SA1 Deliverable Review Form

Attach the reviewed document to the deliverable page, put here a link

General comments

Additional recommendations (not affecting the document content, e.g. recommendation for future work)

It don't seem to emerge clearly the impact of the various QA processes in case of negative deviations or their benefits. But I understand that this is not really possible for EMI-1, so I put this comment in this section as a recommendation for the future. For example it would be nice to have some trend graphs about the metric improvements, and a table which summarizes the actions taken as consequences of negative deviations. However those data are not only part of QA, but also of Project Management and they could also be included in one of the management deliverables.

Maria: I agree and I have put a comment in section 7 (Metrics) to explain that QA plans to use metrics reports after the improvement exercise so that if necessary, corrective actions can be proposed by SA2. This is also added as a recommendation in section 8 (Recommendations).

Detailed comments on the content

Note 1: The reviewers must list here any observation they want to track explicitly and that require interaction with the authors
Alternatively all changes must be listed in the document itself using Word change tracking features (if you use Word)
Note 2: These comments have to be explicitly addressed by the authors and the action taken must be clearly described

Any other modification, spelling or grammatical corrections, etc must be done directly in the document using tracked changes or similar mechanisms that allows the authors to identify which correction is suggested.

-- FloridaEstrella - 06-May-2011