CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-HIN-16-008 ; CERN-EP-2017-080
Suppression of excited ${\Upsilon} $ states relative to the ground state in PbPb collisions at ${\sqrt{{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV
Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 142301
Abstract: The relative yields of $ {\Upsilon} $ mesons produced in pp and PbPb collisions at ${\sqrt{{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV and reconstructed via the dimuon decay channel are measured using data collected by the CMS experiment. Double ratios are formed by comparing the yields of the excited states, $ {\Upsilon(\mathrm{2S})} $ and $ {\Upsilon(\mathrm{3S})} $, to the ground state, $ {\Upsilon(\mathrm{1S})} $, in both PbPb and pp collisions at the same center-of-mass energy. The double ratios, $ [{\Upsilon(\mathrm{nS})} /{\Upsilon(\mathrm{1S})} ]_{{\mathrm{PbPb}} }/ [{\Upsilon(\mathrm{nS})} /{\Upsilon(\mathrm{1S})} ]_{pp}$, are measured to be 0.308 $\pm$ 0.055 (stat) $\pm$ 0.019 (syst) for the $ {\Upsilon(\mathrm{2S})} $ and less than 0.26 at 95% confidence level for the $ {\Upsilon(\mathrm{3S})} $. No significant $ {\Upsilon(\mathrm{3S})} $ signal is found in the PbPb data. The double ratios are studied as a function of collision centrality, as well as dimuon transverse momentum and rapidity. No significant dependencies are observed.
Figures Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Measured dimuon invariant mass distributions in PbPb data. The total fit (solid blue line) and the background component (dot-dashed blue line) are also shown, as are the individual $ {\Upsilon (\mathrm {1S})} $, $ {\Upsilon (\mathrm {2S})} $, and $ {\Upsilon (\mathrm {3S})} $ signal shapes (dotted gray lines). The dashed red line represents the pp signal shape added to the PbPb background and normalized to the $ {\Upsilon (\mathrm {1S})} $ mass peak in PbPb.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Double ratio of the $ {\Upsilon (\mathrm {2S})} $ as a function of centrality. The centrality-integrated value is shown in the right panel. The error bars represent the statistical uncertainty in the PbPb data while the boxes represent the systematic uncertainty due to signal and background variations. The box drawn around the line at unity depicts the systematic and statistical uncertainties from pp data, as well as the systematic uncertainties due to the combined detection efficiency; it is 3.1% and applies to all measurements (including the centrality-integrated one). Calculations by Krouppa and Strickland (orange curves [21]) and by Emerick, Zhao, and Rapp (green hatched band [35]) are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Double ratio of the $ {\Upsilon (\mathrm {2S})} $ as functions of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mu \mu }$ (left) and $|y^{\mu \mu }|$ (right). The error bars depict the statistical uncertainty while the boxes represent the systematic uncertainties in the signal and background models as well as the combined detection efficiency. Calculations by Krouppa and Strickland (orange curves [21]) and by Emerick, Zhao, and Rapp (green hatched band [35]) are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Double ratio of the $ {\Upsilon (\mathrm {2S})} $ as functions of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mu \mu }$. The error bars depict the statistical uncertainty while the boxes represent the systematic uncertainties in the signal and background models as well as the combined detection efficiency. Calculations by Krouppa and Strickland (orange curves [21]) and by Emerick, Zhao, and Rapp (green hatched band [35]) are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Double ratio of the $ {\Upsilon (\mathrm {2S})} $ as functions of $|y^{\mu \mu }|$. The error bars depict the statistical uncertainty while the boxes represent the systematic uncertainties in the signal and background models as well as the combined detection efficiency. Calculations by Krouppa and Strickland (orange curves [21]) and by Emerick, Zhao, and Rapp (green hatched band [35]) are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Confidence intervals at 95% CL (blue arrows) and 68% CL (red boxes) of the $ {\Upsilon (\mathrm {3S})} $ double ratio as a function of centrality. The centrality-integrated limit is shown in the right panel.
Summary
In summary, the $ \Upsilon(\mathrm{2S}) $ and $ \Upsilon(\mathrm{3S}) $ double ratios have been measured at 5.02 TeV, using pp and PbPb data samples significantly larger than those used in the corresponding 2.76 TeV measurements. The centrality-integrated double ratios are 0.308 $\pm$ 0.055 (stat) $\pm$ 0.019 (syst) for the $ \Upsilon(\mathrm{2S}) $ and $<$0.26 at 95% CL for the $ \Upsilon(\mathrm{3S}) $. The large relative suppression of the $ \Upsilon(\mathrm{2S}) $ does not show significant variations with $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mu\mu}$ or $|{y^{\mu\mu}} |$ within the explored phase space window of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mu\mu} < $ 30 GeV/$c^2$ and $|{y^{\mu\mu}}| < $ 2.4. The $ \Upsilon(\mathrm{2S}) $ double ratio is compatible with unity in the most peripheral collisions (70--100%) and with zero in the most central ones (0--5%), but a flat centrality dependence is not excluded, given the current uncertainties. The 95% CL intervals for the $ \Upsilon(\mathrm{3S}) $ double ratio exclude unity in the four centrality bins of this analysis, including the most peripheral collisions (50--100%).
References
1 T. Matsui and H. Satz $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ suppression by quark-gluon plasma formation PLB 178 (1986) 416
2 CMS Collaboration Indications of suppression of excited $ \varUpsilon $ states in PbPb collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = $ 2.76 TeV PRL 107 (2011) 052302 CMS-HIN-11-007
1105.4894
3 CMS Collaboration Event activity dependence of Y(nS) production in $ \sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}= $ 5.02 TeV pPb and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 2.76 TeV pp collisions JHEP 04 (2014) 103 CMS-HIN-13-003
1312.6300
4 CMS Collaboration Observation of sequential Upsilon suppression in PbPb collisions PRL 109 (2012) 222301 CMS-HIN-11-011
1208.2826
5 CMS Collaboration Suppression of $ \Upsilon\text{(1S)} $, $ \Upsilon\text{(2S)} $ and $ \Upsilon\text{(3S)} $ production in PbPb collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{NN}} = $ 2.76 TeV PLB 770 (2017) 357 CMS-HIN-15-001
1611.01510
6 ALICE Collaboration Suppression of $ \Upsilon (1S) $ at forward rapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = $ 2.76 TeV PLB 738 (2014) 361 1405.4493
7 STAR Collaboration Suppression of $ \upsilon $ production in d+Au and Au+Au collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{NN}} = $ 200 GeV PLB 735 (2014) 127 1312.3675
8 A. Adare et al. An upgrade proposal from the PHENIX collaboration 1501.06197
9 N. Brambilla et al. Heavy quarkonium: progress, puzzles, and opportunities EPJC 71 (2011) 1534 1010.5827
10 A. Andronic et al. Heavy-flavour and quarkonium production in the LHC era: from proton--proton to heavy-ion collisions EPJC 76 (2016) 107 1506.03981
11 S. Digal, P. Petreczky, and H. Satz Quarkonium feed down and sequential suppression PRD 64 (2001) 094015 hep-ph/0106017
12 A. Mocsy and P. Petreczky Color screening melts quarkonium PRL 99 (2007) 211602 0706.2183
13 M. Laine, O. Philipsen, P. Romatschke, and M. Tassler Real-time static potential in hot QCD JHEP 03 (2007) 054 hep-ph/0611300
14 N. Brambilla, J. Ghiglieri, A. Vairo, and P. Petreczky Static quark-antiquark pairs at finite temperature PRD 78 (2008) 014017 0804.0993
15 A. Dumitru, Y. Guo, and M. Strickland The imaginary part of the static gluon propagator in an anisotropic (viscous) QCD plasma PRD 79 (2009) 114003 0903.4703
16 A. Rothkopf, T. Hatsuda, and S. Sasaki Complex heavy-quark potential at finite temperature from lattice QCD PRL 108 (2012) 162001 1108.1579
17 Y. Burnier, O. Kaczmarek, and A. Rothkopf Quarkonium at finite temperature: Towards realistic phenomenology from first principles JHEP 12 (2015) 101 1509.07366
18 B. Krouppa and M. Strickland Predictions for bottomonia suppression in 5.023 TeV Pb-Pb collisions Universe 2 (2016) 16 1605.03561
19 N. Brambilla, M. A. Escobedo, J. Soto, and A. Vairo Quarkonium suppression in heavy-ion collisions: an open quantum system approach PRD 96 (2017), no. 3, 034021 1612.07248
20 A. Emerick, X. Zhao, and R. Rapp Bottomonia in the quark-gluon plasma and their production at RHIC and LHC EPJA 48 (2012) 72 1111.6537
21 X. Du, R. Rapp, and M. He Color Screening and Regeneration of Bottomonia at RHIC and the LHC 1706.08670
22 R. L. Thews, M. Schroedter, and J. Rafelski Enhanced $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ production in deconfined quark matter PRC 63 (2001) 054905 hep-ph/0007323
23 M. I. Gorenstein, A. P. Kostyuk, H. Stoecker, and W. Greiner Statistical coalescence model with exact charm conservation PLB 509 (2001) 277 hep-ph/0010148
24 A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel Evidence for charmonium generation at the phase boundary in ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions PLB 652 (2007) 259 nucl-th/0701079
25 ALICE Collaboration Centrality, rapidity and transverse momentum dependence of $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ suppression in Pb-Pb collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = $ 2.76 TeV PLB 734 (2014) 314 1311.0214
26 M. Cacciari et al. Theoretical predictions for charm and bottom production at the LHC JHEP 10 (2012) 137 1205.6344
27 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
28 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
29 CMS Collaboration Observation and studies of jet quenching in pbpb collisions at nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy = 2.76 TeV PRC 84 (2011) 024906 CMS-HIN-10-004
1102.1957
30 CMS Collaboration Dependence on pseudorapidity and on centrality of charged hadron production in PbPb collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}= $ 2.76 TeV JHEP 08 (2011) 141 CMS-HIN-10-001
1107.4800
31 C. Loizides, J. Nagle, and P. Steinberg Improved version of the PHOBOS Glauber Monte Carlo SoftwareX 1-2 (2015) 13 1408.2549
32 CMS Collaboration Charged-particle nuclear modification factors in PbPb and pPb collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{\mathrm{N}\;\mathrm{N}}}= $ 5.02 TeV JHEP 04 (2017) 039 CMS-HIN-15-015
1611.01664
33 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
34 M. J. Oreglia A study of the reactions $\psi' \to \gamma\gamma \psi$ PhD thesis, Stanford University, 1980 SLAC Report SLAC-R-236, see Appendix D
35 Particle Data Group Collaboration Review of Particle Physics CPC 40 (2016), no. 10, 100001
36 T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 CPC 178 (2008) 852 0710.3820
37 I. P. Lokhtin and A. M. Snigirev A model of jet quenching in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions and high-$ {p_{\mathrm{T}}} $ hadron spectra at RHIC EPJC 45 (2006) 211 hep-ph/0506189
38 CMS Collaboration $ \Upsilon(\mathrm{nS}) $ polarizations versus particle multiplicity in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PLB 761 (2016) 31 CMS-HIN-15-003
1603.02913
39 CMS Collaboration Measurement of prompt $ \psi $(2S) to $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ yield ratios in PbPb and pp collisions at $ \sqrt {s_{\rm NN}} = $ 2.76 TeV PRL 113 (2014) 262301 CMS-HIN-12-007
1410.1804
40 CMS Collaboration Relative modification of prompt $ {\psi\mathrm{(2s)}} $ and $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ yields from pp to PbPb collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = $ 5.02 TeV PRL (2016) , [PRLett.118,162301(2017)] CMS-HIN-16-004
1611.01438
41 G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins A unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals PRD 57 (1998) 3873 physics/9711021
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN