CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-TOP-13-017 ; CERN-EP-2016-208
Search for top quark decays via Higgs-boson-mediated flavor-changing neutral currents in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV
JHEP 02 (2017) 079
Abstract: A search is performed for Higgs-boson-mediated flavor-changing neutral currents in the decays of top quarks. The search is based on proton-proton collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.7 fb$^{-1}$ at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV collected with the CMS detector at the LHC. Events in which a top quark pair is produced with one top quark decaying into a charm or up quark and a Higgs boson (H), and the other top quark decaying into a bottom quark and a W boson are selected. The Higgs boson in these events is assumed to subsequently decay into either dibosons or difermions. No significant excess is observed above the expected standard model background, and an upper limit at the 95% confidence level is set on the branching fraction $\mathcal{B} ({\rm t \to Hc} )$ of 0.40% and $\mathcal{B}({\rm t \to Hu})$ of 0.55%, where the expected upper limits are 0.43% and 0.40%, respectively. These results correspond to upper limits on the square of the flavor-changing Higgs boson Yukawa couplings $|\lambda_{\rm tc}^{\mathrm{H}}|^{2} < 6.9\times 10^{-3}$ and $|\lambda_{\rm tu}^{\mathrm{H}}|^{2} < 9.8 \times 10^{-3}$.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Trilepton invariant mass versus opposite-sign dilepton invariant mass in the trilepton channel after the event selection described in Section 3 for simulated signal, estimated background, and data, from left to right.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Jet multiplicity in the samples featuring three identified leptons (left) and two SS leptons (right) after rejecting events with Z bosons. The data are represented by the points with vertical bars, and the unfilled histogram shows the expected signal assuming $\mathcal {B}({\rm t\to Hc})$ is equal to 3%. The dominant backgrounds are represented with filled histograms and the background (BG) uncertainty is shown as shaded bands.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Jet multiplicity in the samples featuring three identified leptons after rejecting events with Z bosons. The data are represented by the points with vertical bars, and the unfilled histogram shows the expected signal assuming $\mathcal {B}({\rm t\to Hc})$ is equal to 3%. The dominant backgrounds are represented with filled histograms and the background (BG) uncertainty is shown as shaded bands.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Jet multiplicity in the samples featuring two SS leptons after rejecting events with Z bosons. The data are represented by the points with vertical bars, and the unfilled histogram shows the expected signal assuming $\mathcal {B}({\rm t\to Hc})$ is equal to 3%. The dominant backgrounds are represented with filled histograms and the background (BG) uncertainty is shown as shaded bands.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The ${E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}}$ (top) and ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ (bottom) distributions in the trilepton (left) and SS dilepton (right) channels in data (points with bars) and predicted by the SM background simulations (filled histograms) after rejecting events containing Z bosons, requiring at least two jets, and the event selection described in Section 3. The overall background uncertainty is shown in shaded black. The expected signal assuming a $\mathcal {B}({\rm t\to Hc})$ of 3% is shown by the unfilled histogram.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The ${E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}}$ distribution in the trilepton channel in data (points with bars) and predicted by the SM background simulations (filled histograms) after rejecting events containing Z bosons, requiring at least two jets, and the event selection described in Section 3. The overall background uncertainty is shown in shaded black. The expected signal assuming a $\mathcal {B}({\rm t\to Hc})$ of 3% is shown by the unfilled histogram.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The ${E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}}$ distribution in the SS dilepton channel in data (points with bars) and predicted by the SM background simulations (filled histograms) after rejecting events containing Z bosons, requiring at least two jets, and the event selection described in Section 3. The overall background uncertainty is shown in shaded black. The expected signal assuming a $\mathcal {B}({\rm t\to Hc})$ of 3% is shown by the unfilled histogram.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
The ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ distribution in the trilepton channel in data (points with bars) and predicted by the SM background simulations (filled histograms) after rejecting events containing Z bosons, requiring at least two jets, and the event selection described in Section 3. The overall background uncertainty is shown in shaded black. The expected signal assuming a $\mathcal {B}({\rm t\to Hc})$ of 3% is shown by the unfilled histogram.

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
The ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ distribution in the SS dilepton channel in data (points with bars) and predicted by the SM background simulations (filled histograms) after rejecting events containing Z bosons, requiring at least two jets, and the event selection described in Section 3. The overall background uncertainty is shown in shaded black. The expected signal assuming a $\mathcal {B}({\rm t\to Hc})$ of 3% is shown by the unfilled histogram.

png pdf
Figure 4:
The $m_{\gamma \gamma }$ distribution and the fit result of the hadronic (left) and leptonic (right) channels. The dashed line represents the component of the nonresonant diphoton background, while the solid line represents the total background plus signal. The shaded bands represent one and two standard deviation uncertainties of the fit.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The $m_{\gamma \gamma }$ distribution and the fit result of the hadronic channel. The dashed line represents the component of the nonresonant diphoton background, while the solid line represents the total background plus signal. The shaded bands represent one and two standard deviation uncertainties of the fit.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The $m_{\gamma \gamma }$ distribution and the fit result of the leptonic channel. The dashed line represents the component of the nonresonant diphoton background, while the solid line represents the total background plus signal. The shaded bands represent one and two standard deviation uncertainties of the fit.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Comparison between data and simulated events after the basic selection for b jet + lepton events has been applied: the ${E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}}$ distribution (left) and the reconstructed transverse mass of the W boson candidate (right).

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Comparison between data and simulated events after the basic selection for b jet + lepton events has been applied: the ${E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}}$ distribution.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Comparison between data and simulated events after the basic selection for b jet + lepton events has been applied: the reconstructed transverse mass of the W boson candidate.

png pdf
Figure 6:
The output distributions from the ANN discriminator for data (points) and simulated background (lines) where the ANN was trained to discriminate the backgrounds from either $\mathrm{ t } \to \mathrm{ H } \mathrm{c} $ (left) or $\mathrm{ t } \to \mathrm{ H } \mathrm{u} $ (right) decays. The solid line shows the result of the fit of the signal and background templates to data. The dotted line gives the predicted signal distribution from simulation for $\mathcal {B}(\mathrm{ t } \to \mathrm{ H } \mathrm{c} ) = $ 3% and the filled histogram shows the proportion of signal estimated from the fit.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
The output distributions from the ANN discriminator for data (points) and simulated background (lines) where the ANN was trained to discriminate the backgrounds from $\mathrm{ t } \to \mathrm{ H } \mathrm{u} $ decays. The solid line shows the result of the fit of the signal and background templates to data. The dotted line gives the predicted signal distribution from simulation for $\mathcal {B}(\mathrm{ t } \to \mathrm{ H } \mathrm{c} ) = $ 3% and the filled histogram shows the proportion of signal estimated from the fit.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
The output distributions from the ANN discriminator for data (points) and simulated background (lines) where the ANN was trained to discriminate the backgrounds from either $\mathrm{ t } \to \mathrm{ H } \mathrm{c} $ (left) or $\mathrm{ t } \to \mathrm{ H } \mathrm{u} $ (right) decays. The solid line shows the result of the fit of the signal and background templates to data. The dotted line gives the predicted signal distribution from simulation for $\mathcal {B}(\mathrm{ t } \to \mathrm{ H } \mathrm{c} ) = $ 3% and the filled histogram shows the proportion of signal estimated from the fit.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of the requirements for the ${\rm pp \to {\mathrm{ t } {}\mathrm{ \bar{t} } } \to Hq + Wb}$ channels used in this analysis.

png pdf
Table 2:
Two-dimensional selection requirements on ${E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}}$ and ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ applied in the SS dilepton channel. An event is selected if it satisfies one of the three listed sets.

png pdf
Table 3:
The predicted and observed inclusive event yields after the full event selection for the trilepton and SS dilepton categories assuming $\mathcal {B}({\rm t\rightarrow Hq}) = $ 1%. The quoted uncertainties include both statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. The total number of observed events is given in the last row.

png pdf
Table 4:
Observed event yield and the expected numbers of background and signal events for the diphoton selection in the hadronic and leptonic channels in the 100 $ < m_{\gamma \gamma } < $ 180 GeV mass range. The signal yields assume $\mathcal {B}(\mathrm{ t } \to \mathrm{ H } \mathrm{ q } ) = $ 1%. The uncertainties are statistical only.

png pdf
Table 5:
The expected number of background and signal events for the b jet + lepton selection from simulation. The signal yields from the simulation of the signal assume $\mathcal {B}(\mathrm{ t } \to \mathrm{ H } \mathrm{ q } ) = $ 1%. Uncertainties combine both statistical and systematic components in quadrature.

png pdf
Table 6:
The measured number of background and signal events for the b jet + lepton selection from fitting the ANN output trained on $\mathrm{ t } \to \mathrm{ H } \mathrm{c} $ and $\mathrm{ t } \to \mathrm{ H } \mathrm{u} $ final states. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic values, respectively. The observed number of events is shown in the last row.

png pdf
Table 7:
Systematic uncertainties for the $\rm t \bar{t} \to Hq + Wb $ (q = u, c) channels in percent. Ranges are quoted to indicate values that vary across the different analyses.

png pdf
Table 8:
The observed and expected upper limits at the 95% CL on the branching fraction (in %) of $\rm t \rightarrow Hq $ (q = u, c) for: trilepton, SS dilepton, and combined multilepton channels; diphoton; b jet + lepton; and the combination of all channels. For the expected upper limit, the limit plus and minus a standard deviation are also shown.
Summary
A search for flavor-changing neutral currents in the decay of a top quark to a charm or up quark and a Higgs boson based on $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV proton-proton collisions has been presented. Samples of multilepton, diphoton, and b jet + lepton events were selected from data recorded with the CMS detector, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.7 fb$^{-1}$. The topologies ${\rm pp \to \mathrm{ t \bar{t} } \to}$ ${\rm Hq + Wb}$ events, where q = u, c and H is allowed to decay into WW, ZZ, $\tau \tau$, $\gamma\gamma$, and $\mathrm{ b \bar{b} }$. No excess of events above the SM background is observed, and branching fractions of ${\cal B}({\rm t \to Hc})$ larger than 0.40% and ${\cal B}({\rm t \to Hu})$ larger than 0.55% are excluded at the 95% confidence level. These upper limits are the most stringent ones published and provide the strongest constraints on top quark flavor-changing Higgs boson Yukawa couplings.
References
1 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 1 1207.7214
2 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 30 CMS-HIG-12-028
1207.7235
3 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 06 (2013) 081 CMS-HIG-12-036
1303.4571
4 Particle Data Group, K. A. Olive et al. Review of Particle Physics CPC 38 (2014) 090001
5 M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov Total Top-Quark Pair-Production Cross Section at Hadron Colliders Through $ O(\alpha\frac{4}{S}) $ PRL 110 (2013) 252004 1303.6254
6 G. Eilam, J. L. Hewett, and A. Soni Rare decays of the top quark in the standard and two Higgs doublet models PRD 44 (1991) 1473
7 B. Mele, S. Petrarca, and A. Soddu A new evaluation of the t$ \rightarrow $cH decay width in the standard model PLB 435 (1998) 401 hep-ph/9805498
8 J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra Top flavor-changing neutral interactions: Theoretical expectations and experimental detection Acta Phys. Polon. B 35 (2004) 2695 hep-ph/0409342
9 ATLAS Collaboration Search for top quark decays t $ \to $ qH with H $ \to \gamma\gamma $ using the ATLAS detector JHEP 06 (2014) 008 1403.6293
10 ATLAS Collaboration Search for flavour-changing neutral current top quark decays $ t\to Hq $ in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 12 (2015) 061 1509.06047
11 CMS Collaboration Searches for heavy Higgs bosons in two-Higgs-doublet models and for t to ch decay using multilepton and diphoton final states in pp collisions at 8 TeV PRD 90 (2014) 112013 CMS-HIG-13-025
1410.2751
12 LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 3. Higgs Properties 1307.1347
13 A. Denner et al. Standard model Higgs-boson branching ratios with uncertainties EPJC 71 (2011) 1753 1107.5909
14 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
15 CMS Collaboration Performance of Photon Reconstruction and Identification with the CMS Detector in Proton-Proton Collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P08010 CMS-EGM-14-001
1502.02702
16 CMS Collaboration Particle--flow event reconstruction in CMS and performance for jets, taus, and $ E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}} $ CDS
17 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the particle--flow event reconstruction with the first lhc collisions recorded in the cms detector CDS
18 S. Baffioni et al. Electron reconstruction in CMS EPJC 49 (2007) 1099
19 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in $ pp $ collision events at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
20 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
21 CMS Collaboration Study of the mass and spin-parity of the Higgs boson candidate via its decays to Z boson pairs PRL 110 (2013) 81803 CMS-HIG-12-041
1212.6639
22 CMS Collaboration Energy calibration and resolution of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter in $ pppp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 7 $ TeV JINST 8 (2013) P09009 CMS-EGM-11-001
1306.2016
23 CMS Collaboration Observation of the diphoton decay of the Higgs boson and measurement of its properties EPJC 74 (2014) 3076 CMS-HIG-13-001
1407.0558
24 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive $ W $ and $ Z $ production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 10 (2011) 132 CMS-EWK-10-005
1107.4789
25 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Dispelling the $ N^{3} $ myth for the $ k_t $ jet-finder PLB 641 (2006) 57 hep-ph/0512210
26 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2008) 119 0707.1378
27 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The Catchment Area of Jets JHEP 04 (2008) 005 0802.1188
28 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet User Manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
29 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) 11002 CMS-JME-10-011
1107.4277
30 CMS Collaboration Identification of b-quark jets with the CMS experiment JINST 8 (2013) P04013 CMS-BTV-12-001
1211.4462
31 J. Alwall et al. MadGraph 5: Going Beyond JHEP 06 (2011) 128 1106.0522
32 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
33 S. Frixione et al. Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
34 S. Alioli et al. A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
35 T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual JHEP 05 (2006) 026 hep-ph/0603175
36 Z. Was TAUOLA the library for tau lepton decay, and KKMC / KORALB / KORALZ /... status report NPPS 98 (2001) 96 hep-ph/0011305
37 T. Gleisberg et al. Event generation with SHERPA 1.1 JHEP 02 (2009) 007 0811.4622
38 J. Reuter et al. Modern Particle Physics Event Generation with WHIZARD J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 608 (2015) 012063 1410.4505
39 R. Field Min-Bias and the Underlying Event at the LHC Acta Phys. Polon. B 42 (2011) 2631 1110.5530
40 H.-L. Lai et al. Uncertainty induced by QCD coupling in the CTEQ global analysis of parton distributions PRD 82 (2010) 054021 1004.4624
41 P. M. Nadolsky et al. Implications of CTEQ global analysis for collider observables PRD 78 (2008) 013004 0802.0007
42 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4 -- a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
43 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the differential cross section for top quark pair production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV EPJC 75 (2015) 542 CMS-TOP-12-028
1505.04480
44 CMS Collaboration Search for the associated production of the Higgs boson with a top-quark pair JHEP 09 (2014) 087 CMS-HIG-13-029
1408.1682
45 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the Drell-Yan cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 10 (2011) 007 CMS-EWK-10-007
1108.0566
46 R. C. Gray et al. Backgrounds To Higgs Boson Searches from $ W \gamma^* \to l \nu l (l) $ Asymmetric Internal Conversion 1110.1368
47 CMS Collaboration Search for new physics with same-sign isolated dilepton events with jets and missing transverse energy at the LHC JHEP 06 (2011) 077 CMS-SUS-10-004
1104.3168
48 CMS Collaboration Search for new physics with same-sign isolated dilepton events with jets and missing transverse energy PRL 109 (2012) 071803 CMS-SUS-11-010
1205.6615
49 CMS Collaboration Search for the standard model Higgs boson decaying to $ W^{+}W^{-} $ in the fully leptonic final state in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV PLB 710 (2012) 91 CMS-HIG-11-024
1202.1489
50 CMS Collaboration Search for the standard model Higgs boson decaying into two photons in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV PLB 710 (2012) 403 CMS-HIG-11-033
1202.1487
51 H. Voss, A. Hocker, J. Stelzer, and F. Tegenfeldt TMVA, the toolkit for multivariate data analysis with ROOT in XIth International Workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Physics Research (ACAT) 2007 physics/0703039
52 CMS Collaboration Cms luminosity based on pixel cluster counting - summer 2013 update CMS-PAS-LUM-13-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-13-001
53 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{ t \bar{t} } $ production cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV in dilepton final states containing one $ \tau $ lepton PLB 739 (2014) 23 CMS-TOP-12-026
1407.6643
54 D. Bourilkov, R. C. Group, and M. R. Whalley LHAPDF: PDF use from the Tevatron to the LHC in TeV4LHC Workshop - 4th meeting Batavia, Illinois, 2005 hep-ph/0605240
55 M. V. Garzelli, A. Kardos, C. G. Papadopoulos, and Z. Trocsanyi $ \mathrm{ t \bar{t} } \mathrm{W}^{\pm} $ and $ \mathrm{ t \bar{t} } $ Z hadroproduction at NLO accuracy in QCD with parton shower and hadronization effects JHEP 11 (2012) 056 1208.2665
56 LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Collaboration Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 1. Inclusive Observables 1101.0593
57 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
58 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ CL_s $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
59 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
60 N. Craig et al. Searching for t $ \to $ ch with Multi-Leptons PRD 86 (2012) 075002 1207.6794
61 D. Atwood, S. K. Gupta, and A. Soni Constraining the flavor changing Higgs couplings to the top-quark at the LHC JHEP 10 (2014) 057 1305.2427
62 A. Denner and T. Sack The top width NPB 358 (1991) 46
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN