CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-SUS-16-032
Search for direct production of bottom and top squark pairs in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV
Abstract: This note presents a search for direct production of bottom or top squark pairs in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC in 2016. The data used correspond to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb$^{-1}$. This search is performed in a final state of two, three, or four jets accompanied by a significant imbalance in the transverse momentum. No statistically significant excess of events is found beyond the expected contribution from standard model processes. Exclusion limits are set in the context of simplified models of bottom- or top-squark pair production. Bottom squarks with masses below 1225 GeV are excluded at 95%CL for small values of the neutralino mass. Top squarks with masses below 525 GeV are excluded if the mass difference to the lightest neutralino is close to 10 GeV.
Figures & Tables Summary Additional Figures & Tables References CMS Publications
Additional information on efficiencies needed for reinterpretation of these results are available here.
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Diagrams showing the pair production of top or bottom squarks followed by their decays according to $\tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } \rightarrow \mathrm{ b } \tilde{\chi}^{0} _1$ (left) and $\tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } \rightarrow \tilde{\mathrm{c}} \tilde{\chi}^{0} _1$ (right).

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Diagram showing the pair production of bottom squarks followed by their decays according to $\tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } \rightarrow \mathrm{ b } \tilde{\chi}^{0} _1$.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Diagram showing the pair production of top squarks followed by their decays according to $\tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } \rightarrow \tilde{\mathrm{c}} \tilde{\chi}^{0} _1$.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Distribution of ${m_{\mathrm {CT}}}$ (left) and ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ (right) for the search in the non-compressed region as obtained from simulation. The stacked, filled histograms represent different background components while the lines show three different model points for bottom squark production.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Distribution of ${m_{\mathrm {CT}}}$ for the search in the non-compressed region as obtained from simulation. The stacked, filled histograms represent different background components while the lines show three different model points for bottom squark production.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Distribution of ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ for the search in the non-compressed region as obtained from simulation. The stacked, filled histograms represent different background components while the lines show three different model points for bottom squark production.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Distributions of the combined b-, c-tagged jet, and SV multiplicity (left), and ${E_{ \mathrm {T}}^{ \mathrm {miss}}}$ for events with at least one b- or c-tagged jet (right) after the baseline selection for the compressed region as obtained from simulation. The stacked, filled histograms represent different background components while the lines show three different model points for bottom squark production.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Distributions of the combined b-, c-tagged jet, and SV multiplicity after the baseline selection for the compressed region as obtained from simulation. The stacked, filled histograms represent different background components while the lines show three different model points for bottom squark production.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Distributions of ${E_{ \mathrm {T}}^{ \mathrm {miss}}}$ for events with at least one b- or c-tagged jet after the baseline selection for the compressed region as obtained from simulation. The stacked, filled histograms represent different background components while the lines show three different model points for bottom squark production.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Yields in the signal regions targeting the non-compressed (top left) and compressed (top right: ${N_{\mathrm {b-tags}}} =$ 1, 2, bottom left: ${N_{\mathrm {c-tags}}} = $ 1, 2, bottom right: ${N_{\mathrm {b-tags}}} + {N_{\mathrm {c-tags}}} =$ 0) scenarios. Data are shown as black points. The background predictions are represented by the stacked, filled histograms. The expected yields for two signal models are also shown. The lower panels show the ratio of data over total background prediction in each signal region.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Yields in the signal region targeting the non-compressed scenario. Data are shown as black points. The background predictions are represented by the stacked, filled histograms. The expected yields for two signal models are also shown. The lower panel shows the ratio of data over total background prediction.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Yields in the signal region targeting the compressed with ${N_{\mathrm {b-tags}}} =$ 1, 2 scenario. Data are shown as black points. The background predictions are represented by the stacked, filled histograms. The expected yields for two signal models are also shown. The lower panel shows the ratio of data over total background prediction.

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
Yields in the signal region targeting the non-compressed compressed with ${N_{\mathrm {c-tags}}} = $ 1, 2 scenario. Data are shown as black points. The background predictions are represented by the stacked, filled histograms. The expected yields for two signal models are also shown. The lower panel shows the ratio of data over total background prediction.

png pdf
Figure 4-d:
Yields in the signal region targeting the compressed with ${N_{\mathrm {b-tags}}} + {N_{\mathrm {c-tags}}} =$ 0) scenario. Data are shown as black points. The background predictions are represented by the stacked, filled histograms. The expected yields for two signal models are also shown. The lower panel shows the ratio of data over total background prediction.

png pdf
Figure 5:
The 95% CL limits on the cross section, assuming 100% BR for the decay of the top squark shown in the legend (left). The combined 95% CL exclusion limits for top squark pair production assuming 100% branching fraction to the decay $\tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } \rightarrow \tilde{\mathrm{c}} \tilde{\chi}^{0} _1$ (right). The mass limits are shown as a black line for the observed limit and as a red line for the expected limit.

png pdf root
Figure 5-a:
The 95% CL limits on the cross section, assuming 100% BR for the decay of the top squark shown in the legend. The mass limits are shown as a black line for the observed limit and as a red line for the expected limit.

png pdf root
Figure 5-b:
The combined 95% CL exclusion limits for top squark pair production assuming 100% branching fraction to the decay $\tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } \rightarrow \tilde{\mathrm{c}} \tilde{\chi}^{0} _1$. The mass limits are shown as a black line for the observed limit and as a red line for the expected limit.

png pdf
Figure 6:
The covariance and correlation matrices for the estimated backgrounds in the compressed and non-compressed search regions.

png pdf root
Figure 6-a:
The covariance matrix for the estimated backgrounds in the compressed search region.

png pdf root
Figure 6-b:
The correlation matrix for the estimated backgrounds in the compressed search region.

png pdf root
Figure 6-c:
The covariance matrix for the estimated backgrounds in the non-compressed search region.

png pdf root
Figure 6-d:
The correlation matrix for the estimated backgrounds in the non-compressed search region.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
The ${m_{\mathrm {CT}}}$ and ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ signal bins in the non-compressed search region.

png pdf
Table 2:
The signal bin definitions in the compressed search region.

png pdf
Table 3:
Baseline selections in both the non-compressed and compressed regions.

png pdf
Table 4:
Typical ranges for the different systematic uncertainties on the lost lepton background estimate.

png pdf
Table 5:
Observed number of events and background prediction (individual, total) in the non-compressed region. The uncertainties shown combine the statistical and systematic components.

png pdf
Table 6:
Observed number of events and background prediction (individual and total) in the compressed region with ${N_{\mathrm {b-tags}}} = $ 1, 2. the uncertainties shown combine the statistical and systematic components.

png pdf
Table 7:
Observed number of events and background prediction (individual and total) in the compressed region with ${N_{\mathrm {c-tags}}} =$ 1, 2. The uncertainties shown combine the statistical and systematic components.

png pdf
Table 8:
Observed number of events and background prediction (individual and total) in the compressed region with ${N_{\mathrm {b-tags}}} + {N_{\mathrm {c-tags}}} =$ 0. The uncertainties shown combine the statistical and systematic components.

png pdf
Table 9:
The bin number and definition in the compressed search region.
Summary
A search for pair production of bottom and top squarks is reported, based on a data sample of pp collisions collected with the CMS detector at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in 2016, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb$^{-1}$. Final states with two, three, and four jets, two of which originate from b or c quarks, and significant ${E_{\, \mathrm{T}}^{\, \mathrm{miss}}} $ have been analyzed. The search has been performed in exclusive binned signal regions defined by the number of jets identified as originating from a b or c quark, missing energy, scalar sum of the jets $p_{\mathrm{T}}$, and the contransverse mass. The standard model backgrounds per bin have been estimated from data control samples. We observe no excess above the SM predictions. Exclusion limits are set at the 95% CL on the simplified model production of a pair of bottom (top) squarks, with each bottom (top) squark decaying to a bottom (charm) quark and the lightest neutralino. The production of bottom squarks with masses up to 1225 GeV is excluded at 95% confidence level for neutralino masses less than 100 GeV. Top squarks with masses below 525 GeV are excluded if mass splitting between a top squark and an LSP is close to 10 GeV.
Additional Figures

png pdf
Additional Figure 1:
Observed significances for simplified models of top squark pair production in the $\tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } \rightarrow \mathrm{ b } \tilde{\chi}^{0} _1$ ("T2bb") decay scenario.

png pdf
Additional Figure 2:
Observed significances for simplified models of top squark pair production in the $\tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } \rightarrow \tilde{\mathrm{c}} \tilde{\chi}^{0} _1$ ("T2cc") decay scenario.
Additional Tables

png pdf
Additional Table 1:
Event yields from simulation for two signal points ($m_{\tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } } = $ 900 GeV and $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0} _1} =$ 300 GeV) and ($m_{\tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } } =$ 1200 GeV and $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0} _1} =$ 100 GeV) after applying each requirement in the non-compressed search region. The numbers are normalized to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb$^{-1}$ and the uncertainties correspond to statistical uncertainty from the MC samples.

png pdf
Additional Table 2:
Event yields from simulation for two signal points ($m_{\tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } } =$ 550 GeV and $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0} _1} =$ 500 GeV) and ($m_{\tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } } =$ 400 GeV and $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0} _1} =$ 370 GeV) after applying each requirement in the compressed search region. The numbers are normalized to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb$^{-1}$ and the uncertainties correspond to statistical uncertainty from the MC samples.
References
1 G. 't Hooft Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking NATO Sci. Ser. B 59 (1980)135
2 E. Witten Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry Nucl. Phys. B 188 (1981) 513
3 M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki Supersymmetric technicolor Nucl. Phys. B 189 (1981) 575
4 S. Dimopoulos and S. Raby Supercolor Nucl. Phys. B 192 (1981) 353
5 S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi Softly broken supersymmetry and SU(5) Nucl. Phys. B 193 (1981) 150
6 R. K. Kaul and P. Majumdar Cancellation of quadratically divergent mass corrections in globally supersymmetric spontaneously broken gauge theories Nucl. Phys. B 199 (1982) 36
7 J. Wess and B. Zumino Supergauge transformations in four-dimensions Nucl. Phys. B 70 (1974) 39
8 G. R. Farrar and P. Fayet Phenomenology of the Production, Decay, and Detection of New Hadronic States Associated with Supersymmetry PLB 76 (1978) 575
9 C. Boehm, A. Djouadi, and M. Drees Light scalar top quarks and supersymmetric dark matter PRD 62 (2000) 035012 hep-ph/9911496
10 C. Balazs, M. Carena, and C. E. M. Wagner Dark matter, light stops and electroweak baryogenesis PRD 70 (2004) 015007 hep-ph/403224
11 G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest Supersymmetric dark matter PR 267 (1996) 195 hep-ph/9506380
12 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
13 A. Delgado et al. The light stop window EPJC73 (2013), no. 3 1212.6847
14 ATLAS Collaboration Search for a supersymmetric partner to the top quark in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRL 109 (2012) 211802 1208.1447
15 ATLAS Collaboration Search for direct top squark pair production in final states with one isolated lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum in $ \sqrt{s}=$ 7 TeV $ pp $ collisions using 4.7 fb$ ^{-1} $ of ATLAS data PRL 109 (2012) 211803 1208.2590
16 ATLAS Collaboration Search for a heavy top-quark partner in final states with two leptons with the ATLAS detector at the LHC JHEP 11 (2012) 094 1209.4186
17 ATLAS Collaboration Search for direct top-squark pair production in final states with two leptons in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 06 (2014) 124 1403.4853
18 ATLAS Collaboration Search for direct third-generation squark pair production in final states with missing transverse momentum and two b-jets in $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV $ pp $ collisions with the ATLAS detector JHEP 10 (2013) 189 1308.2631
19 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of Spin Correlation in Top-Antitop Quark Events and Search for Top Squark Pair Production in pp Collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 8 TeV Using the ATLAS Detector PRL 114 (2015) 142001 1412.4742
20 ATLAS Collaboration Search for pair-produced third-generation squarks decaying via charm quarks or in compressed supersymmetric scenarios in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 90 (2014) 052008 1407.0608
21 ATLAS Collaboration ATLAS Run 1 searches for direct pair production of third-generation squarks at the Large Hadron Collider EPJC 75 (2015) 510 1506.08616
22 CMS Collaboration Search for top-squark pair production in the single-lepton final state in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 8 TeV EPJC 73 (2013) 2677 CMS-SUS-13-011
1308.1586
23 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in hadronic final states with missing transverse energy using the variables $ \alpha_\mathrm{T} $ and b-quark multiplicity in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV EPJC 73 (2013) 2568 CMS-SUS-12-028
1303.2985
24 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry using razor variables in events with $ b $-tagged jets in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PRD 91 (2015) 052018 CMS-SUS-13-004
1502.00300
25 CMS Collaboration Searches for third-generation squark production in fully hadronic final states in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 8 TeV JHEP 06 (2015) 116 CMS-SUS-14-001
1503.08037
26 CMS Collaboration Search for direct pair production of supersymmetric top quarks decaying to all-hadronic final states in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 8 TeV EPJC 76 (2016) 460 CMS-SUS-13-023
1603.00765
27 CMS Collaboration Particle Flow Event Reconstruction in CMS and Performance for Jets, Taus and MET
28 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the Particle-Flow Reconstruction in Minimum-Bias and Jet Events from pp Collisions at 7 TeV
29 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the particle-flow event reconstruction with leptons from J/Psi and W decays at 7 TeV
30 M. Cacciari, P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm JHEP 08 (2008) 063
31 M. Cacciari, M. Salam, P. Gavin, and G. Soyez Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2007) 119 0707.1378
32 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS missing transverse momentum reconstruction in pp data at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P02006 CMS-JME-13-003
1411.0511
33 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
34 CMS Collaboration Identification of b-quark jets with the CMS experiment JINST 8 (2013) P04013 CMS-BTV-12-001
1211.4462
35 CMS Collaboration Identification of c-quark jets at the CMS experiment CMS-PAS-BTV-16-001 CMS-PAS-BTV-16-001
36 J. Alwall et al. MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond JHEP 06 (2011) 128 1106.0522
37 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
38 S. M. T. Sjostrand and P. Z. Skands A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 CPC 178 (2008) 852--867
39 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4 --- simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
40 CMS Collaboration Fast simulation of the CMS detector J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 219 (2010)
41 CMS Collaboration Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2008) 119--126 0707.1378
42 D. Tovey Supersymmetric particle mass measurement with boost-corrected constransverse mass JHEP 03 (2010)
43 G. Polesello and D. Tovey On measuring the masses of pair-produced semi-invisibly decaying particles at hadron colliders JHEP 04 (2008)
44 CMS Collaboration Collaboration Identification of double-b quark jets in boosted event topologies Technical Report CMS-PAS-BTV-15-002, CERN, Geneva
45 Particle Data Group Collaboration Review of Particle Physics CPC 38 (2014) 090001
46 CMS Collaboration Interpretation of Searches for Supersymmetry with simplified Models PRD 88 (2013), no. 5, 052017 CMS-SUS-11-016
1301.2175
47 J. Alwall, P. Schuster, and N. Toro Simplified Models for a First Characterization of New Physics at the LHC PRD 79 (2009)
48 J. Alwall, M.-P. Le, M. Lisanti, and et al Model-Independent Jets plus Missing Energy Searches PRD 79 (2009)
49 LHC New Physics Working Group Collaboration Simplified Models for LHC New Physics Searches JPG 39 (2012) 105005 1105.2838
50 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the CL s technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
51 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 434 (1999) 435
52 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011
53 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
54 A. Kulesza and L. Motyka Threshold resummation for squark-antisquark and 645 gluino-pair production at the LHC PRL 102 (2009) 111802
55 A. Kulesza and L. Motyka Soft gluon resummation for the production of gluino-gluino and squark-antisquark pairs at the LHC PRL 80 (2009) 095004
56 W. Beenakker and et al. Soft-gluon resummation for squark and gluino hadroproduction JHEP 12 (2009) 041
57 W. Beenakker and et al. Squark and gluino hadroproduction Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26 (2011) 2637
58 M. Kramer and et al. Supersymmetry production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 7 TeV 1206.2892
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN