CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-SUS-16-019
Search for supersymmetry in events with one lepton and multiple jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV in 2016
Abstract: A search for supersymmetry is performed in events with a single electron or muon in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV in 2016. The data were recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC, and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 12.9 fb$^{-1}$. Several exclusive search regions are defined based on the number of jets and b-tagged jets, the scalar sum of the jet transverse momenta, and the scalar sum of the missing transverse momentum and the transverse momentum of the lepton. The observed yields are compatible with predictions from standard model processes. The results are interpreted in two simplified models of gluino pair production. In a model where each gluino decays to top quarks and a neutralino, gluinos with masses up to 1.65 TeV are excluded for neutralino masses below 600 GeV. In the other model, each gluino decays to two light quarks and an intermediate chargino, with the latter decaying to a W boson and a neutralino. Here, gluino masses below 1.6 TeV are excluded for neutralino masses below 500 GeV, assuming a chargino with mass midway between the gluino and neutralino masses.
Figures & Tables Summary Additional Figures & Tables References CMS Publications
Additional information on efficiencies needed for reinterpretation of these results are available here.
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Graphs showing the simplified models (a) T1tttt and (b) T5qqqqWW. Depending on the mass difference between the chargino ($ {\tilde{\chi}^{\pm }_1} $) and the neutralino ($ {\tilde{\chi}^0_1} $), the W boson can be virtual.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Graphs showing the simplified models (a) T1tttt and (b) T5qqqqWW. Depending on the mass difference between the chargino ($ {\tilde{\chi}^{\pm }_1} $) and the neutralino ($ {\tilde{\chi}^0_1} $), the W boson can be virtual.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Comparison of the ${\Delta \Phi }$ distribution for (a) the multi-b and (b) the zero-b analysis after the baseline selection. The simulated background contributions are stacked on top of each other, and several signal points are overlaid for illustration, but without stacking. For the multi-b analysis, the models T1tttt(1.2,0.8) (T1tttt(1.5,0.1)) correspond to a gluino mass of 1.2 TeV (1.5 TeV ) and neutralino mass of 0.8 TeV (0.1 TeV ), respectively. For the zero-b analysis, the models T5qqqqWW(1.2,0.8) (T5qqqqWW(1.6,0.1)) correspond to a gluino mass of 1.2 TeV (1.6 TeV ) and neutralino mass of 0.8 TeV (0.1 TeV ), and the intermediate chargino mass is fixed at 1.0 TeV (0.85 TeV ), respectively. The DY refers to $\mathrm{ q \bar{q} } \rightarrow \mathrm{Z} \gamma ^* \rightarrow \ell ^{+}\ell ^{-}$ events, and QCD refers to multijet events. The ratio of data to simulation is given below each of the panels. All uncertainties are statistical only.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Comparison of the ${\Delta \Phi }$ distribution for (a) the multi-b and (b) the zero-b analysis after the baseline selection. The simulated background contributions are stacked on top of each other, and several signal points are overlaid for illustration, but without stacking. For the multi-b analysis, the models T1tttt(1.2,0.8) (T1tttt(1.5,0.1)) correspond to a gluino mass of 1.2 TeV (1.5 TeV ) and neutralino mass of 0.8 TeV (0.1 TeV ), respectively. For the zero-b analysis, the models T5qqqqWW(1.2,0.8) (T5qqqqWW(1.6,0.1)) correspond to a gluino mass of 1.2 TeV (1.6 TeV ) and neutralino mass of 0.8 TeV (0.1 TeV ), and the intermediate chargino mass is fixed at 1.0 TeV (0.85 TeV ), respectively. The DY refers to $\mathrm{ q \bar{q} } \rightarrow \mathrm{Z} \gamma ^* \rightarrow \ell ^{+}\ell ^{-}$ events, and QCD refers to multijet events. The ratio of data to simulation is given below each of the panels. All uncertainties are statistical only.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Fits to the ${n_\textrm {b}}$ multiplicity for control regions in (a) 3 $\leq {n_\textrm {jet}} \leq$ 4 (250 $\leq {L_{\textrm T}} < $ 350 GeV, 500 $ \leq {H_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 750 GeV, $ {\Delta \Phi } < $ 1, muon channel) and (b) 6 $ \leq {n_\textrm {jet}} \leq $ 7 (350 $ \leq {L_{\textrm T}} < $ 450 GeV, ${H_{\mathrm {T}}} \geq $ 750 GeV, $ {\Delta \Phi } < $ 1) in data. The solid lines represent the templates scaled according to the fit result (blue for ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $, green for W+jet, turquoise for QCD, and red for the remaining backgrounds), the dashed line shows the sum after fit, and the points with error bars represent data.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Fits to the ${n_\textrm {b}}$ multiplicity for control regions in (a) 3 $\leq {n_\textrm {jet}} \leq$ 4 (250 $\leq {L_{\textrm T}} < $ 350 GeV, 500 $ \leq {H_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 750 GeV, $ {\Delta \Phi } < $ 1, muon channel) and (b) 6 $ \leq {n_\textrm {jet}} \leq $ 7 (350 $ \leq {L_{\textrm T}} < $ 450 GeV, ${H_{\mathrm {T}}} \geq $ 750 GeV, $ {\Delta \Phi } < $ 1) in data. The solid lines represent the templates scaled according to the fit result (blue for ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $, green for W+jet, turquoise for QCD, and red for the remaining backgrounds), the dashed line shows the sum after fit, and the points with error bars represent data.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Multi-b search: observed and predicted event counts in the 30 search regions. The black points with error bars show the number of events observed in data. The total expected contribution from standard model background processes is determined from control samples in the data and is used to set the overall normalization of the stacked background histograms. The relative fraction of the individual background components is taken from simulation and shown for illustration only. The uncertainty on the background prediction is shown as a grey, hatched region. The expected event yields for two T1tttt benchmark SUSY models are represented by open histograms. The vertical dashed and dotted lines separate different ${n_\textrm {jet}}$ and ${L_{\textrm T}}$ bins, respectively. The lower panel shows the ratio of the difference between data and background to the sum of the uncertainties on data and background prediction. The error bars indicate the total statistical and systematic uncertainty in the ratio.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Zero-b search: observed and predicted event counts in the 20 search regions. The black points with error bars show the number of observed events. The background components are shown as stacked histograms. The contributions from ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ and W+jet are both estimated from control samples in the data. The uncertainty on the background prediction is shown as a grey, hatched region. The expected event yields for three T5qqqqWW benchmark SUSY models are represented by open histograms. The lower panel shows the ratio of data to background prediction. The grey, hatched area indicates the total statistical and systematic uncertainty on the prediction, while the black error bars correspond to the uncertainty on data.

png pdf root
Figure 6-a:
Cross section limits at a 95% CL for (a) the T1tttt model, and (b) the T5qqqqWW model. For the T5qqqqWW model, the mass of the chargino is taken to be $m_{ {\tilde{\chi}^{\pm }_1} }=0.5(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }+m_{ {\tilde{\chi}^0_1} })$. The solid black (dashed red) lines correspond to the observed (expected) mass limits, with the thicker lines representing the central values and the thinner lines representing the $\pm$1$ \sigma $ uncertainty bands related to the theoretical (experimental) uncertainties.

png pdf root
Figure 6-b:
Cross section limits at a 95% CL for (a) the T1tttt model, and (b) the T5qqqqWW model. For the T5qqqqWW model, the mass of the chargino is taken to be $m_{ {\tilde{\chi}^{\pm }_1} }=0.5(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }+m_{ {\tilde{\chi}^0_1} })$. The solid black (dashed red) lines correspond to the observed (expected) mass limits, with the thicker lines representing the central values and the thinner lines representing the $\pm$1$ \sigma $ uncertainty bands related to the theoretical (experimental) uncertainties.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Search regions and the corresponding minimum $ {\Delta \Phi }$ requirements.

png pdf
Table 2:
Overview of the definitions of sideband and mainband regions. For the multijet (QCD) fit the electron (e) sample is used, while for the determination (det.) of $ {R_{\textrm {CS}}} ( {\mathrm {W}^{\pm }} )$ the muon ($\mu $) sample is used.

png pdf
Table 3:
Summary of systematic uncertainties in the total background prediction for the multi-b and for the zero-b analysis.

png pdf
Table 4:
Summary of the systematic uncertainties and their average effect on the yields of the benchmark signals. The values are very similar for the multi-b and the zero-b analysis, and are usually larger for compressed scenarios, where the mass difference between gluino and neutralino is small.

png pdf
Table 5:
Summary of the results in the multi-b search.

png pdf
Table 6:
Background prediction and observation in the 0-tag regions, 12.9 fb$^{-1}$
Summary
A search for supersymmetry has been performed with 12.9 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data recorded by the CMS experiment at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in 2016. The data are analyzed in several exclusive categories, differing in the number of jets and b-tagged jets, the scalar sum of all jet transverse momenta, and the scalar sum of the imbalance in transverse momentum and the transverse momentum of the lepton. The main background is significantly reduced by requiring a large azimuthal angle between the directions of the lepton and of the reconstructed W boson $p_{\mathrm{T}}$. No significant excess is observed, and the results are interpreted in terms of two simplified models that describe gluino pair production. For a simplified model in which each gluino decays through an off-shell top squark to a $\mathrm{ t \bar{t} }$ pair and the lightest neutralino, gluino masses up to 1.65 TeV are excluded for neutralino masses below 600 GeV. Neutralino masses below 950 GeV can be excluded for a gluino mass of approximately 1.5 TeV. A second simplified model also describes gluino pair production, with the gluinos decaying to first or second generation quarks and a chargino, which then decays to a W boson and the lightest neutralino. The chargino mass in this decay chain is taken to be $m_{{\widetilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1} }=0.5(m_{{\widetilde{\mathrm g}} }+m_{{\widetilde{\chi}^0_1} })$. In this model, gluino masses below 1.6 TeV are excluded for neutralino masses below 500 GeV. Neutralino masses below 850 GeV can be excluded for a gluino mass of approximately 1.3 TeV. These results extend the limits obtained from the dataset recorded in 2015 by up to 200 GeV.
Additional Figures

png pdf
Additional Figure 1:
The number of b-tagged jets after requiring at least six jets and one b-tagged jet. A minimum ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ of 500 GeV and a minimum $ {L_{\textrm T}} $ of 250 GeV is required in addition to exactly one lepton with $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 25 GeV. The simulated background events are stacked on top of each other, and two signal points are overlaid for illustration without being stacked. The model T1tttt(1.2,0.8) (T1tttt(1.5,0.1)) corresponds to a gluino mass of 1.2 TeV (1.5 TeV) and neutralino mass of 0.8 TeV (0.1 TeV), respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 2:
The number of b-tagged jets, after the preselection, requiring at least five jets. A minimum ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ of 500 GeV and a minimum $ {L_{\textrm T}} $ of 250 GeV is required in addition to exactly one lepton with $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 25 GeV. The simulated background events are stacked on top of each other, and several signal points are overlaid for illustration without being stacked. The model T5qqqqWW(1.2,0.8) (T5qqqqWW(1.4,1.0) and T5qqqqWW(1.6,0.1)) corresponds to a gluino mass of 1.2 TeV (1.4 TeV and 1.6 TeV) and neutralino mass of 0.8 TeV (1.0 TeV and 0.1 TeV), respectively. The intermediate chargino mass is fixed at 1.0 TeV (1.2 TeV and 0.85 TeV).

png pdf
Additional Figure 3:
The ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ distribution for the zero-b analysis, after the preselection, requiring at least five jets, with no b-tagged jet. A minimum ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ of 500 GeV and a minimum $ {L_{\textrm T}} $ of 250 GeV is required in addition to exactly one lepton with $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 25 GeV. The simulated background events are stacked on top of each other, and several signal points are overlaid for illustration without being stacked. The model T5qqqqWW(1.2,0.8) (T5qqqqWW(1.6,0.1)) corresponds to a gluino mass of 1.2 TeV (1.6 TeV) and neutralino mass of 0.8 TeV (0.1 TeV), respectively. The intermediate chargino mass is fixed at 1.0 TeV (0.85 TeV).

png pdf
Additional Figure 4:
The $ {L_{\textrm T}} $ distribution for the zero-b analysis, after the preselection, requiring at least five jets, with no b-tagged jet. A minimum ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ of 500 GeV and a minimum $ {L_{\textrm T}} $ of 250 GeV is required in addition to exactly one lepton with $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 25 GeV. The simulated background events are stacked on top of each other, and several signal points are overlaid for illustration without being stacked. The model T5qqqqWW(1.2,0.8) (T5qqqqWW(1.6,0.1)) corresponds to a gluino mass of 1.2 TeV (1.6 TeV) and neutralino mass of 0.8 TeV (0.1 TeV), respectively. The intermediate chargino mass is fixed at 1.0 TeV (0.85 TeV).

png pdf
Additional Figure 5:
The $ {L_{\textrm T}} $ distribution for the multi-b analysis, after the preselection, requiring at least six jets, of which at least one is b-tagged. A minimum ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ of 500 GeV and a minimum $ {L_{\textrm T}} $ of 250 GeV is required in addition to exactly one lepton with $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 25 GeV. The simulated background events are stacked on top of each other, and several signal points are overlaid for illustration without being stacked. The model T1tttt(1.2,0.8) (T1tttt(1.5,0.1)) corresponds to a gluino mass of 1.2 TeV (1.5 TeV) and neutralino mass of 0.8 TeV (0.1 TeV), respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 6:
The ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ distribution for the multi-b analysis, after the preselection, requiring at least six jets, of which at least one is b-tagged. A minimum ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ of 500 GeV and a minimum $ {L_{\textrm T}} $ of 250 GeV is required in addition to exactly one lepton with $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 25 GeV. The simulated background events are stacked on top of each other, and several signal points are overlaid for illustration without being stacked. The model T1tttt (1.2,0.8) (T1tttt (1.5,0.1)) corresponds to a gluino mass of 1.2 TeV (1.5 TeV) and neutralino mass of 0.8 TeV (0.1 TeV), respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 7:
The $ {\Delta \Phi } $ distribution for the zero-b analysis, in the W+jets sideband. A minimum ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ of 500 GeV and $ {L_{\textrm T}} >250 GeV $ is required in addition to exactly one lepton with $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 25 GeV. The simulated background events are stacked on top of each other, and several signal points are overlaid for illustration without being stacked. The model T5qqqqWW(1.2,0.8) (T5qqqqWW(1.6,0.1)) corresponds to a gluino mass of 1.2 TeV (1.6 TeV) and neutralino mass of 0.8 TeV (0.1 TeV), respectively. The intermediate chargino mass is fixed at 1.0 TeV (0.85 TeV).

png pdf
Additional Figure 8:
The $ {\Delta \Phi } $ distribution for the zero-b analysis, in the $ {\mathrm{ t } {}\mathrm{ \bar{t} } } $ sideband. A minimum ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ of 500 GeV and $ {L_{\textrm T}} >250 GeV $ is required in addition to exactly one lepton with $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 25 GeV. The simulated background events are stacked on top of each other, and several signal points are overlaid for illustration without being stacked. The model T5qqqqWW(1.2,0.8) (T5qqqqWW(1.6,0.1)) corresponds to a gluino mass of 1.2 TeV (1.6 TeV) and neutralino mass of 0.8 TeV (0.1 TeV), respectively. The intermediate chargino mass is fixed at 1.0 TeV (0.85 TeV).

png pdf
Additional Figure 9:
The $ {R_{\textrm {CS}}} $ values from simulation (excluding the QCD sample) and $\kappa _{\rm EWK}$ for all signal regions of the multi-b analysis.

png pdf
Additional Figure 10:
The systematic uncertainties for all signal regions of the zero-b analysis. The top part of the plot shows the relative uncertainty on the background prediction for the different sources of uncertainties. The various uncertainties are stacked linearly on top of each other, while the black crosses represent the square root of the sum of squares. The bottom part of the plot shows the total relative uncertainty, including statistical and systematic terms, as a blue dotted area around unity.

png pdf
Additional Figure 11:
The systematic uncertainties for all signal regions of the multi-b analysis.The top part of the plot shows the relative uncertainty on the background prediction for the different sources of uncertainties. The various uncertainties are stacked linearly on top of each other, while the black crosses represent the square root of the sum of squares. The bottom part of the plot shows the nominal $\kappa $ values with the statistical uncertainty represented by the black line and the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainty shown by the blue dotted area.

png pdf
Additional Figure 12:
The systematic uncertainties for all signal regions of the multi-b analysis. The top part of the plot shows the relative uncertainty for an example signal point T1tttt (1.2,0.8) for the different sources of uncertainties. The various uncertainties are stacked linearly on top of each other, while the black crosses represent the square root of the sum of squares. The bottom part of the plot shows the expected number of events with the statistical uncertainty represented by the black line and the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainty shown by the blue area.

png pdf
Additional Figure 13:
Fit results for $n_{\text{jet}} \in $ [3, 4], $n_{\text{btag}} =$ 0, and $ L_{\textrm{T}} \in $ [250,350] GeV. The black dots represent data. EWK and QCD selected events from simulation normalized to the luminosity are shown with the blue and cyan filled histograms. The full fit result is shown with the solid red line, while the separate EWK and QCD components are depicted by the blue dashed and cyan dotted-dashed line, respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 14:
Ratio of selected to anti-selected electron events from QCD for $ {n_\textrm {jet}} \in $ [3, 4], $ {n_\textrm {b-tag}} = $ 0, in bins of $ {L_{\textrm T}} $ in data. The number of selected electrons from QCD events is extracted from the fit of the $ {L_{\textrm P}} $ distribution.
Additional Tables

png pdf
Additional Table 1:
Yields table for 12.9 fb$^{-1}$ for the baseline selections and the two different signal models, with two mass configurations respectively.
Additional root files containing the limit curves for T1tttt can be found here and for T5qqqqWW here.
References
1 P. Ramond Dual theory for free fermions PRD 3 (1971) 2415
2 Y. A. Golfand and E. P. Likhtman Extension of the algebra of Poincar$ \'e $ group generators and violation of P invariance JEPTL 13 (1971)323
3 A. Neveu and J. H. Schwarz Factorizable dual model of pions Nucl. Phys. B 31 (1971) 86
4 D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov Possible universal neutrino interaction JEPTL 16 (1972)438
5 J. Wess and B. Zumino A Lagrangian model invariant under supergauge transformations PLB 49 (1974) 52
6 J. Wess and B. Zumino Supergauge transformations in four dimensions Nucl. Phys. B 70 (1974) 39
7 P. Fayet Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino Nucl. Phys. B 90 (1975) 104
8 H. P. Nilles Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics Phys. Rep. 110 (1984) 1
9 G. R. Farrar and P. Fayet Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with supersymmetry Physics Letters B 76 (1978), no. 5, 575 -- 579
10 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in events with one lepton in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the CMS experiment CMS-PAS-SUS-15-006 CMS-PAS-SUS-15-006
11 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV in events with a single lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum EPJC 73 (2013) 2404 CMS-SUS-12-010
1212.6428
12 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in final states with a single lepton, b-quark jets, and missing transverse energy in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PRD 87 (2013) 052006 CMS-SUS-11-028
1211.3143
13 ATLAS Collaboration Further search for supersymmetry at $ \sqrt{s}=7 $$ TeV $ in final states with jets, missing transverse momentum and isolated leptons with the ATLAS detector PRD 86 (2012) 092002 1208.4688
14 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV in events with a single lepton, large jet multiplicity, and multiple b jets PLB 733 (2014) 328 CMS-SUS-13-007
1311.4937
15 ATLAS Collaboration Search for squarks and gluinos in events with isolated leptons, jets and missing transverse momentum at $ \sqrt{s}=8 $ TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 04 (2015) 116 1501.03555
16 ATLAS Collaboration Search for strong production of supersymmetric particles in final states with missing transverse momentum and at least three b-jets at $ \sqrt{s} $= 8 TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector JHEP 10 (2014) 024 1407.0600
17 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV in the single-lepton final state using the sum of masses of large-radius jets Submitted to JHEP CMS-SUS-15-007
1605.04608
18 ATLAS Collaboration Search for gluinos in events with an isolated lepton, jets and missing transverse momentum at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector Submitted to EPJC 1605.04285
19 ATLAS Collaboration Search for pair production of gluinos decaying via stop and sbottom in events with b-jets and large missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 13 $ TeV with the ATLAS detector 1605.09318
20 N. Arkani-Hamed et al. MARMOSET: The path from LHC data to the new standard model via on-shell effective theories hep-ph/0703088
21 J. Alwall, P. Schuster, and N. Toro Simplified models for a first characterization of new physics at the LHC PRD 79 (2009) 075020 0810.3921
22 J. Alwall, M.-P. Le, M. Lisanti, and J. G. Wacker Model-independent jets plus missing energy searches PRD 79 (2009) 015005 0809.3264
23 D. Alves et al. Simplified models for LHC new physics searches JPG 39 (2012) 105005 1105.2838
24 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
25 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
26 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) P11002 CMS-JME-10-011
1107.4277
27 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 8 $$ TeV $ JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
28 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s} = 7 $$ TeV $ JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
29 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow event reconstruction in CMS and performance for jets, taus, and $ E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}} $ CDS
30 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the particle-flow event with the first LHC collisions recorded in the CMS detector CDS
31 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2008) 119 0707.1378
32 CMS Collaboration Identification of $ \mathrm{b }-quark $ jets with the CMS experiment JINST 8 (2013) P04013 CMS-BTV-12-001
1211.4462
33 CMS Collaboration Identification of b quark jets at the CMS Experiment in the LHC Run 2 CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001 CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001
34 CMS Collaboration Performance of $ \mathrm{b } $ tagging at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV in multijet, $ \mathrm{ t \bar{t} } $ and boosted topology events CMS-PAS-BTV-13-001 CMS-PAS-BTV-13-001
35 J. Alwall et al. MadGraph5: going beyond JHEP 06 (2011) 128 1106.0522
36 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
37 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
38 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
39 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
40 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: $ s $- and $ t $-channel contributions JHEP 09 (2009) 111, , [Erratum: JHEP \bf 02 (2010) 011] 0907.4076
41 E. Re Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
42 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
43 T. Sj\"ostrand et al. An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
44 W. Beenakker, R. H\"opker, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas Squark and gluino production at hadron colliders Nucl. Phys. B 492 (1997) 51 hep-ph/9610490
45 A. Kulesza and L. Motyka Threshold resummation for squark-antisquark and gluino-pair production at the LHC PRL 102 (2009) 111802 0807.2405
46 A. Kulesza and L. Motyka Soft gluon resummation for the production of gluino-gluino and squark-antisquark pairs at the LHC PRD 80 (2009) 095004 0905.4749
47 W. Beenakker et al. Soft-gluon resummation for squark and gluino hadroproduction JHEP 12 (2009) 041 0909.4418
48 W. Beenakker et al. Squark and gluino hadroproduction Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26 (2011) 2637 1105.1110
49 S. Agostinelli et al. GEANT4 --- a simulation toolkit Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 506 (2003) 250
50 CMS Collaboration The Fast Simulation of the CMS Detector at LHC Technical Report 3, CERN
51 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the Polarization of W Bosons with Large Transverse Momenta in W+Jets Events at the LHC PRL 107 (2011) 021802 CMS-EWK-10-014
1104.3829
52 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the Inelastic Proton-Proton Cross Section at $ \sqrt{s} = 13 $ TeV with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC Submitted to PRL 1606.02625
53 CMS Collaboration CMS Luminosity Measurement for the 2015 Data Taking Period CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001
54 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the differential cross section for top quark pair production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV EPJC75 (2015), no. 11, 542 CMS-TOP-12-028
1505.04480
55 Z. Bern et al. Left-Handed W Bosons at the LHC PRD84 (2011) 034008 1103.5445
56 CMS Collaboration Angular coefficients of Z bosons produced in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV and decaying to $ \mu^+ \mu^- $ as a function of transverse momentum and rapidity PLB 750 (2015) 154 CMS-SMP-13-010
1504.03512
57 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the polarisation of W bosons produced with large transverse momentum in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=7 $ TeV with the ATLAS experiment EPJC 72 (2012) 2001 1203.2165
58 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554, , [Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C \bf 73 (2013) 2501] 1007.1727
59 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
60 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ {CL}_s $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN