CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-SMP-17-001 ; CERN-EP-2018-320
Measurement of the differential Drell-Yan cross section in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
JHEP 12 (2019) 059
Abstract: Measurements of the differential cross section for the Drell-Yan process, based on proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, collected by the CMS experiment, are presented. The data correspond to an integrated luminosity of 2.8 (2.3) fb$^{-1}$ in the dimuon (dielectron) channel. The total and fiducial cross section measurements are presented as a function of dilepton invariant mass in the range 15 to 3000 GeV, and compared with the perturbative predictions of the standard model. The measured differential cross sections are in good agreement with the theoretical calculations.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
The observed dimuon (top) and dielectron (bottom) invariant mass spectra within the detector acceptance. The "EW'' label indicates the contributions from the DY production of $\tau ^+\tau ^-$, WW, WZ, and ZZ processes. The "Misid.'' label corresponds W+jets and QCD multijet backgrounds. Each MC process is normalised using the most accurate theoretical cross section value available. The error bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainty only.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
The observed dimuon invariant mass spectrum within the detector acceptance. The "EW'' label indicates the contributions from the DY production of $\tau ^+\tau ^-$, WW, WZ, and ZZ processes. The "Misid.'' label corresponds W+jets and QCD multijet backgrounds. Each MC process is normalised using the most accurate theoretical cross section value available. The error bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainty only.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
The observed dielectron invariant mass spectrum within the detector acceptance. The "EW'' label indicates the contributions from the DY production of $\tau ^+\tau ^-$, WW, WZ, and ZZ processes. The "Misid.'' label corresponds W+jets and QCD multijet backgrounds. Each MC process is normalised using the most accurate theoretical cross section value available. The error bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainty only.

png pdf
Figure 2:
The signal acceptance (A), efficiency ($\varepsilon $) and their product for each invariant mass bin in the dimuon (top) and dielectron (bottom) channels, calculated from simulation. The error bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainty only.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
The signal acceptance (A), efficiency ($\varepsilon $) and their product for each invariant mass bin in the dimuon channel, calculated from simulation. The error bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainty only.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
The signal acceptance (A), efficiency ($\varepsilon $) and their product for each invariant mass bin in the dielectron channel, calculated from simulation. The error bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainty only.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Summary of the systematic uncertainties on the differential cross section measurement $ {\mathrm {d}}\sigma / {\mathrm {d}}{m}$ [pb/GeV] in the dimuon (upper) and dielectron (lower) channels. The "Total systematic'' is a quadratic sum of all systematic uncertainty sources except for the "Acceptance + PDF''.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Summary of the systematic uncertainties on the differential cross section measurement $ {\mathrm {d}}\sigma / {\mathrm {d}}{m}$ [pb/GeV] in the dimuon channel. The "Total systematic'' is a quadratic sum of all systematic uncertainty sources except for the "Acceptance + PDF''.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Summary of the systematic uncertainties on the differential cross section measurement $ {\mathrm {d}}\sigma / {\mathrm {d}}{m}$ [pb/GeV] in the dielectron channel. The "Total systematic'' is a quadratic sum of all systematic uncertainty sources except for the "Acceptance + PDF''.

png pdf
Figure 4:
The differential cross section as a function of the dimuon (upper) and dielectron (lower) invariant mass, measured in the full phase space, with FSR correction applied. The spectra are compared with the NNLO theoretical prediction of FEWZ (blue) and the NLO prediction of MadGraph 5_aMC@NLO (red). The NNPDF3.0 PDF set is used in both cases. In the middle and lower panels, the coloured bands denote the theoretical uncertainty and the hatched bands denote the total uncertainty, which is the combination of statistical, systematic, and integrated luminosity components.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The differential cross section as a function of the dimuon invariant mass, measured in the full phase space, with FSR correction applied. The spectra are compared with the NNLO theoretical prediction of FEWZ (blue) and the NLO prediction of MadGraph 5_aMC@NLO (red). The NNPDF3.0 PDF set is used in both cases. In the middle and lower panels, the coloured bands denote the theoretical uncertainty and the hatched bands denote the total uncertainty, which is the combination of statistical, systematic, and integrated luminosity components.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The differential cross section as a function of the dielectron invariant mass, measured in the full phase space, with FSR correction applied. The spectra are compared with the NNLO theoretical prediction of FEWZ (blue) and the NLO prediction of MadGraph 5_aMC@NLO (red). The NNPDF3.0 PDF set is used in both cases. In the middle and lower panels, the coloured bands denote the theoretical uncertainty and the hatched bands denote the total uncertainty, which is the combination of statistical, systematic, and integrated luminosity components.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Comparison between the measured fiducial cross section (with no FSR correction applied) and the NLO theoretical prediction using MadGraph 5_aMC@NLO in the dimuon (upper) and dielectron (lower) channels. In the bottom panels, the red band represents the theoretical uncertainty and the hatched band represents the total uncertainty, which is the combination of the statistical, systematic, and integrated luminosity components.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Comparison between the measured fiducial cross section (with no FSR correction applied) and the NLO theoretical prediction using MadGraph 5_aMC@NLO in the dimuon channel. In the bottom panel, the red band represents the theoretical uncertainty and the hatched band represents the total uncertainty, which is the combination of the statistical, systematic, and integrated luminosity components.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Comparison between the measured fiducial cross section (with no FSR correction applied) and the NLO theoretical prediction using MadGraph 5_aMC@NLO in the dielectron channel. In the bottom panel, the red band represents the theoretical uncertainty and the hatched band represents the total uncertainty, which is the combination of the statistical, systematic, and integrated luminosity components.

png pdf
Figure 6:
The differential DY cross section measured for the combination of the two channels and as predicted by the NNLO theoretical calculation of FEWZ in the full phase space. The ratio between the data and the theoretical prediction is presented in the bottom panel. The coloured boxes represent the theoretical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Magnified view of the ratio of the NNLO theoretical prediction from FEWZ to data for the combined differential cross sections in two different mass ranges: $m < $ 200 GeV (top) and $m > $ 200 GeV (bottom). The blue bands represent the theoretical uncertainty on the ratio. The bottom plot also shows the ratio with the photon-induced contribution (red dashed lines), which has a sizeable effect in the high-mass region.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
Magnified view of the ratio of the NNLO theoretical prediction from FEWZ to data for the combined differential cross sections in the $m < $ 200 GeV mass range. The blue bands represent the theoretical uncertainty on the ratio. The bottom plot also shows the ratio with the photon-induced contribution (red dashed lines), which has a sizeable effect in the high-mass region.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
Magnified view of the ratio of the NNLO theoretical prediction from FEWZ to data for the combined differential cross sections in the $m > $ 200 GeV mass range. The blue bands represent the theoretical uncertainty on the ratio. The bottom plot also shows the ratio with the photon-induced contribution (red dashed lines), which has a sizeable effect in the high-mass region.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of the systematic uncertainties (%) for the $ {\mathrm {d}}\sigma / {\mathrm {d}}{m}$ (pb/GeV) measurement in the dimuon channel. The column labelled "Total'' corresponds to the quadratic sum of all the experimental sources, except for that Acceptance+PDF.

png pdf
Table 2:
Summary of the systematic uncertainties (%) for the $ {\mathrm {d}}\sigma / {\mathrm {d}}{m}$ (pb/GeV) measurement in the dielectron channel. The column labelled "Total'' corresponds to the quadratic sum of all the experimental sources, except for that Acceptance+PDF.

png pdf
Table 3:
Summary of the measured values of $ {\mathrm {d}}\sigma / {\mathrm {d}}{m}$ (pb/GeV) in the dimuon channel with the statistical ($\delta _{\text {stat}}$), experimental ($\delta _{\text {exp}}$) and theoretical ($\delta _{\text {theo}}$) uncertainties, respectively. Here, $\delta _{\text {tot}}$ is the quadratic sum of the three components.

png pdf
Table 4:
Summary of the measured values of $ {\mathrm {d}}\sigma / {\mathrm {d}}{m}$ (pb/GeV) in the dielectron channel with the statistical ($\delta _{\text {stat}}$), experimental ($\delta _{\text {exp}}$) and theoretical ($\delta _{\text {theo}}$) uncertainties, respectively. Here, $\delta _{\text {tot}}$ is the quadratic sum of the three components.

png pdf
Table 5:
Summary of the measured values of fiducial $ {\mathrm {d}}\sigma / {\mathrm {d}}{m}$ (pb/GeV) (with no FSR correction applied) in the dimuon channel with the statistical ($\delta _{\text {stat}}$) and experimental ($\delta _{\text {exp}}$) uncertainties shown separately. Here, $\delta _{\text {tot}}$ is the quadratic sum of the two components.

png pdf
Table 6:
Summary of the measured values of fiducial $ {\mathrm {d}}\sigma / {\mathrm {d}}{m}$ (pb/GeV) (with no FSR correction applied) in the dielectron channel with the statistical ($\delta _{\text {stat}}$) and experimental ($\delta _{\text {exp}}$) uncertainties shown separately. Here, $\delta _{\text {tot}}$ is the quadratic sum of the two components.

png pdf
Table 7:
Summary of the combined values of $ {\mathrm {d}}\sigma / {\mathrm {d}}{m}$ (pb/GeV) using the results from both the dimuon and dielectron channels. Here, $\delta _{\text {tot}}$ is the quadratic sum of the statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties.
Summary
This paper presents measurements of the total and fiducial Drell-Yan differential cross sections ${\mathrm{d}}\sigma / {\mathrm{d}}{m}$ in the dimuon and the dielectron channels as well as their combination, in the dilepton invariant mass range 15 $ < m < $ 3000 GeV, using data collected by the CMS experiment, in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of up to 2.8 fb$^{-1}$. The data are corrected for detector resolution effects, the differences in the efficiency between data and Monte Carlo simulation, and the acceptance. Additionally the final-state photon radiation effects, which are most pronounced below the Z boson peak, are included. The results are in good agreement with the theoretical predictions of the standard model.
References
1 R. Hamberg, W. L. van Neerven, and T. Matsuura A complete calculation of the order $ \alpha^2_s $ correction to the Drell--Yan k-factor NPB 359 (1991) 343
2 S. Catani et al. Vector boson production at hadron colliders: A fully exclusive QCD calculation at next-to-next-to-leading order PRL 103 (2009) 082001 0903.2120
3 S. Catani and M. Grazzini Next-to-next-to-leading-order subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs-boson production at the Large Hadron Collider PRL 98 (2007) 222002 hep-ph/0703012
4 K. Melnikov and F. Petriello Electroweak gauge boson production at hadron colliders through O($ \alpha_s^2 $) PRD 74 (2006) 114017 hep-ph/0609070
5 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the high-mass Drell--Yan differential cross-section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 725 (2013) 223 1305.4192
6 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the low-mass Drell--Yan differential cross section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector JHEP 06 (2014) 112 1404.1212
7 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the double-differential high-mass Drell--Yan cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 08 (2016) 009 1606.01736
8 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the Drell--Yan cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt s= $ 7 TeV JHEP 10 (2011) 007 CMS-EWK-10-007
1108.0566
9 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the differential and double-differential Drell--Yan cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 12 (2013) 030 CMS-SMP-13-003
1310.7291
10 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential and double-differential Drell--Yan cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV EPJC 75 (2015) 147 CMS-SMP-14-003
1412.1115
11 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of $ W^{\pm} $ and $ Z $-boson production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 759 (2016) 601 1603.09222
12 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
13 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
14 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
15 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
16 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
17 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
18 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
19 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
20 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction JHEP 09 (2007) 126 0707.3088
21 E. Re Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
22 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
23 NNPDF Collaboration A first unbiased global NLO determination of parton distributions and their uncertainties NPB 838 (2010) 136 1002.4407
24 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
25 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
26 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
27 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders CPC 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
28 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams Vector boson pair production at the LHC JHEP 07 (2011) 018 1105.0020
29 T. Melia, P. Nason, R. Rontsch, and G. Zanderighi WW, WZ and ZZ production in the POWHEG BOX JHEP 11 (2011) 078 1107.5051
30 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4 --- a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
31 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
32 CMS Collaboration Energy calibration and resolution of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JINST 8 (2013) P09009 CMS-EGM-11-001
1306.2016
33 A. Bodek et al. Extracting muon momentum scale corrections for hadron collider experiments EPJC 72 (2012) 2194 1208.3710
34 CMS Collaboration Search for physics beyond the standard model in dilepton mass spectra in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JHEP 04 (2015) 025 CMS-EXO-12-061
1412.6302
35 R. Gavin, Y. Li, F. Petriello, and S. Quackenbush FEWZ 2.0: A code for hadronic Z production at next-to-next-to-leading order CPC 182 (2011) 2388 1011.3540
36 Y. Li and F. Petriello Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in the framework of the FEWZ simulation code PRD 86 (2012) 094034 1208.5967
37 A. V. Manohar, P. Nason, G. P. Salam, and G. Zanderighi The photon content of the proton JHEP 12 (2017) 046 1708.01256
38 D. Bourilkov Photon-induced background for dilepton searches and measurements in pp collisions at 13 TeV 1606.00523
39 D. Bourilkov Exploring the LHC landscape with dileptons 1609.08994
40 G. D'Agostini A multidimensional unfolding method based on Bayes' theorem NIMA 362 (1995) 487
41 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive W and Z production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV with the CMS experiment JHEP 10 (2011) 132 CMS-EWK-10-005
1107.4789
42 P. Golonka and Z. Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo: a precision tool for QED corrections in Z and W decays EPJC 45 (2006) 97 hep-ph/0506026
43 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2015 data taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001
44 A. Valassi Combining correlated measurements of several different physical quantities NIMA 500 (2003) 391
45 G. D. Lafferty and T. R. Wyatt Where to stick your data points: The treatment of measurements within wide bins NIMA 355 (1995) 541
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN