CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-EXO-16-018 ; CERN-EP/2016-154
Search for resonant production of high-mass photon pairs in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 8 and 13 TeV
Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 051802
Abstract: A search for the resonant production of high-mass photon pairs is presented. The analysis is based on samples of proton-proton collision data collected by the CMS experiment at center-of-mass energies of 8 and 13 TeV, corresponding to integrated luminosities of 19.7 and 3.3 fb$^{-1}$, respectively. The search focuses on spin-0 and spin-2 resonances with masses between 0.5 and 4 TeV and with widths, relative to the mass, between $ 1.4 \times 10^{-4}$ and $ 5.6 \times 10^{-2}$. Limits are set on scalar resonances produced through gluon-gluon fusion, and on Randall-Sundrum gravitons. A modest excess of events compatible with a narrow resonance with a mass of about 750 GeV is observed. The local significance of the excess is approximately 3.4 standard deviations. The significance is reduced to 1.6 standard deviations once the effect of searching under multiple signal hypotheses is considered. More data are required to determine the origin of this excess.
Figures Summary Additional Figures References CMS Publications
PRL Editor's Suggestion

png
Data from the CMS collaboration contain a modest excess of photon pairs at 750 GeV. If this bump were confirmed it would require the existence of new elementary particles. More data should resolve the issue.
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Observed diphoton invariant mass ${m_{\gamma \gamma }}$ spectra for the event categories used in the analysis of the 13 TeV data: (a,b) magnetic field strength $\mathrm {B}=$ 3.8 T; (c,d) $\mathrm {B}=$ 0 T; (a,c) both photons in the ECAL barrel detector, (b,d) one photon in the ECAL barrel detector and the other in an ECAL endcap detector. The results of a likelihood fit to the background-only hypothesis are also shown. The shaded regions show the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty bands. The lower panels show the difference between the data and fit, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data points.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Observed diphoton invariant mass ${m_{\gamma \gamma }}$ spectra for the event categories used in the analysis of the 13 TeV data: (a,b) magnetic field strength $\mathrm {B}=$ 3.8 T; (c,d) $\mathrm {B}=$ 0 T; (a,c) both photons in the ECAL barrel detector, (b,d) one photon in the ECAL barrel detector and the other in an ECAL endcap detector. The results of a likelihood fit to the background-only hypothesis are also shown. The shaded regions show the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty bands. The lower panels show the difference between the data and fit, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data points.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
Observed diphoton invariant mass ${m_{\gamma \gamma }}$ spectra for the event categories used in the analysis of the 13 TeV data: (a,b) magnetic field strength $\mathrm {B}=$ 3.8 T; (c,d) $\mathrm {B}=$ 0 T; (a,c) both photons in the ECAL barrel detector, (b,d) one photon in the ECAL barrel detector and the other in an ECAL endcap detector. The results of a likelihood fit to the background-only hypothesis are also shown. The shaded regions show the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty bands. The lower panels show the difference between the data and fit, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data points.

png pdf
Figure 1-d:
Observed diphoton invariant mass ${m_{\gamma \gamma }}$ spectra for the event categories used in the analysis of the 13 TeV data: (a,b) magnetic field strength $\mathrm {B}=$ 3.8 T; (c,d) $\mathrm {B}=$ 0 T; (a,c) both photons in the ECAL barrel detector, (b,d) one photon in the ECAL barrel detector and the other in an ECAL endcap detector. The results of a likelihood fit to the background-only hypothesis are also shown. The shaded regions show the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty bands. The lower panels show the difference between the data and fit, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data points.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Observed diphoton invariant mass ${m_{\gamma \gamma }}$ spectra for the event categories used in the analysis of the 8 TeV data for resonance mass $ {m_{\mathrm{X} }} \leq $ 850 GeV: (upper row) $\mathrm{min}( {R_{9}} )> $ 0.94 , (lower row) $\mathrm{min}( {R_{9}} )\leq $ 0.94 ; (left column) both photons in the ECAL barrel detector; (right column) one photon in the ECAL barrel detector and the other in the ECAL endcap detector. The results of background-only parametric fits to the data corresponding to the fit range used for the $ {m_{\mathrm{X} }} = $ 750 GeV hypothesis test are also shown [8]. The shaded regions show the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty bands. The lower panels show the difference between the data and fit, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data points.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Observed diphoton invariant mass ${m_{\gamma \gamma }}$ spectra for the event categories used in the analysis of the 8 TeV data for resonance mass $ {m_{\mathrm{X} }} \leq $ 850 GeV: (upper row) $\mathrm{min}( {R_{9}} )> $ 0.94 , (lower row) $\mathrm{min}( {R_{9}} )\leq $ 0.94 ; (left column) both photons in the ECAL barrel detector; (right column) one photon in the ECAL barrel detector and the other in the ECAL endcap detector. The results of background-only parametric fits to the data corresponding to the fit range used for the $ {m_{\mathrm{X} }} = $ 750 GeV hypothesis test are also shown [8]. The shaded regions show the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty bands. The lower panels show the difference between the data and fit, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data points.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
Observed diphoton invariant mass ${m_{\gamma \gamma }}$ spectra for the event categories used in the analysis of the 8 TeV data for resonance mass $ {m_{\mathrm{X} }} \leq $ 850 GeV: (upper row) $\mathrm{min}( {R_{9}} )> $ 0.94 , (lower row) $\mathrm{min}( {R_{9}} )\leq $ 0.94 ; (left column) both photons in the ECAL barrel detector; (right column) one photon in the ECAL barrel detector and the other in the ECAL endcap detector. The results of background-only parametric fits to the data corresponding to the fit range used for the $ {m_{\mathrm{X} }} = $ 750 GeV hypothesis test are also shown [8]. The shaded regions show the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty bands. The lower panels show the difference between the data and fit, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data points.

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
Observed diphoton invariant mass ${m_{\gamma \gamma }}$ spectra for the event categories used in the analysis of the 8 TeV data for resonance mass $ {m_{\mathrm{X} }} \leq $ 850 GeV: (upper row) $\mathrm{min}( {R_{9}} )> $ 0.94 , (lower row) $\mathrm{min}( {R_{9}} )\leq $ 0.94 ; (left column) both photons in the ECAL barrel detector; (right column) one photon in the ECAL barrel detector and the other in the ECAL endcap detector. The results of background-only parametric fits to the data corresponding to the fit range used for the $ {m_{\mathrm{X} }} = $ 750 GeV hypothesis test are also shown [8]. The shaded regions show the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty bands. The lower panels show the difference between the data and fit, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data points.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The 95% CL upper limits on the production of diphoton resonances as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{\mathrm{X} }} $, from the combined analysis of the 8 and 13 TeV data. The 8 TeV results are scaled by the ratio of the 8 to 13 TeV cross sections. The blue-grey (darker) curves and the green (lighter) ones correspond to the scalar and RS graviton signals, respectively. Solid (dashed) curves represent the observed (median expected) exclusion limit. The expected results are shown with their 1 standard deviation dispersion bands. The leading-order RS graviton production cross section is shown by the red dot-dashed curves. The results are shown for (upper) a narrow, (middle) an intermediate-width, and (lower) a broad resonance, with the value of the width ${\Gamma _{\mathrm{X} } / m_{\mathrm{X} }} $, relative to the mass, indicated in the legend of each plot.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Observed background-only $p$-values for narrow-width scalar resonances as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{\mathrm{X} }} $, from the combined analysis of the 8 and 13 TeV data. The results for the separate 8 and 13 TeV data sets are also shown. The inset shows an expanded region around $ {m_{\mathrm{X} }} = $ 750 GeV.
Summary
In summary, a search for the resonant production of high-mass photon pairs is presented. The analysis is based on 19.7 and 3.3 of proton-proton collisions collected at $\sqrt{s} =$ 8 and 13 TeV, respectively, by the CMS experiment. Limits on the production cross section of scalar resonances and Randall-Sundrum gravitons for resonance masses 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4 TeV and relative widths $1.4\times 10^{-4} < {\Gamma _{\mathrm{X} } / m_{\mathrm{X} }} < 5.6\times10^{-2}$ are determined. Using leading-order cross sections for RS graviton production, RS gravitons with masses below about 1.6, 3.3, and 3.8 TeV are excluded at 95% confidence level for $\tilde{k} =$ 0.01, 0.1, and 0.2, respectively, corresponding to $ {\Gamma _{\mathrm{X} } / m_{\mathrm{X} }} =1.4\times10^{-4}$, $1.4\times10^{-2}$, and $5.6\times10^{-2}$. A modest excess of events over the background-only hypothesis is observed for $m_{\mathrm{X}} \approx $ 750 GeV. The local $p$-value under the narrow-width hypothesis of $ {\Gamma _{\mathrm{X} } / m_{\mathrm{X} }} = 1.4 \times 10^{-4} $ is 3.4 standard deviations. At $m_{\mathrm{X}}=$ 750 GeV, the 8 and 13 TeV data contribute with similar weights to the combined result. The significance of the excess is reduced to about 1.6 standard deviations once the effect of searching under multiple signal hypotheses is taken into account. More data are required to determine the origin of this excess.
A similar analysis is presented by the ATLAS Collaboration [43].
Additional Figures

png pdf
Additional Figure 1:
Observed diphoton invariant mass ${m_{\gamma \gamma }}$ spectra for the event categories used in the analysis of the 8 TeV data for the $ {m_{\mathrm{X} }} >$ 850 GeV search. No event with $ {m_{\gamma \gamma }} >$ 1800 GeV is selected in the analysis. The results of a likelihood fit to the background-only hypothesis are also shown. The lower panel shows the difference between the data and fit, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data points.

png pdf
Additional Figure 2-a:
Measured composition of the background for the 13 TeV analysis at 3.8 T for the (a) EBEB and (b) EBEE categories. The method described in Ref. [1] was used to obtain these results. The background corresponds to the direct production of two photons ($\gamma \gamma $), the production of $\gamma $+jets events ($\gamma \mathrm{j}$), and the production of multijet events ($\mathrm{jj}$). The shaded error boxes represent the systematic uncertainties associated with the measurement, while the error bars represent the total uncertainties, obtained adding in quadrature statistical and systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Additional Figure 2-b:
Measured composition of the background for the 13 TeV analysis at 3.8 T for the (a) EBEB and (b) EBEE categories. The method described in Ref. [1] was used to obtain these results. The background corresponds to the direct production of two photons ($\gamma \gamma $), the production of $\gamma $+jets events ($\gamma \mathrm{j}$), and the production of multijet events ($\mathrm{jj}$). The shaded error boxes represent the systematic uncertainties associated with the measurement, while the error bars represent the total uncertainties, obtained adding in quadrature statistical and systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Additional Figure 3-a:
Comparison between the measured and the predicted invariant mass spectrum of the nonresonant SM $\gamma \gamma $ background for the 13 TeV analysis at 3.8 T for the (a) EBEB and (b) EBEE categories. The $\gamma$+jets and multijet background components are subtracted in data, using the method described in Ref. [1]. The predicted background is obtained correcting the distribution of the events generated with the SHERPA 2.1 [2] generator (where the CMS detector response was simulated using the GEANT4 package [3]) to match the predictions obtained with the 2$\gamma $ NNLO program [4].

png pdf
Additional Figure 3-b:
Comparison between the measured and the predicted invariant mass spectrum of the nonresonant SM $\gamma \gamma $ background for the 13 TeV analysis at 3.8 T for the (a) EBEB and (b) EBEE categories. The $\gamma$+jets and multijet background components are subtracted in data, using the method described in Ref. [1]. The predicted background is obtained correcting the distribution of the events generated with the SHERPA 2.1 [2] generator (where the CMS detector response was simulated using the GEANT4 package [3]) to match the predictions obtained with the 2$\gamma $ NNLO program [4].

png pdf
Additional Figure 4:
Observed background-only $p$-values for spin-0 resonances with $ {\Gamma _{\mathrm{X} } / m_{\mathrm{X} }} =5.6\times 10^{-2}$ as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{\mathrm{X} }}$ from the combined analysis of the 8 and 13 TeV data. The results for the 8 and 13 TeV data sets are also shown separately.

png pdf
Additional Figure 5-a:
Observed background-only $p$-values as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{\mathrm{X} }}$ from the combined analysis of the 8 and 13 TeV data. Three width hypotheses are shown: (a) $ {\Gamma _{\mathrm{X} } / m_{\mathrm{X} }} = 1.4 \times 10^{-4}$; (b) $ {\Gamma _{\mathrm{X} } / m_{\mathrm{X} }} = 1.4 \times 10^{-2}$; (c) $ {\Gamma _{\mathrm{X} } / m_{\mathrm{X} }} = 5.6 \times 10^{-2}$. In each plot, the results obtained under the RS graviton and scalar hypotheses are shown.

png pdf
Additional Figure 5-b:
Observed background-only $p$-values as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{\mathrm{X} }}$ from the combined analysis of the 8 and 13 TeV data. Three width hypotheses are shown: (a) $ {\Gamma _{\mathrm{X} } / m_{\mathrm{X} }} = 1.4 \times 10^{-4}$; (b) $ {\Gamma _{\mathrm{X} } / m_{\mathrm{X} }} = 1.4 \times 10^{-2}$; (c) $ {\Gamma _{\mathrm{X} } / m_{\mathrm{X} }} = 5.6 \times 10^{-2}$. In each plot, the results obtained under the RS graviton and scalar hypotheses are shown.

png pdf
Additional Figure 5-c:
Observed background-only $p$-values as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{\mathrm{X} }}$ from the combined analysis of the 8 and 13 TeV data. Three width hypotheses are shown: (a) $ {\Gamma _{\mathrm{X} } / m_{\mathrm{X} }} = 1.4 \times 10^{-4}$; (b) $ {\Gamma _{\mathrm{X} } / m_{\mathrm{X} }} = 1.4 \times 10^{-2}$; (c) $ {\Gamma _{\mathrm{X} } / m_{\mathrm{X} }} = 5.6 \times 10^{-2}$. In each plot, the results obtained under the RS graviton and scalar hypotheses are shown.

png pdf
Additional Figure 6-a:
Fraction of events selected by the analysis categories for 0.5 $< {m_{\mathrm{X} }} <$ 4.5 TeV and $ {\Gamma _{\mathrm{X} } / m_{\mathrm{X} }} = 1.4\times 10^{-4}$. Curves for both spin-0 and RS graviton resonances are shown, in the left plot for the 3.8 T sample and in the right one for the 0 T sample.

png pdf
Additional Figure 6-b:
Fraction of events selected by the analysis categories for 0.5 $< {m_{\mathrm{X} }} <$ 4.5 TeV and $ {\Gamma _{\mathrm{X} } / m_{\mathrm{X} }} = 1.4\times 10^{-4}$. Curves for both spin-0 and RS graviton resonances are shown, in the left plot for the 3.8 T sample and in the right one for the 0 T sample.

png pdf
Additional Figure 7-a:
Likelihood scan for the cross section corresponding to the largest excess in the combined analysis of the 8 and 13 TeV data sets. The (a) (resp. b) plot corresponds to the scalar (resp. RS graviton) signals. The 8 TeV results are scaled by the expected ratio of cross sections in each scenario.

png pdf
Additional Figure 7-b:
Likelihood scan for the cross section corresponding to the largest excess in the combined analysis of the 8 and 13 TeV data sets. The (a) (resp. b) plot corresponds to the scalar (resp. RS graviton) signals. The 8 TeV results are scaled by the expected ratio of cross sections in each scenario.
References
1 L. D. Landau On the angular momentum of a system of two photons Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 60 (1948) 207
2 C. N. Yang Selection Rules for the Dematerialization of a Particle into Two Photons PR77 (1950) 242
3 G. C. Branco et al. Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models PR 516 (2012) 1 1106.0034
4 T. D. Lee A Theory of Spontaneous T Violation PRD 8 (1973) 1226
5 L. Randall and R. Sundrum A large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension PRL 83 (1999) 3370 hep-ph/9905221
6 H. Davoudiasl, J. L. Hewett, and T. G. Rizzo Phenomenology of the Randall-Sundrum Gauge Hierarchy Model PRL 84 (2000) 2080 hep-ph/9909255
7 ATLAS Collaboration Search for Scalar Diphoton Resonances in the Mass Range 65--600$ GeV $ with the ATLAS Detector in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ Collision Data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PRL 113 (2014) 171801 1407.6583
8 CMS Collaboration Search for diphoton resonances in the mass range from 150 to 850$ GeV $ in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PLB 750 (2015) 494 CMS-HIG-14-006
1506.02301
9 ATLAS Collaboration Search for high-mass diphoton resonances in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 92 (2015) 032004 1504.05511
10 ATLAS Collaboration Search for extra dimensions in diphoton events using proton-proton collisions recorded at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 043007 1210.8389
11 ATLAS Collaboration Search for high-mass dilepton resonances in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 90 (2014) 052005 1405.4123
12 ATLAS Collaboration Search for dilepton resonances in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRL 107 (2011) 272002 1108.1582
13 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new phenomena in the $ W W $ to $ \ell \nu \ell{\rm'} \nu{\rm'} $ final state in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 718 (2013) 860 1208.2880
14 ATLAS Collaboration Search for resonant diboson production in the $ WW/WZ \to \ell \nu j j $ decay channels with the ATLAS detector at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PRD 87 (2013) 112006 1305.0125
15 CMS Collaboration Search for signatures of extra dimensions in the diphoton mass spectrum at the Large Hadron Collider PRL 108 (2012) 111801 CMS-EXO-11-038
1112.0688
16 CMS Collaboration Search for physics beyond the standard model in dilepton mass spectra in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JHEP 04 (2015) 025 CMS-EXO-12-061
1412.6302
17 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy narrow dilepton resonances in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV and $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PLB 720 (2013) 63 CMS-EXO-12-015
1212.6175
18 CMS Collaboration Search for narrow resonances decaying to dijets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRL 116 (2016) 071801 CMS-EXO-15-001
1512.01224
19 CMS Collaboration Search for narrow resonances using the dijet mass spectrum in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PRD 87 (2013) 114015 CMS-EXO-12-016
1302.4794
20 CMS Collaboration Search for narrow resonances in dijet final states at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the novel CMS technique of data scouting Submitted to \it PRLett CMS-EXO-14-005
1604.08907
21 CMS Collaboration Search for resonances and quantum black holes using dijet mass spectra in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PRD 91 (2015) 052009 CMS-EXO-12-059
1501.04198
22 CMS Collaboration Search for massive resonances in dijet systems containing jets tagged as $ \mathrm{ W } $ or $ \mathrm{ Z } $ boson decays in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JHEP 08 (2014) 173 CMS-EXO-12-024
1405.1994
23 CMS Collaboration Search for exotic resonances decaying into $ \mathrm{ W }\mathrm{ Z }/\mathrm{ Z }\mathrm{ Z } $ in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 02 (2013) 036 CMS-EXO-12-014
1211.5779
24 CMS Collaboration Search for a narrow spin-2 resonance decaying to a pair of $ \mathrm{ Z } $ vector bosons in the semileptonic final state PLB 718 (2013) 1208 CMS-EXO-11-102
1209.3807
25 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
26 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow event reconstruction in CMS and performance for jets, taus, and $ E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}} $ CDS
27 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the particle-flow event with the first LHC collisions recorded in the CMS detector CDS
28 T. Sj\"ostrand et al. An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
29 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions with LHC data Nucl. Phys. B 867 (2013) 244 1207.1303
30 T. Gleisberg et al. Event generation with SHERPA 1.1 JHEP 02 (2009) 007 0811.4622
31 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
32 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4 --- a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
33 CMS Collaboration Performance of photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P08010 CMS-EGM-14-001
1502.02702
34 CMS Collaboration Observation of the diphoton decay of the Higgs boson and measurement of its properties EPJC 74 (2014) 3076 CMS-HIG-13-001
1407.0558
35 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential cross sections for the production of a pair of isolated photons in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV EPJC 74 (2014) 3129 CMS-SMP-13-001
1405.7225
36 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
37 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ \rm CL_s $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
38 LHC Higgs Combination Group Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 CMS-NOTE-2011-005
39 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
40 M. Baak, S. Gadatsch, R. Harrington, and W. Verkerke Interpolation between multi-dimensional histograms using a new non-linear moment morphing method NIMA 771 (2015) 39 1410.7388
41 CMS Collaboration CMS Luminosity Measurement for the 2015 Data Taking Period CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001
42 E. Gross and O. Vitells Trial factors or the look elsewhere effect in high energy physics EPJC 70 (2010) 525 1005.1891
43 ATLAS Collaboration Search for resonances in diphoton events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector Submitted to JHEP 1606.03833
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN