Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured with the di-jet balance (squares) and bisector (circles) in-situ techniques using the EM+JES calibration in anti-kT R=0.6 cluster jets. The bottom plot shows the relative difference between data results (black) and Monte Carlo simulation for each method. The dotted lines indicate a relative difference of ±10%.Only statistical errors are shown. Both methods are described in Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306. | [eps] |
Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured with the di-jet balance (squares) and bisector (circles) in-situ techniques using the LCW+JES calibration in anti-kT R=0.6 cluster jets. The bottom plot shows the relative difference between data results (black) and Monte Carlo simulation for each method. The dotted lines indicate a relative difference of ±10%. Only statistical errors are shown.Both methods are described in Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306. | [eps] |
Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured with the di-jet balance (squares) and bisector (circles) in-situ techniques using the EM+JES calibration in anti-kT R=0.4 cluster jets. The bottom plot shows the relative difference between data results (black) and Monte Carlo simulation for each method. The dotted lines indicate a relative difference of ±10%. Only statistical errors are shown.Both methods are described in Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306. | [eps] |
Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured with the di-jet balance (squares) and bisector (circles) in-situ techniques using the LCW+JES calibration in anti-kT R=0.4 cluster jets. The bottom plot shows the relative difference between data results (black) and Monte Carlo simulation for each method. The dotted lines indicate a relative difference of ±10%.Only statistical errors are shown.Both methods are described in Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306. | [eps] |
Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured with the bisector in-situ technique using the EM+JES calibration (circles) and the LCW+JES calibration (triangles) with 2011 data, in anti-kT R=0.4 cluster jets. The bottom plot shows the ratio as a function of the average jet transverse momenta. Both methods are described in Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306. | [eps] |
Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured with the bisector in-situ technique using the EM+JES calibration (circles) and the LCW+JES calibration (triangles) with 2011 data, in anti-kT R=0.6 cluster jets. The bottom plot shows the ratio as a function of the average jet transverse momenta. Both methods are described in Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306. | [eps] |
Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured with the bisector in-situ technique using the EM+JES calibration in anti-kT R=0.4 cluster jets, for 2010 data (triangles) and 2011 data (circles). The Bisector method is described in Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306. | [eps] |
Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured with the bisector in-situ technique using the EM+JES calibration in anti-kT R=0.6 cluster jets, for 2010 data (triangles) and 2011 data (circles). The bisector method is described in Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306. | [eps] |
Fractional jet energy resolution as a function of the average jet transverse momenta measured in 2011 data with the bisector in-situ technique using the LCW+JES calibration in anti-kT R=0.4 cluster jets. Results for different rapidity regions in the calorimeter are shown. The resolution above 500 GeV is not shown for 2.1 < |y| < 2.8 due to lack of statistics. The bisector method is described in Eur. Phys. J. C, 73 3 (2013) 2306. | [eps] |