CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-SMP-14-022 ; CERN-EP-2016-043
Measurement of the differential cross section and charge asymmetry for inclusive pp $ \to \mathrm{ W }^{\pm}+X$ production at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV
Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 469
Abstract: The differential cross section and charge asymmetry for inclusive pp $ \to \mathrm{ W }^{\pm}+X \to \mu^{\pm}\nu+X$ production at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV are measured as a function of muon pseudorapidity. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 18.8 fb$^{-1}$ recorded with the CMS detector at the LHC. These results provide important constraints on the parton distribution functions of the proton in the range of the Bjorken scaling variable $x$ from 10$^{-3}$ to 10$^{-1}$.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Examples of fits in three $ { {| \eta | }} $ ranges: 0.0 $ < { {| \eta | }} < $ 0.2 (top), 1.0 $ < { {| \eta | }} < $ 1.2 (center), and 2.1 $ < { {| \eta | }} < $ 2.4 (bottom). For each $\eta $ range, results for $\mathrm{ W^{+} } $ (left) and $\mathrm{ W^{-} } $ (right) are shown. The ratios between the data points and the final fits are shown at the bottom of each panel.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Example of fit for $\mathrm{ W^{+} } $ in $ | \eta | $ range 0.0 $ < { {| \eta | }} < $ 0.2. The ratios between the data points and the final fits are shown at the bottom of each panel.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Example of fit for $\mathrm{ W^{-} } $ in $ | \eta | $ range 0.0 $ < { {| \eta | }} < $ 0.2. The ratios between the data points and the final fits are shown at the bottom of each panel.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
Example of fit for $\mathrm{ W^{+} } $ in 1.0 $ < { {| \eta | }} < $ 1.2. The ratios between the data points and the final fits are shown at the bottom of each panel.

png pdf
Figure 1-d:
Example of fit for $\mathrm{ W^{-} } $ in 1.0 $ < { {| \eta | }} < $ 1.2. The ratios between the data points and the final fits are shown at the bottom of each panel.

png pdf
Figure 1-e:
Example of fit for $\mathrm{ W^{+} } $ in 2.1 $ < { {| \eta | }} < $ 2.4. The ratios between the data points and the final fits are shown at the bottom of each panel.

png pdf
Figure 1-f:
Example of fit for $\mathrm{ W^{-} } $ in 2.1 $ < { {| \eta | }} < $ 2.4. The ratios between the data points and the final fits are shown at the bottom of each panel.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Distribution of ${R_{\pm }^{\mathrm {QCD}}}$ in QCD control region for data (solid circles), QCD control region for simulation (solid squares), and signal region for simulation (open squares). Open circles show the ${R_{\pm }^{\mathrm {QCD}}}$distribution when QCD contributions in $ {\mathrm {W^+}}$ and $ {\mathrm {W^-}}$ events are not constrained. Shaded area indicates assigned systematic uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Comparison of the measured cross sections (upper plot for $ {\sigma _\eta } ^+$ and middle for $ {\sigma _\eta } ^-$) and asymmetries (lower plot) to NNLO predictions calculated using the FEWZ3.1 MC tool interfaced with different PDF sets. The right column shows the ratios (differences) between the theoretical predictions and the measured cross sections (asymmetries). The smaller vertical error bars on the data points represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The full error bars include the integrated luminosity uncertainty. The PDF uncertainty of each PDF set is shown by a shaded (or hatched) band and corresponds to 68% CL .

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Comparison of the measured cross sections for $ {\sigma _\eta } ^+$ to NNLO predictions calculated using the FEWZ3.1 MC tool interfaced with different PDF sets. The smaller vertical error bars on the data points represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The full error bars include the integrated luminosity uncertainty. The PDF uncertainty of each PDF set is shown by a shaded (or hatched) band and corresponds to 68% CL .

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Ratios between the theoretical predictions and the measured cross sections plot for $ {\sigma _\eta } ^+$. The smaller vertical error bars on the data points represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The full error bars include the integrated luminosity uncertainty. The PDF uncertainty of each PDF set is shown by a shaded (or hatched) band and corresponds to 68% CL .

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
Comparison of the measured cross sections for $ {\sigma _\eta } ^-$ to NNLO predictions calculated using the FEWZ3.1 MC tool interfaced with different PDF sets. The smaller vertical error bars on the data points represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The full error bars include the integrated luminosity uncertainty. The PDF uncertainty of each PDF set is shown by a shaded (or hatched) band and corresponds to 68% CL .

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
Ratios between the theoretical predictions and the measured cross sections for $ {\sigma _\eta } ^-$. The smaller vertical error bars on the data points represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The full error bars include the integrated luminosity uncertainty. The PDF uncertainty of each PDF set is shown by a shaded (or hatched) band and corresponds to 68% CL .

png pdf
Figure 3-e:
Comparison of asymmetries to NNLO predictions calculated using the FEWZ3.1 MC tool interfaced with different PDF sets. The smaller vertical error bars on the data points represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The full error bars include the integrated luminosity uncertainty. The PDF uncertainty of each PDF set is shown by a shaded (or hatched) band and corresponds to 68% CL .

png pdf
Figure 3-f:
Differences between the theoretical predictions and the measured asymmetries. The smaller vertical error bars on the data points represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The full error bars include the integrated luminosity uncertainty. The PDF uncertainty of each PDF set is shown by a shaded (or hatched) band and corresponds to 68% CL .

png pdf
Figure 4:
Distributions of u valence (left) and d valence (right) quarks as functions of $x$ at the scale $Q^2=m^2_{\mathrm{ W } }$. The results of the fit to the HERA data and muon asymmetry measurements (light shaded band), and to HERA data only (hatched band) are compared. The total PDF uncertainties are shown. In the bottom panels the distributions are normalized to 1 for a direct comparison of the uncertainties. The change of the PDFs with respect to the HERA-only fit is represented by a solid line.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Distribution of u valence quarks as a function of $x$ at the scale $Q^2=m^2_{\mathrm{ W } }$. The results of the fit to the HERA data and muon asymmetry measurements (light shaded band), and to HERA data only (hatched band) are compared. The total PDF uncertainties are shown. In the bottom panel the distribution is normalized to 1 for a direct comparison of the uncertainties. The change of the PDFs with respect to the HERA-only fit is represented by a solid line.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Distributions of d valence quarks as a function of $x$ at the scale $Q^2=m^2_{\mathrm{ W } }$. The results of the fit to the HERA data and muon asymmetry measurements (light shaded band), and to HERA data only (hatched band) are compared. The total PDF uncertainties are shown. In the bottom panel the distribution is normalized to 1 for a direct comparison of the uncertainties. The change of the PDFs with respect to the HERA-only fit is represented by a solid line.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of the fitted $N^{+}$, $N^{-}$, the correlation ($\rho _{+,-}$) between the uncertainties in $N^{+}$ and $N^{-}$, and the $\chi ^{2}$ of the fit for each $ {| \eta | }$ bin. The number of degrees of freedom($n_{\text {dof}}$) in each fit is 197. The quoted uncertainties are statistical and include statistical uncertainties in the templates. The correlation coefficients are expressed as percentages.

png pdf
Table 2:
Systematic uncertainties in cross sections ($\delta {\sigma _\eta } ^\pm $) and charge asymmetry ($\delta \mathcal {A}$) for each $ {| \eta | }$ bin. The statistical and integrated luminosity uncertainties are also shown for comparison. A detailed description of each systematic uncertainty is given in the text.

png pdf
Table 3:
Correlation matrices of systematic uncertainties for $ {\sigma _\eta } ^\pm $ and $\mathcal {A}$. The statistical and integrated luminosity uncertainties are not included. The full 22$\times $22 correlation matrix for $ {\sigma _\eta } ^\pm $ is presented as four blocks of 11$\times $11 matrices. The $C_{++}$ and $C_{-}$ blocks on the diagonal represent the bin-to-bin correlations of $\delta {\sigma _\eta } ^+$ and $\delta {\sigma _\eta } ^-$, respectively. The off-diagonal $C_{+-}$ and $C_{+-}^T$ blocks describe the correlations between the two charges. The values are expressed as percentages.

png pdf
Table 4:
Summary of the measured differential cross sections $ {\sigma _\eta } ^\pm $ (pb) and charge asymmetry $\mathcal {A}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic, and the third is the integrated luminosity uncertainty. The theoretical predictions are obtained using the fewz3.1 [37] NNLO MC tool interfaced with five different PDF sets.

png pdf
Table 5:
Partial $\chi ^2$ per number of data points, $n_{\text {dp}}$, and the global $\chi ^2$ per degrees of freedom, $n_{\text {dof}}$, as obtained in the QCD analysis of HERA DIS and the CMS muon charge asymmetry data. For HERA measurements, the energy of the proton beam is listed for each data set, with electron energy being $E_{ {\mathrm {e}}}=$ 27.5 GeV.
Summary
In summary, we have measured the differential cross section and charge asymmetry of the $\mathrm{W}^{\pm} \to \mu^{\pm}\nu$ production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV using a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 18.8 fb$^{-1}$ collected with the CMS detector at the LHC. The measurements were performed in 11 bins of absolute muon pseudorapidity $| \eta |$ for muons with $p_{\mathrm{T}}>$ 25 GeV. The results have been incorporated into a QCD analysis at next-to-next-to-leading-order together with the inclusive deep inelastic scattering data from HERA. A significant improvement in the accuracy of the valence quark distributions is observed in the range $10^{-3} < x <10^{-1}$, demonstrating the power of these muon charge asymmetry measurements to improve the main constraints on the valence distributions imposed by the HERA data, in the kinematics range probed. This strongly suggests the use of these measurements in future PDF determinations.
References
1 J. D. Bjorken and E. A. Paschos Inelastic electron--proton and $ \gamma $--proton scattering and the structure of the nucleon PR185 (1969) 1975
2 CDF Collaboration Measurement of the lepton charge asymmetry in $ \mathrm{ W } $ boson decays produced in $ \mathrm{ p } \mathrm{ \bar{p} } $ collisions PRL 81 (1998) 5754 hep-ex/9809001
3 CDF Collaboration Direct measurement of the $ \mathrm{ W } $ production charge asymmetry in $ \mathrm{ p } \mathrm{ \bar{p} } $ Collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRL 102 (2009) 181801 0901.2169
4 D0 Collaboration Measurement of the muon charge asymmetry from $ \mathrm{ W } $ boson decays PRD 77 (2008) 011106 0709.4254
5 D0 Collaboration Measurement of the electron charge asymmetry in $ \mathrm{ p } \mathrm{ \bar{p} } \to \mathrm{ W } + X \to \mathrm{ e } \nu + X $ events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRL 101 (2008) 211801 0807.3367
6 D0 Collaboration Measurement of the muon charge asymmetry in $ \mathrm{ p } \mathrm{ \bar{p} } \to \mathrm{ W } + X \to \mu \nu + X $ events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRD 88 (2013) 091102 1309.2591
7 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the lepton charge asymmetry in inclusive $ \mathrm{ W } $ production in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 04 (2011) 050 CMS-EWK-10-006
1103.3470
8 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive $ \mathrm{ W }^\pm $ and $ \mathrm{ Z }/\gamma $ cross sections in the $ \mathrm{ e } $ and $ \mu $ decay channels in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 85 (2012) 072004 1109.5141
9 LHCb Collaboration Inclusive $ \mathrm{ W } $ and $ \mathrm{ Z } $ production in the forward region at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 06 (2012) 058 1204.1620
10 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the Electron Charge Asymmetry in Inclusive $ \mathrm{ W } $ Production in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ Collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PRL 109 (2012) 111806 CMS-SMP-12-001
1206.2598
11 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the muon charge asymmetry in inclusive $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } \rightarrow \mathrm{ W }+X $ production at $ \sqrt s = 7 TeV $ and an improved determination of light parton distribution functions PRD 90 (2014) 032004 CMS-SMP-12-021
1312.6283
12 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
13 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG JHEP 07 (2008) 060 0805.4802
14 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
15 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
16 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
17 T. Sj\"ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual JHEP 05 (2006) 026 hep-ph/0603175
18 H.-L. Lai et al. New parton distributions for collider physics PRD 82 (2010) 074024 1007.2241
19 N. Davidson et al. Universal Interface of TAUOLA Technical and Physics Documentation CPC 183 (2012) 821 1002.0543
20 J. Pumplin et al. New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis JHEP 07 (2002) 012 hep-ph/0201195
21 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4---a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
22 A. Bodek et al. Extracting muon momentum scale corrections for hadron collider experiments EPJC 72 (2012) 2194 1208.3710
23 CMS Collaboration Measurements of inclusive $ \mathrm{ W } $ and $ \mathrm{ Z } $ cross sections in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the CMS experiment JHEP 10 (2011) 132 CMS-EWK-10-005
1107.4789
24 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collision events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
25 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow event reconstruction in CMS and performance for jets, taus, and $ E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}} $ CDS
26 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the particle-flow event reconstruction with the first LHC collisions recorded in the CMS detector CDS
27 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS missing transverse momentum reconstruction in pp data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P02006 CMS-JME-13-003
1411.0511
28 D0 Collaboration A novel method for modeling the recoil in $ \mathrm{ W } $ boson events at hadron collider NIMA 609 (2009) 250 0907.3713
29 CMS Collaboration Missing transverse energy performance of the CMS detector JINST 6 (2011) P09001 CMS-JME-10-009
1106.5048
30 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders CPC 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
31 Particle Data Group Collaboration Review of particle physics CPC 38 (2014) 090001
32 G. Nanava and Z. Was How to use SANC to improve the PHOTOS Monte Carlo simulation of bremsstrahlung in leptonic $ \mathrm{ W } $ boson decays Acta Phys. Polon. B 34 (2003) 4561 hep-ph/0303260
33 H. Burkhardt and B. Pietrzyk Update of the hadronic contribution to the QED vacuum polarization PLB 513 (2001) 46
34 A. D. Martin, W. J. Stirling, R. S. Thorne, and G. Watt Parton distributions for the LHC EPJC 63 (2009) 189 0901.0002
35 NNPDF Collaboration Impact of heavy quark masses on parton distributions and LHC phenomenology Nucl. Phys. B 849 (2011) 296 1101.1300
36 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity based on pixel cluster counting -- Summer 2013 update CMS-PAS-LUM-13-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-13-001
37 Y. Li and F. Petriello Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in the framework of the FEWZ simulation code PRD 86 (2012) 094034 1208.5967
38 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
39 H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Combination and QCD Analysis of the HERA Inclusive Cross Sections in Proc. of the 35th Int. Conf. of High Energy Physics, volume 168 2010 PoS(ICHEP2010)168
40 L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, P. Motylinski, and R. S. Thorne Parton distributions in the LHC era: MMHT 2014 PDFs EPJC 75 (2015) 204 1412.3989
41 S. Alekhin, J. Blumlein, and S. Moch The ABM parton distributions tuned to LHC data PRD 89 (2014) 054028 1310.3059
42 H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Combination of measurements of inclusive deep inelastic $ {\mathrm{ e }^{\pm }\mathrm{ p }} $ scattering cross sections and QCD analysis of HERA data EPJC 75 (2015) 580 1506.06042
43 J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis Update on vector boson pair production at hadron colliders PRD 60 (1999) 113006 hep-ph/9905386
44 J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC NPPS 205--206 (2010) 10 1007.3492
45 T. Carli et al. A posteriori inclusion of parton density functions in NLO QCD final-state calculations at hadron colliders: the APPLGRID project EPJC 66 (2010) 503 0911.2985
46 S. Alekhin et al. HERAFitter, Open source QCD fit project EPJC 75 (2015) 304 1410.4412
47 HERAFitter Collaboration HERAFitter HERAFitter web site
48 V. N. Gribov and L. N. Lipatov Deep inelastic $ \mathrm{ e } $-$ \mathrm{ p } $ scattering in perturbation theory Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 15 (1972)438
49 G. Altarelli and G. Parisi Asymptotic freedom in parton language Nucl. Phys. B 126 (1977) 298
50 G. Curci, W. Furmanski, and R. Petronzio Evolution of parton densities beyond leading order: The non-singlet case Nucl. Phys. B 175 (1980) 27
51 W. Furmanski and R. Petronzio Singlet parton densities beyond leading order PLB 97 (1980) 437
52 S. Moch, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt The three-loop splitting functions in QCD: the non-singlet case Nucl. Phys. B 688 (2004) 101 hep-ph/0403192
53 A. Vogt, S. Moch, and J. A. M. Vermaseren The three-loop splitting functions in QCD: the singlet case Nucl. Phys. B 691 (2004) 129 hep-ph/0404111
54 M. Botje QCDNUM: fast QCD evolution and convolution CPC 182 (2011) 490 1005.1481
55 R. S. Thorne Variable-flavor number scheme for NNLO PRD 73 (2006) 054019 hep-ph/0601245
56 H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Combined measurement and QCD analysis of the inclusive $ \mathrm{ e }^\pm \mathrm{ p } $ scattering cross sections at HERA JHEP 01 (2010) 109 0911.0884
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN