [1006 KiB]
Thumbnail [569 KiB]
*.C file
Fig6e.pdf
Fig6f.pdf [196 KiB]
HiDef png [465 KiB]
Thumbnail [592 KiB]
*.C file
Fig6f.pdf

Results of the fit of the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ distribution with the baseline model. Figures (a) and (b) show the $m( D ^{*-} \pi ^+ )$ projection, with (a) zoomed in to illustrate the contributions from all the resonances while (b) shows the projection near the $D_1(2420)$ resonance. The $m( D ^+_ s \pi ^+ )$, $m( D ^{*-} D ^+_ s )$, $\cos\theta_{D}$ and $\phi_{D}$ projections are shown in (c), (d), (e) and (f), respectively.

Fig7a.pdf [140 KiB]
HiDef png [617 KiB]
Thumbnail [476 KiB]
*.C file
Fig7a.pdf
Fig7b.pdf [135 KiB]
HiDef png [430 KiB]
Thumbnail [395 KiB]
*.C file
Fig7b.pdf
Fig7c.pdf [169 KiB]
HiDef png [444 KiB]
Thumbnail [406 KiB]
*.C file
Fig7c.pdf
Fig7d.pdf [169 KiB]
HiDef png [430 KiB]
Thumbnail [390 KiB]
*.C file
Fig7d.pdf
Fig7e.pdf [196 KiB]
HiDef png [415 KiB]
Thumbnail [396 KiB]
*.C file
Fig7e.pdf
Fig7f.pdf [196 KiB]
HiDef png [447 KiB]
Thumbnail [398 KiB]
*.C file
Fig7f.pdf
Fig7legend.pdf [164 KiB]
HiDef png [115 KiB]
Thumbnail [101 KiB]
*.C file
Fig7legend.pdf

Pulls of the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ Dalitz-plot distribution for the fits with (a) the baseline model and (b) the model including $ D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ components.

Fig8a.pdf [200 KiB]
HiDef png [262 KiB]
Thumbnail [337 KiB]
*.C file
Fig8a.pdf
Fig8b.pdf [200 KiB]
HiDef png [262 KiB]
Thumbnail [340 KiB]
*.C file
Fig8b.pdf

Comparison of the fit results of the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ distribution with the baseline model and with the model that includes $ D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ components. The $m( D ^{*-} \pi ^+ )$, $m( D ^+_ s \pi ^+ )$, $m( D ^{*-} D ^+_ s )$, $\cos\theta_{D}$ and $\phi_{D}$ projections are shown in (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e), respectively. The requirement $m( D ^{*-} \pi ^+ )>2.5\text{ Ge V} $ is applied to the distributions shown in plots (b)--(e).

Fig9a.pdf [135 KiB]
HiDef png [374 KiB]
Thumbnail [352 KiB]
*.C file
Fig9a.pdf
Fig9b.pdf [167 KiB]
HiDef png [382 KiB]
Thumbnail [345 KiB]
*.C file
Fig9b.pdf
Fig9c.pdf [167 KiB]
HiDef png [372 KiB]
Thumbnail [338 KiB]
*.C file
Fig9c.pdf
Fig9d.pdf [197 KiB]
HiDef png [403 KiB]
Thumbnail [374 KiB]
*.C file
Fig9d.pdf
Fig9e.pdf [197 KiB]
HiDef png [387 KiB]
Thumbnail [320 KiB]
*.C file
Fig9e.pdf
Fig9legend.pdf [163 KiB]
HiDef png [172 KiB]
Thumbnail [198 KiB]
*.C file
Fig9legend.pdf

Animated gif made out of all figures.

PAPER-2024-001.gif
Thumbnail
thumbnail_PAPER-2024-001.gif

Tables and captions

The angular dependencies for the $ B ^+ \rightarrow \overline{ D } ^{**0}(\rightarrow D ^{*-} \pi ^+ ) D ^+_ s $ partial-wave terms $\mathcal{H}_n^{( D ^* \pi)}$.

Table_1.pdf [76 KiB]
HiDef png [64 KiB]
Thumbnail [25 KiB]
tex code
Table_1.pdf

The angular dependencies for the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} T_{c\bar{s}}^{++}(\rightarrow D ^+_ s \pi ^+ )$ partial-wave terms $\mathcal{H}_n^{( D _s\pi)}$.

Table_2.pdf [76 KiB]
HiDef png [74 KiB]
Thumbnail [33 KiB]
tex code
Table_2.pdf

Yields of signal and background components for the $ D ^{*-} D ^+_ s $ invariant-mass fit in range 5.15--5.60 $\text{ Ge V}$ .

Table_3.pdf [61 KiB]
HiDef png [53 KiB]
Thumbnail [27 KiB]
tex code
Table_3.pdf

Yields of signal and background components for the $ D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ invariant-mass fit in range 4.80--5.60 $\text{ Ge V}$ and in the signal box $|m( D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ )-m_{ B ^+ }|<30\text{ Me V} $.

Table_4.pdf [55 KiB]
HiDef png [58 KiB]
Thumbnail [29 KiB]
tex code
Table_4.pdf

Resonances considered in the baseline amplitude model and their parameters.

Table_5.pdf [68 KiB]
HiDef png [107 KiB]
Thumbnail [53 KiB]
tex code
Table_5.pdf

Fit fractions (in %) for the components of the $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ amplitude. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty related to the amplitude model.

Table_6.pdf [72 KiB]
HiDef png [129 KiB]
Thumbnail [64 KiB]
tex code
Table_6.pdf

Relative systematic uncertainties on the $\mathcal{R}^{(*)}$ measurements.

Table_7.pdf [63 KiB]
HiDef png [107 KiB]
Thumbnail [50 KiB]
tex code
Table_7.pdf

Fit results for the baseline and selected alternative $ B ^+ \rightarrow D ^{*-} D ^+_ s \pi ^+ $ amplitude models.

Table_8.pdf [77 KiB]
HiDef png [290 KiB]
Thumbnail [135 KiB]
tex code
Table_8.pdf

Fitted complex values $f_i$ of the $1^+$ S-wave amplitudes at the spline knots of the QMI model.

Table_9.pdf [60 KiB]
HiDef png [70 KiB]
Thumbnail [36 KiB]
tex code
Table_9.pdf

Absolute systematic uncertainties on the fit parameters and fit fractions for the baseline model

Table_10.pdf [73 KiB]
HiDef png [352 KiB]
Thumbnail [153 KiB]
tex code
Table_10.pdf

Absolute systematic uncertainties on the fit parameters and fit fractions for the baseline model (continued)

Table_11.pdf [74 KiB]
HiDef png [385 KiB]
Thumbnail [173 KiB]
tex code
Table_11.pdf

Created on 17 May 2024.