Deliverable Review Form
Identification of the reviewer |
Name: Morris Riedel |
Affiliation: Juelich Supercomputing Centre |
EMI Activity/External project or Institute: JRA1 |
Review date |
2010-10-18 |
Author(s) revision date |
yyyy-mm-dd |
Reviewer acceptance date |
yyyy-mm-dd |
Attach the reviewed document to the deliverable page, put here a link:
General comments
- Document reads nicely - only minor comments
- Track changes was not possible due to open office - I compiled a pdf and commented on this one instead
- 03/12/2010 MR: the document looks ok from my point of view.
Additional recommendations (not affecting the document content, e.g. recommendation for future work)
- One idea would be to remove conclusions from documents since the executive summary provides room for the same highlights
Detailed comments on the content
Note 1: The reviewers must list here any observation they want to track explicitly and that require interaction with the authors. These comments have to be explicitly addressed by the authors and the action taken must be clearly described.
Note 2: Alternatively all changes must be listed in the document itself using Word/OpenOfficeWriter change tracking features.
N° |
Page |
Section |
Observations |
Is Addressed? |
1 |
xx |
x.y |
Sequence of comments and replies separated by twiki signature and date |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
Any other modification, spelling or grammatical corrections, etc. can be done directly in the document using tracked changes or similar mechanisms that allows the authors to identify which correction is suggested.
--
FrancescoGiacomini - 06-Oct-2010
Topic revision: r3 - 2010-12-04
- unknown