CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-TOP-16-022
Measurement of the top quark mass with muon+jets final states in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV
Abstract: The mass of the top quark is measured using a sample of $\rm{t}\bar{\rm t}$ candidate events with one muon and at least four jets in the final state, collected by CMS in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV at the CERN LHC. The candidate events are selected from data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.2 fb$^{-1}$. For each event the mass is reconstructed from a kinematic fit of the decay products to a $\rm{t}\bar{\rm t}$ hypothesis. The top quark mass is determined simultaneously with an overall jet energy scale factor (JSF), constrained by the known mass of the W boson in $\rm{q}\bar{\rm q}$ decays. The estimator is calibrated on samples simulated at next-to-leading order matched to parton shower. The top quark mass is measured to be 172.62 $\pm$ 0.38 (stat.+JSF) $\pm$ 0.70 (syst.) GeV.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
(a) Invariant mass $m_\mathrm{ W } ^\text {reco}$ of the two untagged jets and (b) the invariant mass $ {m_{\mathrm{ t } }} ^\text {reco}$ of the two untagged jets and one of the b-tagged jets after the b tagging requirement. The vertical bars show the statistical uncertainty and the hatched bands show the statistical and systematic uncertainties considered in Sec. 4 added in quadrature. The lower portion of each panel show the ratio of the yields between the collision data and the simulation. The simulations are normalized to the luminosity.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
The invariant mass $m_\mathrm{ W } ^\text {reco}$ of the two untagged jets. The vertical bars show the statistical uncertainty and the hatched bands show the statistical and systematic uncertainties considered in Sec. 4 added in quadrature. The lower portion of the panel shows the ratio of the yields between the collision data and the simulation. The simulations are normalized to the luminosity.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
The invariant mass $ {m_{\mathrm{ t } }} ^\text {reco}$ of the two untagged jets and one of the b-tagged jets after the b tagging requirement. The vertical bars show the statistical uncertainty and the hatched bands show the statistical and systematic uncertainties considered in Sec. 4 added in quadrature. The lower portion of the panel shows the ratio of the yields between the collision data and the simulation. The simulations are normalized to the luminosity.

png pdf
Figure 2:
(a) The reconstructed W boson masses $m_\mathrm{ W } ^\text {reco}$ and (b) the fitted top quark masses $ {m_{\mathrm{ t } }} ^\text {fit}$ after the goodness-of-fit selection and the weighting by $P_\mathrm {gof}$. The vertical bars show the statistical uncertainty and the hatched bands show the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. The lower portion of each panel show the ratio of the yields between the collision data and the simulation.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
The reconstructed W boson masses $m_\mathrm{ W } ^\text {reco}$. The vertical bars show the statistical uncertainty and the hatched bands show the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. The lower portion of the panel shows the ratio of the yields between the collision data and the simulation.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
The fitted top quark masses $ {m_{\mathrm{ t } }} ^\text {fit}$ after the goodness-of-fit selection and the weighting by $P_\mathrm {gof}$. The vertical bars show the statistical uncertainty and the hatched bands show the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. The lower portion of the panel shows the ratio of the yields between the collision data and the simulation.

png pdf
Figure 3:
(a) Mean difference between the calibrated and generated values of $ {m_{\mathrm{ t } }} $ and JSF as a function of different generated $m_{\mathrm{ t } ,\text {gen}}$ and five values of JSF; (b) width of the pull distributions after the calibration. The colored dashed lines correspond to straight line fits, the black solid line corresponds to a constant fit to all calibration points. The error bars in (a) indicate the statistical uncertainty on the mean difference.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Mean difference between the calibrated and generated values of $ {m_{\mathrm{ t } }} $ and JSF as a function of different generated $m_{\mathrm{ t } ,\text {gen}}$ and five values of JSF. The colored dashed lines correspond to straight line fits, the black solid line corresponds to a constant fit to all calibration points. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainty on the mean difference.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Width of the pull distributions after the calibration. The colored dashed lines correspond to straight line fits, the black solid line corresponds to a constant fit to all calibration points. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainty on the mean difference.

png pdf
Figure 4:
(a) The likelihood ($-2 \Delta \log\left (\mathcal {L}\right )$) measured for the muon+jets final state. The ellipses correspond to contours of $-2 \Delta \log\left (\mathcal {L}\right ) = $ 1 (4, 9) allowing the construction one (two, three) $\sigma $ statistical intervals of $ {m_{\mathrm{ t } }} $. (b) The statistical uncertainty distribution obtained from pseudo-experiments is compared to the uncertainty of the measurement in data.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The likelihood ($-2 \Delta \log\left (\mathcal {L}\right )$) measured for the muon+jets final state. The ellipses correspond to contours of $-2 \Delta \log\left (\mathcal {L}\right ) = $ 1 (4, 9) allowing the construction one (two, three) $\sigma $ statistical intervals of $ {m_{\mathrm{ t } }} $.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The statistical uncertainty distribution obtained from pseudo-experiments is compared to the uncertainty of the measurement in data.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Comparison of this result (in red) with previous measurements with lepton+jets final states [45,9,46,36,7] and the CMS [7] and world [47] averages.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
List of systematic uncertainties for the fit to the muon+jets data set.
Summary
The mass of the top quark has been measured with high precision by CMS in Run 1 of the LHC. The most precise of these measurements is repeated using the first data of Run 2 and POWHEG v2 interfaced to PYTHIA 8 with the CUETP8M1 tune for the simulation. Candidate events are selected from $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.2 fb$^{-1}$ requiring one muon and at least four jets with two b tags in the final state. The top quark mass is measured to be 172.62 $\pm$ 0.38 (stat.+JSF) $\pm$ 0.70 (syst.) GeV from the 5798 selected events. This result is consistent with the CMS measurements of Run 1 and no impact from the new reference generator or changes in the experimental setup is observed. This preliminary measurement will serve as a reference for improved measurements of the top quark mass with the Run 2 data.
References
1 K. A. Olive Review of Particle Physics CPC 40 (2016) 100001
2 S. Moch et al. High precision fundamental constants at the TeV scale DESY-14-081, MITP-14-036 1405.4781
3 P. Marquard, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Steinhauser Quark Mass Relations to Four-Loop Order in Perturbative QCD PRL 114 (2015) 142002 1502.01030
4 G. Corcella Interpretation of the top-quark mass measurements: a theory overview in Proceedings, 8th International Workshop on Top Quark Physics (TOP2015): Ischia, Italy 1511.08429
5 M. Beneke, P. Marquard, P. Nason, and M. Steinhauser On the ultimate uncertainty of the top quark pole mass DESY-16-082, TTP16-016, TUM-HEP-1044-16 1605.03609
6 M. Butenschoen et al. Top Quark Mass Calibration for Monte Carlo Event Generators IFT-UAM-CSIC-16-069, FTUAM-16-28, MIT-CTP-4820, UWTHPH-2016-13, DESY-16-150 1608.01318
7 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the top quark mass using proton-proton data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV PRD 93 (2016) 072004 CMS-TOP-14-022
1509.04044
8 CMS Collaboration Combinations of the CMS alternative technique measurements of the top quark mass CMS-PAS-TOP-15-012 CMS-PAS-TOP-15-012
9 D0 Collaboration Precision measurement of the top-quark mass in lepton+jets final states PRD 91 (2015) 112003 1501.07912
10 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
11 CMS Collaboration CMS Luminosity Measurement for the 2015 Data Taking Period CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001
12 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential cross sections for top quark pair production using the lepton+jets final state in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV Accepted for publication in PRD CMS-TOP-16-008
1610.04191
13 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
14 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
15 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
16 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, P. Nason, and E. Re Top-pair production and decay at NLO matched with parton showers JHEP 04 (2015) 114 1412.1828
17 T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual JHEP 05 (2006) 026 hep-ph/0603175
18 T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 CPC 178 (2008) 852--867 0710.3820
19 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
20 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
21 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
22 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top++: A Program for the Calculation of the Top-Pair Cross-Section at Hadron Colliders CPC 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
23 Y. Li and F. Petriello Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in FEWZ PRD 86 (2012) 094034 1208.5967
24 P. Kant et al. HatHor for single top-quark production: Updated predictions and uncertainty estimates for single top-quark production in hadronic collisions CPC 191 (2015) 74 1406.4403
25 N. Kidonakis NNLL threshold resummation for top-pair and single-top production Phys. Part. Nucl. 45 (2014) 714 1210.7813
26 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4---a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
27 J. Allison et al. Geant4 developments and applications IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (2006) 270
28 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the Particle-Flow Reconstruction in Minimum-Bias and Jet Events from pp Collisions at 7 TeV CDS
29 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Dispelling the $ N^{3} $ myth for the $ k_{\rm t} $ jet-finder PLB 641 (2006) 57 hep-ph/0512210
30 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_{\rm t} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
31 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
32 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
33 CMS Collaboration Identification of b quark jets at the CMS experiment in the LHC Run 2 CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001 CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001
34 \DZERO Collaboration Direct measurement of the top quark mass at D0 PRD 58 (1998) 052001 hep-ex/9801025
35 DELPHI Collaboration Measurement of the mass and width of the W boson in $ {\rm e}^{+}{\rm e}^{-} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 161-209 GeV EPJC 55 (2008) 1 0803.2534
36 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the top-quark mass in $ t\bar{t} $ events with lepton+jets final states in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 12 (2012) 105 CMS-TOP-11-015
1209.2319
37 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Jet energy scale uncertainty correlations between ATLAS and CMS at 8 TeV ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-049, CMS-PAS-JME-15-001
38 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
39 M. Bahr et al. Herwig++ physics and manual EPJC 58 (2008) 639 0803.0883
40 ALEPH Collaboration Study of the fragmentation of b quarks into B mesons at the Z peak PLB 512 (2001) 30--48 hep-ex/0106051
41 DELPHI Collaboration A study of the b-quark fragmentation function with the DELPHI detector at LEP I and an averaged distribution obtained at the Z Pole EPJC 71 (2011) 1557 1102.4748
42 CMS Collaboration Investigations of the impact of the parton shower tuning in Pythia 8 in the modelling of $ \mathrm{t\overline{t}} $ at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 and 13 TeV CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021 CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021
43 M. Czakon, D. Heymes, and A. Mitov High-precision differential predictions for top-quark pairs at the LHC PRL 116 (2016) 082003 1511.00549
44 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the differential cross section for $ \mathrm{t \bar t} $ production in the dilepton final state at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-TOP-16-011 CMS-PAS-TOP-16-011
45 CDF Collaboration Precision Top-Quark Mass Measurement at CDF PRL 109 (2012) 152003
46 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the top quark mass in the $ t\bar{t}\rightarrow \text{ lepton+jets } $ and $ t\bar{t}\rightarrow \text{ dilepton } $ channels using $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV ATLAS data EPJC 75 (2015) 330 1503.05427
47 ATLAS, CDF, CMS, \DZERO Collaborations First combination of Tevatron and LHC measurements of the top-quark mass ATLAS-CONF-2014-008, CDF-NOTE-11071, CMS-PAS-TOP-13-014, D0-NOTE-6416 1403.4427
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN