CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-HIG-18-008
First constraints on invisible Higgs boson decays using $\mathrm{t}\bar{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{H}$ production at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV
Abstract: This document presents first upper bounds on the branching fraction of the Higgs boson to invisible particles using an event topology corresponding to production of the Higgs boson in association with a top quark pair. This is done by reinterpreting results of the searches for scalar top quarks performed in the all-hadronic, the semi-leptonic, and the di-leptonic final states. Proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV is used, recorded with the CMS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider in 2016 and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. An observed (expected) upper limit of $\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{inv}) < $ 0.46 (0.48) is set on the branching fraction of the Higgs boson decaying to invisible particles at the 95% confidence level, assuming standard model $\mathrm{t}\bar{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{H}$ production cross section.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Additional information on efficiencies needed for reinterpretation of these results are available here.
Additional technical material for CMS speakers can be found here
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Example leading-order diagram corresponding to pair production of top squarks ($ {\tilde{\mathrm {t}}} {\overline {\tilde{\mathrm {t}}}} $) predicted by SUSY (left). The process results in the production of two top quarks and ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$ corresponding to undetected neutralinos. The same topology can be produced via a $ {{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {\mathrm {H}}}$ process with the Higgs boson decaying to invisible particles (right).

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Example leading-order diagram corresponding to pair production of top squarks ($ {\tilde{\mathrm {t}}} {\overline {\tilde{\mathrm {t}}}} $) predicted by SUSY. The process results in the production of two top quarks and ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$ corresponding to undetected neutralinos.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
The topology that consists in two top quarks and ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$ can also be produced via a $ {{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {\mathrm {H}}}$ process with the Higgs boson decaying to invisible particles.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Observed data events, background predictions and signal expectations assuming 100% branching fraction are shown for the all hadronic search regions. Details of the selection applied is displayed on each plot. Ratios of the observed to SM predicted event counts are shown in the lower panel of each plot. The shaded blue band represents the statistical and systematic uncertainty in the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Observed data events, background predictions and signal expectations assuming 100% branching fraction are shown for the all hadronic search regions. Details of the selection applied is displayed on the plot. Ratios of the observed to SM predicted event counts are shown in the lower panel. The shaded blue band represents the statistical and systematic uncertainty in the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Observed data events, background predictions and signal expectations assuming 100% branching fraction are shown for the all hadronic search regions. Details of the selection applied is displayed on the plot. Ratios of the observed to SM predicted event counts are shown in the lower panel. The shaded blue band represents the statistical and systematic uncertainty in the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
Observed data events, background predictions and signal expectations assuming 100% branching fraction are shown for the all hadronic search regions. Details of the selection applied is displayed on the plot. Ratios of the observed to SM predicted event counts are shown in the lower panel. The shaded blue band represents the statistical and systematic uncertainty in the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
Observed data events, background predictions and signal expectations assuming 100% branching fraction are shown for the all hadronic search regions. Details of the selection applied is displayed on the plot. Ratios of the observed to SM predicted event counts are shown in the lower panel. The shaded blue band represents the statistical and systematic uncertainty in the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Results of the background predictions, signal expectations, and data yields of the full 2016 data for the signal regions of the semi-leptonic analysis. The uncertainties, which are the quadratic sums of statistical and systematic uncertainties, are shown as shaded band. The ratio plot shows data over full prediction. A 100% branching fraction is assumed for the ${{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} $+$ {\mathrm {H}} \to {{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} $+$\mathrm {inv.}$ signal.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Predicted backgrounds and observed yields in the dilepton channel. The numbers on the x-axis indicate different signal regions. The hatched band shows the uncertainties discussed in the text. A 100% branching fraction is assumed for the ${{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} $+$ {\mathrm {H}} \to {{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} $+$\mathrm {inv.}$ signal.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $\sigma {{\mathcal {B}({{\mathrm {H}} \to \mathrm {inv}})}} /\sigma _{\textrm {SM}}$ for the all-hadronic, semi-leptonic, and di-leptonic final states, as well as their combination, assuming an SM Higgs boson with a mass of 125 GeV (left). The solid curves represent the observations in data, while the dashed lines represent the expected result assuming the absence of any signal. Profile likelihood ratios as a function of $ {\mathcal {B}({{\mathrm {H}} \to \mathrm {inv}})} $ (right). The observed and expected likelihood scans are reported for the combination, as well as for the all-hadronic, semi-leptonic, and di-leptonic final states, repectively.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $\sigma {{\mathcal {B}({{\mathrm {H}} \to \mathrm {inv}})}} /\sigma _{\textrm {SM}}$ for the all-hadronic, semi-leptonic, and di-leptonic final states, as well as their combination, assuming an SM Higgs boson with a mass of 125 GeV. The solid curves represent the observations in data, while the dashed lines represent the expected result assuming the absence of any signal.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Profile likelihood ratios as a function of $ {\mathcal {B}({{\mathrm {H}} \to \mathrm {inv}})} $. The observed and expected likelihood scans are reported for the combination, as well as for the all-hadronic, semi-leptonic, and di-leptonic final states, repectively.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of the signal systematic uncertainties with their typical ranges in individual signal bins for the three channels.
Summary
The first CMS limits on the branching fraction of invisible Higgs boson decays in the ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{H}}$ production channel are presented. The results are obtained by recasting and combining the results of three searches for direct scalar top pair production using the data sample of proton-proton collisions collected with the CMS detector at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$.

The result targets previously unexplored ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{H}}$ production mode. The combination yields an observed (expected) upper limit for the branching fraction of invisible Higgs boson decays of ${\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{inv}} )} < $ 0.46 (0.48) at the 95% CL for a Higgs boson mass of 125 GeV. Under the assumption of Standard Model like production cross section, the constraint is weaker than direct limits obtained using the vector boson fusion topology, comparable with those obtained using the associated production, and stronger than the gluon fusion limits [50]. Furthermore, the ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{H}}$ mode can have highest sensitivity to beyond Standard Model scenarios with enhanced top quark Yukawa couplings, and therefore provides comlementary information to the vector boson fusion topology based searches. The result is currently statistically limited due to the low cross section of the ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{H}}$ process and will strongly benefit from updates with more data.
References
1 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 1 1207.7214
2 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 30 CMS-HIG-12-028
1207.7235
3 CMS Collaboration Search for invisible decays of the Higgs boson produced through vector boson fusion at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-HIG-17-023 CMS-PAS-HIG-17-023
4 B. A. Dobrescu, G. D. Kribs, and A. Martin Higgs Underproduction at the LHC PRD85 (2012) 074031 1112.2208
5 CMS Collaboration Search for direct production of supersymmetric partners of the top quark in the all-jets final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 10 (2017) 005 CMS-SUS-16-049
1707.03316
6 CMS Collaboration Search for top squark pair production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV using single lepton events JHEP 10 (2017) 019 CMS-SUS-16-051
1706.04402
7 CMS Collaboration Search for top squarks and dark matter particles in opposite-charge dilepton final states at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PRD 97 (2018) 032009 CMS-SUS-17-001
1711.00752
8 P. Ramond Dual theory for free fermions PRD 3 (1971) 2415
9 Y. A. Gelfand and E. P. Likhtman Extension of the algebra of Poincar$ \'e $ group generators and violation of P invariance JEPTL 13 (1971)323
10 A. Neveu and J. H. Schwarz Factorizable dual model of pions NPB 31 (1971) 86
11 D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov Possible universal neutrino interaction JEPTL 16 (1972)438
12 J. Wess and B. Zumino A lagrangian model invariant under supergauge transformations PLB 49 (1974) 52
13 J. Wess and B. Zumino Supergauge transformations in four dimensions NPB 70 (1974) 39
14 P. Fayet Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino NPB 90 (1975) 104
15 H. P. Nilles Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics Phys. Rep. 110 (1984) 1
16 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
17 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
18 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
19 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
20 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS missing transverse momentum reconstruction in pp data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 ~TeV JINST 10 (2015) P02006 CMS-JME-13-003
1411.0511
21 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the cms detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
22 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
23 CMS Collaboration Reconstruction and identification of $ \tau $ lepton decays to hadrons and $ \nu_\tau $ at CMS JINST 11 (2016) P01019 CMS-TAU-14-001
1510.07488
24 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2008) 119 0707.1378
25 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) P11002 CMS-JME-10-011
1107.4277
26 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
27 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV Submitted to \it JINST CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
28 T. Melia, P. Nason, R. Rontsch, and G. Zanderighi W$ ^+ $W$ ^- $, WZ and ZZ production in the POWHEG BOX JHEP 11 (2011) 078 1107.5051
29 P. Nason and G. Zanderighi $ \mathrm{W}^+ \mathrm{W}^- $, $ \mathrm{W} \mathrm{Z} $ and $ \mathrm{Z} \mathrm{Z} $ production in the POWHEG-BOX-V2 EPJC 74 (2014) 2702 1311.1365
30 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
31 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
32 T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 CPC 178 (2008) 852 0710.3820
33 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
34 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
35 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
36 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: $ s $- and $ t $-channel contributions JHEP 09 (2009) 111 0907.4076
37 E. Re Single-top $ Wt $-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
38 R. Gavin, Y. Li, F. Petriello, and S. Quackenbush FEWZ 2.0: A code for hadronic Z production at next-to-next-to-leading order CPC 182 (2011) 2388 1011.3540
39 R. Gavin, Y. Li, F. Petriello, and S. Quackenbush W physics at the LHC with FEWZ 2.1 CPC 184 (2013) 208 1201.5896
40 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders CPC 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
41 GEANT4Collaboration GEANT4 -- a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
42 M. L. Graesser and J. Shelton Hunting mixed top squark decays PRL 111 (2013) 121802 1212.4495
43 CMS Collaboration Searches for pair production of third-generation squarks in $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV pp collisions EPJC 77 (2017) 327 CMS-SUS-16-008
1612.03877
44 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
45 CMS Collaboration CMS Luminosity Measurement for the 2016 Data Taking Period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
46 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
47 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ CL_s $ technique in Durham IPPP Workshop: Advanced Statistical Techniques in Particle Physics, p. 2693 Durham, UK, March, 2002 [JPG 28 (2002) 2693]
48 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, LHC Higgs Combination Group Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 ATL-PHYS-PUB 2011-11, CMS NOTE 2011/005
49 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
50 CMS Collaboration Search for invisible decays of a Higgs boson produced through vector boson fusion in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV Submitted to: PL(2018) CMS-HIG-17-023
1809.05937
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN