The purpose of the group is to discuss and address the issues related to fiducial and differential cross sections as well as simplified template cross sections (STXS), within the LHCHXSWG WG2 structure.

Organization

Conveners

  • ATLAS: Jelena Jovicevic (IPB)
  • CMS: Matteo Bonanomi (UHH)
  • Theory: Frank Tackmann (DESY)

Communication and meetings

  • Group discussions: lhc-higgs-prop-fidSTXS[@]cern.ch
  • Contact with conveners: lhc-higgs-fidSTXS-convener[@]cern.ch

Meetings

  • Next meeting: TBD
Links to previous meetings on fiducial cross sections: Links to previous meetings on STXS:

Fiducial and differential cross sections

In theories beyond the SM, the properties of the 125 GeV Higgs boson may not be determined only by a simple scaling of couplings. Instead, the kinematic distributions in the various Higgs production and decay channels may be sensitively modified by BSM (incl. EFT) effects. Fiducial cross sections (FXS), i.e. cross sections, whether total or differential, for specific states within the phase space de fined by experimental selection and acceptance cuts, provide a largely model-independent way to test for such deviations in kinematic distributions. In particular, differential FXS are a powerful for scrutinizing the SM Lagrangian structure of the Higgs boson interactions, including tests for new tensorial couplings, non-standard production modes, determination of effective form factors, etc.

Simplified template cross sections (STXS)

The Higgs boson coupling measurements during the LHC Run1 had as their main results measured signal strength and multiplicative coupling modifiers. Simplified template cross sections (STXS) were developed to provide a natural way to evolve these coupling measurements in the future. Compared to the Run1 measurements, the STXS framework aims to separate more cleanly measurement and interpretation steps in order to reduce in a systematic fashion the theory dependencies that are folded into the measurements (including both the dependence on theoretical uncertainties and on the underlying physics model). In addition, they provide more finely-grained measurements (and hence more information for theoretical interpretations) while at the same time allowing and benefiting from the global combination of the measurements in all decay channels.

Here is a pictorial overview of the framework. The development was initiated at Les Houches 2015.
Details on the guiding principles, common object definitions, and specific bin definitions are documented in chapter III.2 of YR4 as well as the Les Houches 2015 proceedings.

The primary goals of the STXS framework are to maximize the sensitivity of the measurements while at the same time to minimize their theory dependence. Consequently, some of their defining features are:

  • Inclusive over the Higgs decays
    • This allows one to perform a global combination of all decay channels
  • Measure cross sections (instead of signal strengths), in mutually exclusive regions of phase space
  • Measure cross sections separated into production modes (or more generally kinematic templates)
    • Allows different efficiencies/acceptances for different production modes without incurring a dependence on the SM production mode mix
    • Currently, the main SM production processes act as kinematic templates, in the future more kinematic templates can be added (e.g. for a CP-odd Higgs)
  • Non-Higgs backgrounds are subtracted
    • In the future, one could add templates for BSM sensitive backgrounds (e.g. for pp->WW)
  • Simplified (idealized) bin definitions abstracted from the actual measurement categories
    • Allows for some acceptance corrections
    • Analyzes can use optimized selection at reconstruction level
The measured exclusive regions of phase space, called “bins” for simplicity, are specific to the different production modes. Their definitions are motivated by
  • Minimizing the dependence on theoretical uncertainties that are directly folded into the measurements
  • Maximizing experimental sensitivity
  • Isolation of possible BSM effects
  • Minimizing the number of bins without loss of experimental sensitivity
Since these are competing requirements a nontrivial compromise has to be achieved. In particular, to account for the evolving experimental sensitivity the STXS bins are thus defined in stages (corresponding to increasingly fine granularity)

Recommended binning : Stage 1.2

This section describes the second update of the Stage 1 binning (Stage 1.2). This definition supersedes the Stage 1 and Stage 1.1 binning described below, and should be used by new analyses performing STXS measurements.An overview of the binning can be found here.

Bin definitions

The Rivet tool that performs the STXS classification has also been updated to implement the Stage 1.2 scheme. The bins defined for each production process are as follows:

  • gg → H (gluon-fusion and gg → Z(→ qq) H)

PDF version simplifiedXS_ggF_1_2.png

NOTE: This process is defined as the usual gluon-fusion production including gg-induced EW corrections. This includes virtual EW corrections to the gg → H form factor as well as real EW corrections, corresponding to gg → ZH → qq H. (The latter are very small and are typically neglected at the present level of precision.)
Furthermore, the same binning should also be applied to the bbH process in analyses in which it is not distinguishable from gg → H. In this case, measurements should report the sum of gg→H + bbH for each bin.

  • EW qqH (VBF and qq → V(→ qq) H)

PDF version simplifiedXS_VBF_1_2.png

  • VH (qq+gg → V(→ leptons) H)

PDF version simplifiedXS_VH_1_2.png

  • ttH

PDF version simplifiedXS_ttH_1_2.png

Theory uncertainties

  • ggF :
    • Stage 1.2: The proposed uncertainty scheme, after discussion among ATLAS, CMS and theory communities, is summarized at this document. The implementation is under development.
    • Stage 1: the uncertainties are based on the "2017" scheme described in this document and implemented in this code. The scheme was developed for the Stage 1 bin definition.
  • EW qqH : A preliminary version of the uncertainty scheme is available in this tool. The numbers include VBF production only and should be updated to also include (V → qq)H
  • VH : The uncertainties as described in this note.
  • ttH : Uncertainties in bins of pTH are in preparation.

Other binning

Stage 0

Stage 0 bins

Stage 1 (Obsolete, use Stage 1.2 instead)

Stage 1 gg → H bins

Stage 1 EW qqH bins

Stage 1 VH bins

Stage 1.1 (Obsolete, use Stage 1.2 instead)

This section describes an updated definition of the Stage 1 binning (Stage 1.1). This definition supersedes the one provided above, and should be used by new analyses performing STXS measurements. The changes with respect to Stage 1 are not backwards-compatible (due to the VBF process which required some reorganization). A note describing these new binnings in more detail can be found here.

This update follows from discussions at the 2018 LHCHXSWG workshop and dedicated fid/dif/STXS subgroup meetings ( here and here).

The Rivet tool that performs the STXS classification has also been updated to implement the Stage 1.1 scheme.

  • gg → H (gluon-fusion and gg → Z(→ qq) H)

PDF version

NOTE: This process is defined as the usual gluon-fusion production including gg-induced EW corrections. This includes virtual EW corrections to the gg → H form factor as well as real EW corrections, corresponding to gg → ZH → qq H. (The latter are very small and are typically neglected at the present level of precision.)
Furthermore, the same binning should also be applied to the bbH process in analyses in which it is not distinguishable from gg → H. In this case, measurements should report the sum of gg→H + bbH for each bin.

  • EW qqH (VBF and qq → V(→ qq) H)

PDF version

  • VH (qq+gg → V(→ leptons) H)

PDF version

Code

The relevant code is hosted in the STXS gitlab area :

  • Classification : Rivet routines that assign STXS bin labels to a given MC event.
  • VBF Uncertainties : Code computing theory uncertainty values for events in the VBF categories.

References

Run 2 results

Run 1 results

  • Measurement of the transverse momentum spectrum of the Higgs boson produced in pp collisions at sqrt(s)=8 TeV using the H→WW decays, CMS Collaboration, CMS-PAS-HIG-15-010

  • Measurement of differential and integrated fiducial cross sections for Higgs boson production in the four-lepton decay channel in pp collisions at sqrt(s)= 7 and 8 TeV, CMS Collaboration, arXiv:1512.08377

  • Measurement of differential cross sections for Higgs boson production in the diphoton decay channel in pp collisions at sqrt(s)=8 TeV, CMS Collaboration, arXiv:1508.07819

  • Constraints on non-Standard Model Higgs boson interactions in an effective field theory using differential cross sections measured in the H→γγ decay channel at √s=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS Collaboration, arXiv:1508.02507

  • Measurements of the Total and Differential Higgs Boson Production Cross Sections Combining the H→γγ and H→ZZ*→4ℓ Decay Channels at √s=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 091801 (2015)

  • Fiducial and differential cross sections of Higgs boson production measured in the four-lepton decay channel in pp collisions at √s=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS Collaboration, Physics Letters B 738 (2014) 234-253

  • Measurements of fiducial and differential cross sections for Higgs boson production in the diphoton decay channel at √s=8 TeV with ATLAS, ATLAS Collaboration, JHEP09(2014)112

Theory: precision calculations, BSM effects, etc.

Selected references, certainly incomplete. Let us know to add your paper.

  • High energy resummation of transverse momentum distributions:Higgs in gluon fusion, Stefano Forte, Claudio Muselli, arXiv:1511.05561

  • Resummation ambiguities in the Higgs transverse-momentum spectrum in the Standard Model and beyond, Emanuele Bagnaschi, Robert V. Harlander, Hendrik Mantler, Alessandro Vicini, Marius Wiesemann, arXiv:1510.08850

  • Pushing Higgs Effective Theory to its Limits, Johann Brehmer, Ayres Freitas, David Lopez-Val, Tilman Plehn, arXiv:1510.03443

  • Fiducial cross sections for Higgs boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD, Fabrizio Caola, Kirill Melnikov, Markus Schulze arXiv:1508.02684

  • Benchmarks for Higgs Effective Theory: Extended Higgs Sectors, Martin Gorbahn, Jose Miguel No, Veronica Sanz, arXiv:1502.07352

  • Mass Effects in the Higgs-Gluon Coupling: Boosted vs Off-Shell Production, Malte Buschmann, Dorival Goncalves, Silvan Kuttimalai, Marek Schonherr, Frank Krauss, Tilman Plehn, arXiv:1410.5806

  • Resolving the Higgs-Gluon Coupling with Jets, Malte Buschman, Christoph Englert, Dorival Goncalves, Tilman Plehn, Michael Spannowsky, arXiv:1405.7651

  • Complete Higgs Sector Constraints on Dimension-6 Operators, John Ellis, Veronica Sanz, Tevong You, arXiv:1404.3667

  • Probing Higgs couplings with high pT Higgs production, Aleksandr Azatov, Ayan Paul, arXiv:1309.5273

  • Probing top-partners in Higgs+jets, Andrea Banfi, Adam Martin, Veronica Sanz, arXiv:1308.4771

  • Probing the spin-parity of the Higgs boson via jet kinematics in vector boson fusion, A. Djouadi, R.M. Godbole, B. Mellado, K. Mohan, arXiv:1301.4965

-- NicolasBerger - 2017-05-05

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
PDFpdf simplifiedXS.pdf r1 manage 18.2 K 2017-05-08 - 15:28 FrankTackmann  
PDFpdf simplifiedXS_VBF.pdf r1 manage 12.9 K 2017-05-08 - 15:27 FrankTackmann  
PDFpdf simplifiedXS_VBF_1.1.pdf r1 manage 13.7 K 2019-01-27 - 23:36 NicolasBerger  
PNGpng simplifiedXS_VBF_1.1.png r1 manage 78.2 K 2019-01-27 - 23:36 NicolasBerger  
PDFpdf simplifiedXS_VBF_1_2.pdf r1 manage 13.7 K 2019-10-18 - 11:47 NicolasBerger  
PNGpng simplifiedXS_VBF_1_2.png r1 manage 85.3 K 2019-10-18 - 11:47 NicolasBerger  
PDFpdf simplifiedXS_VH.pdf r1 manage 12.3 K 2017-05-08 - 15:27 FrankTackmann  
PDFpdf simplifiedXS_VH_1.1.pdf r1 manage 11.9 K 2019-01-27 - 23:36 NicolasBerger  
PNGpng simplifiedXS_VH_1.1.png r1 manage 60.4 K 2019-01-27 - 23:36 NicolasBerger  
PDFpdf simplifiedXS_VH_1_2.pdf r1 manage 11.9 K 2019-10-18 - 11:47 NicolasBerger  
PNGpng simplifiedXS_VH_1_2.png r1 manage 44.3 K 2019-10-18 - 11:47 NicolasBerger  
PDFpdf simplifiedXS_ggF.pdf r1 manage 12.9 K 2017-05-08 - 15:27 FrankTackmann  
PDFpdf simplifiedXS_ggF_1.1.pdf r1 manage 13.0 K 2019-01-27 - 23:36 NicolasBerger  
PNGpng simplifiedXS_ggF_1.1.png r1 manage 75.9 K 2019-01-27 - 23:36 NicolasBerger  
PDFpdf simplifiedXS_ggF_1.2_theory_uncertainty.pdf r1 manage 465.7 K 2021-06-14 - 22:40 HongtaoYang  
PDFpdf simplifiedXS_ggF_1_2.pdf r1 manage 13.4 K 2019-10-18 - 11:47 NicolasBerger  
PNGpng simplifiedXS_ggF_1_2.png r1 manage 90.8 K 2019-10-18 - 11:47 NicolasBerger  
PDFpdf simplifiedXS_stage0.pdf r1 manage 10.4 K 2017-05-08 - 15:23 FrankTackmann  
PDFpdf simplifiedXS_ttH_1_2.pdf r1 manage 9.1 K 2019-10-18 - 11:47 NicolasBerger  
PNGpng simplifiedXS_ttH_1_2.png r1 manage 22.4 K 2019-10-18 - 11:47 NicolasBerger  
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r27 < r26 < r25 < r24 < r23 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r27 - 2024-03-08 - JelenaJovicevic
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    LHCPhysics All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright &© 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback