CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-HIG-16-018
Search for Higgs bosons produced in association with b quarks and decaying into a b-quark pair with 13 TeV data
Abstract: A search for Higgs bosons that decay into a b quark-antiquark pair and are accompanied by at least one additional b quark is performed with the CMS detector. The data analyzed were recorded in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.7 fb$^{-1}$. The final state considered is particularly sensitive to signatures of a Higgs sector beyond the standard model, as predicted by the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) and the two Higgs doublet model (2HDM) with large values of the parameter $\tan \beta$. No signal above the standard model background expectation is observed. Stringent upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction are set for Higgs bosons with masses up to 1300 GeV at 95% confidence level. The results are interpreted within several MSSM and 2HDM scenarios. In the hMSSM scenario, upper limits on $\tan \beta$ are obtained, ranging from 22 to 60 for Higgs masses from 300 to 900 GeV. In the flipped 2HDM scenario, similar upper limits on $\tan \beta$ are set over the full $\cos(\beta-\alpha)$ range and for Higgs masses from 300 to 850 GeV.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Example Feynman diagrams of the signal processes.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Example Feynman diagram of the signal process.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Example Feynman diagram of the signal process.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
Example Feynman diagram of the signal process.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Signal mass distributions and parameterizations as obtained from simulation for different Higgs masses: 400 GeV (red), 600 GeV (blue), and 1100 GeV (green).

png pdf
Figure 3:
Signal efficiency as a function of the Higgs boson mass after different stages of event selection: offline kinematic selection (black), online trigger selection (red) and offline b tagging selection (green).

png pdf
Figure 4:
Invariant dijet mass $ {\mathrm {M}_{12}} $ in the reverse-b-tag control region in the three subranges used for the fit: $ {\mathrm {M}_{12}} = $ [200, 650] GeV (top left) in linear scale, $ {\mathrm {M}_{12}} = $ [350, 1190] GeV (top right) and $ {\mathrm {M}_{12}} = $ [500, 1700] GeV (bottom) in logarithmic scale. The dots represent the data. The red line is the result of the fit of the background parameterizations described in the text. In the bottom panel of each plot the normalized difference ($\frac {\mathrm {Data}-\mathrm {Fit}}{\sqrt {\mathrm {Fit}}}$) is shown.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Invariant dijet mass $ {\mathrm {M}_{12}} $ in the reverse-b-tag control region in the one of the subranges used for the fit: $ {\mathrm {M}_{12}} = $ [200, 650] GeV in linear scale. The dots represent the data. The red line is the result of the fit of the background parameterizations described in the text. In the bottom panel the normalized difference ($\frac {\mathrm {Data}-\mathrm {Fit}}{\sqrt {\mathrm {Fit}}}$) is shown.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Invariant dijet mass $ {\mathrm {M}_{12}} $ in the reverse-b-tag control region in the one of the subranges used for the fit: $ {\mathrm {M}_{12}} = $ [350, 1190] GeV in logarithmic scale. The dots represent the data. The red line is the result of the fit of the background parameterizations described in the text. In the bottom panel the normalized difference ($\frac {\mathrm {Data}-\mathrm {Fit}}{\sqrt {\mathrm {Fit}}}$) is shown.

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
Invariant dijet mass $ {\mathrm {M}_{12}} $ in the reverse-b-tag control region in the one of the subranges used for the fit: $ {\mathrm {M}_{12}} = $ [500, 1700] GeV in logarithmic scale. The dots represent the data. The red line is the result of the fit of the background parameterizations described in the text. In the bottom panel the normalized difference ($\frac {\mathrm {Data}-\mathrm {Fit}}{\sqrt {\mathrm {Fit}}}$) is shown.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Distribution of the dijet mass $ {\mathrm {M}_{12}} $ in the data triple-b-tag sample showing the three subranges together with the background-only fit. The shaded area shows the post-fit uncertainty. For illustration, the expected signal contribution for three representative mass points is shown, scaled to cross sections suitable for visualization. The kink at around 350 GeV of the 300 GeV signal shape is caused by the wrong-pairing background. In the bottom panels the normalized difference ($\frac {\mathrm {Data}-\mathrm {Bkg}}{\sqrt {\mathrm {Bkg}}}$), where Bkg is the background as estimated by the fit, for the three subranges is shown.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Expected and observed upper limits on $\sigma ({\mathrm {p}} {\mathrm {p}}\to {\mathrm {b}} {\rm A/H}+\mathrm {X})\, \mathcal {B}({\rm A/H}\to {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}})$ at 95% CL as a function of the Higgs boson mass ${m_{\mathrm {A/H}}}$. For the observed limit, three different marker types are used to distinguish the three subranges in which the results have been obtained. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Expected and observed upper limits at 95% CL for ${m_{\mathrm {A/H}}}$ vs. the MSSM parameter $ \tan \beta $ in the (left) $m_{\rm h}^{\rm mod+}$ benchmark scenario with $\mu = $ +200 GeV, and (right) in the hMSSM scenario. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The excluded parameter space is indicated by the red shaded area.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
Expected and observed upper limits at 95% CL for ${m_{\mathrm {A/H}}}$ vs. the MSSM parameter $ \tan \beta $ in the $m_{\rm h}^{\rm mod+}$ benchmark scenario with \mu = $ +200 GeV. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The excluded parameter space is indicated by the red shaded area.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
Expected and observed upper limits at 95% CL for ${m_{\mathrm {A/H}}}$ vs. the MSSM parameter $ \tan \beta $ in the hMSSM scenario. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The excluded parameter space is indicated by the red shaded area.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Expected and observed upper limits at 95% CL for ${m_{\mathrm {A/H}}}$ vs. the MSSM parameter $ \tan \beta $ in the (left) light $ \tilde{\tau} $ and the (right) light $ \tilde{\mathrm {t}} $ benchmark scenarios. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The excluded parameter space is indicated by the red shaded area.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
Expected and observed upper limits at 95% CL for ${m_{\mathrm {A/H}}}$ vs. the MSSM parameter $ \tan \beta $ in the light $ \tilde{\tau} $ benchmark scenarios. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The excluded parameter space is indicated by the red shaded area.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
Expected and observed upper limits at 95% CL for ${m_{\mathrm {A/H}}}$ vs. the MSSM parameter $ \tan \beta $ in the light $ \tilde{\mathrm {t}} $ benchmark scenarios. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The excluded parameter space is indicated by the red shaded area.

png pdf
Figure 9:
Upper limits for the parameter $ \tan \beta $ at 95% confidence level for the flipped (upper) and type-II (lower) models, as a function of $\cos (\beta -\alpha)$ in the range of $[-0.5,0.5]$ for the mass $m_{\rm H}=m_{\rm A}= $ 300 GeV (left) and as a function of ${m_{\mathrm {A/H}}}$ when $\cos (\beta -\alpha) = $ 0.1 (right). The results from the ATLAS $\mathrm {A} \rightarrow {\mathrm {Z}} {\mathrm {h}} $ analysis [32] are also shown as blue shaded area for comparison which provide limits up to $ \tan \beta $ of 50.

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
Upper limits for the parameter $ \tan \beta $ at 95% confidence level for the flipped (upper) and type-II (lower) models, as a function of $\cos (\beta -\alpha)$ in the range of $[-0.5,0.5]$ for the mass $m_{\rm H}=m_{\rm A}= $ 300 GeV. The results from the ATLAS $\mathrm {A} \rightarrow {\mathrm {Z}} {\mathrm {h}} $ analysis [32] are also shown as blue shaded area for comparison which provide limits up to $ \tan \beta $ of 50.

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
Upper limits for the parameter $ \tan \beta $ at 95% confidence level for the flipped (upper) and type-II (lower) models, as a function of ${m_{\mathrm {A/H}}}$ when $\cos (\beta -\alpha) = $ 0.1. The results from the ATLAS $\mathrm {A} \rightarrow {\mathrm {Z}} {\mathrm {h}} $ analysis [32] are also shown as blue shaded area for comparison which provide limits up to $ \tan \beta $ of 50.

png pdf
Figure 9-c:
Upper limits for the parameter $ \tan \beta $ at 95% confidence level for the flipped (upper) and type-II (lower) models, as a function of $\cos (\beta -\alpha)$ in the range of $[-0.5,0.5]$ for the mass $m_{\rm H}=m_{\rm A}= $ 300 GeV (left) and as a function of ${m_{\mathrm {A/H}}}$ when $\cos (\beta -\alpha) = $ 0.1 (right). The results from the ATLAS $\mathrm {A} \rightarrow {\mathrm {Z}} {\mathrm {h}} $ analysis [32] are also shown as blue shaded area for comparison which provide limits up to $ \tan \beta $ of 50.

png pdf
Figure 9-d:
Upper limits for the parameter $ \tan \beta $ at 95% confidence level for the flipped (upper) and type-II (lower) models, as a function of $\cos (\beta -\alpha)$ in the range of $[-0.5,0.5]$ for the mass $m_{\rm H}=m_{\rm A}= $ 300 GeV (left) and as a function of ${m_{\mathrm {A/H}}}$ when $\cos (\beta -\alpha) = $ 0.1 (right). The results from the ATLAS $\mathrm {A} \rightarrow {\mathrm {Z}} {\mathrm {h}} $ analysis [32] are also shown as blue shaded area for comparison which provide limits up to $ \tan \beta $ of 50.

png pdf
Figure 10:
Upper limits for the parameter $ \tan \beta $ at 95% confidence level for the flipped (left) and type-II (right) models as a function of $\cos (\beta -\alpha)$ in the full range of $[-1.0,1.0]$, for the mass $m_{\rm H}=m_{\rm A}= $ 500 GeV. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis.

png pdf
Figure 10-a:
Upper limits for the parameter $ \tan \beta $ at 95% confidence level for the flipped model as a function of $\cos (\beta -\alpha)$ in the full range of $[-1.0,1.0]$, for the mass $m_{\rm H}=m_{\rm A}= $ 500 GeV. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis.

png pdf
Figure 10-b:
Upper limits for the parameter $ \tan \beta $ at 95% confidence level for the type-II model as a function of $\cos (\beta -\alpha)$ in the full range of $[-1.0,1.0]$, for the mass $m_{\rm H}=m_{\rm A}= $ 500 GeV. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
The total signal efficiency in per mille as a function of the Higgs boson mass ${m_{\mathrm {A/H}}}$.

png pdf
Table 2:
Expected and observed CLs upper limits on $\sigma ({\mathrm {p}} {\mathrm {p}}\to {\mathrm {b}} {\rm A/H}+\mathrm {X})\, \mathcal {B}({\rm A/H}\to {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}})$ in pb as a function of ${m_{\mathrm {A/H}}}$, as obtained from the 13 TeV data.

png pdf
Table 3:
Expected and observed CLs upper limits on $ \tan \beta $ as a function of ${m_{\mathrm {A}}} in the {m_{{\mathrm {h}}}^{\text {mod+}}}$, $\mu = $ +200 GeV, benchmark scenario obtained from a 13 TeV data. Since theoretical predictions for $ \tan \beta > $ 60 are not reliable, cells for which $ \tan \beta $ would exceed this value are indicated by --.

png pdf
Table 4:
Expected and observed CLs upper limits on $ \tan \beta $ as a function of ${m_{\mathrm {A}}}$ in the hMSSM, $\mu = $ +200 GeV, benchmark scenario obtained from a 13 TeV data. Since theoretical predictions for $ \tan \beta > $ 60 are not reliable, cells for which $ \tan \beta $ would exceed this value are indicated by --.

png pdf
Table 5:
Expected and observed CLs upper limits on $ \tan \beta $ as a function of ${m_{\mathrm {A}}}$ in the light $ \tilde{\tau} $, $\mu = $ +200 GeV, benchmark scenario. Since theoretical predictions for $ \tan \beta > 60$ are not reliable, cells for which $ \tan \beta $ would exceed this value are indicated by --.

png pdf
Table 6:
Expected and observed CLs upper limits on $ \tan \beta $ as a function of ${m_{\mathrm {A}}}$ in the light $ \tilde{\mathrm{t}} $, $\mu = $ +200 GeV, benchmark scenario. Since theoretical predictions for $ \tan \beta > $ 60 are not reliable, cells for which $ \tan \beta $ would exceed this value are indicated by --.
Summary
A search for a heavy Higgs boson decaying into a b quark-antiquark pair and accompanied by at least one additional b quark has been performed. The data analyzed correspond to an integrated luminosity of 35.7 fb$^{-1}$, recorded in pp collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV at the LHC. For this purpose, dedicated triggers using all-hadronic jet signatures combined with online b tagging were developed. The signal is characterized by events with at least three b-tagged jets. The search has been performed in the invariant mass spectrum of the two leading b-tagged jets.

No evidence for a signal is found. Upper limits on the Higgs boson cross section times branching fraction are obtained in the mass region 300-1300 GeV at 95% confidence level. They range from about 20 pb at the lower end of the mass range, to about 0.4 pb at 1100 GeV, and extend to considerably higher masses than those accessible to previous analyses performed.

The results are interpreted within various MSSM benchmark scenarios. They yield upper limits on the model parameter ${\tan\beta}$ as a function of the mass parameter ${m_{\mathrm{A}}} $. The observed limit for ${\tan\beta}$ ranges down to about 25 at the lowest ${m_{\mathrm{A}}}$ value of 300 GeV in the ${m_{\mathrm{h}}^{\text{mod+}}} $ scenario with a higgsino mass parameter of $\mu= $ +200 GeV. The results are also interpreted in the 2HDM type-II and flipped scenarios. The limits obtained for the flipped scenario provide the only experimental upper limits in the region around zero of $\cos(\beta-\alpha)$, and strong unique constraints on $\tan\beta$.
References
1 H. P. Nilles Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics PR 110 (1984) 1
2 G. C. Branco et al. Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models Phys. Rep. 516 (2012) 1 1106.0034
3 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 1 1207.7214
4 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 30 CMS-HIG-12-028
1207.7235
5 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 06 (2013) 081 CMS-HIG-12-036
1303.4571
6 M. Carena et al. MSSM Higgs boson searches at the LHC: benchmark scenarios after the discovery of a Higgs-like particle EPJC 73 (2013) 2552 1302.7033
7 M. S. Carena, S. Heinemeyer, C. E. M. Wagner, and G. Weiglein MSSM Higgs boson searches at the Tevatron and the LHC: Impact of different benchmark scenarios EPJC 45 (2006) 797 hep-ph/0511023
8 ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, and OPAL Collaborations, LEP Working Group for Higgs Boson Searches Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons at LEP EPJC 47 (2006) 547 hep-ex/0602042
9 M. Carena, S. Heinemeyer, C. E. M. Wagner, and G. Weiglein Suggestions for benchmark scenarios for MSSM Higgs boson searches at hadron colliders EPJC 26 (2003) 601 hep-ph/0202167
10 S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, and G. Weiglein Constraints on $ {\tan\beta} $ in the MSSM from the upper bound on the mass of the lightest Higgs boson JHEP 06 (2000) 009 hep-ph/9909540
11 L. Maiani, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer Bounds to the Higgs Sector Masses in Minimal Supersymmetry from LHC Data PLB 724 (2013) 274 1305.2172
12 A. Djouadi et al. The post-Higgs MSSM scenario: Habemus MSSM? EPJC 73 (2013) 2650 1307.5205
13 A. Djouadi et al. Fully covering the MSSM Higgs sector at the LHC JHEP 06 (2015) 168 1502.05653
14 LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Benchmark scenarios for low $ \tan \beta $ in the MSSM Public Note LHCHXSWG-2015-002, CERN, Geneva
15 LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 3. Higgs Properties 1307.1347
16 E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, and B. Shuve Bottom-up approach to the Galactic Center excess PRD 90 (2014) 055002 1404.2018
17 A. Berlin, D. Hooper, and S. D. McDermott Simplified dark matter models for the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess PRD 89 (2014) 115022 1404.0022
18 CMS Collaboration Search for neutral Higgs bosons decaying to tau pairs in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 ~TeV PLB 713 (2012) 68 CMS-HIG-11-029
1202.4083
19 ATLAS Collaboration Search for the neutral Higgs bosons of the minimal supersymmetric standard model in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 02 (2013) 095 1211.6956
20 CMS Collaboration Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons decaying to a pair of tau leptons in pp collisions JHEP 10 (2014) 160 CMS-HIG-13-021
1408.3316
21 ATLAS Collaboration Search for neutral Higgs bosons of the minimal supersymmetric standard model in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 11 (2014) 056 1409.6064
22 CMS Collaboration Search for a neutral MSSM Higgs boson decaying into $ \tau\tau $ with $ 12.9 \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ of data at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-HIG-16-037 CMS-PAS-HIG-16-037
23 ATLAS Collaboration Search for additional heavy neutral Higgs and gauge bosons in the ditau final state produced in 36 fb$ ^{-1} $ of pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 01 (2018) 055 1709.07242
24 CDF Collaboration Search for Higgs Bosons Predicted in Two-Higgs-Doublet Models via Decays to Tau Lepton Pairs in 1.96~TeV p$ \overline{\mathrm{p}} $ Collisions PRL 103 (2009) 201801 0906.1014
25 D0 Collaboration Search for Higgs Bosons Decaying to Tau Pairs in p$ \overline{\mathrm{p}} $ Collisions with the D0 Detector PRL 101 (2008) 071804 0805.2491
26 D0 Collaboration Search for Higgs bosons of the minimal supersymmetric standard model p$ \overline{\mathrm{p}} $ in collisions at $ {\sqrt{s}=1.96 TeV} $ PLB 710 (2012) 569 1112.5431
27 CMS Collaboration Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons decaying to $ \mu^{+} \mu^{-} $ in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV PLB 752 (2016) 221 CMS-HIG-13-024
1508.01437
28 CDF and D0 Collaborations Search for neutral Higgs bosons in events with multiple bottom quarks at the Tevatron PRD 86 (2012) 091101 1207.2757
29 CMS Collaboration Search for a Higgs boson decaying into a b-quark pair and produced in association with b quarks in proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV PLB 722 (2013) 207 CMS-HIG-12-033
1302.2892
30 CMS Collaboration Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons decaying into a pair of bottom quarks JHEP 11 (2015) 071 CMS-HIG-14-017
1506.08329
31 ATLAS Collaboration Search for a CP-odd Higgs boson decaying to Zh in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 744 (2015) 163 1502.04478
32 ATLAS Collaboration Search for heavy resonances decaying into a $ W $ or $ Z $ boson and a Higgs boson in final states with leptons and b-jets in 36Zfb$ ^{-1} $ of $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 ~$ TeV\ $ pp collisions with the ATLAS detector Submitted to \it JHEP 1712.06518
33 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
34 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
35 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
36 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
37 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet User Manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1111.6097
38 CMS Collaboration Pileup removal algorithms CMS-PAS-JME-14-001 CMS-PAS-JME-14-001
39 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2008) 119 0707.1378
40 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
41 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV Submitted to \it JINST CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
42 T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 Comp. Phys. Comm. 178 (2008) 852 0710.3820
43 LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, S. Dittmaier et al. Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 2. Differential Distributions 1201.3084
44 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
45 M. Wiesemann et al. Higgs production in association with bottom quarks JHEP 02 (2015) 132 1409.5301
46 R. Frederix, S. Frixione, F. Maltoni, and T. Stelzer Automation of next-to-leading order computations in QCD: The FKS subtraction JHEP 10 (2009) 003 0908.4272
47 V. Hirschi et al. Automation of one-loop QCD corrections JHEP 05 (2011) 044 1103.0621
48 R. D. Ball et al. Impact of Heavy Quark Masses on Parton Distributions and LHC Phenomenology NPB 849 (2011) 296 1101.1300
49 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
50 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4: a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
51 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
52 Belle Collaboration A detailed test of the CsI(Tl) calorimeter for BELLE with photon beams of energy between 20-MeV and 5.4-GeV NIMA 441 (2000) 401
53 CMS Collaboration Search for massive resonances decaying into WW, WZ or ZZ bosons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 03 (2017) 162 CMS-B2G-16-004
1612.09159
54 CMS Collaboration CMS Luminosity Measurements for the 2016 Data Taking Period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
55 LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, D. de Florian et al. Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector 1610.07922
56 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
57 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: The $ CL_s $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
58 L. Moneta et al. The RooStats Project in 13th International Workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Physics Research (ACAT2010) SISSA 1009.1003
59 S. Dittmaier, M. Kramer, and M. Spira Higgs radiation off bottom quarks at the Tevatron and the CERN LHC PRD 70 (2004) 074010 hep-ph/0309204
60 S. Dawson, C. B. Jackson, L. Reina, and D. Wackeroth Exclusive Higgs boson production with bottom quarks at hadron colliders PRD 69 (2004) 074027 hep-ph/0311067
61 R. V. Harlander and W. B. Kilgore Higgs boson production in bottom quark fusion at next-to-next-to leading order PRD 68 (2003) 013001 hep-ph/0304035
62 R. V. Harlander, M. Kramer, and M. Schumacher Bottom-quark associated Higgs-boson production: reconciling the four- and five-flavour scheme approach CERN Preprint 1112.3478
63 G. Degrassi et al. Towards high-precision predictions for the MSSM Higgs sector EPJC 28 (2003) 133 hep-ph/0212020
64 M. Frank et al. The Higgs boson masses and mixings of the complex MSSM in the Feynman-diagrammatic approach JHEP 02 (2007) 047 hep-ph/0611326
65 S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, and G. Weiglein FeynHiggs: A program for the calculation of the masses of the neutral CP even Higgs bosons in the MSSM CPC 124 (2000) 76 hep-ph/9812320
66 S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, and G. Weiglein The Masses of the neutral CP - even Higgs bosons in the MSSM: Accurate analysis at the two loop level EPJC 9 (1999) 343 hep-ph/9812472
67 A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski, and M. Spira HDECAY: A Program for Higgs boson decays in the standard model and its supersymmetric extension CPC 108 (1998) 56 hep-ph/9704448
68 A. Djouadi, M. M. Muhlleitner, and M. Spira Decays of supersymmetric particles: The Program SUSY-HIT in Physics at LHC. Proceedings, 3rd Conference, Cracow, Poland, July 3-8, 2006, volume 38, p. 635 2007 hep-ph/0609292
69 R. V. Harlander, S. Liebler, and H. Mantler SusHi: A program for the calculation of Higgs production in gluon fusion and bottom-quark annihilation in the Standard Model and the MSSM CPC 184 (2013) 1605 1212.3249
70 D. Eriksson, J. Rathsman, and O. St\aal 2HDMC: Two-Higgs-Doublet Model Calculator Physics and Manual CPC 181 (2010) 189 0902.0851
71 A. Buckley et al. LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era EPJC 75 (2015) 132 1412.7420
72 H. E. Haber and O. St\aal New LHC benchmarks for the $ \mathcal{CP} $ -conserving two-Higgs-doublet model EPJC 75 (2015) 491 1507.04281
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN