1. Introduction
2. Description of Apparatus
   • Vessel/target in frame (click on figure to edit),
   • Description of beamline and typical conditions,
3. Predictions for Damage Summary of what is in the models, assumptions/limitations
   • Energy deposition (from FLUKA and from dE/dx estimate) and figure,
   • Resulting macroscopic heating (from ANSYS and "back of the envelope" estimate)
   • For various (sig_x, sig_y), charge (single bunch impacts)
     • Also consider 3 bunch "mini-train" mode, separated by 150ns
   • Compare also with previous works
     • Marc Ross et al
     • V. Rotshtein et al, poster procs., URL: http://www.congress-2006.hcei.tsc.ru/cat/proc_2006/cmm/Paper-088.pdf
4. Experimental procedure
   • Include comparison of "single pulse" vs. "continuous operation" data taking
5. Data Analysis
   • Interferometer measurements, estimates of damaged area
   • Example plots of damaged area, two different ways of estimating melted area:
     • Example of single inteferometer picture, sample 2, before installation:
     • Example of 3D profile inteferometer picture, sample 2, before installation:
   • Comparison with predictions
     • Figures and Tables,

1. Summary and Conclusions

-- NigelWatson - 22 Feb 2008