CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-BPH-13-008 ; CERN-EP-2017-244
Measurement of b hadron lifetimes in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV
Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 457 [Erratum]
Abstract: Measurements are presented of the lifetimes of the $ \mathrm{B}^{0} $, $ \mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} $, $\Lambda_\mathrm{b}^0$, and $ \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}}^{+} $ hadrons using the decay channels ${\mathrm{B}^{0} \!\to\! \mathrm{J}/\psi {\mathrm{K^{*}(892)}}^{0}}$, ${\mathrm{B}^{0} \!\to\! \mathrm{J}/\psi {\mathrm{K^0_S}}}$, ${\mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} \!\to\! \mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+} \pi^{-}}$, ${\mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} \!\to\! \mathrm{J}/\psi \phi(1020)}$, $ \Lambda_{\mathrm{b}} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \Lambda $, and $ \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}}^{+} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+} $. The data sample, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.7 fb$^{-1}$, was collected by the CMS detector at the LHC in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV. The $ \mathrm{B}^{0} $ lifetime is measured to be 453.0 $\pm$ 1.6 (stat) $\pm$ 1.5 (syst) $\mu$m in ${\mathrm{J}/\psi {\mathrm{K^{*}(892)}}^{0}} $ and 457.8 $\pm$ 2.7 (stat) $\pm$ 2.7 (syst) $\mu$m in ${\mathrm{J}/\psi {\mathrm{K^0_S}}}$, which results in a combined measurement of $c\tau_{\mathrm{B}^{0}} = $ 454.1 $\pm$ 1.4 (stat) $\pm$ 1.3 (syst) $\mu$m. The effective lifetime of the $ \mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} $ meson is measured in two decay modes, with contributions from different amounts of the heavy and light eigenstates. This results in two different measured lifetimes: $c\tau_{\mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+} \pi^{-}} = $ 502.7 $\pm$ 10.2 (stat) $\pm$ 3.2 (syst) $\mu$m and $c\tau_{\mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \phi(1020)} = $ 443.9 $\pm$ 2.0 (stat) $\pm$ 1.2 (syst) $\mu$m. The $\Lambda_\mathrm{b}^0$ lifetime is found to be 442.9 $\pm$ 8.2 (stat) $\pm$ 2.7 (syst) $\mu$m. The precision from each of these channels is as good as or better than previous measurements. The $ \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}}^{+} $ lifetime, measured with respect to the $ \mathrm{B^{+}} $ to reduce the systematic uncertainty, is 162.3 $\pm$ 8.2 (stat) $\pm$ 4.7 (syst) $\pm$ 0.1 ($\tau_{\mathrm{B^{+}}}$) $\mu$m. All results are in agreement with current world-average values.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
The combined reconstruction and selection efficiency from simulation versus ${ct}$ with a superimposed fit to an inverse power function for ${\mathrm{B^{+}} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \mathrm{K^{+}}}$ (upper left), ${\Lambda_{\mathrm{b}}^{0} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \Lambda ^{0}} $ (upper right), $ {\mathrm{B}^{0} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi {\mathrm{K^0_S}}}$ (centre left), ${\mathrm{B}^{0} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi {\mathrm{K^{*}(892)}} ^{0}} $ (centre right), ${\mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+} \pi^{-}} $ (lower left), and $ {\mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \phi (1020)} $ (lower right). The efficiency scale is arbitrary.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
The combined reconstruction and selection efficiency from simulation versus ${ct}$ with a superimposed fit to an inverse power function for ${\mathrm{B^{+}} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \mathrm{K^{+}}}$. The efficiency scale is arbitrary.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
The combined reconstruction and selection efficiency from simulation versus ${ct}$ with a superimposed fit to an inverse power function for ${\Lambda_{\mathrm{b}}^{0} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \Lambda ^{0}} $. The efficiency scale is arbitrary.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
The combined reconstruction and selection efficiency from simulation versus ${ct}$ with a superimposed fit to an inverse power function for $ {\mathrm{B}^{0} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi {\mathrm{K^0_S}}}$. The efficiency scale is arbitrary.

png pdf
Figure 1-d:
The combined reconstruction and selection efficiency from simulation versus ${ct}$ with a superimposed fit to an inverse power function for ${\mathrm{B}^{0} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi {\mathrm{K^{*}(892)}} ^{0}} $. The efficiency scale is arbitrary.

png pdf
Figure 1-e:
The combined reconstruction and selection efficiency from simulation versus ${ct}$ with a superimposed fit to an inverse power function for ${\mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+} \pi^{-}} $. The efficiency scale is arbitrary.

png pdf
Figure 1-f:
The combined reconstruction and selection efficiency from simulation versus ${ct}$ with a superimposed fit to an inverse power function for $ {\mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \phi (1020)} $. The efficiency scale is arbitrary.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Invariant mass (left) and $ct$ (right) distributions for ${\mathrm{B^{+}}} $ (upper) and for $\Lambda_{\mathrm{b}}^{0}$ (lower) candidates. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown. The bottom panels of the figures on the right show the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Invariant mass distribution for ${\mathrm{B^{+}}} $ candidates. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
$ct$ distribution for $\Lambda_{\mathrm{b}}^{0}$ candidates. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown. The bottom panel shows the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
Invariant mass distribution for ${\mathrm{B^{+}}} $ candidates. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown.The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
$ct$ distribution for $\Lambda_{\mathrm{b}}^{0}$ candidates. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown. The bottom panel shows the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Invariant mass (left) and $ct$ (right) distributions for $ \mathrm{B}^{0} $ candidates reconstructed from $ {\mathrm{J}/\psi {\mathrm{K^{*}(892)}} ^{0}} $ (upper) and $ {\mathrm{J}/\psi {\mathrm{K^0_S}}} $ (lower) decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown. The bottom panels of the figures on the right show the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Invariant mass distribution for $ \mathrm{B}^{0} $ candidates reconstructed from $ {\mathrm{J}/\psi {\mathrm{K^{*}(892)}} ^{0}} $ decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
$ct$ distribution for $ \mathrm{B}^{0} $ candidates reconstructed from $ {\mathrm{J}/\psi {\mathrm{K^{*}(892)}} ^{0}} $ decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown. The bottom panel shows the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
Invariant mass distribution for $ \mathrm{B}^{0} $ candidates reconstructed from $ {\mathrm{J}/\psi {\mathrm{K^0_S}}} $ decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
$ct$ distribution for $ \mathrm{B}^{0} $ candidates reconstructed from $ {\mathrm{J}/\psi {\mathrm{K^0_S}}} $ decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown. The bottom panel shows the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Invariant mass (left) and $ct$ (right) distributions for ${ \mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} }$ candidates reconstructed from ${\mathrm{J}/\psi \phi (1020)}$ (upper) and ${\mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+} \pi^{-}}$ (lower) decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the full fit function (solid) and signal (dashed) shown for both decays, the total background (dotted) shown for the upper plots, and the combinatorial background (dotted), misidentified ${\mathrm{B^{+}} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \mathrm{K^{+}}}$ background (dashed-dotted), ${\mathrm{B}^{0} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+} \pi^{-}} $ contribution (dashed-dotted-dotted-dotted), and partially reconstructed and other misidentified B backgrounds (dashed-dotted-dotted) shown for the lower plots. The bottom panels of the figures on the right show the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Invariant mass distribution for ${ \mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} }$ candidates reconstructed from ${\mathrm{J}/\psi \phi (1020)}$ decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the full fit function (solid) and signal (dashed) shown for both decays, the total background (dotted) shown for the upper plots, and the combinatorial background (dotted), misidentified ${\mathrm{B^{+}} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \mathrm{K^{+}}}$ background (dashed-dotted), ${\mathrm{B}^{0} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+} \pi^{-}} $ contribution (dashed-dotted-dotted-dotted), and partially reconstructed and other misidentified B backgrounds (dashed-dotted-dotted) shown for the lower plots. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
$ct$ distribution for ${ \mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} }$ candidates reconstructed from ${\mathrm{J}/\psi \phi (1020)}$ decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the full fit function (solid) and signal (dashed) shown for both decays, the total background (dotted) shown for the upper plots, and the combinatorial background (dotted), misidentified ${\mathrm{B^{+}} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \mathrm{K^{+}}}$ background (dashed-dotted), ${\mathrm{B}^{0} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+} \pi^{-}} $ contribution (dashed-dotted-dotted-dotted), and partially reconstructed and other misidentified B backgrounds (dashed-dotted-dotted) shown for the lower plots. The bottom panel shows the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
Invariant mass distribution for ${ \mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} }$ candidates reconstructed from ${\mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+} \pi^{-}}$ decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the full fit function (solid) and signal (dashed) shown for both decays, the total background (dotted) shown for the upper plots, and the combinatorial background (dotted), misidentified ${\mathrm{B^{+}} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \mathrm{K^{+}}}$ background (dashed-dotted), ${\mathrm{B}^{0} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+} \pi^{-}} $ contribution (dashed-dotted-dotted-dotted), and partially reconstructed and other misidentified B backgrounds (dashed-dotted-dotted) shown for the lower plots. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 4-d:
$ct$ distribution for ${ \mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} }$ candidates reconstructed from ${\mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+} \pi^{-}}$ decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the full fit function (solid) and signal (dashed) shown for both decays, the total background (dotted) shown for the upper plots, and the combinatorial background (dotted), misidentified ${\mathrm{B^{+}} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \mathrm{K^{+}}}$ background (dashed-dotted), ${\mathrm{B}^{0} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+} \pi^{-}} $ contribution (dashed-dotted-dotted-dotted), and partially reconstructed and other misidentified B backgrounds (dashed-dotted-dotted) shown for the lower plots. The bottom panel shows the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5:
The ${\mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+}} $ invariant mass distribution (left) with the solid line representing the total fit, the dashed line the signal component, the dotted line the combinatorial background, and the dashed-dotted line the contribution from $ {\mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}}^{+} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \mathrm{K^{+}}} $ decays. The $ {\mathrm{J}/\psi \mathrm{K^{+}}} $ invariant mass distribution (right) with the solid line representing the total fit, the dashed line the signal component, the dotted-dashed curves the $\mathrm{B^{+}} \to {\mathrm{J}/\psi} \pi^{+} $ and $ \mathrm{B}^{0} $ contributions, and the dotted curve the combinatorial background. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
The ${\mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+}} $ invariant mass distribution with the solid line representing the total fit, the dashed line the signal component, the dotted line the combinatorial background, and the dashed-dotted line the contribution from $ {\mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}}^{+} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \mathrm{K^{+}}} $ decays. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
The $ {\mathrm{J}/\psi \mathrm{K^{+}}} $ invariant mass distribution (right) with the solid line representing the total fit, the dashed line the signal component, the dotted-dashed curves the $\mathrm{B^{+}} \to {\mathrm{J}/\psi} \pi^{+} $ and $ \mathrm{B}^{0} $ contributions, and the dotted curve the combinatorial background. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Left: Yields of $ {\mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}}^{+} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+}} and {\mathrm{B^{+}} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \mathrm{K^{+}}} $ events as a function of ${ct}$, normalized to the bin width, as determined from fits to the invariant mass distributions. Right: Ratio of the $ \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}}^{+} $ and $ \mathrm{B^{+}} $ efficiency distributions as a function of ${ct}$, as determined from simulated events. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties, and the horizontal bars show the bin widths.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Yields of $ {\mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}}^{+} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+}} and {\mathrm{B^{+}} \to \mathrm{J}/\psi \mathrm{K^{+}}} $ events as a function of ${ct}$, normalized to the bin width, as determined from fits to the invariant mass distributions. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties, and the horizontal bars show the bin widths.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Ratio of the $ \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}}^{+} $ and $ \mathrm{B^{+}} $ efficiency distributions as a function of ${ct}$, as determined from simulated events. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties, and the horizontal bars show the bin widths.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Ratio of the $\mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}}^{+} to \mathrm{B^{+}} $ efficiency-corrected ${ct}$ distributions, $R/R_{\varepsilon}$, with a line showing the result of the fit to an exponential function. The vertical bars give the statistical uncertainty in the data, and the horizontal bars show the bin widths.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of the sources and values of systematic uncertainties in the lifetime measurements (in $\mu$m). The total systematic uncertainty is the sum in quadrature of the individual uncertainties.

png pdf
Table 2:
Summary of the systematic uncertainties in the $\Delta \Gamma $ and $c\tau _{\mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}}^{+}}$ measurements.
Summary
The lifetimes of the $ \mathrm{B}^{0} $, $ \mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} $, $ \Lambda_{\mathrm{b}}^{0} $, and $ \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}}^{+} $ hadrons have been measured using fully reconstructed decays with a $ {\mathrm{J}/\psi} $ meson. The data were collected by the CMS detector in proton-proton collision events at a centre-of-mass energy of 8 TeV, and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 19.7 fb$^{-1}$. The $ \mathrm{B}^{0} $ and $ \mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} $ meson lifetimes have each been measured in two channels: ${\mathrm{J}/\psi {\mathrm{K^{*}(892)}}^{0}}$, ${\mathrm{J}/\psi {\mathrm{K^0_S}}}$ for $ \mathrm{B}^{0} $ and ${\mathrm{J}/\psi \pi^{+} \pi^{-}}$, ${\mathrm{J}/\psi \phi(1020)}$ for $ \mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} $. The precision from each channel is as good as or better than previous measurements in the respective channel. The $ \mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} $ lifetime results are used to obtain the lifetimes of the heavy and light $ \mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}} $ mass eigenstates. The precision of the $ \Lambda_{\mathrm{b}}^{0} $ lifetime measurement is also as good as any previous measurement in the ${\mathrm{J}/\psi \Lambda^{0}}$ channel. The measurement of the $\mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}}^{+}$ meson lifetime confirms a longer lifetime than found by the Tevatron experiments, in agreement with results from LHCb. All measured lifetimes are compatible with the current world-average values.
References
1 A. Lenz Lifetimes and heavy quark expansion Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30 (2015) 1543005
2 Particle Data Group, C. Patrignani et al. Review of particle physics CPC 40 (2016) 100001
3 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
4 R. Fleischer and R. Knegjens Effective lifetimes of $ \text{B}_\text{s} $ decays and their constraints on the $ \mathrm{B}^{0}s $--$ {\mathrm{\overline{B}}^0}s $ mixing parameters EPJC 71 (2011) 1789 1109.5115
5 LHCb Collaboration Analysis of the resonant components in $ {\mathrm{\overline{B}}^0}s \to J/\psi \pi^+ \pi^- $ PRD 86 (2012) 052006 1301.5347
6 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of resonant and CP components in $ {\mathrm{\overline{B}}^0}s \to J/\psi \pi^+ \pi^- $ PRD 89 (2014) 092006 1402.6248
7 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the CP-violating weak phase $ \phi_s $ and the decay width difference $ \Delta \Gamma_s $ using the $ \mathrm{B}^{0}s \to J/\psi\phi $(1020) decay channel in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV PLB 757 (2016) 97 CMS-BPH-13-012
1507.07527
8 V. V. Kiselev Exclusive decays and lifetime of $ \mathrm{B_c} $ meson in QCD sum rules hep-ph/0211021
9 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}} $ meson lifetime using $ \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}} \to J\!/\!\psi \mu^+ \nu_{\mu} X $ decays EPJC 74 (2014) 2839 1401.6932
10 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the lifetime of the $ \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}} $ meson using the $ \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}} \to J/\psi \pi^+ $ decay mode PLB 742 (2015) 29 1411.6899
11 CDF Collaboration Observation of the $ \text{B}_\text{c} $ meson in $ \text{p}\overline{\text{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.8 TeV PRL 81 (1998) 2432 hep-ex/9805034
12 CDF Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}} $ meson lifetime using the decay mode $ \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}}\to J/\psi \mathrm{e^{+}} \nu $ PRL 97 (2006) 012002 hep-ex/0603027
13 D0 Collaboration Measurement of the lifetime of the $ \text{B}^{\pm}_\text{c} $ meson in the semileptonic decay channel PRL 102 (2009) 092001 0805.2614
14 CDF Collaboration Measurement of the $ \text{B}^-_\text{c} $ meson lifetime in the decay $ \text{B}^-_\text{c} \to J/\psi \pi^- $ PRD 87 (2013) 011101 1210.2366
15 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
16 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
17 T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual JHEP 05 (2006) 026 hep-ph/0603175
18 C. Chang, C. Driouchi, P. Eerola, and X. Wu BCVEGPY: an event generator for hadronic production of the $ \mathrm{B_c} $ meson CPC 159 (2004) 192 hep-ph/0309120
19 C. Chang, J. Wang, and X. Wu BCVEGPY2.0: An upgraded version of the generator BCVEGPY with the addition of hadroproduction of the P-wave $ \mathrm{B_c} $ states CPC 174 (2006) 241 hep-ph/0504017
20 D. J. Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package NIMA 462 (2001) 152
21 P. Golonka and Z. W\cas PHOTOS Monte Carlo: a precision tool for QED corrections in Z and W decays EPJC 45 (2006) 97 hep-ph/0506026
22 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4---a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
23 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
24 A. S. Dighe, I. Dunietz, and R. Fleischer Extracting CKM phases and $ \text{B}_\text{s} - \overline{\text{B}}_\text{s} $ mixing parameters from angular distributions of non-leptonic $ \text{B} $ decays EPJC 6 (1999) 647 hep-ph/9804253
25 LHCb Collaboration First observation of the decay $ \mathrm{B^+_c}\to \mathrm{J}/\psi \mathrm{K^{+}} $ JHEP 09 (2013) 075 1306.6723
26 CMS Collaboration Alignment of the CMS tracker with LHC and cosmic ray data JINST 9 (2014) P06009 CMS-TRK-11-002
1403.2286
27 M. J. Oreglia A study of the reactions $\psi' \to \gamma\gamma \psi$ PhD thesis, Stanford University, 1980 SLAC Report SLAC-R-236, see Appendix D
28 CDF Collaboration Measurement of branching ratio and $ \mathrm{B}^{0}s $ lifetime in the decay $ \mathrm{B}^{0}s \to J/\psi \text{f}_0(980) $ at CDF PRD 84 (2011) 052012 1106.3682
29 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of CP violation and the $ \mathrm{B}^{0}s $ meson decay width difference with $ \mathrm{B}^{0}s \to J/\psi \mathrm{K^{+}} \mathrm{K^{-}} $ and $ \mathrm{B}^{0}s \to J/\psi \pi^+\pi^- $ decays PRD 87 (2013) 112010 1304.2600
30 D0 Collaboration $ \mathrm{B}^{0}s $ lifetime measurement in the CP-odd decay channel $ \mathrm{B}^{0}s \to J/\psi \text{f}_0(980) $ PRD 94 (2016) 012001 1603.01302
31 C.-H. Chang, S.-L. Chen, T.-F. Feng, and X.-Q. Li Lifetime of the $ \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}} $ meson and some relevant problems PRD 64 (2001) 014003 hep-ph/0007162
32 M. Beneke and G. Buchalla $ \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}} $ meson lifetime PRD 53 (1996) 4991 hep-ph/9601249
33 A. Yu. Anisimov, I. M. Narodetskii, C. Semay, and B. Silvestre-Brac The $ \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}} $ meson lifetime in the light-front constituent quark model PLB 452 (1999) 129 hep-ph/9812514
34 V. V. Kiselev, A. E. Kovalsky, and A. K. Likhoded Decays and lifetime of $ \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}} $ in QCD sum rules in 5th International Workshop on Heavy Quark Physics, Dubna, Russia, April 6-8 hep-ph/0006104
35 R. Alonso, B. Grinstein, and J. Martin Camalich Lifetime of $ \mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{c}}^- $ constrains explanations for anomalies in $ \mathrm{B} \to \mathrm{D}^{(*)}\tau\nu $ PRL 118 (2017) 081802 1611.06676
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN