Deliverable Review Form

(1) more forward looking events # section about next period would be better as a plan, not only 'the next period' # e.g. EMI technical conference 2012 - what should be trained there # another example might be a training at OGF34 in Oxford, etc. # many other events at least roughly planned for whole 2012 (and as EMI ends in 04/13 maybe even until then)

(2) Lessons learned from Training activities and users # user survey feedback at the end seems to be not very much information # perhaps there is the possibility in the progress section, but much more lessons learned from existing trainings would be good # e.g. component CREAM, A-REX, UNICORE has been used in 5 trainings and still 50% users are not satisfied with its usage # what can we change until EMI 2&3 in this respect

(3) Coverage of components in training section # it would be nice to have a section to understand which components are affected overall by training activities # in the moment that might be covered in progress, but perhaps in an inadequate degree to have the overview # e.g. while I assume that the CE's are used very much, I believe less training is performed of setting up authZ policies with ARGUS for example

(4) Follow-up # once a training is performed, the user uses the components - or not, why? # we need to understand if they do and in this case how # a follow-up with training end-users after 3 months or so would be fruitful and could be one sub-section # it seems to be more work now, but it is also essential for our sustainability # furthermore, reviewers might ask 'training - so what?' - what was the impact of the training: new regular users?

(5) Permanent training infrastructure # we work with FutureGrid to establish a permanent training/testbed with EMI components # this should be mentioned in the plan # FutureGrid offers also the possibility to put slides/training material on their website for these testbeds # Contact me to get more information once you put a section about this into your document

1. Which OGF - fixed - OGF34
2. Missing title - no, title was removed but OpenOffice did something funny with the formatting. I've fixed it now.
3. "Test bed" changed to "testbed" throughout
4. Reformat table to be on one page - done
5. details of testbed used for training added
6. Table moved to section 4.2.6 - now appears on single page
7. 2010 changed to 2011
8. Too many repetitions of "and" - reworded.
9. Remove dupicate "had" - done
10. table header and first column left-justified to fix formatting
11. Description column removed
12. Feedback survey reformatted a bit, it is meant to reflect the formatting of the web-based form from which it was created, so I don't want to change it too radically. However, it displays quite differently in OpenOffice and Word. I have fixed the worst parts now, hopefully it is ok.
13, 14. reformat tables to stop word-wrap - done
15. "-" is a comment. I know it's a bit pointless but I thought it was best to include all comments verbatim here anyway.