CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-TOP-16-016
Search for standard model production of four top quarks in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV
Abstract: A search for standard model four top quark production, combining the single lepton and dilepton channels, is presented. The analysis utilises the data recorded by the CMS experiment at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV in 2015, which corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 2.6 fb$^{-1}$. A boosted decision tree algorithm is used to select signal and suppress background events. Upper limits on four top quark production of $ 10.2 \times \sigma_{t\overline{t}t\overline{t}}^{SM}$ observed and $ 10.8^{+6.7}_{-3.8} \times \sigma_{t\overline{t}t\overline{t}}^{SM}$ expected are calculated at the 95% confidence level.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
The dominant diagram for ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} {\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ production in the SM at leading order.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
The ${\textrm {BDT}_{\textrm {trijet1}}}$ discriminant for data and simulation in the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (a), $\mu $e (b) and ee (c) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+H production.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
The ${\textrm {BDT}_{\textrm {trijet1}}}$ discriminant for data and simulation in the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (a), $\mu $e (b) and ee (c) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+H production.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
The ${\textrm {BDT}_{\textrm {trijet1}}}$ discriminant for data and simulation in the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (a), $\mu $e (b) and ee (c) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+H production.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The ${\textrm {BDT}_{\textrm {trijet2}}}$ discriminant for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a) and e+jets (b) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The ${\textrm {BDT}_{\textrm {trijet2}}}$ discriminant for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a) and e+jets (b) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The $N {_{\textrm {j}}}$ distributions for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a), e+jets (b), the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (c), $\mu $e (d) and ee (e) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The $N {_{\textrm {j}}}$ distributions for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a), e+jets (b), the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (c), $\mu $e (d) and ee (e) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production.

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
The $N {_{\textrm {j}}}$ distributions for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a), e+jets (b), the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (c), $\mu $e (d) and ee (e) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production.

png pdf
Figure 4-d:
The $N {_{\textrm {j}}}$ distributions for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a), e+jets (b), the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (c), $\mu $e (d) and ee (e) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production.

png pdf
Figure 4-e:
The $N {_{\textrm {j}}}$ distributions for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a), e+jets (b), the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (c), $\mu $e (d) and ee (e) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
The $S$ distributions for data and simulation in the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (a), $\mu $e (b) and ee (bottom) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
The $S$ distributions for data and simulation in the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (a), $\mu $e (b) and ee (bottom) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
The $S$ distributions for data and simulation in the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (a), $\mu $e (b) and ee (bottom) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
The $T$ distributions for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a) and e+jets (b) final states are shown with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
The $T$ distributions for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a) and e+jets (b) final states are shown with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
Dilepton BDT output discriminator summed across lepton species channels for 4-5 jets (upper left), 6-7 jets (upper right), and $\geq $8 jets (bottom).

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
Dilepton BDT output discriminator summed across lepton species channels for 4-5 jets (upper left), 6-7 jets (upper right), and $\geq $8 jets (bottom).

png pdf
Figure 7-c:
Dilepton BDT output discriminator summed across lepton species channels for 4-5 jets (upper left), 6-7 jets (upper right), and $\geq $8 jets (bottom).

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
BDT output distributions in the $\mu $+jets channel (a) and e+jets channel (b) for the $\geq 9 N {_{\textrm {j}}}$ and $3 N {_{\textrm {tags}}^{\textrm {M}}} $category.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
BDT output distributions in the $\mu $+jets channel (a) and e+jets channel (b) for the $\geq 9 N {_{\textrm {j}}}$ and $3 N {_{\textrm {tags}}^{\textrm {M}}} $category.

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
BDT output distributions in the $\mu $ jets channel (a) and e+jets channel (b) for the $\geq 9 N {_{\textrm {j}}} $ and $\geq 4 N {_{\textrm {tags}}^{\textrm {M}}}$ category.

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
BDT output distributions in the $\mu $ jets channel (a) and e+jets channel (b) for the $\geq 9 N {_{\textrm {j}}} $ and $\geq 4 N {_{\textrm {tags}}^{\textrm {M}}}$ category.

png pdf
Figure 10:
Expected and observed upper limits on ${\sigma _{ {\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} {\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} }^{SM}}$ for the single lepton, dilepton, and combined analysis in multiples of ${\sigma _{ {\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} {\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} }^{SM}} $.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the standard model four top quark production as a multiple of ${\sigma _{ {\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} {\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} }^{SM}} $. The values quoted on the expected limits are the 1$\sigma $ uncertainties.
Summary
A search for events containing four top quarks has been performed using 2.6 fb$^{-1}$ of data recorded by the CMS experiment at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV. The analysis focuses on a combination of the single lepton channel in the $\mu$+jets and e+jets final states and dilepton channel in the $\mu \mu$, $\mu$e, and ee final states. The analysis is comprised of three stages. Firstly, a baseline selection is defined for each final state that is used to broadly select signal events while suppressing backgrounds. Secondly, an event classification scheme based on a BDT algorithm is defined, further enhancing sensitivity to four top quark production. The BDT algorithm exploits the differences in event activity, event topology, b content and t content to discriminate between signal and background. Thirdly, upper limits on four top quark production of $10.2 \times {\sigma_{{t}\overline{{t}}} {{t}\overline{{t}}} }^{SM} $ observed and $10.8^{+6.7}_{-3.8} \times \sigma^{SM}_{{{t}\overline{{t}}} {{t}\overline{{t}}} }$ expected are calculated at the 95% CL.
References
1 ATLAS, CDF, CMS, D0 Collaboration First combination of Tevatron and LHC measurements of the top-quark mass 1403.4427
2 G. Cacciapaglia et al. Composite scalars at the LHC: the Higgs, the Sextet and the Octet JHEP 11 (2015) 201 1507.02283
3 C. Arina et al. A comprehensive approach to dark matter studies: exploration of simplified top-philic models 1605.09242
4 M. Toharia and J. D. Wells Gluino decays with heavier scalar superpartners JHEP 02 (2006) 015 hep-ph/0503175
5 S. Calvet, B. Fuks, P. Gris, and L. Valery Searching for sgluons in multitop events at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV JHEP 04 (2013) 043 1212.3360
6 Q.-H. Cao, S.-L. Chen, and Y. Liu Probing Higgs Width and Top Quark Yukawa Coupling from $ \textrm{t}\bar{\textrm{t}}\textrm{H} $ and $ \textrm{t}\bar{\textrm{t}}\textrm{t}\bar{\textrm{t}} $ Productions 1602.01934
7 O. Ducu, L. Heurtier, and J. Maurer LHC signatures of a Z' mediator between dark matter and the SU(3) sector JHEP 03 (2016) 006 1509.05615
8 G. Bevilacqua and M. Worek Constraining BSM Physics at the LHC: Four top final states with NLO accuracy in perturbative QCD JHEP 07 (2012) 111 1206.3064
9 CMS Collaboration Search for standard model production of four top quarks in the lepton + jets channel in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $= 8 TeV JHEP 11 (2014) 154
10 ATLAS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry at $ \sqrt{s} $=8 TeV in final states with jets and two same-sign leptons or three leptons with the ATLAS detector JHEP 06 (2014) 035 1404.2500
11 CMS Collaboration Search for new physics in same-sign dilepton events in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV CMS-SUS-15-008
1605.03171
12 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
13 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
14 J. Alwall et al. MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond JHEP 06 (2011) 128 1106.0522
15 P. Nason A New method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
16 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
17 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
18 S. Alioli, S.-O. Moch, and P. Uwer Hadronic top-quark pair-production with one jet and parton showering JHEP 1 (2012) 137
19 CMS Collaboration Measurement of $ \mathrm {t}\overline{\mathrm {t}} $ production with additional jet activity, including $ \mathrm {b} $ quark jets, in the dilepton decay channel using pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 8\,\text {TeV} $ EPJC 76 (2016) 379 CMS-TOP-12-041
1510.03072
20 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the differential cross section for $ \mathrm{t \bar t} $ production in the dilepton final state at $ \sqrt{s}=13 \mathrm{TeV} $ CMS-PAS-TOP-16-011 CMS-PAS-TOP-16-011
21 E. Re Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
22 T. Sj\"ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual JHEP 05 (2006) 026
23 T. Sj\"ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 Computer Physics Communications 178 (2008) 852
24 NNPDF Collaboration Unbiased global determination of parton distributions and their uncertainties at NNLO and at LO Nucl. Phys. B 855 (2012) 153 1107.2652
25 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4: A Simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
26 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow event reconstruction in CMS and performance for jets, taus, and $ E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}} $ CDS
27 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the particle-flow event reconstruction with the first LHC collisions recorded in the CMS detector CDS
28 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 8 $~TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
29 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s}=7 $ TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
30 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
31 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet User Manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
32 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) P11002 CMS-JME-10-011
1107.4277
33 CMS Collaboration Identification of b quark jets at the CMS Experiment in the LHC Run 2 CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001 CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001
34 L. Breiman, J. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone Chapman and Hall/CRC
35 H. J. Friedman Recent Advances in Predictive (Machine) Learning Journal of Classification 23 (2006) 175
36 A. Hocker et al. TMVA - Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis PoS ACAT (2007) 040 physics/0703039
37 J. D. Bjorken and S. J. Brodsky Statistical Model for electron-Positron Annihilation Into Hadrons PRD 1 (1970) 1416
38 CMS Collaboration CMS Luminosity Measurement for the 2015 Data Taking Period CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001
39 M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov Total Top-Quark Pair-Production Cross Section at Hadron Colliders Through $ O(\alpha^4_S) $ PRL 110 (2013) 252004 1303.6254
40 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the cross section ratio $ \textrm{t}\bar{\textrm{t}}\textrm{b}\bar{\textrm{b}}/\textrm{t}\bar{\textrm{t}}\textrm{j}\textrm{j} $ using dilepton final states in pp collisions at 13 TeV
41 L. Moneta et al. The RooStats Project PoS ACAT2010 (2010) 057 1009.1003
42 ATLAS, CMS, LHC Higgs Combination Group Collaboration Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 CMS-NOTE-2011-005
43 R. Barlow and C. Beeston Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples Computer Physics Communications 77 (1993) 219
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN