Public Liquid-Argon Calorimeter Plots on Detector Status

Introduction
Detector Description
Readout Electronics
Detector Status
Liquid argon temperature stability and homogeneity
LAr Purity Stability
Noise, Calibration, Signal Reconstruction
Ionization Pulse Shape
Monitoring plots
Shutdown 2010-2011 - Splashes 2011
The Electronic Performance Paper

Introduction

The LAr commissioning and performance plots below are approved to be shown by ATLAS speakers at conferences and similar events.

Please do not add figures on your own. Contact the LAr project leader in case of questions and/or suggestions.

Detector Description

	eps
	eps

These numbers are here for reference and to be used when describing the Liquid Argon Calorimeter. They are extracted from the ATLAS Detector paper.

pdf file with corresponding page numbers

http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/LIQARGON/Organization/RefPlots/ExpectedPerf.jpg

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/LArCaloPublicResultsDetStatus/LAr-segmentation-table.jpg

http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/LIQARGON/Organization/RefPlots/ChannelCount.jpg

Readout Electronics

The two schematics are documented in the ATLAS Detector paper (Calorimeter chapter 5)

Liquid Argon Readout Electronics Chain		eps pdf
Liquid Argon Front End Board Schematics		eps pdf

Detector Status

LAr dead and problematic channels: A detailed description of how dead and problematic LAr read-out channels are discovered and treated/masked for data analysis can be found in the paper "Monitoring and data quality assessment of the ATLAS liquid argon calorimeter"	Link to ATLAS Detector Status Table
LAr High Voltage Correction	HV Corrections (September 2009) eps

Liquid argon temperature stability and homogeneity

Liquid Argon Temperature	Liquid argon temperature stability vs time eps Liquid argon temperature stability close to the FCal vs time eps Liquid argon temperature stability barrel A side eps Liquid argon temperature stability barrel C side eps Liquid argon temperature stability endcap A eps Liquid argon temperature stability endcap C eps Liquid argon temperature homogeneity barrel eps Liquid argon temperature homogeneity endcap A eps Liquid argon temperature homogeneity endcap C eps

Liquid Argon Temperature

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/LArCaloPublicResultsDetStatus/TempComparison.gif

Liquid argon temperature stability vs time eps

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/LArCaloPublicResultsDetStatus/TempComparisonFcal.gif

Liquid argon temperature stability close to the FCal vs time eps

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/LArCaloPublicResultsDetStatus/emba.png

Liquid argon temperature stability barrel A side eps

Liquid argon temperature stability barrel C side eps

Liquid argon temperature stability endcap A eps

Liquid argon temperature stability endcap C eps

Liquid argon temperature homogeneity barrel eps

Liquid argon temperature homogeneity endcap A eps

Liquid argon temperature homogeneity endcap C eps

LAr Purity Stability

Measured impurity in oxygen equivalent of the liquid argon in the barrel cryostat (run 2): Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting at the beginning of 2015 until the end of 2018. Periods between pp-runs are marked hatched. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage. The decreasing trend in all monitors is correlated with the data taking periods. A clear explanation is not yet found, a change of other input parameters (like temperature or high voltage of the ionization chambers) is excluded. The measured purity in barrel A 1 after middle 2016 is excluded due to problems which are not yet understood. Barrel A 2 and barrel C 4 monitors are not working properly.	eps version, pdf version
Measured impurity in oxygen equivalent of the liquid argon in the barrel cryostat (run 1 + run 2): Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting at the end of 2009 until the end of 2018. Periods between pp-runs are marked hatched. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage. The decreasing trend in all monitors is correlated with the data taking periods. A clear explanation is not yet found, a change of other input parameters (like temperature or high voltage of the ionization chambers) is excluded. The leap of the measured purity in barrel A 4 at the beginning of 2010 is unclear; a connection with an actual improvement of the purity can be excluded. The measured purity in barrel A 1 after middle 2016 is excluded due to problems which are not yet understood. Barrel A 2 and barrel C 4 monitors are not working properly.	eps version, pdf version
Measured impurity in oxygen equivalent of the liquid argon in the end-cap cryostat on side A (run 2): Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting at the beginning of 2015 until the end of 2018. Last letter A, B or C in the legend corresponds to the monitor position with respect to phi. Periods between pp-runs are marked hatched. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage.	eps version, pdf version
Measured impurity in oxygen equivalent of the liquid argon in the end-cap cryostat on side A (run 1 + run 2): Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting at the end of 2009 until the end of 2018. Last letter A, B or C in the legend corresponds to the monitor position with respect to phi. Periods between pp-runs are marked hatched. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage. The decreasing trend in all monitors before LS1 is correlated with the data taking periods. A clear explanation is not yet found, a change of other input parameters (like temperature or high voltage of the ionization chambers) is excluded.	eps version, pdf version
Measured impurity in oxygen equivalent of the liquid argon in the end-cap cryostat on side C (run 2): Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting at the beginning of 2015 until the end of 2018. Last letter A, B or C in the legend corresponds to the monitor position with respect to phi. Periods between pp-runs are marked hatched. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage. The measured purity in HEC 1 C B after middle 2016 is excluded due to problems which are not yet understood. HEC 1 C C, HEC 2 C B and EC C top monitors are not working properly.	eps version, pdf version
Measured impurity in oxygen equivalent of the liquid argon in the end-cap cryostat on side C (run 1 + run 2): Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting at the end of 2009 until the end of 2018. Last letter A, B or C in the legend corresponds to the monitor position with respect to phi. Periods between pp-runs are marked hatched. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage. The decreasing trend in all monitors before LS1 is correlated with the data taking periods. A clear explanation is not yet found, a change of other input parameters (like temperature or high voltage of the ionization chambers) is excluded. The measured purity in HEC 1 C B after middle 2016 is excluded due to problems which are not yet understood. HEC 1 C C, HEC 2 C B and EC C top monitors are not working properly.	eps version, pdf version
Measured impurity of the liquid argon in the barrel cryostat: Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting middle of 2009 until beginning of 2016. Periods between pp-runs are marked gray. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage. The decreasing trend in all monitors is correlated with the data taking periods. A clear explanation is not yet found, a change of other input parameters (like temperature or high voltage of the ionization chambers is excluded). The leap of the measured purity in barrel A4 at the beginning of 2009 is unclear; a connection with an actual improvement of the purity can be excluded. See here for more information.	eps - pdf
Measured impurity of the liquid argon in the end-cap cryostat on side A: Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting middle of 2009 until beginning of 2016. Periods between pp-runs are marked gray. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage. The decreasing trend in all monitors is correlated with the data taking periods. A clear explanation is not yet found, a change of other input parameters (like temperature or high voltage of the ionization chambers is excluded). See here for more information.	eps - pdf
Measured impurity of the liquid argon in the end-cap cryostat on side C: Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting middle of 2009 until beginning of 2016. Periods between pp-runs are marked gray. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage. The decreasing trend in all monitors is correlated with the data taking periods. A clear explanation is not yet found, a change of other input parameters (like temperature or high voltage of the ionization chambers is excluded). See here for more information.	eps - pdf

Measured impurity in oxygen equivalent of the liquid argon in the barrel cryostat (run 2): Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting at the beginning of 2015 until the end of 2018. Periods between pp-runs are marked hatched. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage. The decreasing trend in all monitors is correlated with the data taking periods. A clear explanation is not yet found, a change of other input parameters (like temperature or high voltage of the ionization chambers) is excluded. The measured purity in barrel A 1 after middle 2016 is excluded due to problems which are not yet understood. Barrel A 2 and barrel C 4 monitors are not working properly.

eps version, pdf version

Measured impurity in oxygen equivalent of the liquid argon in the barrel cryostat (run 1 + run 2): Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting at the end of 2009 until the end of 2018. Periods between pp-runs are marked hatched. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage. The decreasing trend in all monitors is correlated with the data taking periods. A clear explanation is not yet found, a change of other input parameters (like temperature or high voltage of the ionization chambers) is excluded. The leap of the measured purity in barrel A 4 at the beginning of 2010 is unclear; a connection with an actual improvement of the purity can be excluded. The measured purity in barrel A 1 after middle 2016 is excluded due to problems which are not yet understood. Barrel A 2 and barrel C 4 monitors are not working properly.

eps version, pdf version

Measured impurity in oxygen equivalent of the liquid argon in the end-cap cryostat on side A (run 2): Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting at the beginning of 2015 until the end of 2018. Last letter A, B or C in the legend corresponds to the monitor position with respect to phi. Periods between pp-runs are marked hatched. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage.

eps version, pdf version

Measured impurity in oxygen equivalent of the liquid argon in the end-cap cryostat on side A (run 1 + run 2): Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting at the end of 2009 until the end of 2018. Last letter A, B or C in the legend corresponds to the monitor position with respect to phi. Periods between pp-runs are marked hatched. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage. The decreasing trend in all monitors before LS1 is correlated with the data taking periods. A clear explanation is not yet found, a change of other input parameters (like temperature or high voltage of the ionization chambers) is excluded.

eps version, pdf version

Measured impurity in oxygen equivalent of the liquid argon in the end-cap cryostat on side C (run 2): Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting at the beginning of 2015 until the end of 2018. Last letter A, B or C in the legend corresponds to the monitor position with respect to phi. Periods between pp-runs are marked hatched. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage. The measured purity in HEC 1 C B after middle 2016 is excluded due to problems which are not yet understood. HEC 1 C C, HEC 2 C B and EC C top monitors are not working properly.

eps version, pdf version

Measured impurity in oxygen equivalent of the liquid argon in the end-cap cryostat on side C (run 1 + run 2): Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting at the end of 2009 until the end of 2018. Last letter A, B or C in the legend corresponds to the monitor position with respect to phi. Periods between pp-runs are marked hatched. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage. The decreasing trend in all monitors before LS1 is correlated with the data taking periods. A clear explanation is not yet found, a change of other input parameters (like temperature or high voltage of the ionization chambers) is excluded. The measured purity in HEC 1 C B after middle 2016 is excluded due to problems which are not yet understood. HEC 1 C C, HEC 2 C B and EC C top monitors are not working properly.

eps version, pdf version

Measured impurity of the liquid argon in the barrel cryostat: Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting middle of 2009 until beginning of 2016. Periods between pp-runs are marked gray. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage. The decreasing trend in all monitors is correlated with the data taking periods. A clear explanation is not yet found, a change of other input parameters (like temperature or high voltage of the ionization chambers is excluded). The leap of the measured purity in barrel A4 at the beginning of 2009 is unclear; a connection with an actual improvement of the purity can be excluded. See here for more information.

eps - pdf

Measured impurity of the liquid argon in the end-cap cryostat on side A: Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting middle of 2009 until beginning of 2016. Periods between pp-runs are marked gray. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage. The decreasing trend in all monitors is correlated with the data taking periods. A clear explanation is not yet found, a change of other input parameters (like temperature or high voltage of the ionization chambers is excluded). See here for more information.

eps - pdf

Measured impurity of the liquid argon in the end-cap cryostat on side C: Each point shows the mean of the purity values measured during one week starting middle of 2009 until beginning of 2016. Periods between pp-runs are marked gray. Data points during collisions are not taken into account due to high radiation in the calorimeter that lead to signals in the ionization chambers. Most of the monitors show charge-up effects after periods of time without high voltage. The decreasing trend in all monitors is correlated with the data taking periods. A clear explanation is not yet found, a change of other input parameters (like temperature or high voltage of the ionization chambers is excluded). See here for more information.

eps - pdf

Noise, Calibration, Signal Reconstruction

Total Noise in the Liquid Argon Detector at the Electron Scale (2015)	Total noise (electronics and pile-up for <μ> = 14) at the electron scale (data) eps Total noise (electronics and pile-up for <μ> = 14) at the electron scale (MC) eps Ratio of total noise (electronics and pile-up for <μ> = 14) at the electron scale (data/MC) eps
Total Noise in the Liquid Argon Detector at the Electron Scale (2011)	Total noise (electronics and pile-up for <μ> = 14) at the electron scale (data) eps Total noise (electronics and pile-up for <μ> = 14) at the electron scale (MC) eps Ratio of total noise (electronics and pile-up for <μ> = 14) at the electron scale (data/MC) eps Electronics noise at the electron scale eps Expected Electronics Noise (eps) (From the ATLAS Detector paper)
Reconstruction of Missing Energy with Random Events	EtMiss 2008(LAr) eps EtMiss 2009(LAr) eps
Calibration stability plots from 2012 Details on calibration procedure More stability plots from 2012 Stability plots from 2011 Calibration Stability from 2009	Pedestal stability for LAr-EM in High Gain eps Pedestal stability for LAr-FCal in Medium Gain eps Pedestal stability for LAr-HEC in Medium Gain eps Gain relative stability for LAr-EM in High Gain eps Gain relative stability for LAr-FCal in Medium Gain eps Gain relative stability for LAr-HEC in Medium Gain eps
Calibration stability plots from 2011 Details on calibration procedure More stability plots from 2011 Calibration Stability from 2009	Pedestal stability for LAr-EM in High Gain Pedestal stability for LAr-FCal in Medium Gain Pedestal stability for LAr-HEC in Medium Gain Gain relative stability for LAr-EM in High Gain Gain relative stability for LAr-FCal in Medium Gain Gain relative stability for LAr-HEC in Medium Gain
Energy Reconstruction Formulae	Formulae Formulae and explanations pdf ppt
Signal Reconstruction Quality Across EM Calorimeter	Signal Reconstruction Quality Across EM Calorimeter pdf

Total Noise in the Liquid Argon Detector at the Electron Scale (2015)

Total noise (electronics and pile-up for <μ> = 14) at the electron scale (data) eps

Total noise (electronics and pile-up for <μ> = 14) at the electron scale (MC) eps

Ratio of total noise (electronics and pile-up for <μ> = 14) at the electron scale (data/MC) eps

Total Noise in the Liquid Argon Detector at the Electron Scale (2011)

Total noise (electronics and pile-up for <μ> = 14) at the electron scale (data) eps

Total noise (electronics and pile-up for <μ> = 14) at the electron scale (MC) eps

Ratio of total noise (electronics and pile-up for <μ> = 14) at the electron scale (data/MC) eps

Electronics noise at the electron scale eps

Expected Electronics Noise (eps)
(From the ATLAS Detector paper)

Reconstruction of Missing Energy with Random Events

http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/LIQARGON/Organization/RefPlots/calibration/TopoOnlyLAr.gif

EtMiss 2008(LAr)

eps

EtMiss 2009(LAr) eps

Calibration stability plots from 2012

Details on calibration procedure

More stability plots from 2012

Stability plots from 2011

Calibration Stability from 2009

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/LArCaloPublicResultsDetStatus/Stability_EM_PEDESTAL_H_ALL_RED_ON-ON_FT-1_Sl-1_Ch-1_user.png

Pedestal stability for LAr-EM in High Gain
eps

Pedestal stability for LAr-FCal in Medium Gain
eps

Pedestal stability for LAr-HEC in Medium Gain
eps

Gain relative stability for LAr-EM in High Gain
eps

Gain relative stability for LAr-FCal in Medium Gain
eps

Gain relative stability for LAr-HEC in Medium Gain
eps

Calibration stability plots from 2011

Details on calibration procedure

More stability plots from 2011

Calibration Stability from 2009

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/LArCaloPublicResultsDetStatus/Ped-HG-EM.gif

Pedestal stability for LAr-EM in High Gain

Pedestal stability for LAr-FCal in Medium Gain

Pedestal stability for LAr-HEC in Medium Gain

Gain relative stability for LAr-EM in High Gain

Gain relative stability for LAr-FCal in Medium Gain

Gain relative stability for LAr-HEC in Medium Gain

Energy Reconstruction Formulae

Formulae

Formulae and explanations
pdf

ppt

Signal Reconstruction Quality Across EM Calorimeter

http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/LIQARGON/Organization/RefPlots/calibration/QFactor.jpg

Signal Reconstruction Quality Across EM Calorimeter

pdf

Ionization Pulse Shape

Ionization Pulse Shape EM Barrel

Ionization Pulse Shape in the 4 EM Barrel layers	(PS) (eps) (Front) (eps) (Middle) (eps) (Back) (eps)

Ionization Pulse Shape in the 4 EM Barrel layers

(PS) (eps)

(Front) (eps)

(Middle) (eps)

(Back) (eps)

Ionization Pulse Shape EM endap

Ionization Pulse Shape in the EM endcap middle layer	(Middle,HV=2.3kV) (eps) (Middle,HV=2.1kV) (eps) (Middle,HV=1.7kV) (eps) (Middle,HV=1.5kV) (eps)

Ionization Pulse Shape in the EM endcap middle layer

(Middle,HV=2.3kV) (eps)

(Middle,HV=2.1kV) (eps)

(Middle,HV=1.7kV) (eps)

(Middle,HV=1.5kV) (eps)

Ionization Pulse Shape FCal

Ionization Pulse Shape in the FCal	(FCal 3 pulse shape from cosmic muon data) (eps)

Ionization Pulse Shape in the FCal

(FCal 3 pulse shape from cosmic muon data) (eps)

Ionization Pulse Shape HEC

Ionization Pulse Shape in the HEC	(HEC layer 1 pulse shape) (eps) (HEC layer 2 pulse shape) (eps) (HEC layer 3 pulse shape) (eps) (HEC layer 4 pulse shape) (eps)

Ionization Pulse Shape in the HEC

(HEC layer 1 pulse shape) (eps)

(HEC layer 2 pulse shape) (eps)

(HEC layer 3 pulse shape) (eps)

(HEC layer 4 pulse shape) (eps)

Monitoring plots

LAr Data Quality Inefficiency for 2011 proton-proton data taking - Some details
LAr Data Quality Inefficiency for 2011 lead-lead data taking - Some details
Noise bursts
Noise bursts fix in the presampler (Winter 08)
Pedestals and noise stability
Impact of FEB refurbishment (winter 09)
Monitoring of timing
DSP computation

Shutdown 2010-2011 - Splashes 2011

Figure with caption
Figure with caption
Figure with caption

The Electronic Performance Paper

Abstract :
The ATLAS detector has been designed for operation at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. ATLAS includes electromagnetic and hadronic liquid argon calorimeters, with almost 200,000 channels of data that must be sampled at the LHC bunch crossing frequency of 40 MHz. The calorimeter electronics calibration and readout are performed by custom electronics developed speciﬁcally for these purposes. This paper describes the system performance of the ATLAS liquid argon calibration and readout electronics, including noise, energy and time resolution, and long term stability, with data taken mainly from full-system calibration runs performed after installation of the system in the ATLAS detector hall at CERN.

Here is the "Performance of the electronic readout of the ATLAS liquid argon calorimeters" paper, with all the figures available.

Page variables

Local page variables

This section contains local page variables that you can use in editing this page to avoid hardcoding long paths etc.

To use the variable, just enclose it with %, like: %IMG{name}% which will turn into automatically.

If you require to introduce a new variable, simply add it to the list below.

Set IMGNAME = %IF{"attachments[name='%DEFAULT{default="fig1"}%.png']" then="%DEFAULT{default="fig1"}%.png" else="%IF{"attachments[name='%DEFAULT{default="fig1"}%.jpg']" then="%DEFAULT{default="fig1"}%.jpg" else="%IF{"attachments[name='%DEFAULT{default="fig1"}%.jpeg']" then="%DEFAULT{default="fig1"}%.jpeg" else="File '%DEFAULT{default="fig1"}%' not found!"}%"}%"}%
Set IMGPATH = /twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/LArCaloPublicResultsDetStatus/%IMGNAME{%DEFAULT{default="fig1"}%}%
Set IMG =
Set PDF = pdf version
Set EPS = eps version
Set PLOT = %IMG{%DEFAULT{default="fig1"}%}%
%EPS{%DEFAULT{default="fig1"}%}%, %PDF{%DEFAULT{default="fig1"}%}%
Set HALFPLOT = %IMG{"%DEFAULT{default="fig1"}%" IMGSIZE="175"}%
%EPS{%DEFAULT{default="fig1"}%}%, %PDF{%DEFAULT{default="fig1"}%}%

Responsible: EmmanuelMonnier

Last reviewed by: Never reviewed

Attachments

Topic attachments
I	Attachment	History	Action	Size	Date	Who	Comment
eps	BARREL_longterm_6.eps	r1	manage	653.4 K	2016-05-17 - 18:29	MartinAleksa	Purity Plots eps, png
pdf	BARREL_longterm_6.pdf	r1	manage	56.9 K	2016-05-17 - 18:27	MartinAleksa	Purity plots pdf
png	BARREL_longterm_6.png	r1	manage	61.4 K	2016-05-17 - 18:29	MartinAleksa	Purity Plots eps, png
eps	EMEC_HEC_A_longterm_6.eps	r1	manage	630.9 K	2016-05-17 - 18:29	MartinAleksa	Purity Plots eps, png
pdf	EMEC_HEC_A_longterm_6.pdf	r1	manage	50.0 K	2016-05-17 - 18:27	MartinAleksa	Purity plots pdf
png	EMEC_HEC_A_longterm_6.png	r1	manage	50.8 K	2016-05-17 - 18:29	MartinAleksa	Purity Plots eps, png
eps	EMEC_HEC_C_longterm_6.eps	r1	manage	591.3 K	2016-05-17 - 18:29	MartinAleksa	Purity Plots eps, png
pdf	EMEC_HEC_C_longterm_6.pdf	r1	manage	42.2 K	2016-05-17 - 18:27	MartinAleksa	Purity plots pdf
png	EMEC_HEC_C_longterm_6.png	r1	manage	42.8 K	2016-05-17 - 18:29	MartinAleksa	Purity Plots eps, png
jpg	SigRecFormula_Images_Comments.jpg	r1	manage	632.0 K	2017-02-16 - 15:24	MartinAleksa	Calibration formula
pdf	SigRecFormula_Images_Comments.pdf	r1	manage	70.8 K	2017-02-16 - 15:27	MartinAleksa	LAr Calibration
ppt	SigRecFormula_Images_Comments.ppt	r1	manage	137.0 K	2017-02-16 - 15:24	MartinAleksa	Calibration formula
eps	barrels_run12.eps	r1	manage	44.7 K	2019-01-29 - 10:42	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Barrel Run 1+2
pdf	barrels_run12.pdf	r1	manage	70.0 K	2019-01-29 - 10:42	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Barrel Run 1+2
png	barrels_run12.png	r1	manage	31.7 K	2019-01-29 - 10:42	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Barrel Run 1+2
eps	barrels_run2.eps	r1	manage	26.7 K	2019-01-29 - 10:40	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Barrel Run 2
pdf	barrels_run2.pdf	r1	manage	39.8 K	2019-01-29 - 10:40	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Barrel Run 2
png	barrels_run2.png	r1	manage	28.8 K	2019-01-29 - 10:40	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Barrel Run 2
eps	cryo_a_run12.eps	r1	manage	44.5 K	2019-01-29 - 10:45	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Endcap A Run 1+2
pdf	cryo_a_run12.pdf	r1	manage	80.9 K	2019-01-29 - 10:45	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Endcap A Run 1+2
png	cryo_a_run12.png	r1	manage	29.8 K	2019-01-29 - 10:45	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Endcap A Run 1+2
eps	cryo_a_run2.eps	r1	manage	27.5 K	2019-01-29 - 10:44	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Endcap A Run 2
pdf	cryo_a_run2.pdf	r1	manage	40.5 K	2019-01-29 - 10:44	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Endcap A Run 2
png	cryo_a_run2.png	r1	manage	26.5 K	2019-01-29 - 10:44	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Endcap A Run 2
eps	cryo_c_run12.eps	r1	manage	30.9 K	2019-01-29 - 10:46	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Endcap C Run 1+2
pdf	cryo_c_run12.pdf	r1	manage	58.2 K	2019-01-29 - 10:46	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Endcap C Run 1+2
png	cryo_c_run12.png	r1	manage	26.7 K	2019-01-29 - 10:46	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Endcap C Run 1+2
eps	cryo_c_run2.eps	r1	manage	20.6 K	2019-01-29 - 10:45	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Endcap C Run 2
pdf	cryo_c_run2.pdf	r1	manage	30.7 K	2019-01-29 - 10:45	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Endcap C Run 2
png	cryo_c_run2.png	r1	manage	22.2 K	2019-01-29 - 10:45	SteffenStaerz	Purity Plots Endcap C Run 2
pdf	lar-noise-2015data.pdf	r1	manage	151.4 K	2016-01-25 - 17:07	MartinAleksa	LAr total noise plots (2015)
eps	noise_2015_ratio.eps	r1	manage	17.9 K	2016-01-25 - 17:07	MartinAleksa	LAr total noise plots (2015)
pdf	noise_2015_ratio.pdf	r1	manage	27.0 K	2016-01-25 - 17:07	MartinAleksa	LAr total noise plots (2015)
png	noise_2015_ratio.png	r1	manage	74.2 K	2016-01-25 - 17:07	MartinAleksa	LAr total noise plots (2015)
eps	noise_data_2015.eps	r1	manage	17.6 K	2016-01-25 - 17:07	MartinAleksa	LAr total noise plots (2015)
pdf	noise_data_2015.pdf	r1	manage	27.7 K	2016-01-25 - 17:07	MartinAleksa	LAr total noise plots (2015)
png	noise_data_2015.png	r1	manage	77.0 K	2016-01-25 - 17:07	MartinAleksa	LAr total noise plots (2015)
eps	noise_mc_2015.eps	r1	manage	17.3 K	2016-01-25 - 17:07	MartinAleksa	LAr total noise plots (2015)
pdf	noise_mc_2015.pdf	r1	manage	27.1 K	2016-01-25 - 17:07	MartinAleksa	LAr total noise plots (2015)
png	noise_mc_2015.png	r1	manage	77.3 K	2016-01-25 - 17:07	MartinAleksa	LAr total noise plots (2015)

Topic revision: r37 - 2021-01-13 - EmmanuelMonnier

Account
- Log In

- Cern Search
- TWiki Search
- Google Search
Atlas All webs

Edit
Attach

Copyright &© 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback