Deliverable Review Form

Identification of the deliverable or milestone
Project: EMI	Deliverable or milestone identifier: Dx.y.z
Title: MNA2.2.2 - Dissemination material	Doc. identifier: EMI-DXXX-CDSREF-Title-vx.x
Author(s): Pina Salente	Due date: __

Identification of the reviewer
Name: Florida Estrella	Affiliation: CERN	EMI Activity/External project or Institute: NA1

Review date	mm/dd/yyyy
Author(s) revision date	mm/dd/yyyy
Reviewer acceptance date	mm/dd/yyyy

Attach the reviewed document to the deliverable page, put here a link

General comments

210511 PO comments on MNA222 v2
1. Gridtalk- web article -> Gridcast (GridTalk does not exist anylonger)
2. LSWN – web article (2nd entry) -> LSWN – press release
3. For consistency, can 1.2 table have the same format as 1.1 ?
4. The ff are missing
-iSGTW EMI 1 K announcement
-in reach training videos
-EMI TC videos (or interviews)
5. Move Future Events and Public Web Site to Annex(es) as these are strictly not part of the M report but useful to add nonetheless
6. Can we add a new Illustration 4 showing the EMI 1 K release ?
7. Add to Future Event the next planned OGF meeting(s) and CHEP2011

* What happened to the planned EMI 1 K Press Release ?

Answers to comments

240411 WP leader answers to PO comments

1. Done
2. Done
3. Done
4. 1. Added
   2. I don't agree, those videos have been done for internal use, and reports internal details with low dissemination interest.
   3. Added to table 1.1 (which has been integrated also with all EMI K issues.
5. Done
6. Done
7. OK OGF, next CHEP is in May 2012.

Additional recommendations (not affecting the document content, e.g. recommendation for future work)

Detailed comments on the content

Note 1: The reviewers must list here any observation they want to track explicitly and that require interaction with the authors
Alternatively all changes must be listed in the document itself using Word change tracking features (if you use Word)
Note 2: These comments have to be explicitly addressed by the authors and the action taken must be clearly described

N°	Page	Section	Observations and Replies	Is Addressed?
1	xx	x.y	Sequence of comments and replies separated by twiki signature and date
2
3
4

Any other modification, spelling or grammatical corrections, etc must be done directly in the document using tracked changes or similar mechanisms that allows the authors to identify which correction is suggested.

-- AlbertoDiMeglio - 12-Jul-2010

-- FloridaEstrella - 21-May-2011