CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-EXO-16-027
Search for resonant production of high mass photon pairs using 12.9 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV and combined interpretation of searches at 8 and 13 TeV.
Abstract: We report on a search for resonant production of high mass photon pairs. The search employs 12.9 fb$^{-1}$ of pp collision data collected by the CMS experiment in 2016 at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. It is aimed at spin-0 and spin-2 resonances of mass between 0.5 and 4.5 TeV and width, relative to the mass, up to $ 5.6 \times 10^{-2} $. The results of the search are combined statistically with those previously obtained by the CMS collaboration at $\sqrt{s}= $ 8 and 13 TeV. Limits are set on scalar resonances produced through gluon-gluon fusion, and on Randall-Sundrum gravitons. No significant excess is observed over the standard model predictions.
Figures Summary Additional Figures References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Comparison between the predicted and observed invariant mass distribution of electron pairs obtained after the application of energy scale, resolution and identification efficiency corrections. Distributions are shown for events where both electrons are reconstructed in the barrel (a) and events where one electron is in an endcap (b).

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Comparison between the predicted and observed invariant mass distribution of electron pairs obtained after the application of energy scale, resolution and identification efficiency corrections. Distributions are shown for events where both electrons are reconstructed in the barrel (a) and events where one electron is in an endcap (b).

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Observed invariant mass spectra for the EBEB (a) and EBEE (b). No event with $ {m_{\gamma \gamma }} > $ 2000 GeV is selected in the analysis. The results of a likelihood fit to the background-only hypothesis are also shown. The shaded regions show the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty bands associated with the fit, and reflect the statistical uncertainty of the data. The lower panels show the difference between the data and fit, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data points.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Observed invariant mass spectra for the EBEB (a) and EBEE (b). No event with $ {m_{\gamma \gamma }} > $ 2000 GeV is selected in the analysis. The results of a likelihood fit to the background-only hypothesis are also shown. The shaded regions show the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty bands associated with the fit, and reflect the statistical uncertainty of the data. The lower panels show the difference between the data and fit, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data points.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The 95% CL upper limits on the production of diphoton resonances as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} $, from the analysis of the 12.9 fb$^{-1}$ data collected in 2016 at 13 TeV . The blue-grey (darker) curves and the green (lighter) ones correspond to the scalar and RS graviton signals, respectively. Solid (dashed) curves represent the observed (median expected) exclusion limit. The expected results are shown with their 1 standard deviation dispersion bands. The leading-order RS graviton production cross section is shown by the red dot-dashed curves. The results are shown for (upper) a narrow, (middle) an intermediate-width, and (lower) a broad resonance, with the value of the width ${\Gamma _{ {\mathrm {X}}} / m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} $, relative to the mass, indicated in the legend of each plot.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Observed background-only $p$-values for resonances with $ {\Gamma _{ {\mathrm {X}}} / m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} = 1.4 \times 10^{-4}$ (a), $1.4 \times 10^{-2} $ (b), and $5.6 \times 10^{-2} $ (c) as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} $, from the analysis of the 12.9 fb$^{-1}$ data collected at ${\sqrt {s}} =$ 13 TeV in 2016. Solid black and dashed blue lines correspond to spin-0 and spin-2 resonances respectively.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Observed background-only $p$-values for resonances with $ {\Gamma _{ {\mathrm {X}}} / m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} = 1.4 \times 10^{-4}$ (a), $1.4 \times 10^{-2} $ (b), and $5.6 \times 10^{-2} $ (c) as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} $, from the analysis of the 12.9 fb$^{-1}$ data collected at ${\sqrt {s}} =$ 13 TeV in 2016. Solid black and dashed blue lines correspond to spin-0 and spin-2 resonances respectively.

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
Observed background-only $p$-values for resonances with $ {\Gamma _{ {\mathrm {X}}} / m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} = 1.4 \times 10^{-4}$ (a), $1.4 \times 10^{-2} $ (b), and $5.6 \times 10^{-2} $ (c) as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} $, from the analysis of the 12.9 fb$^{-1}$ data collected at ${\sqrt {s}} =$ 13 TeV in 2016. Solid black and dashed blue lines correspond to spin-0 and spin-2 resonances respectively.

png pdf
Figure 5:
The 95% CL upper limits on the production of diphoton resonances as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} $, from the combined analysis of the 13 TeV data collected in 2015 and in 2016. The blue-grey (darker) curves and the green (lighter) ones correspond to the scalar and RS graviton signals, respectively. Solid (dashed) curves represent the observed (median expected) exclusion limit. The expected results are shown with their 1 standard deviation dispersion bands. The leading-order RS graviton production cross section is shown by the red dot-dashed curves. The results are shown for (upper) a narrow, (middle) an intermediate-width, and (lower) a broad resonance, with the value of the width ${\Gamma _{ {\mathrm {X}}} / m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} $, relative to the mass, indicated in the legend of each plot.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Observed background-only $p$-values for resonances with $ {\Gamma _{ {\mathrm {X}}} / m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4}$ (a,b) and $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $ (c,d) as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} $, from the combined analysis of the 13 TeV data recorded in 2015 and 2016. The results obtained with the two individual datasets are also shown. Curves corresponding to the scalar and RS graviton hypotheses are shown in (a,c) and (b,d) respectively.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Observed background-only $p$-values for resonances with $ {\Gamma _{ {\mathrm {X}}} / m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4}$ (a,b) and $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $ (c,d) as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} $, from the combined analysis of the 13 TeV data recorded in 2015 and 2016. The results obtained with the two individual datasets are also shown. Curves corresponding to the scalar and RS graviton hypotheses are shown in (a,c) and (b,d) respectively.

png pdf
Figure 6-c:
Observed background-only $p$-values for resonances with $ {\Gamma _{ {\mathrm {X}}} / m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4}$ (a,b) and $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $ (c,d) as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} $, from the combined analysis of the 13 TeV data recorded in 2015 and 2016. The results obtained with the two individual datasets are also shown. Curves corresponding to the scalar and RS graviton hypotheses are shown in (a,c) and (b,d) respectively.

png pdf
Figure 6-d:
Observed background-only $p$-values for resonances with $ {\Gamma _{ {\mathrm {X}}} / m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4}$ (a,b) and $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $ (c,d) as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} $, from the combined analysis of the 13 TeV data recorded in 2015 and 2016. The results obtained with the two individual datasets are also shown. Curves corresponding to the scalar and RS graviton hypotheses are shown in (a,c) and (b,d) respectively.

png pdf
Figure 7:
The 95% CL upper limits on the production of diphoton resonances as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} $, from the combined analysis of the 8 and 13 TeV data. The 8 TeV results are scaled by the ratio of the 8 to 13 TeV cross sections. The blue-grey (darker) curves and the green (lighter) ones correspond to the scalar and RS graviton signals, respectively. Solid (dashed) curves represent the observed (median expected) exclusion limit. The expected results are shown with their 1 standard deviation dispersion bands. The leading-order RS graviton production cross section is shown by the red dot-dashed curves. The results are shown for (upper) a narrow, (middle) an intermediate-width, and (lower) a broad resonance, with the value of the width ${\Gamma _{ {\mathrm {X}}} / m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} $, relative to the mass, indicated in the legend of each plot.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
Observed background-only $p$-values for resonances with $ {\Gamma _{ {\mathrm {X}}} / m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} = 1.4 \times 10^{-4} $ (a,b) and $ 5.6 \times 10^{-2} $ (c,d) as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} $, from the combined analysis of the 8 and 13 TeV data. The results obtained at the two centre of mass energies are also shown. Curves corresponding to the scalar and RS graviton hypotheses are shown in (a,c) and (b,d) columns respectively.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
Observed background-only $p$-values for resonances with $ {\Gamma _{ {\mathrm {X}}} / m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} = 1.4 \times 10^{-4} $ (a,b) and $ 5.6 \times 10^{-2} $ (c,d) as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} $, from the combined analysis of the 8 and 13 TeV data. The results obtained at the two centre of mass energies are also shown. Curves corresponding to the scalar and RS graviton hypotheses are shown in (a,c) and (b,d) columns respectively.

png pdf
Figure 8-c:
Observed background-only $p$-values for resonances with $ {\Gamma _{ {\mathrm {X}}} / m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} = 1.4 \times 10^{-4} $ (a,b) and $ 5.6 \times 10^{-2} $ (c,d) as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} $, from the combined analysis of the 8 and 13 TeV data. The results obtained at the two centre of mass energies are also shown. Curves corresponding to the scalar and RS graviton hypotheses are shown in (a,c) and (b,d) columns respectively.

png pdf
Figure 8-d:
Observed background-only $p$-values for resonances with $ {\Gamma _{ {\mathrm {X}}} / m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} = 1.4 \times 10^{-4} $ (a,b) and $ 5.6 \times 10^{-2} $ (c,d) as a function of the resonance mass ${m_{ {\mathrm {X}}}} $, from the combined analysis of the 8 and 13 TeV data. The results obtained at the two centre of mass energies are also shown. Curves corresponding to the scalar and RS graviton hypotheses are shown in (a,c) and (b,d) columns respectively.
Summary
A search for the resonant production of high mass photon pairs has been presented. The analysis is based on 12.9 fb$^{-1}$ of pp collisions collected by the CMS experiment in 2016 at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV. Events containing two photon candidates with transverse momenta above 75 GeV are selected. The mass spectrum above 500 GeV is inspected to search for the production of spin-0 and spin-2 resonances. Limits on the production of scalar resonances and Randall-Sundrum gravitons in the range where 0.5 TeV $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV and $\Gamma_{\mathrm{X}}/m_{\mathrm{X}} < 5.6 \times 10^{-2}$ are set using the modified frequentist approach. The results obtained with the 2016 dataset are combined statistically with those obtained in Ref. [12] using data corresponding to 19.7 fb$^{-1}$ and 3.3 fb$^{-1}$ recorded at $\sqrt{s}=$ 8 and $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV respectively. No significant excess is observed above the predictions from the standard model. Using the LO cross sections from PYTHIA-8.2, RS gravitons with masses below 3.85 and 4.45 TeV are excluded for $\tilde{k} =$ 0.1 and 0.2 respectively. For $\tilde{k}=0.01$, graviton masses below 1.95 TeV are excluded, except for the region between 1.75 TeV and 1.85 TeV. These are, to-date, the most stringent limits on RS graviton production.
Additional Figures

png pdf
Additional Figure 1-a:
Photon identification efficiency for all selection requirements except the electron rejection, measured in barrel (a) and endcaps (b) using the tag-and-probe method for both data and simulated events. The lower panel shows the ratio between the efficiencies in data and simulation.

png pdf
Additional Figure 1-b:
Photon identification efficiency for all selection requirements except the electron rejection, measured in barrel (a) and endcaps (b) using the tag-and-probe method for both data and simulated events. The lower panel shows the ratio between the efficiencies in data and simulation.

png pdf
Additional Figure 2-a:
Observed background-only $p$-values for resonances with $\Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-2}$ as a function of the resonance mass $m_{\mathrm{X}}$, from the combined analysis of the 13 TeV data recorded in 2015 and 2016. The results obtained with the two individual datasets are also shown. Curves corresponding to the scalar and RS graviton hypotheses are shown in (a) and (b) respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 2-b:
Observed background-only $p$-values for resonances with $\Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-2}$ as a function of the resonance mass $m_{\mathrm{X}}$, from the combined analysis of the 13 TeV data recorded in 2015 and 2016. The results obtained with the two individual datasets are also shown. Curves corresponding to the scalar and RS graviton hypotheses are shown in (a) and (b) respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 3-a:
Observed background-only $p$-values for resonances with $\Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-2}$ as a function of the resonance mass $m_{\mathrm{X}}$, from the combined analysis of the 8 and 13 TeV data. Results obtained at each of the two centre of mass energies are also shown. Curves corresponding to the scalar and RS graviton hypotheses are shown respectively in (a) and (b) respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 3-b:
Observed background-only $p$-values for resonances with $\Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-2}$ as a function of the resonance mass $m_{\mathrm{X}}$, from the combined analysis of the 8 and 13 TeV data. Results obtained at each of the two centre of mass energies are also shown. Curves corresponding to the scalar and RS graviton hypotheses are shown respectively in (a) and (b) respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 4:
Likelihood scan for the cross section of a narrow-width spin-0 resonance with a mass of 750 GeV. Results for the 8 TeV data (19.7 fb$^{-1}$), 13 TeV data recorded in 2015 (3.3 fb$^{-1}$) and in 2016 (12.9 fb$^{-1}$), and their combination are shown.

png pdf
Additional Figure 5-a:
Observed invariant mass spectra for the EBEB (a) and EBEE (b) in the region 510 $ < m_{\gamma \gamma } < $ 1030 GeV. The results of a likelihood fit to the background-only hypothesis are also shown. The shaded regions show the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty bands associated with the fit, and reflect the statistical uncertainty of the data. The red curve shows the shape expected for a spin-0 signal corresponding to the largest excess observed in the combined analysis of 8 TeV and 2015 13 TeV data. The lower panels show the difference between the data and fit, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data points.

png pdf
Additional Figure 5-b:
Observed invariant mass spectra for the EBEB (a) and EBEE (b) in the region 510 $ < m_{\gamma \gamma } < $ 1030 GeV. The results of a likelihood fit to the background-only hypothesis are also shown. The shaded regions show the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty bands associated with the fit, and reflect the statistical uncertainty of the data. The red curve shows the shape expected for a spin-0 signal corresponding to the largest excess observed in the combined analysis of 8 TeV and 2015 13 TeV data. The lower panels show the difference between the data and fit, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data points.

png pdf
Additional Figure 6-a:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the 13 TeV 2016 data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $ \Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4} $, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2} $, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 6-b:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the 13 TeV 2016 data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $ \Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4} $, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2} $, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 6-c:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the 13 TeV 2016 data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $ \Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4} $, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2} $, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 6-d:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the 13 TeV 2016 data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $ \Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4} $, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2} $, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 6-e:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the 13 TeV 2016 data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $ \Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4} $, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2} $, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 6-f:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the 13 TeV 2016 data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $ \Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4} $, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2} $, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 7-a:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the combination of the 2015 and 2016 13 TeV data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $ \Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4} $, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2}$, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 7-b:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the combination of the 2015 and 2016 13 TeV data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $ \Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4} $, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2}$, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 7-c:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the combination of the 2015 and 2016 13 TeV data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $ \Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4} $, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2}$, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 7-d:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the combination of the 2015 and 2016 13 TeV data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $ \Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4} $, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2}$, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 7-e:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the combination of the 2015 and 2016 13 TeV data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $ \Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4} $, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2}$, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 7-f:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the combination of the 2015 and 2016 13 TeV data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $ \Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4} $, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2}$, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 8-a:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the combination of the 8 and 13 TeV data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $\Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4}$, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2}$, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 8-b:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the combination of the 8 and 13 TeV data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $\Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4}$, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2}$, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 8-c:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the combination of the 8 and 13 TeV data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $\Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4}$, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2}$, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 8-d:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the combination of the 8 and 13 TeV data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $\Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4}$, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2}$, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 8-e:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the combination of the 8 and 13 TeV data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $\Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4}$, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2}$, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 8-f:
Expected and observed 95% C.L. exclusion limits obtained with the combination of the 8 and 13 TeV data for different signal hypotheses. The range 0.5 $ < m_{\mathrm{X}} < $ 4.5 TeV is shown for $\Gamma _{\mathrm{X}} / m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4}$, $ 1.4\times 10^{-2}$, $ 5.6\times 10^{-2} $. Plots (a), (c), (e) and (b), (d), (f) corresponds to the scalar and RS graviton signals respectively.
References
1 L. D. Landau On the angular momentum of a system of two photons Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 60 (1948) 207
2 C. N. Yang Selection Rules for the Dematerialization of a Particle into Two Photons PR77 (1950) 242
3 G. C. Branco et al. Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models PR 516 (2012) 1 1106.0034
4 T. D. Lee A Theory of Spontaneous T Violation PRD 8 (1973) 1226
5 L. Randall and R. Sundrum A large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension PRL 83 (1999) 3370 hep-ph/9905221
6 H. Davoudiasl, J. L. Hewett, and T. G. Rizzo Phenomenology of the Randall-Sundrum Gauge Hierarchy Model PRL 84 (2000) 2080 hep-ph/9909255
7 N. Craig, J. Galloway, and S. Thomas Searching for signs of the second Higgs doublet 1305.2424
8 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 1 1207.7214
9 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 30 CMS-HIG-12-028
1207.7235
10 P. S. B. Dev and A. Pilaftsis Maximally symmetric two Higgs doublet model with natural standard model alignment 1408.3405
11 ATLAS Collaboration Search for resonances in diphoton events at $ \sqrt{s}=13 $ TeV with the ATLAS detector Submitted to \it J. High Energy Phys 1606.03833
12 CMS Collaboration Search for resonant production of high-mass photon pairs in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=8 $ and 13 TeV PRL 117 (2016) 051802 CMS-EXO-16-018
1606.04093
13 ATLAS Collaboration Search for high-mass diphoton resonances in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 92 (2015) 032004 1504.05511
14 ATLAS Collaboration Search for extra dimensions in diphoton events using proton-proton collisions recorded at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 043007 1210.8389
15 ATLAS Collaboration Search for high-mass dilepton resonances in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 90 (2014) 052005 1405.4123
16 ATLAS Collaboration Search for dilepton resonances in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRL 107 (2011) 272002 1108.1582
17 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new phenomena in the $ W W $ to $ \ell \nu \ell{\rm'} \nu{\rm'} $ final state in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 718 (2013) 860 1208.2880
18 ATLAS Collaboration Search for resonant diboson production in the $ WW/WZ \to \ell \nu j j $ decay channels with the ATLAS detector at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PRD 87 (2013) 112006 1305.0125
19 CMS Collaboration Search for diphoton resonances in the mass range from 150 to 850$ GeV $ in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PLB 750 (2015) 494 CMS-HIG-14-006
1506.02301
20 CMS Collaboration Search for signatures of extra dimensions in the diphoton mass spectrum at the Large Hadron Collider PRL 108 (2012) 111801 CMS-EXO-11-038
1112.0688
21 CMS Collaboration Search for physics beyond the standard model in dilepton mass spectra in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JHEP 04 (2015) 025 CMS-EXO-12-061
1412.6302
22 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy narrow dilepton resonances in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV and $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PLB 720 (2013) 63 CMS-EXO-12-015
1212.6175
23 CMS Collaboration Search for narrow resonances decaying to dijets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRL 116 (2016) 071801 CMS-EXO-15-001
1512.01224
24 CMS Collaboration Search for narrow resonances using the dijet mass spectrum in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PRD 87 (2013) 114015 CMS-EXO-12-016
1302.4794
25 CMS Collaboration Search for narrow resonances in dijet final states at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the novel CMS technique of data scouting Submitted to \it PRLett CMS-EXO-14-005
1604.08907
26 CMS Collaboration Search for resonances and quantum black holes using dijet mass spectra in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PRD 91 (2015) 052009 CMS-EXO-12-059
1501.04198
27 CMS Collaboration Search for massive resonances in dijet systems containing jets tagged as $ \mathrm{ W } $ or $ \mathrm{ Z } $ boson decays in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JHEP 08 (2014) 173 CMS-EXO-12-024
1405.1994
28 CMS Collaboration Search for exotic resonances decaying into $ \mathrm{ W }\mathrm{ Z }/\mathrm{ Z }\mathrm{ Z } $ in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 02 (2013) 036 CMS-EXO-12-014
1211.5779
29 CMS Collaboration Search for a narrow spin-2 resonance decaying to a pair of $ \mathrm{ Z } $ vector bosons in the semileptonic final state PLB 718 (2013) 1208 CMS-EXO-11-102
1209.3807
30 ATLAS Collaboration Search for Scalar Diphoton Resonances in the Mass Range 65--600$ GeV $ with the ATLAS Detector in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ Collision Data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PRL 113 (2014) 171801 1407.6583
31 CMS Collaboration Performance of photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P08010 CMS-EGM-14-001
1502.02702
32 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow event reconstruction in CMS and performance for jets, taus, and $ E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}} $ CDS
33 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the particle-flow event with the first LHC collisions recorded in the CMS detector CDS
34 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
35 T. Sj\"ostrand et al. An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
36 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions with LHC data Nucl. Phys. B 867 (2013) 244 1207.1303
37 T. Gleisberg et al. Event generation with SHERPA 1.1 JHEP 02 (2009) 007 0811.4622
38 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
39 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4 --- a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
40 CMS Collaboration Observation of the diphoton decay of the Higgs boson and measurement of its properties EPJC 74 (2014) 3076 CMS-HIG-13-001
1407.0558
41 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
42 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ \rm CL_s $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
43 LHC Higgs Combination Group Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 CMS-NOTE-2011-005
44 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN