CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-SUS-17-004
Combined search for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
Abstract: A statistical combination of several searches for the electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos is presented. All searches use 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV recorded by CMS in 2016. In addition to previously performed searches, an optimized analysis requiring three or more charged leptons (electrons or muons) is presented, targeting the challenging scenario where the difference in mass between the two least massive neutralinos is approximately equal to the mass of the Z boson. The results are interpreted in simplified models of supersymmetric chargino-neutralino or neutralino pair production. When the lightest neutralino is massless in the chargino-neutralino model, the combined result obtains an observed (expected) limit at the 95% confidence level in the chargino mass of up to 650 (570) GeV in the most favorable scenario, improving upon the exclusion limits from individual analyses by up to 40 GeV. If the mass difference between the two least massive neutralinos is approximately equal to the mass of the Z boson in the chargino-neutralino model, the optimized search for three or more leptons obtains observed and expected exclusion limits of around 225 GeV in the second neutralino mass and 125 GeV in the lightest neutalino mass, improving the observed limit by as much as 60 GeV compared to the previously published result. In the neutralino pair production model, the observed (expected) exclusion limits from the combined result extends up to 650-750 (550-750) GeV depending on the branching fraction assumed, extending the observed exclusion achieved by individual analyses by up to 200 GeV. The combined result additionally excludes some intermediate gaps in the mass coverage of individual analyses.
Figures & Tables Summary Additional Figures References CMS Publications
Additional information on efficiencies needed for reinterpretation of these results are available here.
Additional technical material for CMS speakers can be found here
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Chargino-neutralino pair production with the chargino decaying to the W boson and the LSP and the neutralino decaying to either (left) a Z boson and the LSP or (right) a H boson and the LSP.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Chargino-neutralino pair production with the chargino decaying to the W boson and the LSP and the neutralino decaying to a Z boson and the LSP.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Chargino-neutralino pair production with the chargino decaying to the W boson and the LSP and the neutralino decaying to a H boson and the LSP.

png pdf
Figure 2:
A GMSB model with neutralino-neutralino pair production and the neutralinos decaying into gravitinos and (left) two Z bosons, (center) a Z and a H boson, or (right) two H bosons.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
A GMSB model with neutralino-neutralino pair production and the neutralinos decaying into gravitinos and two Z bosons.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
A GMSB model with neutralino-neutralino pair production and the neutralinos decaying into gravitinos and a Z and a H boson.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
A GMSB model with neutralino-neutralino pair production and the neutralinos decaying into gravitinos and two H bosons.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Cross section for $\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_2 $ production at $\sqrt {s} = $ 13 TeV versus the wino mass, assuming mass-degenerate wino $\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ and $ \tilde{\chi}^0_2 $. The various curves show different assumptions on the masses of the squarks and gluinos, as described in the legend. The green band shows the theoretical uncertainty in the cross section calculation for the 100 TeV squark and gluino mass assumption.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Distributions of $ {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}} $ for two representative signal points in the WZ corridor as well as the expected SM background for $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 100 (left) and $ > $ 200 GeV (right). For larger values of $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} $ the shape difference between signal and background becomes more pronounced due to the presence of the LSPs.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Distributions of $ {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}} $ for two representative signal points in the WZ corridor as well as the expected SM background for $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 100 GeV. For larger values of $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} $ the shape difference between signal and background becomes more pronounced due to the presence of the LSPs.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Distributions of $ {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}} $ for two representative signal points in the WZ corridor as well as the expected SM background for $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 200 GeV. For larger values of $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} $ the shape difference between signal and background becomes more pronounced due to the presence of the LSPs.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Distributions of the transverse mass of the third lepton (top left), the $ {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}} $ (top right), the $ {m_{\ell \ell}} $ of the OSSF pair (bottom left), and the $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} $ (bottom right). Distributions for two signal mass points in the WZ corridor are overlaid for illustration.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Distributions of the transverse mass of the third lepton. Distributions for two signal mass points in the WZ corridor are overlaid for illustration.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Distributions of the transverse mass of the $ {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}} $. Distributions for two signal mass points in the WZ corridor are overlaid for illustration.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
Distributions of the transverse mass of the $ {m_{\ell \ell}} $ of the OSSF pair. Distributions for two signal mass points in the WZ corridor are overlaid for illustration.

png pdf
Figure 5-d:
Distributions of the transverse mass of the $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} $. Distributions for two signal mass points in the WZ corridor are overlaid for illustration.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Expected and observed yield comparison in the search regions. Two example signal mass points along the WZ corridor are overlaid for illustration.

png pdf root
Figure 7:
The 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}} $ and $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ for the model of $ {\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_2 } $ production with the WZ topology, using only the search requiring three or more leptons as described in Section 6. The thick solid black (dashed red) curve represents the observed (expected) exclusion contour assuming the theory cross sections. The area below each curve is the excluded region. The thin dashed red line indicates the $ \pm 1 \sigma _{\mathrm {experiment}}$ uncertainty. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties ($ \pm 1 \sigma _{\mathrm {theory}}$) on the signal cross section. The $z$ axis shows the observed limit at 95% CL on the signal production cross section.

png pdf
Figure 8:
The 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}} $ and $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ for the models of $ {\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_2 } $ production with (top) the WZ topology, (middle) the WH topology, or (bottom) the mixed topology with 50% branching fraction to each of WZ and WH. The thick solid black (dashed red) curve represents the observed (expected) exclusion contour assuming the theory cross sections. The area below each curve is the excluded region. The thin dashed red line indicates the $ \pm 1 \sigma _{\mathrm {experiment}}$ uncertainty. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties ($ \pm 1 \sigma _{\mathrm {theory}}$) on the signal cross section. The $z$ axis shows the observed limit at 95% CL on the signal production cross section.

png pdf root
Figure 8-a:
The 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}} $ and $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ for the models of $ {\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_2 } $ production with the WZ topology. The thick solid black (dashed red) curve represents the observed (expected) exclusion contour assuming the theory cross sections. The area below each curve is the excluded region. The thin dashed red line indicates the $ \pm 1 \sigma _{\mathrm {experiment}}$ uncertainty. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties ($ \pm 1 \sigma _{\mathrm {theory}}$) on the signal cross section. The $z$ axis shows the observed limit at 95% CL on the signal production cross section.

png pdf root
Figure 8-b:
The 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}} $ and $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ for the models of $ {\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_2 } $ production with the WH topology. The thick solid black (dashed red) curve represents the observed (expected) exclusion contour assuming the theory cross sections. The area below each curve is the excluded region. The thin dashed red line indicates the $ \pm 1 \sigma _{\mathrm {experiment}}$ uncertainty. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties ($ \pm 1 \sigma _{\mathrm {theory}}$) on the signal cross section. The $z$ axis shows the observed limit at 95% CL on the signal production cross section.

png pdf root
Figure 8-c:
The 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}} $ and $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ for the models of $ {\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_2 } $ production with the mixed topology with 50% branching fraction to each of WZ and WH. The thick solid black (dashed red) curve represents the observed (expected) exclusion contour assuming the theory cross sections. The area below each curve is the excluded region. The thin dashed red line indicates the $ \pm 1 \sigma _{\mathrm {experiment}}$ uncertainty. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties ($ \pm 1 \sigma _{\mathrm {theory}}$) on the signal cross section. The $z$ axis shows the observed limit at 95% CL on the signal production cross section.

png pdf
Figure 9:
The analysis with the best expected exclusion limit at each point in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}} $ and $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ for the models of $ {\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_2 } $ production with (top) the WZ topology, (middle) the WH topology, or (bottom) the mixed topology 50% branching fraction to each of WZ and WH.

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
The analysis with the best expected exclusion limit at each point in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}} $ and $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ for the models of $ {\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_2 } $ production with the WZ topology.

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
The analysis with the best expected exclusion limit at each point in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}} $ and $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ for the models of $ {\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_2 } $ production with the WH topology.

png pdf
Figure 9-c:
The analysis with the best expected exclusion limit at each point in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}} $ and $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ for the models of $ {\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_2 } $ production with the mixed topology 50% branching fraction to each of WZ and WH.

png pdf
Figure 10:
Exclusion contours at the 95% CL in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}} $ and $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ for the models of $ {\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_2 } $ production (left) for the individual analyses and (right) for the combination of analyses. The decay modes assumed for each contour are given in the legends.

png pdf
Figure 10-a:
Exclusion contours at the 95% CL in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}} $ and $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ for the models of $ {\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_2 } $ production for the individual analyses. The decay modes assumed for each contour are given in the legends.

png pdf
Figure 10-b:
Exclusion contours at the 95% CL in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}} $ and $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ for the models of $ {\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_2 } $ production for the combination of analyses. The decay modes assumed for each contour are given in the legends.

png pdf root
Figure 11:
Combined exclusion contours at the 95% CL in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ and $ {\mathcal {B}(\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \to \mathrm{H} \tilde{\mathrm{G}})} $ for the model of $ {\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_1} $ production. The area to the left of or below the solid (dashed) black curve represents the observed (expected) exclusion region. The green and yellow bands indicate the $\pm $1 and 2 standard deviation ($\sigma $) uncertainties in the expected limit. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties ($ \pm $1$ \sigma _{\mathrm {theory}}$) on the signal cross section.

png pdf root
Figure 11-a:
Combined exclusion contours at the 95% CL in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ and $ {\mathcal {B}(\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \to \mathrm{H} \tilde{\mathrm{G}})} $ for the model of $ {\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_1} $ production. The area to the left of or below the solid (dashed) black curve represents the observed (expected) exclusion region. The green and yellow bands indicate the $\pm $1 and 2 standard deviation ($\sigma $) uncertainties in the expected limit. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties ($ \pm $1$ \sigma _{\mathrm {theory}}$) on the signal cross section.

png pdf root
Figure 11-b:
Combined exclusion contours at the 95% CL in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ and $ {\mathcal {B}(\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \to \mathrm{H} \tilde{\mathrm{G}})} $ for the model of $ {\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_1} $ production. The area to the left of or below the solid (dashed) black curve represents the observed (expected) exclusion region. The green and yellow bands indicate the $\pm $1 and 2 standard deviation ($\sigma $) uncertainties in the expected limit. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties ($ \pm $1$ \sigma _{\mathrm {theory}}$) on the signal cross section.

png pdf root
Figure 12:
Observed exclusion contours at the 95% CL in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ and $ {\mathcal {B}(\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \to \mathrm{H} \tilde{\mathrm{G}})} $ for the model of $ {\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_1} $ production for each individual analysis compared with the combination. The 4b search drives the exclusion at large values of $ {\mathcal {B}(\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \to \mathrm{H} \tilde{\mathrm{G}})} $ while the on-Z dilepton search and the multilepton search search are competing at lower values of $ {\mathcal {B}(\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \to \mathrm{H} \tilde{\mathrm{G}})} $.

png pdf root
Figure 12-a:
Observed exclusion contours at the 95% CL in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ and $ {\mathcal {B}(\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \to \mathrm{H} \tilde{\mathrm{G}})} $ for the model of $ {\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_1} $ production for each individual analysis compared with the combination. The 4b search drives the exclusion at large values of $ {\mathcal {B}(\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \to \mathrm{H} \tilde{\mathrm{G}})} $ while the on-Z dilepton search and the multilepton search search are competing at lower values of $ {\mathcal {B}(\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \to \mathrm{H} \tilde{\mathrm{G}})} $.

png pdf root
Figure 12-b:
Observed exclusion contours at the 95% CL in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ and $ {\mathcal {B}(\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \to \mathrm{H} \tilde{\mathrm{G}})} $ for the model of $ {\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_1} $ production for each individual analysis compared with the combination. The 4b search drives the exclusion at large values of $ {\mathcal {B}(\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \to \mathrm{H} \tilde{\mathrm{G}})} $ while the on-Z dilepton search and the multilepton search search are competing at lower values of $ {\mathcal {B}(\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \to \mathrm{H} \tilde{\mathrm{G}})} $.

png pdf
Figure 13:
The analysis with the best expected exclusion limit at each point in the plane of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ and $ {\mathcal {B}(\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \to \mathrm{H} \tilde{\mathrm{G}})} $ for the model of $ {\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_1} $ production.

png pdf
Figure 14:
The 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections as a function of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ for the model of $ {\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_1} $ production with three choices of $ {\mathcal {B}(\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \to \mathrm{H} \tilde{\mathrm{G}})} $ : (top) 0%, yielding the ZZ topology, (middle) 100%, yielding the HH topology, and (bottom) 50%, yielding the WH mixed topology. The solid black line represents the observed exclusion. The dashed black line represents the expected exclusion, while the green and yellow bands indicate the $\pm $1 and 2 standard deviation ($\sigma $) uncertainties in the expected limit. The red lines shows the theoretical cross section with its uncertainty. The other lines in each plot show the observed exclusion for individual analyses.

png pdf root
Figure 14-a:
The 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections as a function of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ for the model of $ {\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_1} $ production with three choices of $ {\mathcal {B}(\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \to \mathrm{H} \tilde{\mathrm{G}})} $ : 0%, yielding the ZZ topology. The solid black line represents the observed exclusion. The dashed black line represents the expected exclusion, while the green and yellow bands indicate the $\pm $1 and 2 standard deviation ($\sigma $) uncertainties in the expected limit. The red lines shows the theoretical cross section with its uncertainty. The other lines in each plot show the observed exclusion for individual analyses.

png pdf root
Figure 14-b:
The 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections as a function of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ for the model of $ {\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_1} $ production with three choices of $ {\mathcal {B}(\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \to \mathrm{H} \tilde{\mathrm{G}})} $ : 100%, yielding the HH topology. The solid black line represents the observed exclusion. The dashed black line represents the expected exclusion, while the green and yellow bands indicate the $\pm $1 and 2 standard deviation ($\sigma $) uncertainties in the expected limit. The red lines shows the theoretical cross section with its uncertainty. The other lines in each plot show the observed exclusion for individual analyses.

png pdf root
Figure 14-c:
The 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections as a function of $ {m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}} $ for the model of $ {\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_1} $ production with three choices of $ {\mathcal {B}(\tilde{\chi}^0_1 \to \mathrm{H} \tilde{\mathrm{G}})} $ : 50%, yielding the WH mixed topology. The solid black line represents the observed exclusion. The dashed black line represents the expected exclusion, while the green and yellow bands indicate the $\pm $1 and 2 standard deviation ($\sigma $) uncertainties in the expected limit. The red lines shows the theoretical cross section with its uncertainty. The other lines in each plot show the observed exclusion for individual analyses.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of all experimental searches considered in the combination (rows), and the signal topologies for which each search is used in the combined results (columns).

png pdf
Table 2:
Definition of the search regions optimized for the WZ corridor region in the WZ signal topology. Events must have three leptons (e, $\mu$) forming at least one OSSF pair and they categorized in $ {m_{\ell \ell}} $, $ {M_\text {T}} $, $ {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}} $ and $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} $.

png pdf
Table 3:
Expected and observed yields in the search regions. For each bin, the first number corresponds to the expected yield and its total uncertainty while the second number gives the observation.
Summary
A number of searches for the electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos predicted in supersymmetry (SUSY) have been performed in different final states. All searches considered here use proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV, recorded with the CMS detector at the CERN LHC and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. No significant deviations from the standard model expectation have been observed, as previously reported.

An optimized search requiring three or more charged leptons (electrons or muons) has been presented, targeting chargino-neutralino production where the difference in mass between $ \tilde{\chi}^0_2 $ and $ \tilde{\chi}^0_1 $ is approximately equal to the mass of the Z boson, and no significant deviations from the standard model prediction are observed. This search is interpreted in a simplified model scenario of SUSY chargino-neutralino ($\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_2 $) production with decays $\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1\to\mathrm{W}^{\pm}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ and $ \tilde{\chi}^0_2 \to\mathrm{Z}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$, where $ \tilde{\chi}^0_1 $ is the lightest SUSY particle (LSP). In the targeted phase space, the expected and observed 95% confidence level exclusion limits extend to 255 GeV in the mass of $ \tilde{\chi}^0_2 $ and 125 GeV in the mass of $ \tilde{\chi}^0_1 $, improving the observed limits from the previous publication by up to 60 GeV [29].

A statistical combination of several searches is performed and interpreted in the context of simplified models of either chargino-neutralino production, or neutralino pair production in a gauge-mediated SUSY breaking (GMSB) scenario. For a massless LSP $ \tilde{\chi}^0_1 $ in the chargino-neutralino model, the combined result gives an observed (expected) limit in the $ \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 $ mass of about 650 (570) GeV for the WZ topology, 480 (455) GeV for the WH topology, and 535 (440) GeV for the mixed topology. Compared to the results of individual analyses, the combination improves the observed exclusion limit by up to 40 GeV in the masses of $ \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 $ and $ \tilde{\chi}^0_2 $ in the chargino-neutralino model. The combination also excludes intermediate mass values that were not excluded by individual analyses, including $ \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 $ masses between 180 and 240 GeV in the WH topology. In the GMSB neutralino pair model, the combined result gives an observed (expected) limit in the $ \tilde{\chi}^0_1 $ mass of 650-750 (550-750) GeV. The combined result improves the observed limit by up to 200 GeV in the mass of $ \tilde{\chi}^0_1 $ in the GMSB neutralino pair model, depending on the branching fractions for the SUSY particle decays.
Additional Figures

png pdf root
Additional Figure 1:
Exclusion contours at the 95% CL for the model of neutralino-neutralino production for events obtained in the 2-lep OS analysis.

png pdf root
Additional Figure 2:
Exclusion contours at the 95% CL for the model of neutralino-neutralino production for events obtained in the $\geq $3-lep analysis.

png pdf root
Additional Figure 3:
Exclusion contours at the 95% CL for the model of neutralino-neutralino production for events obtained in the bbbb analysis.

png pdf root
Additional Figure 4:
Exclusion contours at the 95% CL for the model of neutralino-neutralino production for events obtained in the $\mathrm {H}\rightarrow \gamma \gamma $ analysis.
References
1 P. Ramond Dual theory for free fermions PRD 3 (1971) 2415
2 Y. A. Golfand and E. P. Likhtman Extension of the algebra of Poincare group generators and violation of P invariance JEPTL 13 (1971)323
3 A. Neveu and J. H. Schwarz Factorizable dual model of pions NPB 31 (1971) 86
4 D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov Possible universal neutrino interaction JEPTL 16 (1972)438
5 J. Wess and B. Zumino A Lagrangian model invariant under supergauge transformations PLB 49 (1974) 52
6 J. Wess and B. Zumino Supergauge transformations in four dimensions NPB 70 (1974) 39
7 P. Fayet Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino NPB 90 (1975) 104
8 H. P. Nilles Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics Phys. Rep. 110 (1984) 1
9 A. Buras, J. Ellis, M. Gaillard, and D. Nanopoulos Aspects of the grand unification of strong, weak and electromagnetic interactions Nuclear Physics B 135 (1978) 66
10 H. Haber and G. Kane The search for supersymmetry: Probing physics beyond the standard model Phys. Rep. 117 (1985) 75
11 G. R. Farrar and P. Fayet Phenomenology of the Production, Decay, and Detection of New Hadronic States Associated with Supersymmetry PLB 76 (1978) 575
12 ATLAS Collaboration Search for the electroweak production of supersymmetric particles in $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector PRD 93 (2016) 052002 1509.07152
13 ATLAS Collaboration Search for photonic signatures of gauge-mediated supersymmetry in 8 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector PRD 92 (2015) 072001 1507.05493
14 ATLAS Collaboration Search for metastable heavy charged particles with large ionisation energy loss in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV using the ATLAS experiment EPJC 75 (2015) 407 1506.05332
15 ATLAS Collaboration Search for direct pair production of a chargino and a neutralino decaying to the 125 GeV Higgs boson in $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector EPJC 75 (2015) 208 1501.07110
16 ATLAS Collaboration Searches for heavy long-lived charged particles with the ATLAS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JHEP 01 (2015) 068 1411.6795
17 ATLAS Collaboration Search for nonpointing and delayed photons in the diphoton and missing transverse momentum final state in 8 TeV pp collisions at the LHC using the ATLAS detector PRD 90 (2014) 112005 1409.5542
18 ATLAS Collaboration Search for the direct production of charginos, neutralinos and staus in final states with at least two hadronically decaying taus and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 10 (2014) 096 1407.0350
19 ATLAS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in events with four or more leptons in $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector PRD 90 (2014) 052001 1405.5086
20 ATLAS Collaboration Search for direct production of charginos, neutralinos and sleptons in final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 05 (2014) 071 1403.5294
21 ATLAS Collaboration Search for direct production of charginos and neutralinos in events with three leptons and missing transverse momentum in $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector JHEP 04 (2014) 169 1402.7029
22 ATLAS Collaboration Search for charginos nearly mass degenerate with the lightest neutralino based on a disappearing-track signature in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 88 (2013) 112006 1310.3675
23 CMS Collaboration Searches for electroweak production of charginos, neutralinos, and sleptons decaying to leptons and W, Z, and Higgs bosons in pp collisions at 8 TeV EPJC 74 (2014) 3036 CMS-SUS-13-006
1405.7570
24 CMS Collaboration Searches for electroweak neutralino and chargino production in channels with Higgs, Z, and W bosons in pp collisions at 8 TeV PRD 90 (2014) 092007 CMS-SUS-14-002
1409.3168
25 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in electroweak production with photons and large missing transverse energy in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PLB 759 (2016) 479 CMS-SUS-14-016
1602.08772
26 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in events with soft leptons, low jet multiplicity, and missing transverse energy in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PLB 759 (2016) 9 CMS-SUS-14-021
1512.08002
27 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in events with a photon, a lepton, and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PLB 757 (2016) 6 CMS-SUS-14-013
1508.01218
28 CMS Collaboration Search for electroweak production of charginos in final states with two $ \tau $ leptons in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JHEP 04 (2017) 018 CMS-SUS-14-022
1610.04870
29 CMS Collaboration Search for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos in multilepton final states in pp collision data at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-SUS-16-039 CMS-PAS-SUS-16-039
30 CMS Collaboration Search for new physics in events with two low momentum opposite-sign leptons and missing transverse energy at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-SUS-16-048 CMS-PAS-SUS-16-048
31 CMS Collaboration Search for Excess Higgs production in diphoton final states using the razor variables at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-SUS-16-045 CMS-PAS-SUS-16-045
32 CMS Collaboration Search for the pair production of Higgsinos in pp collisions at $ \sqrt s = $ 13 TeV in final states with Higgs bosons and large missing transverse momentum CMS-PAS-SUS-16-044 CMS-PAS-SUS-16-044
33 CMS Collaboration Search for new physics in final states with two opposite-sign, same-flavor leptons, jets, and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-SUS-16-034 CMS-PAS-SUS-16-034
34 CMS Collaboration Search for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos in the WH final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-SUS-16-043 CMS-PAS-SUS-16-043
35 J. Alwall, P. Schuster, and N. Toro Simplified models for a first characterization of new physics at the LHC PRD 79 (2009) 075020 0810.3921
36 J. Alwall, M.-P. Le, M. Lisanti, and J. G. Wacker Model-independent jets plus missing energy searches PRD 79 (2009) 015005 0809.3264
37 D. Alves et al. Simplified models for LHC new physics searches JPG 39 (2012) 105005 1105.2838
38 CMS Collaboration Interpretation of searches for supersymmetry with simplified models PRD 88 (2013) 052017 CMS-SUS-11-016
1301.2175
39 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 08 (2016) 045 1606.02266
40 S. P. Martin A Supersymmetry primer , [Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 18, 1 (1998)] hep-ph/9709356
41 K. T. Matchev and S. D. Thomas Higgs and Z boson signatures of supersymmetry PRD 62 (2000) 077702 hep-ph/9908482
42 P. Meade, M. Reece, and D. Shih Prompt decays of general neutralino NLSPs at the Tevatron JHEP 05 (2010) 105 0911.4130
43 J. T. Ruderman and D. Shih General neutralino NLSPs at the early LHC JHEP 08 (2012) 159 1103.6083
44 B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea, and M. Rothering Precision predictions for electroweak superpartner production at hadron colliders with Resummino EPJC 73 (2013) 2480 1304.0790
45 G. Bozzi, B. Fuks, and M. Klasen Joint resummation for slepton pair production at hadron colliders NPB 794 (2008) 46 0709.3057
46 P. Z. Skands et al. SUSY Les Houches accord: interfacing SUSY spectrum calculators, decay packages, and event generators JHEP 07 (2004) 036 hep-ph/0311123
47 B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea, and M. Rothering Gaugino production in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV JHEP 10 (2012) 081 1207.2159
48 G. Bozzi, B. Fuks, and M. Klasen Threshold Resummation for Slepton-Pair Production at Hadron Colliders NPB 777 (2007) 157 hep-ph/0701202
49 G. Bozzi, B. Fuks, and M. Klasen Transverse-momentum resummation for slepton-pair production at the CERN LHC PRD 74 (2006) 015001 hep-ph/0603074
50 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
51 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector Submitted to JINST CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
52 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ {k_{\mathrm{T}}}\ $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
53 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet User Manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
54 CMS Collaboration Missing transverse energy performance of the CMS detector JINST 6 (2011) P09001 CMS-JME-10-009
1106.5048
55 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the cms detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 tev JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
56 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
57 CMS Collaboration Reconstruction and identification of $ \tau $ lepton decays to hadrons and $ \nu_\tau $ at CMS JINST 11 (2016) P01019 CMS-TAU-14-001
1510.07488
58 CMS Collaboration Identification of b-quark jets with the CMS experiment JINST 8 (2013) P04013 CMS-BTV-12-001
1211.4462
59 D. Guest et al. Jet Flavor Classification in High-Energy Physics with Deep Neural Networks PRD 94 (2016) 112002 1607.08633
60 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
61 T. Melia, P. Nason, R. Rontsch, and G. Zanderighi W$ ^+ $W$ ^- $, WZ and ZZ production in the POWHEG BOX JHEP 11 (2011) 078 1107.5051
62 P. Nason and G. Zanderighi $ \mathrm{W}^+ \mathrm{W}^- $, $ \mathrm{W} \mathrm{Z} $ and $ \mathrm{Z} \mathrm{Z} $ production in the POWHEG-BOX-V2 EPJC 74 (2014) 2702 1311.1365
63 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
64 T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 CPC 178 (2008) 852 0710.3820
65 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
66 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
67 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
68 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: s- and t-channel contributions JHEP 11 (2010) 111 0907.4076v2
69 E. Re Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
70 R. Gavin, Y. Li, F. Petriello, and S. Quackenbush FEWZ 2.0: A code for hadronic Z production at next-to-next-to-leading order CPC 182 (2011) 2388 1011.3540
71 R. Gavin, Y. Li, F. Petriello, and S. Quackenbush W Physics at the LHC with FEWZ 2.1 CPC 184 (2013) 208 1201.5896
72 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top++: A Program for the Calculation of the Top-Pair Cross-Section at Hadron Colliders CPC 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
73 C. Borschensky et al. Squark and gluino production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13, 14, 33 and 100 TeV EPJC 74 (2014) 3174 1407.5066
74 CMS Collaboration Search for top-squark pair production in the single-lepton final state in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV EPJC 73 (2013) 2677 CMS-SUS-13-011
1308.1586
75 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4---a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
76 S. Abdullin et al. The fast simulation of the CMS detector at LHC J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 331 (2011) 032049
77 CMS Collaboration Inclusive search for supersymmetry using the razor variables in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PRL 111 (2013) 081802 CMS-SUS-11-024
1212.6961
78 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry with razor variables in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PRD 90 (2014) 112001 CMS-SUS-12-005
1405.3961
79 CMS Collaboration Search for new physics in same-sign dilepton events in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV EPJC 76 (2016) 439 CMS-SUS-15-008
1605.03171
80 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: The cl$ _\mathrm{s} $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
81 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
82 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
83 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in summer 2011 CMS-NOTE-2011-005
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN