CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-SMP-19-008
Observation of the electroweak production of W$\gamma$ in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV
Abstract: A measurement of the electroweak (EW) production of a W boson and a photon in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions, where the W boson decays leptonically, is presented. Events are selected by requiring one identified electron or muon, missing transverse momentum, one photon, and two jets with a large dijet mass and a large rapidity separation. The measurement is based on data collected with the CMS detector in 2016 at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The observed (expected) significance for this process is 4.9 (4.6) standard deviations. After combining with previously reported CMS results based on 8 TeV data, the observed (expected) significance is 5.3 (4.8) standard deviations. This constitutes the first observation of EW W$\gamma$ production in pp collisions. The cross section measured in the fiducial region is 20.4 $\pm$ 4.5 fb and the total cross section for EW + QCD W$\gamma$ production in association with 2 jets in the same fiducial region is measured to be 108 $\pm$ 16 fb. All measurements are in good agreement with recent theory predictions. We set the most stringent limits to date on the anomalous quartic gauge coupling parameters $F_\mathrm{M,2-5}$ and $F_\mathrm{T,6-7}$.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Representative diagrams for ${\ell \nu \gamma {\text {jj}}}$ production at the LHC: EW production (left), EW production with triple gauge boson coupling (middle left) and with quartic gauge boson coupling (middle right), and QCD-induced processes (right).

png
Figure 1-a:
Representative diagrams for ${\ell \nu \gamma {\text {jj}}}$ production at the LHC: EW production (left), EW production with triple gauge boson coupling (middle left) and with quartic gauge boson coupling (middle right), and QCD-induced processes (right).

png
Figure 1-b:
Representative diagrams for ${\ell \nu \gamma {\text {jj}}}$ production at the LHC: EW production (left), EW production with triple gauge boson coupling (middle left) and with quartic gauge boson coupling (middle right), and QCD-induced processes (right).

png
Figure 1-c:
Representative diagrams for ${\ell \nu \gamma {\text {jj}}}$ production at the LHC: EW production (left), EW production with triple gauge boson coupling (middle left) and with quartic gauge boson coupling (middle right), and QCD-induced processes (right).

png
Figure 1-d:
Representative diagrams for ${\ell \nu \gamma {\text {jj}}}$ production at the LHC: EW production (left), EW production with triple gauge boson coupling (middle left) and with quartic gauge boson coupling (middle right), and QCD-induced processes (right).

png pdf
Figure 2:
Comparison of the photon ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ distribution from data and simulation in the low-$ {m_{{\text {jj}}}}$ control region. All events with photon $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 193 GeV are included in the last bin.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW ${{\mathrm{W} \gamma}}$+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left), and muon endcap (bottom right).

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW ${{\mathrm{W} \gamma}}$+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left), and muon endcap (bottom right).

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW ${{\mathrm{W} \gamma}}$+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left), and muon endcap (bottom right).

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW ${{\mathrm{W} \gamma}}$+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left), and muon endcap (bottom right).

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW ${{\mathrm{W} \gamma}}$+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left), and muon endcap (bottom right).

png pdf
Figure 4:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW+QCD ${{\mathrm{W} \gamma}}$+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left) and muon endcap (bottom right).

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW+QCD ${{\mathrm{W} \gamma}}$+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left) and muon endcap (bottom right).

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW+QCD ${{\mathrm{W} \gamma}}$+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left) and muon endcap (bottom right).

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW+QCD ${{\mathrm{W} \gamma}}$+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left) and muon endcap (bottom right).

png pdf
Figure 4-d:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW+QCD ${{\mathrm{W} \gamma}}$+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left) and muon endcap (bottom right).

png pdf
Figure 5:
The ${m_{{\mathrm{W} \gamma}}}$ distribution of events satisfying the aQGC region selection, which is used to set constraints on the anomalous coupling parameters. The orange line represents a nonzero ${F_{\text {T,0}}}$ setting. All events with $ {m_{{\mathrm{W} \gamma}}} > $ 990 GeV are included in the last bin.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Observed 95% CL interval on the aQGC parameter ${F_{\text {T,0}}}$.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Relative systematic uncertainties in the estimated signal and background yields in units of percent. The range of the uncertainty when varying ${m_{{\text {jj}}}}$ and ${m_{{\ell \gamma}}}$ is shown for the systematic uncertainty sources.

png pdf
Table 2:
Signal, background, and data yields after the final selection for the SM measurement. The pre-fit statistical and systematic uncertainties are added in quadrature.

png pdf
Table 3:
Parameterized by the W$\gamma$ mass, 95% CL shape-based exclusion limits on each aQGC parameter, no form factor is applied. The unitarity bounds are also listed. All coupling parameter limits are in TeV$ ^{-4}$, while the unitarity bounds are in TeV.
Summary
The production cross sections of electroweak production of W$\gamma$ in association with two jets are measured in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ collected at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the CMS detector. Events are selected by requiring exactly one identified lepton (electron or muon), a moderate missing transverse momentum, one photon, and two jets with a large rapidity separation and a large dijet mass. The observed significance is 4.9 standard deviations ($\sigma$), where a significance of 4.6 $\sigma$ is expected based on the standard model. After combining with previously reported CMS results based on 8 TeV data, the observed (expected) signal significance is 5.3 (4.8) $\sigma$. This constitutes the first observation of electroweak W$\gamma$ production in pp collisions. A cross section measurement in a fiducial region is reported and is consistent with standard model predictions. Constraints are placed on anomalous quartic gauge couplings in terms of dimension-8 effective field theory operators. Results are competitive with or more stringent than previous results.
References
1 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 1 1207.7214
2 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 30 CMS-HIG-12-028
1207.7235
3 CMS Collaboration Measuring the properties of the Higgs boson at CMS Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings 273--275 (2016) 2466, . 37th International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP)
4 CMS Collaboration Observation of electroweak production of same-sign w boson pairs in the two jet and two same-sign lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 tev PRL 120 (2018) 081801 CMS-SMP-17-004
1709.05822
5 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of electroweak production of a same-sign W boson pair in association with two jets in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 tev with the atlas detector PRL 123 (2019) 161801
6 CMS Collaboration Measurements of production cross sections of WZ and same-sign WW boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 tev Submitted to PLB CMS-SMP-19-012
2005.01173
7 ATLAS Collaboration Studies of $ z\gamma $ production in association with a high-mass dijet system in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 tev with the atlas detector JHEP 07 (2017) 107 1705.01966
8 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the cross section for electroweak production of $ {Z}\gamma $ in association with two jets and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 tev PLB 770 (2017) 380 CMS-SMP-14-018
1702.03025
9 CMS Collaboration Measurement of electroweak-induced production of $ {W}\gamma $ with two jets in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 tev and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings JHEP 06 (2017) 106 CMS-SMP-14-011
1612.09256
10 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the cross section for electroweak production of a z boson, a photon and two jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 tev and constraints on anomalous quartic couplings Accepted to JHEP CMS-SMP-18-007
2002.09902
11 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
12 V. Khoze, M. Ryskin, W. Stirling, and P. Williams A Z-monitor to calibrate Higgs production via vector boson fusion with rapidity gaps at the LHC EPJC 26 (2003) 429 hep-ph/0207365
13 C. Oleari and D. Zeppenfeld QCD corrections to electroweak $ \ell\nu $jj and $ \ell^{+}\ell^{-} $jj production PRD 69 (2004) 093004 hep-ph/0310156
14 C. Degrande et al. Effective field theory: A modern approach to anomalous couplings Ann. Phys. 335 (2013) 21 1205.4231
15 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
16 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
17 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
18 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
19 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 07 (2010) 1002.2581
20 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
21 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
22 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the lhc run ii JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
23 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4 --- a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
24 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive W and Z production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 tev JHEP 10 (2011) 132 CMS-EWK-10-005
1107.4789
25 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
26 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
27 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm Journal of High Energy Physics 2008 (2008), no. 04, 063
28 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
29 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 tev JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
30 CMS Collaboration Energy calibration and resolution of the cms electromagnetic calorimeter in pp collision at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 tev JINST 8 (2013) P09009 CMS-EGM-11-001
1306.2016
31 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 tev JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
32 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2008) 119 0707.1378
33 CMS Collaboration Performance of photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 tev JINST 10 (2015) P08010 CMS-EGM-14-001
1502.02702
34 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) P11002 CMS-JME-10-011
1107.4277
35 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 tev using the cms detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
36 D. Rainwater, R. Szalapski, and D. Zeppenfeld Probing color singlet exchange in Z+2-jet events at the CERN LHC PRD 54 (1996) 6680 hep-ph/9605444
37 Particle Data Group Collaboration Review of particle physics PRD 98 (2018) 030001
38 CMS Collaboration Search for a heavy resonance decaying to a pair of vector bosons in the lepton plus merged jet final state at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 tev JHEP 05 (2018) 088 CMS-B2G-16-029
1802.09407
39 CMS Collaboration Measurement of $ {W}\gamma $ and $ {Z}\gamma $ production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 tev PLB 701 (2011) 535 CMS-EWK-10-008
1105.2758
40 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
41 M. Botje et al. The PDF4LHC working group interim recommendations 2011
42 S. Alekhin et al. The PDF4LHC working group interim report 2011
43 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
44 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
45 O. J. P. \'Eboli, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, and J. K. Mizukoshi $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} \rightarrow $ jje$ ^\pm \mu^\pm \nu\nu $ and jje$ ^\pm\mu^\mp\nu\nu $ at $ \cal $ O($ \alpha^6_{\rm em} $) and $ \cal $ O($ \alpha_{\rm em}^4 \alpha_{\rm s}^2 $) for the study of the quartic electroweak gauge boson vertex at CERN LHC PRD 74 (2006) 073005 hep-ph/0606118
46 S. S. Wilks The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses Ann. Math. Statist 9 (1938) 60
47 CMS Collaboration Precise determination of the mass of the Higgs boson and tests of compatibility of its couplings with the standard model predictions using proton collisions at 7 and 8 tev EPJC 75 (2014) 212 CMS-HIG-14-009
1412.8662
48 K. Arnold et al. Vbfnlo: A parton level monte carlo for processes with electroweak bosons CPC 180 (2009) 1661 0811.4559
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN