Working group for VH calculations
Role of subgroup: conduit for theorists to get information to experiments (and vice-versa).
A road-map (to be updated) of the HXSWG-VH activities within the Higgs Cross Section WG1 can be found
here
General information
Guidelines for state-of-the-art VH MC+PS predictions for experimental collaborations
- currently in use: Drell-Yan VH production, QCD@MiNLO, PowhegMiNLO +Pythia8; loop-induced ggZH production, QCD@LO, Powheg+Pythia8 [Higgs decay treated by Pythia8 parton-shower]
MC+PS prediction 1-D reweighting to EW@NLO as f(pTV) from HAWK VH calculation
- higher-order in QCD: NNLOPS reweighting for Drell-Yan VH production, Hbb@NLO decay implemented in Powheg
- higher-order in EW: Powheg QCD+EW@MiNLO accuracy
- loop-induced ggZH: available tools for ggZH+1jet@LO (multi-leg setup), see below
Note: Powheg
QCD+EW@MiNLO not easily reweight-able to NNLOPS accuracy. Two options: 1) NNLOPS prediction with ad-hoc reweighting to
EW@NLO calculation, 2) Powheg
QCD+EW@MiNLO without NNLOPS reweighting
Goal: investigate the effect of each possible improvement over the currently used setup, and provide general guidelines for experimental collaboration on which tools to use and how to combine them.
Deliverables: guidelines for experiments
Loop-induced gg->ZH
Cross-section theory predictions - possible improvements
- try to improve approximation (tension between effectiveness of HEFT and boosted region where gg contribution is large);
- can we exploit similarities with (very similar) gg—>HH process of G. Heinrich et al;
- is there any mileage in a direct appeal to the Goldstone equivalence theorem (perhaps applies well enough in boosted region)?
MC+PS predictions - possible short-term improvements
Goal: investigate differences in modeling for the main gg->ZH variables when using
0+1jet@LO multi-leg setup, and improvement in QCD perturbative uncertainties across the typical VH phase space
Deliverables: possibly public note from HXSWG, guidelines for experiments
Background discussion: Vector boson in association with heavy flavors production
- Desire within experiments for more guidance/sharing of experience with background generation and benchmarking in boosted region.
- General agreement that, while not the focus of this subgroup, we should help to facilitate such discussions.
- Host discussion / overview ATLAS vs CMS V+hf background comparison in the context of VH(bb) analysis
VH theoretical uncertainties under simplified template cross-section approach (STXS)
QCD perturbative uncertainties
- How should the calculation of uncertainties for VH be handled under simplified template cross-section approach (STXS), c.f. YR4.
- In particular, correlated uncertainties between jet bins — either using Stewart/Tackmann or other similar approaches.
- Tools under discussion: PowhegMiNLO +Pythia8 MC+PS; hv@nnlo fixed order calculation
Deliverables: guidelines for the implementation of QCD perturbative uncertainties in the STXS VH
stage-1.1 binning scheme; possibly softare tool for the implementation of uncertainties
EW prediction and uncertainties
- As a first step, estimate the EW@NLO correction for each bin of STXS VH stage-1.1
- As a second step, consider how to estimate EW@NLO uncertainties for the STXS VH stage-1.1
ATLAS / CMS comparisons and points of common discussion
- HXSWG-VH often hosts ATLAS / CMS discussion for the VH(bb) experimental results, so far corresponding to main experimental publications
Other material
VH page for YR4
useful links