Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN
Visit us: CMS Public Website, CMS Physics ;
Contact us: CMS Publications Committee
| CMS-PAS-HIN-21-004 | ||
| Study of charm hadronization with prompt $ \Lambda_c^+ $ baryons in proton-proton and lead-lead collisions at $ \sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}= $ 5.02 TeV | ||
| CMS Collaboration | ||
| 26 March 2023 | ||
| Abstract: The production of prompt $ \Lambda_c^+ $ baryons is measured via the exclusive decay channel $ \Lambda_c^+ \to \mathrm{p} \mathrm{K}^- \pi^+ $ at a center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair of 5.02 TeV using 252 nb$^{-1}$ proton-proton (pp) and 0.607 nb$^{-1}$ lead-lead (PbPb) collisions collected at the CERN LHC in 2017 and 2018, respectively. The measurements are performed within the $ \Lambda_c^+ $ rapidity interval $ |y| < $ 1.0 with transverse momentum ($ p_\mathrm{T} $) ranges of 3-30 and 6-40 $ \mathrm{GeV}/c $ for pp and PbPb collisions, respectively. Compared to pp collisions scaled by the number of nucleon-nucleon interactions, the observed yields of $ \Lambda_c^+ $ with $ p_\mathrm{T} > $ 10 GeV/$c$ are strongly suppressed in PbPb collisions. The level of suppression depends significantly on both the collision centrality and the $ p_\mathrm{T} $ of the $ \Lambda_c^+ $ baryon. The $ \Lambda_c^+/\mathrm{D}^0 $ production ratio in PbPb collisions is consistent with the result in pp collisions for $ p_\mathrm{T} > $ 10 GeV/$c$, suggesting that the coalescence process of hadronization is not significant for PbPb collisions in the higher $ p_\mathrm{T} $ region. | ||
|
Links:
CDS record (PDF) ;
CADI line (restricted) ;
These preliminary results are superseded in this paper, Submitted to JHEP. The superseded preliminary plots can be found here. |
||
| Figures | |
png pdf |
Figure 1:
The number of reconstructed $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ candidates per 8 MeVc$ ^{2} $ invariant mass in pp collisions for $ p_{\mathrm{T}} =$ 3-4 (left) and 20-30 GeV/$c$ (right). The solid line represents the fit to the data and the dashed line represents the fit to the background. The lower panels show the pulls, obtained as the difference between the data points and the fit result, divided by the uncertainty in data. |
png pdf |
Figure 1-a:
The number of reconstructed $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ candidates per 8 MeVc$ ^{2} $ invariant mass in pp collisions for $ p_{\mathrm{T}} =$ 3-4 (left) and 20-30 GeV/$c$ (right). The solid line represents the fit to the data and the dashed line represents the fit to the background. The lower panels show the pulls, obtained as the difference between the data points and the fit result, divided by the uncertainty in data. |
png pdf |
Figure 1-b:
The number of reconstructed $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ candidates per 8 MeVc$ ^{2} $ invariant mass in pp collisions for $ p_{\mathrm{T}} =$ 3-4 (left) and 20-30 GeV/$c$ (right). The solid line represents the fit to the data and the dashed line represents the fit to the background. The lower panels show the pulls, obtained as the difference between the data points and the fit result, divided by the uncertainty in data. |
png pdf |
Figure 2:
The number of reconstructed $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ candidates per 8 MeVc$ ^{2} $ invariant mass in PbPb collisions in $ p_{\mathrm{T}} =$ 6.0-8.0 (left) and 30.0-40.0 GeV/$c$ (middle) in the 0-90% centrality bin, and in $ p_{\mathrm{T}} =$ 10.0-12.5 GeV/$c$ in the 0-10% (right) centrality bin. The solid line represents the fit to the data and the dashed line represents the contribution from the combinatorial background. The lower panels show the pulls, obtained as the difference between the data points and the fit result, divided by the uncertainty in data. |
png pdf |
Figure 2-a:
The number of reconstructed $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ candidates per 8 MeVc$ ^{2} $ invariant mass in PbPb collisions in $ p_{\mathrm{T}} =$ 6.0-8.0 (left) and 30.0-40.0 GeV/$c$ (middle) in the 0-90% centrality bin, and in $ p_{\mathrm{T}} =$ 10.0-12.5 GeV/$c$ in the 0-10% (right) centrality bin. The solid line represents the fit to the data and the dashed line represents the contribution from the combinatorial background. The lower panels show the pulls, obtained as the difference between the data points and the fit result, divided by the uncertainty in data. |
png pdf |
Figure 2-b:
The number of reconstructed $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ candidates per 8 MeVc$ ^{2} $ invariant mass in PbPb collisions in $ p_{\mathrm{T}} =$ 6.0-8.0 (left) and 30.0-40.0 GeV/$c$ (middle) in the 0-90% centrality bin, and in $ p_{\mathrm{T}} =$ 10.0-12.5 GeV/$c$ in the 0-10% (right) centrality bin. The solid line represents the fit to the data and the dashed line represents the contribution from the combinatorial background. The lower panels show the pulls, obtained as the difference between the data points and the fit result, divided by the uncertainty in data. |
png pdf |
Figure 2-c:
The number of reconstructed $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ candidates per 8 MeVc$ ^{2} $ invariant mass in PbPb collisions in $ p_{\mathrm{T}} =$ 6.0-8.0 (left) and 30.0-40.0 GeV/$c$ (middle) in the 0-90% centrality bin, and in $ p_{\mathrm{T}} =$ 10.0-12.5 GeV/$c$ in the 0-10% (right) centrality bin. The solid line represents the fit to the data and the dashed line represents the contribution from the combinatorial background. The lower panels show the pulls, obtained as the difference between the data points and the fit result, divided by the uncertainty in data. |
png pdf |
Figure 3:
The product of acceptance and efficiency as a function of $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ for prompt $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ in pp and PbPb collisions. The closed circles represent the value for pp. The $ A\epsilon $ value for PbPb collisions in centrality bin 0-90, 0-10, 10-30, 30-50 and 50-90% are represented by symbols of star, square, triangle, inverted triangle and diamond, respectively. The horizontal error bars represent the bin widths. |
png pdf |
Figure 4:
The $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $-differential cross sections for prompt $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ production in pp collisions. Predictions for pp collisions are displayed for PYTHIA 8 with color reconnection (open crosses), GM-VFNS with fragmentation functions fit to the OPAL data only (open circles labeled GM-VFNS-1) and fit to the OPAL and Belle data (open triangles labeled GM-VFNS-2). The horizontal error bars represent the bin widths. The lower panel shows the data-to-prediction ratio for pp collisions with error bars and brackets corresponding to the statistical and total uncertainty in the data, respectively. The global fit uncertainty of 8.6% is not shown in the plot. The shaded boxes in the bottom panel represent the GM-VFNS uncertainty. |
png pdf |
Figure 5:
The $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $-differential cross sections for prompt $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ production in pp collisions (circles) and the $ T_\text{AA} $-scaled yields for within centrality regions of 0-90 (stars), 0-10 (squares), 10-30 (triangles), 30-50 (inverted triangles) and 50-90% (diamonds) in PbPb collisions. The boxes and error bars represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively. The horizontal error bars represent the bin widths. |
png pdf |
Figure 6:
The nuclear modification factor $ R_{\mathrm{AA}} $ versus $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ for prompt $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ production in centrality region of 0-90 (stars), 0-10 (squares), 10-30 (triangles), 30-50 (inverted triangles) and 50-90% (diamonds) in PbPb collisions. The boxes and error bars represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively. The horizontal error bars represent the bin widths. The band at unity labeled global uncertainty includes the uncertainties for the luminosity of pp collisions, number of MB events in PbPb collisions, and tracking efficiency. The global uncertainty for $ R_{\mathrm{AA}} $ is 16.5%. |
png pdf |
Figure 7:
The ratio of the production cross sections of prompt $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ to prompt D$^{0}$ versus $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ from pp collisions is represented by closed circles (left). The ratio for 0-90 (closed stars) and 0-10% (closed squares) centrality classes of PbPb collisions are compared to the pp result (right). The boxes and error bars represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively. The horizontal error bars represent the bin widths. The 6.6 and 7.3% normalization uncertainties in pp and PbPb collisions, respectively, are not included in the boxes representing the systematic uncertainties for each data point. Model calculations are displayed (see texts for details). |
png pdf |
Figure 7-a:
The ratio of the production cross sections of prompt $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ to prompt D$^{0}$ versus $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ from pp collisions is represented by closed circles (left). The ratio for 0-90 (closed stars) and 0-10% (closed squares) centrality classes of PbPb collisions are compared to the pp result (right). The boxes and error bars represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively. The horizontal error bars represent the bin widths. The 6.6 and 7.3% normalization uncertainties in pp and PbPb collisions, respectively, are not included in the boxes representing the systematic uncertainties for each data point. Model calculations are displayed (see texts for details). |
png pdf |
Figure 7-b:
The ratio of the production cross sections of prompt $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ to prompt D$^{0}$ versus $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ from pp collisions is represented by closed circles (left). The ratio for 0-90 (closed stars) and 0-10% (closed squares) centrality classes of PbPb collisions are compared to the pp result (right). The boxes and error bars represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively. The horizontal error bars represent the bin widths. The 6.6 and 7.3% normalization uncertainties in pp and PbPb collisions, respectively, are not included in the boxes representing the systematic uncertainties for each data point. Model calculations are displayed (see texts for details). |
| Tables | |
png pdf |
Table 1:
Systematic uncertainties from different sources |
| Summary |
| The differential cross section of prompt $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ baryons as a function of transverse momentum ($ p_{\mathrm{T}} $) is presented for both proton-proton (pp) and lead-lead (PbPb) collisions at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of 5.02 TeV in the central region $ |y| < $ 1.0. The measured $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ ranges are 3 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 30 GeV/$c$ and 6 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 40 GeV/$c$ for the pp and PbPb collisions, respectively. The nuclear modification factors ($ R_{\mathrm{AA}} $) corresponding to the $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ yields divided by the yields expected by scaling up the pp results by the number of nucleon-nucleon collisions and the $ \Lambda_{c}^{+}/ \mathrm{D^0} $ production ratios have also been measured in various centrality classes for the PbPb collisions. The prompt $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ production for PbPb collisions is significantly suppressed compared to the pp collision results. The magnitude of the suppression is larger in more central collisions and varies with the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ value of $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ baryon, consistent with the effect originating from the parton energy loss of charm quarks traversing the quark-gluon plasma. A similar effect was previously observed for D$^{0}$ mesons. The $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ baryon yields for pp collisions are much higher than predicted by GM-VFNS calculations that use fragmentation functions obtained by fitting data from the OPAL and Belle experiments, indicating a breakdown of the universality of charm quark fragmentation functions. Calculations based on PYTHIA 8 with the inclusion of color reconnection in the hadronization step can describe the pp data well for $ p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 10 GeV/$c$, but is systematically lower than observed for the 10 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 30 GeV/$c$ range. A model taking into account the contributions from the decays of excited charm baryons and a model involving both coalescence and fragmentation can also describe the $ \Lambda_{c}^{+}/ \mathrm{D^0} $ production ratios in pp collisions. For $ p_{\mathrm{T}} > $ 10 GeV/$c$, the $ \Lambda_{c}^{+}/ \mathrm{D^0} $ ratios for pp and PbPb collisions are consistent with each other. This suggests that the coalescence process does not play a significant role in $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ baryon production in this higher $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ region. The current results extend the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ and centrality (for PbPb collisions) ranges in $ |y| < $ 1.0 over which the $ \Lambda_{c}^{+} $ baryon yields have been measured, thus further constraining model calculations that consider the role of quark coalescence in heavy ion collisions. |
| References | ||||
| 1 | E. V. Shuryak | Theory of hadronic plasma | Sov. Phys. JETP 47 (1978) 212 | |
| 2 | A. Andronic et al. | Heavy-flavour and quarkonium production in the LHC era: From proton-proton to heavy-ion collisions | EPJC 76 (2016) 107 | 1506.03981 |
| 3 | F. Prino and R. Rapp | Open heavy flavor in QCD matter and in nuclear collisions | JPG 43 (2016) 093002 | 1603.00529 |
| 4 | X. Dong and V. Greco | Heavy quark production and properties of Quark-Gluon Plasma | Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 104 (2019) 97 | |
| 5 | X. Dong, Y.-J. Lee, and R. Rapp | Open heavy-flavor production in heavy-ion collisions | Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69 (2019) 417 | 1903.07709 |
| 6 | W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, and W. van der Schee | Heavy ion collisions: The big picture, and the big questions | Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68 (2018) 339 | 1802.04801 |
| 7 | L. Apolinário, Y.-J. Lee, and M. Winn | Heavy quarks and jets as probes of the QGP | Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 127 (2022) 103990 | 2203.16352 |
| 8 | A. Beraudo et al. | Extraction of heavy-flavor transport coefficients in QCD matter | Nucl. Phys. A 979 (2018) 21 | 1803.03824 |
| 9 | B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, G. Ingelman, and T. Sjöstrand | Parton fragmentation and string dynamics | Physics Reports 97 (1983) 31 | |
| 10 | V. Greco, C. M. Ko, and P. Lévai | Parton coalescence and the antiproton/pion anomaly at RHIC | PRL 90 (2003) 202302 | nucl-th/0301093 |
| 11 | R. J. Fries, V. Greco, and P. Sorensen | Coalescence models for hadron formation from quark gluon plasma | Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 58 (2008) 177 | 0807.4939 |
| 12 | Y. Oh, C. M. Ko, S. H. Lee, and S. Yasui | Heavy baryon/meson ratios in relativistic heavy ion collisions | Phys. Rev. C 79 (2009) 044905 | 0901.1382 |
| 13 | S. H. Lee et al. | $ \Lambda_\text{c} $ enhancement from strongly coupled quark-gluon plasma | PRL 100 (2008) 222301 | 0709.3637 |
| 14 | S. Ghosh et al. | Diffusion of $ \Lambda_\text{c} $ in hot hadronic medium and its impact on $ \Lambda_\text{c}/D $ ratio | PRD 90 (2014) 054018 | 1407.5069 |
| 15 | S. Plumari et al. | Charmed hadrons from coalescence plus fragmentation in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC and LHC | EPJC 78 (2018) 348 | 1712.00730 |
| 16 | ALICE Collaboration | $ \Lambda_\text{c}^+ $ production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV and in p-Pb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV | JHEP 04 (2018) 108 | 1712.09581 |
| 17 | ALICE Collaboration | $ \Lambda_\text{c}^+ $ production and baryon-to-meson ratios in pp and p-pb collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 5.02 TeV at the LHC | PRL 127 (2021) 202301 | 2011.06078 |
| 18 | CMS Collaboration | Production of $ \Lambda_\mathrm{c}^+ $ baryons in proton-proton and lead-lead collisions at $ \sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}= $ 5.02 TeV | PLB 803 (2020) 135328 | CMS-HIN-18-009 1906.03322 |
| 19 | LHCb Collaboration | Prompt charm production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV | NPB 871 (2013) 1 | 1302.2864 |
| 20 | M. A. G. Aivazis, J. C. Collins, F. I. Olness, and W.-K. Tung | Leptoproduction of heavy quarks. II. A unified QCD formulation of charged and neutral current processes from fixed-target to collider energies | PRD 50 (1994) 3102 | |
| 21 | LHCb Collaboration | Prompt $ \Lambda^+_c $ production in pPb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV | JHEP 02 (2019) 102 | 1809.01404 |
| 22 | STAR Collaboration | First measurement of $ \Lambda_\text{c}^+ $ baryon production in Au+Au collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 200 GeV | PRL 124 (2020) 172301 | 1910.14628 |
| 23 | ALICE Collaboration | $ \Lambda_\text{c}^+ $ production in Pb-Pb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV | PLB 793 (2019) 212 | 1809.10922 |
| 24 | ALICE Collaboration | Constraining hadronization mechanisms with $ \Lambda_\text{c}^{+}/D^0 $ production ratios in Pb-Pb collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = $ 5.02 tev | 2112.08156 | |
| 25 | CMS Collaboration | Evidence for X(3872) in Pb-Pb collisions and studies of its prompt production at $ \sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}=$ 5.02 TeV | PRL 128 (2022) 032001 | 2102.13048v2 |
| 26 | CMS Collaboration | Observation of the $ {B}_{c}^{+} $ meson in PbPb and pp collisions at $ \sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}=$ 5.02 TeV and measurement of its nuclear modification factor | PRL 128 (2022) 252301 | 2201.02659v2 |
| 27 | CMS Collaboration | Nuclear modification factor of D$ ^0 $ mesons in PbPb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV | PLB 782 (2018) 474 | CMS-HIN-16-001 1708.04962 |
| 28 | CMS Collaboration | Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker | JINST 9 (2014) P10009 | CMS-TRK-11-001 1405.6569 |
| 29 | CMS Collaboration | The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC | Journal of Instrumentation 3 (2008) S08004 | |
| 30 | CMS Collaboration | Charged-particle nuclear modification factors in PbPb and pPb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV | JHEP 04 (2017) 039 | CMS-HIN-15-015 1611.01664 |
| 31 | CMS Collaboration | Transverse-momentum and pseudorapidity distributions of charged hadrons in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 0.9 and 2.36 TeV | JHEP 02 (2010) 041 | CMS-QCD-09-010 1002.0621 |
| 32 | CMS Collaboration | The CMS trigger system | JINST 12 (2017) P01020 | CMS-TRG-12-001 1609.02366 |
| 33 | CMS Collaboration | CMS luminosity measurement using nucleus-nucleus collisions at $ \sqrt{{s_{_{{NN}}}}}= $ 5.02 TeV in 2018 | CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2022 CDS |
|
| 34 | CMS Collaboration | Luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at 5.02 TeV in 2017 at CMS | CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2021 CDS |
|
| 35 | CMS Collaboration | Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS | EPJC 81 (2021) 800 | CMS-LUM-17-003 2104.01927 |
| 36 | T. Sjöstrand et al. | An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 | Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 | 1410.3012 |
| 37 | CMS Collaboration | Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements | EPJC 76 (2016) 155 | CMS-GEN-14-001 1512.00815 |
| 38 | I. P. Lokhtin and A. M. Snigirev | A model of jet quenching in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions and high-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ hadron spectra at RHIC | EPJC 45 (2006) 211 | hep-ph/0506189 |
| 39 | D. J. Lange | The EvtGen particle decay simulation package | NIM A 462 (2001) 152 | |
| 40 | Particle Data Group Collaboration | Review of particle physics | PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01 | |
| 41 | GEANT4 Collaboration | GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit | NIM A 506 (2003) 250 | |
| 42 | E. L. Lehmann | On likelihood ratio tests | IMS Lecture Notes Monogr. Ser. 49 (2006) 1 | |
| 43 | M. Cacciari, M. Greco, and P. Nason | The $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ spectrum in heavy flavor hadroproduction | JHEP 05 (1998) 007 | hep-ph/9803400 |
| 44 | J. R. Christiansen and P. Z. Skands | String formation beyond leading colour | JHEP 08 (2015) 003 | 1505.01681 |
| 45 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of the $ {B}^{\pm} $ meson nuclear modification factor in Pb-Pb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV | PRL 119 (2017) 152301 | CMS-HIN-16-011 1705.04727 |
| 46 | M. Benzke et al. | Prompt neutrinos from atmospheric charm in the general-mass variable-flavor-number scheme | JHEP 12 (2017) 021 | 1705.10386 |
| 47 | B. A. Kniehl, G. Kramer, I. Schienbein, and H. Spiesberger | $ \Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{\pm} $ production in $ pp $ collisions with a new fragmentation function | PRD 101 (2020) 114021 | 2004.04213 |
| 48 | OPAL Collaboration | A study of charm hadron production in $ Z^0 \to c\bar c $ and $ Z^0 \to b\bar b $ decays at LEPdecays at LEP | Z. Phys. C -, 1996 Particles and Fields 72 (1996) 1 |
|
| 49 | Belle Collaboration | Charm hadrons from fragmentation and $ b $ decays in $ {e}^{+}{e}^{-} $ annihilation at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 10 GeV | PRD 73 (2006) 032002 | hep-ex/0506068 |
| 50 | CMS Collaboration | Studies of beauty suppression via nonprompt $ \mathrm{D^0} $ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV | PRL 123 (2019) 022001 | CMS-HIN-16-016 1810.11102 |
| 51 | STAR Collaboration | Observation of $ \mathrm{D^0} $ meson nuclear modifications in $ \mathrm{Au} $+$ \mathrm{Au} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = $ 200 GeV | PRL 113 (2014) 142301 | 1404.6185 |
| 52 | V. Minissale, S. Plumari, and V. Greco | Charm hadrons in pp collisions at LHC energy within a coalescence plus fragmentation approach | PLB 821 (2021) 136622 | |
| 53 | M. He and R. Rapp | Charm-baryon production in proton-proton collisions | PLB 795 (2019) 117 | 1902.08889 |
| 54 | M. He and R. Rapp | Hadronization and charm-hadron ratios in heavy-ion collisions | PRL 124 (2020) 042301 | 1905.09216v2 |
|
|
Compact Muon Solenoid LHC, CERN |
|
|
|
|
|
|