17/05
PO comments to take into account, before review:
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/EMI/MilestoneMSA24

IMPORTANT: 
0. Milestone covers both tools and procedures (see milestone abstract). The latter is missing (only small mention under bug tracking).
1. Clearer distinction bw sw tools and infrastructure; taking comment (0) SA2 has delivered tools, infrastructure, procedures.
2. Each 1.2 artefact should include -short description- of who is using it, for what purpose and clear indication of wide-spread use within EMI. For instance this is done for EMI Building but not for EMI Testing.
3. Section 1.2 is missing the infrastructure and procedure
4. Infrastructure: ETICS and Integration Tesbed; both should be included

Cosmetic/Minor:
0. Link to repo incorrect
1. You only have 1 milestone (not milestones).
2. Add CDS URLS of DSA2* deliverables
3. Consistent orthography of product teams (you use different spellings, caps, etc)


18/05
My take on SA2:
SA2 has put in place a functional suite of quality assurance policies, tools, repositories and testbeds for EMI development and deployment.

If we follow your structure of (1) Summary and (2) Details

(1) Summary: A high level description -what- SA2 has put in place that is being using across the project to support the development and deployment activities in EMI.

(2) Details: Organise this according to the 4 types (policies, tools, repositories, testbeds); and for each type you identify the artefacts (what it is, who is using it, for what purpose, and clear indication of wide-spread use).

-Florida 



-- Main.FloridaEstrella - 17-May-2011