%ATLASPUBLICHEADER% ---+!! <nop>%TOPIC% %STARTINCLUDE% <TABLE border="0"><TBODY> <p /> <tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"> Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured with the di-jet balance (squares) and bisector (circles) in-situ techniques using the EM+JES calibration in anti-k<sub>T</sub> R=0.6 cluster jets. The bottom plot shows the relative difference between data results (black) and Monte Carlo simulation for each method. The dotted lines indicate a relative difference of ±10%.Only statistical errors are shown. Both methods are described in <A href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2306-0">Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306</a>. </td> <td align="center"><a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt6EMJES.png"><img width="350px" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt6EMJES.png"> </a> <br/> <a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt6EMJES.eps">[eps]</a></td></tr></td></tr> <p /> <tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"> Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured with the di-jet balance (squares) and bisector (circles) in-situ techniques using the LCW+JES calibration in anti-k<sub>T</sub> R=0.6 cluster jets. The bottom plot shows the relative difference between data results (black) and Monte Carlo simulation for each method. The dotted lines indicate a relative difference of ±10%. Only statistical errors are shown.Both methods are described in <A href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2306-0">Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306</a>. </td> <td align="center"><a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt6LC.png"><img width="350px" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt6LC.png"> </a> <br/> <a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt6LC.eps">[eps]</a></td></tr></td></tr> <p /> <tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"> Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured with the di-jet balance (squares) and bisector (circles) in-situ techniques using the EM+JES calibration in anti-k<sub>T</sub> R=0.4 cluster jets. The bottom plot shows the relative difference between data results (black) and Monte Carlo simulation for each method. The dotted lines indicate a relative difference of ±10%. Only statistical errors are shown.Both methods are described in <A href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2306-0">Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306</a>. </td> <td align="center"><a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt4EMJES.png"><img width="350px" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt4EMJES.png"> </a> <br/> <a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt4EMJES.eps">[eps]</a></td></tr></td></tr> <p /> <tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"> Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured with the di-jet balance (squares) and bisector (circles) in-situ techniques using the LCW+JES calibration in anti-k<sub>T</sub> R=0.4 cluster jets. The bottom plot shows the relative difference between data results (black) and Monte Carlo simulation for each method. The dotted lines indicate a relative difference of ±10%.Only statistical errors are shown.Both methods are described in <A href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2306-0">Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306</a>. </td> <td align="center"><a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt4LC.png"><img width="350px" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt4LC.png"> </a> <br/> <a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt4LC.eps">[eps]</a></td></tr></td></tr> <p /> <tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"> Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured with the bisector in-situ technique using the EM+JES calibration (circles) and the LCW+JES calibration (triangles) with 2011 data, in anti-k<sub>T</sub> R=0.4 cluster jets. The bottom plot shows the ratio as a function of the average jet transverse momenta. Both methods are described in <A href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2306-0">Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306</a>. </td> <td align="center"><a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt4Data-LCvsEMJES-eta0.png"><img width="350px" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt4Data-LCvsEMJES-eta0.png"> </a> <br/> <a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt4Data-LCvsEMJES-eta0.eps">[eps]</a></td></tr></td></tr> <p /> <tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"> Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured with the bisector in-situ technique using the EM+JES calibration (circles) and the LCW+JES calibration (triangles) with 2011 data, in anti-k<sub>T</sub> R=0.6 cluster jets. The bottom plot shows the ratio as a function of the average jet transverse momenta. Both methods are described in <A href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2306-0">Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306</a>. </td> <td align="center"><a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt6Data-LCvsEMJES-eta0.png"><img width="350px" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt6Data-LCvsEMJES-eta0.png"> </a> <br/> <a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt6Data-LCvsEMJES-eta0.eps">[eps]</a></td></tr></td></tr> <p /> <tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"> Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured with the bisector in-situ technique using the EM+JES calibration in anti-k<sub>T</sub> R=0.4 cluster jets, for 2010 data (triangles) and 2011 data (circles). The Bisector method is described in <A href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2306-0">Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306</a>. </td> <td align="center"><a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt4EMJES-BisectorData2011vs2010_noRatio.png"><img width="350px" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt4EMJES-BisectorData2011vs2010_noRatio.png"> </a> <br/> <a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt4EMJES-BisectorData2011vs2010_noRatio.eps">[eps]</a></td></tr></td></tr> <p /> <tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"> Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured with the bisector in-situ technique using the EM+JES calibration in anti-k<sub>T</sub> R=0.6 cluster jets, for 2010 data (triangles) and 2011 data (circles). The bisector method is described in <A href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2306-0">Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306</a>. </td> <td align="center"><a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt6EMJES-BisectorData2011vs2010_noRatio.png"><img width="350px" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt6EMJES-BisectorData2011vs2010_noRatio.png"> </a> <br/> <a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt6EMJES-BisectorData2011vs2010_noRatio.eps">[eps]</a></td></tr></td></tr> <p /> <tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"> Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured in 2011 data with the bisector in-situ technique using the LCW+JES calibration in anti-k<sub>T</sub> R=0.4 cluster jets. Results for different rapidity regions in the calorimeter are shown. The resolution above 500 GeV is not shown for 2.1 < |y| < 2.8 due to lack of statistics. The bisector method is described in <A href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2306-0">Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306</a>. </td> <td align="center"><a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt4LC-BisectarDataEtas-noRatio.png"><img width="350px" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt4LC-BisectarDataEtas-noRatio.png"> </a> <br/> <a href="%ATTACHURLPATH%/AntiKt4LC-BisectarDataEtas-noRatio.eps">[eps]</a></td></tr></td></tr> </TBODY></TABLE> <!-- *********************************************************** --> <!-- Do NOT remove the remaining lines, but add requested info as appropriate--> <!-- *********************************************************** --> --- <!-- For significant updates to the topic, consider adding your 'signature' (beneath this editing box) --> *Major updates*:%BR% -- Main.MichaelBegel - 10-Sep-2013 <!-- Person responsible for the page: Either leave as is - the creator's name will be inserted; Or replace the complete REVINFO tag (including percentages symbols) with a name in the form Main.TwikiUsersName --> %RESPONSIBLE% %REVINFO{"$wikiusername" rev="1.1"}% %BR% %SUBJECT% public %BR% <!-- Once this page has been reviewed, please add the name and the date e.g. Main.StephenHaywood - 31 Oct 2006 --> %STOPINCLUDE%
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
Watch
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
WYSIWYG
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r1 - 2013-09-10
-
MichaelBegel
ATLAS
Public ATLAS home
Internal TWiki
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Physics Results
B Physics and Light States
Standard Model physics
Top physics
Higgs physics
Higgs and Diboson searches
Supersymmetry searches
Exotics searches
Heavy Ion physics
Physics Modelling
Upgrade Physics Studies
Performance Results
Tracking
Electron and Photon
Muon
Tau
Jets and Etmiss
Flavour Tagging
Simulation
Detector
Detector Systems, Trigger, Luminosity, Data Taking
Upgrade
Account
Log In
Cern Search
TWiki Search
Google Search
Atlas
All webs
E
dit
A
ttach
Copyright &© 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use
Discourse
or
Send feedback