CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-EXO-12-054 ; CERN-PH-EP-2015-297
Search for dark matter and unparticles produced in association with a Z boson in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV
Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 052011 [Erratum]
Abstract: A search for evidence of particle dark matter (DM) and unparticle production at the LHC has been performed using events containing two charged leptons, consistent with the decay of a Z boson, and large missing transverse momentum. This study is based on data collected with the CMS detector corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.7 fb$^{-1}$ of pp collisions at the LHC at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV. No significant excess of events is observed above the number expected from the standard model contributions. The results are interpreted in terms of 90% confidence level limits on the DM-nucleon scattering cross section, as a function of the DM particle mass, for both spin-dependent and spin-independent scenarios. Limits are set on the effective cutoff scale $\Lambda$, and on the annihilation rate for DM particles, assuming that their branching fraction to quarks is 100%. Additionally, the most stringent 95% confidence level limits to date on the unparticle model parameters are obtained.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
The principal Feynman diagrams for the production of DM pairs in association with a Z boson. In (b) and (c) diagrams an additional quark is produced. The hatched circles indicate the interaction modeled with an effective field theory.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
The principal Feynman diagrams for the production of DM pairs in association with a Z boson. In (b) and (c) diagrams an additional quark is produced. The hatched circles indicate the interaction modeled with an effective field theory.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
The principal Feynman diagrams for the production of DM pairs in association with a Z boson. In (b) and (c) diagrams an additional quark is produced. The hatched circles indicate the interaction modeled with an effective field theory.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Feynman diagrams for unparticle production in association with a Z boson. The hatched circles indicate the interaction modeled with an effective field theory.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Feynman diagrams for unparticle production in association with a Z boson. The hatched circles indicate the interaction modeled with an effective field theory.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The distribution in ${E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}}$ at the generator level, for DM (a) and unparticle (b) scenarios. The DM curves are shown for different $m_\chi $ with vector (D5), axial-vector (D8), and tensor (D9) coupling for Dirac fermions, and vector (C3) coupling for complex scalar particles. The unparticle curves have the scalar unparticle coupling $\lambda $ between unparticle and SM fields set to 1, with the scaling dimension $d_\mathcal {U}$ ranging from 1.5 to 2.1. The SM background $ {\mathrm{ Z } } {\mathrm{ Z } } \to \ell ^{-}\ell ^{+}\nu \bar{\nu} $ is shown as a red solid curve.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The distribution in ${E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}}$ at the generator level, for DM (a) and unparticle (b) scenarios. The DM curves are shown for different $m_\chi $ with vector (D5), axial-vector (D8), and tensor (D9) coupling for Dirac fermions, and vector (C3) coupling for complex scalar particles. The unparticle curves have the scalar unparticle coupling $\lambda $ between unparticle and SM fields set to 1, with the scaling dimension $d_\mathcal {U}$ ranging from 1.5 to 2.1. The SM background $ {\mathrm{ Z } } {\mathrm{ Z } } \to \ell ^{-}\ell ^{+}\nu \bar{\nu} $ is shown as a red solid curve.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The distribution of ${E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}}$ after preselection for the $ {\mathrm{ Z } } \to \mathrm{ e }^- \mathrm{ e }^+ $ (a) and $ {\mathrm{ Z } } \to \mu^+ \mu^- $ (b) channels. Expected signal distributions are shown for Dirac fermions with vector or tensor couplings and for unparticles. The total statistical uncertainty in the overall background is shown as a hatched region. The horizontal bars on the data points indicate the bin width. Overflow events are included in the rightmost bins.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The distribution of ${E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}}$ after preselection for the $ {\mathrm{ Z } } \to \mathrm{ e }^- \mathrm{ e }^+ $ (a) and $ {\mathrm{ Z } } \to \mu^+ \mu^- $ (b) channels. Expected signal distributions are shown for Dirac fermions with vector or tensor couplings and for unparticles. The total statistical uncertainty in the overall background is shown as a hatched region. The horizontal bars on the data points indicate the bin width. Overflow events are included in the rightmost bins.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Distributions of the transverse mass for the final selection in the $\mathrm{ e }^- \mathrm{ e }^+ $ (a) and $\mu^+ \mu^- $ (b) channels. Examples of expected signal distributions are shown for DM particle production and unparticle production. The total statistical and systematic uncertainty in the overall background is shown as a hatched region. Overflow events are included in the rightmost bins.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Distributions of the transverse mass for the final selection in the $\mathrm{ e }^- \mathrm{ e }^+ $ (a) and $\mu^+ \mu^- $ (b) channels. Examples of expected signal distributions are shown for DM particle production and unparticle production. The total statistical and systematic uncertainty in the overall background is shown as a hatched region. Overflow events are included in the rightmost bins.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Expected and observed 90% CL lower limits on $\Lambda $ as a function of DM particle mass $m_{\chi }$ for the operators D5 (a), D8 (b), D9 (c), and C3 (d). The pink shaded area is shown in each plot to indicate the lower bound $\Lambda > m_{\chi }/2\pi $ on the validity of the effective field theory DM model. The cyan long-dashed line calculated by MadDM1.0 [82] reflects the relic density of cold, nonbaryonic DM: $\Omega h^2= $ 0.1198 $\pm$ 0.0026 measured by the Planck telescope [81]. Monojet results from CMS [14] are shown for comparison. Truncated limits with $\sqrt {g_\mathrm{ q } g_\chi }= $ 1 are presented with red dot long-dashed lines. The blue double-dot and triple-dot dashed lines indicate the contours of $R_{\Lambda }=80%$ for all operators with couplings $\sqrt {g_\mathrm{ q } g_\chi }=\pi $ and $4\pi $.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Expected and observed 90% CL lower limits on $\Lambda $ as a function of DM particle mass $m_{\chi }$ for the operators D5 (a), D8 (b), D9 (c), and C3 (d). The pink shaded area is shown in each plot to indicate the lower bound $\Lambda > m_{\chi }/2\pi $ on the validity of the effective field theory DM model. The cyan long-dashed line calculated by MadDM1.0 [82] reflects the relic density of cold, nonbaryonic DM: $\Omega h^2= $ 0.1198 $\pm$ 0.0026 measured by the Planck telescope [81]. Monojet results from CMS [14] are shown for comparison. Truncated limits with $\sqrt {g_\mathrm{ q } g_\chi }= $ 1 are presented with red dot long-dashed lines. The blue double-dot and triple-dot dashed lines indicate the contours of $R_{\Lambda }=80%$ for all operators with couplings $\sqrt {g_\mathrm{ q } g_\chi }=\pi $ and $4\pi $.

png pdf
Figure 6-c:
Expected and observed 90% CL lower limits on $\Lambda $ as a function of DM particle mass $m_{\chi }$ for the operators D5 (a), D8 (b), D9 (c), and C3 (d). The pink shaded area is shown in each plot to indicate the lower bound $\Lambda > m_{\chi }/2\pi $ on the validity of the effective field theory DM model. The cyan long-dashed line calculated by MadDM1.0 [82] reflects the relic density of cold, nonbaryonic DM: $\Omega h^2= $ 0.1198 $\pm$ 0.0026 measured by the Planck telescope [81]. Monojet results from CMS [14] are shown for comparison. Truncated limits with $\sqrt {g_\mathrm{ q } g_\chi }= $ 1 are presented with red dot long-dashed lines. The blue double-dot and triple-dot dashed lines indicate the contours of $R_{\Lambda }=80%$ for all operators with couplings $\sqrt {g_\mathrm{ q } g_\chi }=\pi $ and $4\pi $.

png pdf
Figure 6-d:
Expected and observed 90% CL lower limits on $\Lambda $ as a function of DM particle mass $m_{\chi }$ for the operators D5 (a), D8 (b), D9 (c), and C3 (d). The pink shaded area is shown in each plot to indicate the lower bound $\Lambda > m_{\chi }/2\pi $ on the validity of the effective field theory DM model. The cyan long-dashed line calculated by MadDM1.0 [82] reflects the relic density of cold, nonbaryonic DM: $\Omega h^2= $ 0.1198 $\pm$ 0.0026 measured by the Planck telescope [81]. Monojet results from CMS [14] are shown for comparison. Truncated limits with $\sqrt {g_\mathrm{ q } g_\chi }= $ 1 are presented with red dot long-dashed lines. The blue double-dot and triple-dot dashed lines indicate the contours of $R_{\Lambda }=80%$ for all operators with couplings $\sqrt {g_\mathrm{ q } g_\chi }=\pi $ and $4\pi $.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
The 90%CL upper limits on the DM-nucleon cross section as a function of the DM particle mass. a: spin-dependent limits for axial-vector (D8) and tensor (D9) coupling of Dirac fermion DM candidates, together with direct search experimental results from the PICO [101], XENON100 [102], and IceCube [7] collaborations. b: spin-independent limits for vector coupling of complex scalar (C3) and Dirac fermion (D5) DM candidates, together with CDMSlite [8], LUX [11], as well as Higgs-portal scalar DM results from CMS [96] with central (solid), minimum (dashed) and maximum (dot dashed) values of Higgs-nucleon couplings. Collider results from CMS monojet [14] and monophoton [16] searches, interpreted in both spin-dependent and spin-independent scenarios, are shown for comparison. The truncated limits for D5, D8, D9, and C3 with $\sqrt {g_\mathrm{ q } g_\chi }= $ 1 are presented with dashed lines in same shade as the untruncated ones.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
The 90%CL upper limits on the DM-nucleon cross section as a function of the DM particle mass. a: spin-dependent limits for axial-vector (D8) and tensor (D9) coupling of Dirac fermion DM candidates, together with direct search experimental results from the PICO [101], XENON100 [102], and IceCube [7] collaborations. b: spin-independent limits for vector coupling of complex scalar (C3) and Dirac fermion (D5) DM candidates, together with CDMSlite [8], LUX [11], as well as Higgs-portal scalar DM results from CMS [96] with central (solid), minimum (dashed) and maximum (dot dashed) values of Higgs-nucleon couplings. Collider results from CMS monojet [14] and monophoton [16] searches, interpreted in both spin-dependent and spin-independent scenarios, are shown for comparison. The truncated limits for D5, D8, D9, and C3 with $\sqrt {g_\mathrm{ q } g_\chi }= $ 1 are presented with dashed lines in same shade as the untruncated ones.

png pdf
Figure 8:
The 95%CL upper limits on the DM annihilation rate $< \sigma v> $ for $\chi \overline {\chi } \to \mathrm{ q } \mathrm{ \bar{q} } $ as a function of the DM particle mass for vector (D5) and axial-vector (D8) couplings of Dirac fermion DM. A 100% branching fraction of DM annihilating to quarks is assumed. Indirect search experimental results from H.E.S.S [103] and Fermi-LAT [104] are also plotted. The value required for DM particles to account for the relic abundance is labeled ``Thermal relic value'' and is shown as a red dotted line. The truncated limits for D5 and D8 with $\sqrt {g_\mathrm{ q } g_\chi }= $ 1 are presented with dashed lines in same shade as the untruncated ones.

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
Left: 95% CL upper limits on the coupling $\lambda $ between the unparticle and SM fields with fixed effective cutoff scales $\Lambda _\mathcal {U}= $ 10 and 100 TeV . The plot inserted provides an expanded view of the limits at low scaling dimension. Right: 95% CL lower limits on unparticle effective cutoff scale $\Lambda _\mathcal {U}$ with a fixed coupling $\lambda = $ 1 . The results from CMS monojet [14] and reinterpretation of LEP searches [37] are also shown for comparison. The excluded region is indicated by the shading.

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
Left: 95% CL upper limits on the coupling $\lambda $ between the unparticle and SM fields with fixed effective cutoff scales $\Lambda _\mathcal {U}= $ 10 and 100 TeV . The plot inserted provides an expanded view of the limits at low scaling dimension. Right: 95% CL lower limits on unparticle effective cutoff scale $\Lambda _\mathcal {U}$ with a fixed coupling $\lambda = $ 1 . The results from CMS monojet [14] and reinterpretation of LEP searches [37] are also shown for comparison. The excluded region is indicated by the shading.

png pdf
Figure 10:
The model-independent upper limits at 95% CL on the visible cross section ($\sigma A \epsilon $) for BSM production of events, as a function of ${E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}}$ threshold.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of selections used in the analysis.

png pdf
Table 2:
Summary of systematic uncertainties. Each background uncertainty represents the variation of the relative yields of the particular background components. The signal uncertainties represent the relative variations in the signal acceptance, and ranges quoted cover both signals of DM and unparticles with different DM masses or scaling dimensions. For shape uncertainties, the numbers correspond to the overall effect of the shape variation on yield or acceptance. The symbol -- indicates that the systematic uncertainty is not applicable.

png pdf
Table 3:
Signal predictions, background estimates, and observed number of events. The DM signal yields are given for masses $m_\chi =$ 10, 200, and 500 GeV and cutoff scales $\Lambda = $ 0.37 , 0.53, 0.48, and 1.4 TeV. The yields from an unparticle signal are presented with a scaling dimension $d_\mathcal {U}= $ 1.6 and a renormalization scale $\Lambda _\mathcal {U}= $ 33 TeV. The corresponding statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown, in that order.

png pdf
Table 4:
Expected and observed 90% CL upper limits on the DM-nucleon cross section $\sigma _{\chi N}$ and effective cutoff scale $\Lambda $ for operator D5.

png pdf
Table 5:
Expected and observed 90% CL upper limits on the DM-nucleon cross section $\sigma _{\chi N}$ and effective cutoff scale $\Lambda $ for operator D8.

png pdf
Table 6:
Expected and observed 90% CL upper limits on the DM-nucleon cross section $\sigma _{\chi N}$ and effective cutoff scale $\Lambda $ for operator D9.

png pdf
Table 7:
Expected and observed 90% CL upper limits on the DM-nucleon cross section $\sigma _{\chi N}$ and effective cutoff scale $\Lambda $ for operator C3.

png pdf
Table 8:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the coupling $\lambda $ between unparticles and the SM fields, for values of $d_\mathcal {U}$ in the range from 1.01 to 2.20 and a fixed effective cutoff scale $\Lambda _\mathcal {U}= $ 10 TeV.

png pdf
Table 9:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the coupling $\lambda $ between unparticles and the SM fields, for values of $d_\mathcal {U}$ in the range from 1.01 to 2.20 and a fixed effective cutoff scale $\Lambda _\mathcal {U}= $ 100 TeV.

png pdf
Table 10:
Expected and observed 95% CL lower limits on the effective cutoff scale $\Lambda _\mathcal {U}$ for values of $d_\mathcal {U}$ in the range from 1.60 to 2.20 and a fixed coupling $\lambda = $ 1 .

png pdf
Table 11:
Total SM background predictions for the numbers of events passing the selection requirements, for different ${E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}}$ thresholds, compared with the observed numbers of events. The listed uncertainties include both statistical and systematic components. The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits for the contribution of events from BSM sources are also shown. The ${\pm }1\sigma $ and ${\pm }2\sigma $ excursions from expected limits are also given.
Summary
A search for evidence for particle dark matter and unparticle production at the LHC has been performed in events containing two charged leptons, consistent with the decay of a Z boson, and large missing transverse momentum. The study is based on a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.7 fb$^{-1}$ of pp collisions collected by the CMS detector at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV. The results are consistent with the expected standard model contributions. These results are interpreted in two scenarios for physics beyond the standard model: dark matter and unparticles. Model-independent 95% confidence level upper limits are also set on contributions to the visible Z+$E_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss}$ cross section from sources beyond the standard model. Upper limits at 90% confidence level are set on the DM-nucleon scattering cross sections as a function of DM particle mass for both spin-dependent and spin-independent cases. Limits are also set on the DM annihilation rate assuming a branching fraction of 100% for annihilation to quarks, and on the effective cutoff scale. In addition, the most stringent limits to date at 95% confidence level on the coupling between unparticles and the standard model fields as well as the effective cutoff scale as a function of the unparticle scaling dimension are obtained in this analysis.
References
1 R. W. Tucker and C. Wang Dark matter gravitational interactions Class. Quant. Grav. 15 (1998) 933 gr-qc/9612019
2 M. Lopez-Corredoira, J. E. Beckman, and E. Casuso High-velocity clouds as dark matter in the local group AA 351 (1999) 920 astro-ph/9909389
3 D. Clowe et al. A Direct Empirical Proof of The Existence of Dark Matter AJ 648 (2006) 109 astro-ph/0608407
4 PICASSO Collaboration Constraints on low-mass WIMP interactions on $ ^{19} $F from PICASSO PLB 711 (2012) 153 1202.1240
5 SIMPLE Collaboration Final Analysis and Results of the Phase II SIMPLE Dark Matter Search PRL 108 (2012) 201302 1106.3014
6 COUPP Collaboration First dark matter search results from a 4-kg CF$ _3 $I Bubble Chamber Operated in a Deep Underground site PRD 86 (2012) 052001 1204.3094
7 IceCube Collaboration Multi-year search for dark matter annihilations in the Sun with the AMANDA-II and IceCube detectors PRD 85 (2012) 042002 1112.1840
8 SuperCDMS Collaboration Search for Low-Mass Weakly Interacting Massive Particles Using Voltage-Assisted Calorimetric Ionization Detection in the SuperCDMS Experiment PRL 112 (2014) 041302 1309.3259
9 P. Cushman et al. Snowmass CF1 Summary: WIMP Dark Matter Direct Detection 1310.8327
10 SuperCDMS Collaboration Search for Low-Mass WIMPs with SuperCDMS PRL 112 (2014) 241302 1402.7137
11 LUX Collaboration First Results from the LUX Dark Matter Experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility PRL 112 (2014) 091303 1310.8214
12 Fermi-LAT Collaboration Constraining Dark Matter Models from a Combined Analysis of Milky Way Satellites with the Fermi Large Area Telescope PRL 107 (2011) 241302 1108.3546
13 J. Buckley et al. Indirect Dark Matter Detection CF2 Working Group Summary 1310.7040
14 CMS Collaboration Search for dark matter, extra dimensions, and unparticles in monojet events in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV EPJC 75 (2015) 235 CMS-EXO-12-048
1408.3583
15 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new phenomena in final states with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=8~ $ TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC 75 (2015) 299 1502.01518
16 CMS Collaboration Search for new phenomena in monophoton final states in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV PLB 755 (2016) 102 CMS-EXO-12-047
1410.8812
17 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new phenomena in events with a photon and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=8 $ TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 91 (2015) 012008 1411.1559
18 CMS Collaboration Search for physics beyond the standard model in final states with a lepton and missing transverse energy in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV PRD 91 (2015) 092005 CMS-EXO-12-060
1408.2745
19 ATLAS Collaboration Search for dark matter in events with heavy quarks and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions with the ATLAS detector EPJC 75 (2015) 92 1410.4031
20 ATLAS Collaboration Search for dark matter in events with a hadronically decaying W or Z boson and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRL 112 (2014) 041802 1309.4017
21 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new particles in events with one lepton and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 09 (2014) 037 1407.7494
22 ATLAS Collaboration Search for invisible particles produced in association with single-top-quarks in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC 75 (2015) 79 1410.5404
23 ATLAS Collaboration Search for Dark Matter in Events with Missing Transverse Momentum and a Higgs Boson Decaying to Two Photons in $ pp $ Collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=8 $ TeV with the ATLAS Detector PRL 115 (2015) 131801 1506.01081
24 CMS Collaboration Search for Monotop Signatures in Proton-Proton Collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=8 $ TeV PRL 114 (2015) 101801 CMS-B2G-12-022
1410.1149
25 CMS Collaboration Search for the production of dark matter in association with top-quark pairs in the single-lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV JHEP 06 (2015) 121 CMS-B2G-14-004
1504.03198
26 ATLAS Collaboration Search for dark matter in events with a Z boson and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 90 (2014) 012004 1404.0051
27 L. M. Carpenter et al. Collider searches for dark matter in events with a Z boson and missing energy PRD 87 (2013) 074005 1212.3352
28 J. Goodman et al. Constraints on dark matter from colliders PRD 82 (2010) 116010 1008.1783
29 H. Georgi Unparticle physics PRL 98 (2007) 221601 hep-ph/0703260
30 H. Georgi Another odd thing about unparticle physics PLB 650 (2007) 275 0704.2457
31 K. Cheung, W.-Y. Keung, and T.-C. Yuan Collider signals of unparticle physics PRL 99 (2007) 051803 0704.2588
32 K. Cheung, W.-Y. Keung, and T.-C. Yuan Collider Phenomenology of Unparticle Physics PRD 76 (2007) 055003 0706.3155
33 Z. Kang Upgrading sterile neutrino dark matter to FImP using scale invariance EPJC 75 (2015) 471 1411.2773
34 M. Rinaldi, G. Cognola, L. Vanzo, and S. Zerbini Inflation in scale-invariant theories of gravity PRD 91 (2015) 123527 1410.0631
35 H. Cheng The Possible Existence of Weyl's Vector Meson PRL 61 (1988) 2182
36 T. Banks and A. Zaks On the phase structure of vector-like gauge theories with massless fermions Nucl. Phys. B 196 (1982) 189
37 S. Kathrein, S. Knapen, and M. J. Strassler Bounds from LEP on unparticle interactions with electroweak bosons PRD 84 (2011) 015010 1012.3737
38 CMS Collaboration CMS Luminosity Based on Pixel Cluster Counting - Summer 2013 Update CMS-PAS-LUM-13-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-13-001
39 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
40 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) 06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
41 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) 10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
42 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
43 T. Sj\"ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual JHEP 05 (2006) 026 hep-ph/0603175
44 J. Pumplin et al. New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis JHEP 07 (2002) 012 hep-ph/0201195
45 R. Field Early LHC Underlying Event Data - Findings and Surprises in Hadron collider physics. Proceedings, 22nd Conference, HCP 2010, Toronto, Canada, 2010 1010.3558
46 T. Sj\"ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 CPC 178 (2008) 852 0710.3820
47 S. Ask Simulation of $ Z $ plus graviton/unparticle production at the LHC EPJC 60 (2009) 509 0809.4750
48 S. Ask et al. Real emission and virtual exchange of gravitons and unparticles in PYTHIA8 CPC 181 (2010) 1593 0912.4233
49 R. Corke and T. Sj\"ostrand Interleaved parton showers and tuning prospects JHEP 03 (2011) 032 1011.1759
50 P. Nason A New method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
51 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
52 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
53 E. Re Single-top $ W $$ t $-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
54 S. Alioli, S.-O. Moch, and P. Uwer Hadronic top-quark pair-production with one jet and parton showering JHEP 01 (2012) 137 1110.5251
55 J. Alwall et al. MadGraph/MadEvent v4: the new web generation JHEP 09 (2007) 028 0706.2334
56 H.-L. Lai et al. Uncertainty induced by QCD coupling in the CTEQ global analysis of parton distributions PRD 82 (2010) 054021 1004.4624
57 H.-L. Lai et al. New parton distributions for collider physics PRD 82 (2010) 074024 1007.2241
58 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4---a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
59 CMS Collaboration Particle--Flow Event Reconstruction in CMS and Performance for Jets, Taus, and $ E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}} $ CMS-PAS-PFT-09-001
60 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the Particle-flow Event Reconstruction with the first LHC collisions recorded in the CMS detector CMS-PAS-PFT-10-001
61 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2008) 119 0707.1378
62 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
63 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
64 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Dispelling the $ N^{3} $ myth for the $ k_{t} $ jet-finder PLB 641 (2006) 57 hep-ph/0512210
65 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) P11002 CMS-JME-10-011
1107.4277
66 CMS Collaboration Identification of b-quark jets with the CMS experiment JINST 8 (2013) 04013 CMS-BTV-12-001
1211.4462
67 CMS Collaboration Performance of b tagging at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV in multijet, ttbar and boosted topology events CMS-PAS-BTV-13-001 CMS-PAS-BTV-13-001
68 J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC NPPS 205 (2010) 10 1007.3492
69 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive $ W $ and $ Z $ production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=7 $ TeV JHEP 10 (2011) 132 CMS-EWK-10-005
1107.4789
70 S. Alekhin et al. The PDF4LHC Working Group Interim Report 1101.0536
71 M. Botje et al. The PDF4LHC Working Group Interim Recommendations 1101.0538
72 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions with LHC data NPB 867 (2013) 244 1207.1303
73 P. M. Nadolsky et al. Implications of CTEQ global analysis for collider observables PRD 78 (2008) 013004 0802.0007
74 A. D. Martin, W. J. Stirling, R. S. Thorne, and G. Watt Parton distributions for the LHC EPJC 63 (2009) 189 0901.0002
75 P. Nason and G. Zanderighi $ W^+ W^- $ , $ W Z $ and $ Z Z $ production in the POWHEG-BOX-V2 EPJC 74 (2014) 2702 1311.1365
76 T. Gleisberg et al. Event generation with SHERPA 1.1 JHEP 02 (2009) 007 0811.4622
77 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ CL_{s} $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
78 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
79 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554, , [Erratum: \DOI10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2501-z] 1007.1727
80 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, LHC Higgs Combination Group Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-11, CMS-NOTE-2011-005
81 Planck Collaboration Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters AA 571 (2014) A16 1303.5076
82 M. Backovi\'c, K. Kong, and M. McCaskey MadDM v.1.0: Computation of dark matter relic abundance using MadGraph5 Physics of the Dark Universe 5 (2014) 18 1308.4955
83 Y. Bai, P. J. Fox, and R. Harnik The Tevatron at the frontier of dark matter direct detection JHEP 12 (2010) 048 1005.3797
84 A. Friedland, M. L. Graesser, I. M. Shoemaker, and L. Vecchi Probing nonstandard standard model backgrounds with LHC monojets PLB 714 (2012) 267 1111.5331
85 O. Buchmueller, M. J. Dolan, and C. McCabe Beyond effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC JHEP 01 (2014) 025 1308.6799
86 P. J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp, and Y. Tsai Missing energy signatures of dark matter at the LHC PRD 85 (2012) 056011 1109.4398
87 J. Goodman and W. Shepherd LHC Bounds on UV-Complete Models of Dark Matter 1111.2359
88 I. M. Shoemaker and L. Vecchi Unitarity and monojet bounds on models for DAMA, CoGeNT, and CRESST-II PRD 86 (2012) 015023 1112.5457
89 G. Busoni, A. De Simone, E. Morgante, and A. Riotto On the validity of the effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC PLB 728 (2014) 412 1307.2253
90 G. Busoni et al. On the validity of the effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC, part II: complete analysis for the $ s $-channel JCAP 06 (2014) 060 1402.1275
91 G. Busoni et al. On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC Part III: Analysis for the $ t $-channel JCAP 09 (2014) 022 1405.3101
92 S. Malik et al. Interplay and Characterization of Dark Matter Searches at Colliders and in Direct Detection Experiments Physics of the Dark Universe 9--10 (2015) 51 1409.4075
93 J. Abdallah et al. Simplified models for dark matter searches at the LHC Physics of the Dark Universe 9 (2015) 8 1506.03116
94 D. Abercrombie et al. Dark Matter Benchmark Models for Early LHC Run-2 Searches: Report of the ATLAS/CMS Dark Matter Forum 1507.00966
95 G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with micrOMEGAs 2.2 CPC 180 (2009) 747 0803.2360
96 CMS Collaboration Search for invisible decays of Higgs bosons in the vector boson fusion and associated ZH production modes EPJC 74 (2014) 2980 CMS-HIG-13-030
1404.1344
97 A. Djouadi, O. Lebedev, Y. Mambrini, and J. Quevillon Implications of LHC searches for Higgs--portal dark matter PLB 709 (2012) 65 1112.3299
98 A. Djouadi, A. Falkowski, Y. Mambrini, and J. Quevillon Direct detection of Higgs-portal dark matter at the LHC EPJC 73 (2013) 2455 1205.3169
99 R. D. Young and A. W. Thomas Octet baryon masses and sigma terms from an SU(3) chiral extrapolation PRD 81 (2010) 014503 0901.3310
100 MILC Collaboration The Strange Quark Condensate in the Nucleon in 2+1 Flavor QCD PRL 103 (2009) 122002 0905.2432
101 PICO Collaboration Dark Matter Search Results from the PICO-2L C$ _3 $F$ _8 $ Bubble Chamber PRL 114 (2015) 231302 1503.00008
102 XENON100 Collaboration Limits on Spin-Dependent WIMP-Nucleon Cross Sections from 225 Live Days of XENON100 Data PRL 111 (2013) 021301 1301.6620
103 HESS Collaboration Constraints on an Annihilation Signal from a Core of Constant Dark Matter Density around the Milky Way Center with H.E.S.S. PRL 114 (2015) 081301 1502.03244
104 Fermi-LAT Collaboration Dark matter constraints from observations of 25 Milky Way satellite galaxies with the Fermi Large Area telescope PRD 89 (2014) 042001 1310.0828
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN