CMS-PAS-HIG-23-003

CMS-PAS-HIG-23-003
Search for the SM Higgs boson produced in association with bottom quarks in final states with leptons
CMS Collaboration
25 March 2024

Abstract: This note presents the first search for b quark associated production of the Higgs boson, in final states with leptons. Higgs boson decays to pairs of tau leptons and pairs of leptonically decaying W bosons are considered. The search is performed using data collected from 2016 to 2018 by the CMS experiment in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $. Upper limits at the 95% confidence level are placed on the signal strength for Higgs boson production in association with b quarks; the observed (expected) upper limit is 3.7 (6.1) times the value expected in the standard model.
Links: CDS record (PDF) ; Physics Briefing ; CADI line (restricted) ;

Figures & Tables	Summary	References	CMS Publications

Figures
png pdf	Figure 1: Dominant Feynman diagrams contributing to Higgs boson production in association with b quarks. The diagrams initiated by gluons (quarks) are shown in the upper (lower) row. The red circle is used to mark the Higgs boson coupling to b quarks, the green circle marks the Higgs boson coupling to top quarks, and the blue circle marks the coupling between the Higgs boson and vector bosons. In the ggH diagram (upper left), the additional gluon is radiated from within the quark loop, although it can equivalently radiate from one of the initial state gluons.
png pdf	Figure 2: BDT $ H\rightarrow\tau\tau $ class output score distributions for the $ \mathrm{e}\tau_{h} $ (upper left), $ \mu\tau_{h} $ (upper right) and $ \tau_{h}\tau_{h} $ (lower left) channels; and $ \mathrm{ H\rightarrow WW} $ output score for the $ \mathrm{e}\mu $ channel (lower right). The distributions are shown using 138 fb$ ^{-1} $ of data collected by the CMS experiment. The bbH signal is multiplied by a factor 50 while all other processes are scaled according to a combined fit of all BDT categories for all channels and years used in this analysis. The total uncertainty includes the statistical and systematic uncertainties. Electroweak processes in the figure include diboson, W+jets, and single top production. For channels involving $ \tau_\mathrm{h} $ candidates the $ \text{jet}\rightarrow\tau_\mathrm{h} $ fakes have been estimated from data and grouped together; they are removed from the the electroweak, $ \text{DY+jets} $, and $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ groups. The H(125) group includes processes where a Higgs boson is produced not in association with b-quarks.
png	Figure 2-a: BDT $ H\rightarrow\tau\tau $ class output score distributions for the $ \mathrm{e}\tau_{h} $ (upper left), $ \mu\tau_{h} $ (upper right) and $ \tau_{h}\tau_{h} $ (lower left) channels; and $ \mathrm{ H\rightarrow WW} $ output score for the $ \mathrm{e}\mu $ channel (lower right). The distributions are shown using 138 fb$ ^{-1} $ of data collected by the CMS experiment. The bbH signal is multiplied by a factor 50 while all other processes are scaled according to a combined fit of all BDT categories for all channels and years used in this analysis. The total uncertainty includes the statistical and systematic uncertainties. Electroweak processes in the figure include diboson, W+jets, and single top production. For channels involving $ \tau_\mathrm{h} $ candidates the $ \text{jet}\rightarrow\tau_\mathrm{h} $ fakes have been estimated from data and grouped together; they are removed from the the electroweak, $ \text{DY+jets} $, and $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ groups. The H(125) group includes processes where a Higgs boson is produced not in association with b-quarks.
png	Figure 2-b: BDT $ H\rightarrow\tau\tau $ class output score distributions for the $ \mathrm{e}\tau_{h} $ (upper left), $ \mu\tau_{h} $ (upper right) and $ \tau_{h}\tau_{h} $ (lower left) channels; and $ \mathrm{ H\rightarrow WW} $ output score for the $ \mathrm{e}\mu $ channel (lower right). The distributions are shown using 138 fb$ ^{-1} $ of data collected by the CMS experiment. The bbH signal is multiplied by a factor 50 while all other processes are scaled according to a combined fit of all BDT categories for all channels and years used in this analysis. The total uncertainty includes the statistical and systematic uncertainties. Electroweak processes in the figure include diboson, W+jets, and single top production. For channels involving $ \tau_\mathrm{h} $ candidates the $ \text{jet}\rightarrow\tau_\mathrm{h} $ fakes have been estimated from data and grouped together; they are removed from the the electroweak, $ \text{DY+jets} $, and $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ groups. The H(125) group includes processes where a Higgs boson is produced not in association with b-quarks.
png	Figure 2-c: BDT $ H\rightarrow\tau\tau $ class output score distributions for the $ \mathrm{e}\tau_{h} $ (upper left), $ \mu\tau_{h} $ (upper right) and $ \tau_{h}\tau_{h} $ (lower left) channels; and $ \mathrm{ H\rightarrow WW} $ output score for the $ \mathrm{e}\mu $ channel (lower right). The distributions are shown using 138 fb$ ^{-1} $ of data collected by the CMS experiment. The bbH signal is multiplied by a factor 50 while all other processes are scaled according to a combined fit of all BDT categories for all channels and years used in this analysis. The total uncertainty includes the statistical and systematic uncertainties. Electroweak processes in the figure include diboson, W+jets, and single top production. For channels involving $ \tau_\mathrm{h} $ candidates the $ \text{jet}\rightarrow\tau_\mathrm{h} $ fakes have been estimated from data and grouped together; they are removed from the the electroweak, $ \text{DY+jets} $, and $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ groups. The H(125) group includes processes where a Higgs boson is produced not in association with b-quarks.
png	Figure 2-d: BDT $ H\rightarrow\tau\tau $ class output score distributions for the $ \mathrm{e}\tau_{h} $ (upper left), $ \mu\tau_{h} $ (upper right) and $ \tau_{h}\tau_{h} $ (lower left) channels; and $ \mathrm{ H\rightarrow WW} $ output score for the $ \mathrm{e}\mu $ channel (lower right). The distributions are shown using 138 fb$ ^{-1} $ of data collected by the CMS experiment. The bbH signal is multiplied by a factor 50 while all other processes are scaled according to a combined fit of all BDT categories for all channels and years used in this analysis. The total uncertainty includes the statistical and systematic uncertainties. Electroweak processes in the figure include diboson, W+jets, and single top production. For channels involving $ \tau_\mathrm{h} $ candidates the $ \text{jet}\rightarrow\tau_\mathrm{h} $ fakes have been estimated from data and grouped together; they are removed from the the electroweak, $ \text{DY+jets} $, and $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ groups. The H(125) group includes processes where a Higgs boson is produced not in association with b-quarks.
png pdf	Figure 3: Upper limits at 95% CL on the signal strength for the the $ pp\rightarrow bbH(y_\mathrm{b},y_\mathrm{t}) $ process. The terms contributing to the estimated relative cross sections are those where the Higgs boson is produced via Yukawa coupling with the top or bottom quarks, accounting also for the interference term. The $ pp\rightarrow Z(\rightarrow \mathrm{b}\mathrm{b})H $ process is treated as a background for this measurement and not included in the limits. The theoretical prediction, shown as a red line placed at 1 corresponds to an estimated cross section of 1.489 pb, the black markers show the observed limits, and the dashed lines with the green and yellow uncertainty bands represent the expected upper limits with their 68% and 95% confidence intervals.
png pdf	Figure 4: Two-dimensional confidence intervals on the $ \kappa_\mathrm{b} $ and $ \kappa_\mathrm{t} $ parameters for the channels studied in this search. Expected limits are shown in red for the $ H\rightarrow\tau\tau $ cross section measurement [53] performed on other production mechanisms and in green for the combination with the presented analysis. The observed limits on data are shown in blue, with a cross marking the best-fit point. A green diamond is placed to mark the SM expectation. Solid lines with shaded areas mark the 68% CL contours, while dashed lines mark the 95% CL ones.

Tables
png pdf	Table 1: Summary of the BDT categories defined for each channel
png pdf	Table 2: Input features to the BDT classifiers used in the studied channels. Each variable is marked with the $ \checkmark $ symbol if it is used for the training of the BDT models in a particular channel or the $ \times $ symbol if it is not used.
png pdf	Table 3: Summary table of the systematic uncertainties affecting the background processes. For uncertainties that vary significantly depending on the kinematic properties of the event, the label \textitevent-dep. is used. The labels lnN and shape are used respectively for uncertainties acting only on the normalization or having a shape altering effects.
png pdf	Table 4: Expected and observed upper limits at 95% CL on the signal strength modifier.

Summary

A search for a Higgs boson produced in association with bottom quarks and decaying into a pair of $ \tau $ leptons or W bosons has been presented. The search was performed on data collected by the CMS experiment in the period 2016--2018 at a centre-of-mass energy of $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $. This search has been performed in four final states: $ \mathrm{e}\mu $, $ \mu\tau_{h} $, $ \mathrm{e}\tau_{h} $, and $ \tau_{h}\tau_{h} $. Higgs boson decays to $ \tau $ leptons were targeted in all four final states, while $ \mathrm{ H\rightarrow WW } $ decays contributed only in the $ \mathrm{e}\mu $ channel. At the current level of precision, the background processes provide an adequate description of the observed data, and no significant excess above the background-only expectation was found. The observed (expected) upper limit on the bbH production cross section is found to be 3.7 times (6.1 times) the standard model (SM) prediction at 95% confidence level (CL). The search also constrains the Higgs Yukawa couplings to bottom and top quarks in the $ \kappa $-model interpretation and yields a best-fit value for the couplings of $ (\kappa_t,\kappa_b)=(-0.73,1.58) $. The observed constraints are compatible with the SM expectation at 95% CL.

References
1	ATLAS Collaboration	Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC	PLB 716 (2012) 1	1207.7214
2	CMS Collaboration	Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC	PLB 716 (2012) 30	CMS-HIG-12-028 1207.7235
3	CMS Collaboration	Observation of a New Boson with Mass Near 125 GeV in $ pp $ Collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 7 and 8 TeV	JHEP 06 (2013) 081	CMS-HIG-12-036 1303.4571
4	ATLAS Collaboration	The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider	JINST 3 (2008) S08003
5	CMS Collaboration	The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC	JINST 3 (2008) S08004
6	ATLAS Collaboration	A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery	Nature 607 (2022) 7917, 52	2207.00092
7	CMS Collaboration	A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery	Nature 607 (2022) 7917, 60	CMS-HIG-22-001 2207.00043
8	ATLAS Collaboration	Observation and measurement of Higgs boson decays to WW$ ^* $ with the ATLAS detector	PRD 92 (2015) 012006	1412.2641
9	ATLAS Collaboration	Study of (W/Z)H production and Higgs boson couplings using $ H \rightarrow WW^{\ast} $ decays with the ATLAS detector	JHEP 08 (2015) 137	1506.06641
10	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of Higgs boson production and properties in the WW decay channel with leptonic final states	JHEP 01 (2014) 096	CMS-HIG-13-023 1312.1129
11	CMS Collaboration	Observation of Higgs boson decay to bottom quarks	PRL 121 (2018) 121801	CMS-HIG-18-016 1808.08242
12	ATLAS Collaboration	Observation of $ H \rightarrow b\bar{b} $ decays and $ VH $ production with the ATLAS detector	PLB 786 (2018) 59	1808.08238
13	ATLAS and CMS Collaboration	Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV	JHEP 08 (2016) 045	1606.02266
14	CMS Collaboration	Observation of the Higgs boson decay to a pair of $ \tau $ leptons with the CMS detector	PLB 779 (2018) 283	CMS-HIG-16-043 1708.00373
15	ATLAS Collaboration	Cross-section measurements of the Higgs boson decaying into a pair of $ \tau $-leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector	PRD 99 (2019) 072001	1811.08856
16	CMS Collaboration	Evidence for Higgs boson decay to a pair of muons	JHEP 01 (2021) 148	CMS-HIG-19-006 2009.04363
17	ATLAS Collaboration	A search for the dimuon decay of the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector	PLB 812 (2021) 135980	2007.07830
18	CMS Collaboration	Search for Higgs Boson Decay to a Charm Quark-Antiquark Pair in Proton-Proton Collisions at s=13\, TeV	PRL 131 (2023) 061801	CMS-HIG-21-008 2205.05550
19	ATLAS Collaboration	Direct constraint on the Higgs-charm coupling from a search for Higgs boson decays into charm quarks with the ATLAS detector	EPJC 82 (2022) 717	2201.11428
20	D. de Florian et al., LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group	Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector	volume 2. CERN, 2017 link
21	ATLAS Collaboration	Observation of Higgs boson production in association with a top quark pair at the LHC with the ATLAS detector	PLB 784 (2018) 173	1806.00425
22	CMS Collaboration	Observation of $ \mathrm{t\overline{t}} $H production	PRL 120 (2018) 231801	CMS-HIG-17-035 1804.02610
23	D. Pagani, H.-S. Shao, and M. Zaro	RIP $ Hb\overline{b} $: how other Higgs production modes conspire to kill a rare signal at the LHC	JHEP 11 (2020) 036	2005.10277
24	CMS Collaboration	Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV	JINST 15 (2020) P10017	CMS-TRG-17-001 2006.10165
25	CMS Collaboration	The CMS trigger system	JINST 12 (2017) P01020	CMS-TRG-12-001 1609.02366
26	CMS Collaboration	Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC	JINST 16 (2021) P05014	CMS-EGM-17-001 2012.06888
27	CMS Collaboration	Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV	JINST 13 (2018) P06015	CMS-MUO-16-001 1804.04528
28	CMS Collaboration	Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker	JINST 9 (2014) P10009	CMS-TRK-11-001 1405.6569
29	CMS Collaboration	Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector	JINST 12 (2017) P10003	CMS-PRF-14-001 1706.04965
30	CMS Collaboration	Performance of reconstruction and identification of $ \tau $ leptons decaying to hadrons and $ \nu_\tau $ in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV	JINST 13 (2018) P10005	CMS-TAU-16-003 1809.02816
31	CMS Collaboration	Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV	JINST 12 (2017) P02014	CMS-JME-13-004 1607.03663
32	CMS Collaboration	Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector	JINST 14 (2019) P07004	CMS-JME-17-001 1903.06078
33	J. Alwall et al.	The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations	JHEP 07 (2014) 079	1405.0301
34	S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari	Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method	JHEP 11 (2007) 070	0709.2092
35	S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re	A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX	JHEP 06 (2010) 043	1002.2581
36	P. Nason	A New method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms	JHEP 11 (2004) 040	hep-ph/0409146
37	NNPDF Collaboration	Parton distributions from high-precision collider data	EPJC 77 (2017)	1706.00428
38	T. Sjöstrand et al.	An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2	Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159	1410.3012
39	CMS Collaboration	Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements	EPJC 80 (2020) 4	CMS-GEN-17-001 1903.12179
40	GEANT4 Collaboration	GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit	NIM A 506 (2003) 250
41	CMS Collaboration	Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using a deep neural network	JINST 17 (2022) P07023	CMS-TAU-20-001 2201.08458
42	E. Bols et al.	Jet flavour classification using DeepJet	JINST 15 (2020) P12012
43	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the $ \mathrm{Z}\gamma^{*} \to \tau\tau $ cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV and validation of $ \tau $ lepton analysis techniques	EPJC 78 (2018) 708	CMS-HIG-15-007 1801.03535
44	CDF Collaboration	A Measurement of the ratio $ \sigma \times B(p\bar{p} \to W \to e \nu) / \sigma \times B(p\bar{p} \to Z^0 \to e e) $ in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1800 GeV	PRD 52 (1995) 2624
45	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the Higgs boson production rate in association with top quarks in final states with electrons, muons, and hadronically decaying tau leptons at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV	EPJC 81 (2021) 378	CMS-HIG-19-008 2011.03652
46	L. Bianchini, J. Conway, E. K. Friis, and C. Veelken	Reconstruction of the Higgs mass in $ H \to \tau\tau $ Events by Dynamical Likelihood techniques	J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 513 (2014) 022035
47	CDF Collaboration	Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons decaying to tau pairs in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV	PRL 96 (2006) 011802	hep-ex/0508051
48	N. Deutschmann, F. Maltoni, M. Wiesemann, and M. Zaro	Top-Yukawa contributions to bbH production at the LHC	JHEP 07 (2019) 054	1808.01660
49	CMS Collaboration	Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS	EPJC 81 (2021) 800	CMS-LUM-17-003 2104.01927
50	CMS Collaboration	CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV	CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2018 link	CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
51	CMS Collaboration	CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV	CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2019 link	CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
52	G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells	Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics	EPJC 71 (2011) 1554	1007.1727
53	CMS Collaboration	Measurements of Higgs boson production in the decay channel with a pair of $ \tau $ leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV	EPJC 83 (2023) 562	CMS-HIG-19-010 2204.12957