SA2 Deliverable Review Form

General comments

A work plan should have a time line with all the milestones or a table with all the milestones, possibly with some details on the level of the delivered product. Please add a time chart or a time table inside the document or as annex.

REPLY: Unless these "time charts" are common format between the four documents they will be of little use. What do you propose? What does "details on the level of the delivered product" mean?

For each action/task there should be a clear explanation of which product team/developer is in charge for developing, testing and releasing it. Follow the guidelines and example available below that Maria has added (now that we have seen that the plans needed these guidelines). SA2 is glad to clarify the guidelines and support the authors of the document (not in writing it) just contact us.

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/EMI/AreaWorkPlanTPL

REPLY: These guidelines were published for the first time last week. How can we re-organize around guidelines that are available almost three months after the original due date for the document? I have referred this request to the TD and JRA1 leader.

• EMI-DJRA1.3.1_v0.4-SA2.odt: EMI-DJRA1.3.1_v0.4-SA2.odt

REPLY: I cannot reply to the in-document comments as the EMI review template was not used. Some comments valid, others are opinions.

REPLY: Version 0.7 has been uploaded that contains more detailed information on the projected dates for the work plan. Also, the executive summary has been expanded on. It is made clear that each PT is responsible for the development work, certification etc of their components. The comments inserted into the original document as text have been addressed (and removed). All the abbreviations are now defined in a table also. Apparently Morris is producing a GANTT chart that he may want to insert into the document...

09/12/2010: I update the twiki page with the replies from the SA2 reviewers.

* Reply from J. Cernak (given on 08/12/2010)

* Reply from M. Pradillo (given on 06/12/2010)

Reply: Glad to see we're nearly there. I will contact Maria directly to see about this table. For the record, I don't think such a table is useful in this case as this process has been dragged out far too long. I will find the quickest solution.

Reply: Have uploaded a version that contains such a table.

* Reply from M. Pradillo (given on 15/12/2010)