CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-SMP-20-004
Measurement of W and Z boson inclusive cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 and 13 TeV
Abstract: Measurements of total inclusive and fiducial W and Z boson production cross sections in proton-proton collisions at 5.02 TeV and 13 TeV are presented. Electron and muon decay modes are studied in the data collected with the CMS detector in 2017, in dedicated runs with reduced instantaneous luminosity. The data sets correspond to integrated luminosities of 298 $ \pm $ 6 pb$^{-1}$- at 5.02 TeV and 201 $ \pm $ 3 pb$^{-1}$- at 13 TeV. The products of the measured total inclusive cross sections and the branching fractions are $ \sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{W}^{\pm} + X)\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{W}^{\pm} \to \ell^{\pm}\nu ) = $ 7300 $ \pm $ 10 (stat) $\pm$ 30 (syst) $\pm$ 140 (lum) pb, and $ \sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{Z} + X)\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z} \to \ell^+\ell^-) = $ 669 $ \pm $ 2 (stat) $\pm$ 6 (syst) $\pm$ 13 (lum) pb for the dilepton invariant mass in the range of 60 to 120 GeV at 5.02 TeV, and correspondingly 21040 $ \pm $ 10 (stat) $\pm$ 180 (syst) $\pm$ 360 (lum) pb and 2006 $ \pm $ 4 (stat) $\pm$ 18 (syst) $\pm$ 33 (lum) pb at 13 TeV. The measured values agree with cross section calculations at next-to-next-to-leading-order in perturbative QCD. Inclusive and fiducial cross sections, ratios of cross sections of W$^{\pm} $ to Z and W$^{+} $ to W$^{-} $, and the double ratios at different center-of-mass energies are reported.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{e}^+\mathrm{e}^-} $ (left) and $ m_{\mu^+\mu^-} $ (right) for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{e}^+\mathrm{e}^-} $ (left) and $ m_{\mu^+\mu^-} $ (right) for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{e}^+\mathrm{e}^-} $ (left) and $ m_{\mu^+\mu^-} $ (right) for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{e}^+\mathrm{e}^-} $ (left) and $ m_{\mu^+\mu^-} $ (right) for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 1-d:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{e}^+\mathrm{e}^-} $ (left) and $ m_{\mu^+\mu^-} $ (right) for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{+} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{+} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{+} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{+} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{+} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{-} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{-} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{-} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{-} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{-} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Comparisons of the fiducial cross sections and cross section ratios between measurements and the theoretical calculations from DYTURBO with different PDF sets at 5.02 TeV. The uncertainties in the theoretical predictions include the statistical uncertainty, and the PDF, $ \alpha_{s} $, and renormalization and factorization scale uncertainties. The measured values and theoretical predictions (DYTURBO with NNPDF 3.1 as the example) are also shown in the right part of the plot.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Comparisons of the fiducial cross sections and cross section ratios between measurements and the theoretical calculations from DYTURBO with different PDF sets at 13 TeV. The uncertainties in the theoretical predictions include the statistical uncertainty, and the PDF, $ \alpha_{s} $, and renormalization and factorization scale uncertainties. The measured values and theoretical predictions (DYTURBO with NNPDF 3.1 as the example) are also shown in the right part of the plot.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Comparisons of the fiducial cross section ratios and double ratios between 13 TeV and 5.02 TeV, between measurements and the theoretical calculations from DYTURBO with different PDF sets. The uncertainties in the theoretical predictions include the statistical uncertainty, and the PDF, $ \alpha_{s} $, and renormalization and factorization scale uncertainties. The measured values and theoretical predictions (DYTURBO with NNPDF 3.1 as the example) are also shown in the right part of the plot.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Comparisons of the total inclusive cross sections and cross section ratios between measurements and the theoretical calculations from DYTURBO with different PDF sets at 5.02 TeV. The uncertainties in the theoretical predictions include the statistical uncertainty, and the PDF, $ \alpha_{s} $, and renormalization and factorization scale uncertainties. The measured values and theoretical predictions (DYTURBO with NNPDF 3.1 as the example) are also shown in the right part of the plot.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Comparisons of the total inclusive cross sections and cross section ratios between measurements and the theoretical calculations from DYTURBO with different PDF sets at 13 TeV. The uncertainties in the theoretical predictions include the statistical uncertainty, and the PDF, $ \alpha_{s} $, and renormalization and factorization scale uncertainties. The measured values and theoretical predictions (DYTURBO with NNPDF 3.1 as the example) are also shown in the right part of the plot.

png pdf
Figure 9:
Comparisons of the total inclusive cross section ratios and double ratios between 13 TeV and 5.02 TeV, between measurements and the theoretical calculations from DYTURBO with different PDF sets. The uncertainties in the theoretical predictions include the statistical uncertainty, and the PDF, $ \alpha_{s} $, and renormalization and factorization scale uncertainties. The measured values and theoretical predictions (DYTURBO with NNPDF 3.1 as the example) are also shown in the right part of the plot.

png pdf
Figure 10:
Summary of the measurements of the total W$^{+} $, W$^{-} $, W, and Z production cross sections times branching fractions versus center-of-mass energy for CMS and experiments at lower-energy colliders.

png pdf
Figure 11:
Summary of the measurements of the total W$^{+} $, W$^{-} $, W, and Z production cross sections times branching fractions versus center-of-mass energy in CMS.

png pdf
Figure 12:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{e}^+\mathrm{e}^-} $ (left) and $ m_{\mu^+\mu^-} $ (right) for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 12-a:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{e}^+\mathrm{e}^-} $ (left) and $ m_{\mu^+\mu^-} $ (right) for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 12-b:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{e}^+\mathrm{e}^-} $ (left) and $ m_{\mu^+\mu^-} $ (right) for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 12-c:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{e}^+\mathrm{e}^-} $ (left) and $ m_{\mu^+\mu^-} $ (right) for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 12-d:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{e}^+\mathrm{e}^-} $ (left) and $ m_{\mu^+\mu^-} $ (right) for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 13:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{+} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 13-a:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{+} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 13-b:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{+} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 13-c:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{+} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 13-d:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{+} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 14:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{-} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 14-a:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{-} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 14-b:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{-} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 14-c:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{-} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.

png pdf
Figure 14-d:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T}} $ in the W$^{-} $ signal selection for electron (left) and muon (right) final states for the pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV (upper) and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV (lower). The histograms for EW backgrounds include the contributions from Drell-Yan, $ \mathrm{W} \to \tau\nu $, and diboson processes. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total signal and background predictions.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Event yields, after the fit to data, for the different processes in Z, W$^{+} $, and W$^{-} $ muon and electron final states at 5.02 TeV.

png pdf
Table 2:
Event yields, after the fit to data, for the different processes in Z, W$^{+} $, and W$^{-} $ electron and muon final states at 13 TeV.

png pdf
Table 3:
Systematic uncertainties, in percent, for the fiducial cross sections at 5.02 TeV. The 1.9% luminosity uncertainty, which affects the W$^{\pm} $ and Z cross sections, is not included in the table.

png pdf
Table 4:
Systematic uncertainties, in percent, for the fiducial cross sections at 13 TeV. The 1.7% luminosity uncertainty, which affects the W$^{\pm} $ and Z cross sections, is not included in the table.

png pdf
Table 5:
Systematic uncertainties, in percent, for the fiducial cross section ratios between 13 TeV and 5.02 TeV. The 2.3% luminosity uncertainty, which affects the W$^{\pm} $ and Z cross section ratios, is not included in the table.

png pdf
Table 6:
Systematic uncertainties, in percent, for the total cross sections at 5.02 TeV. The 1.9% luminosity uncertainty, which affects the W$^{\pm} $ and Z cross sections, is not included in the table.

png pdf
Table 7:
Systematic uncertainties, in percent, for the total cross sections at 13 TeV. The 1.7% luminosity uncertainty, which affects the W$^{\pm} $ and Z cross sections, is not included in the table.

png pdf
Table 8:
Systematic uncertainties, in percent, for the total cross section ratios between 13 TeV and 5.02 TeV. The 2.3% luminosity uncertainty, which affects the W$^{\pm} $ and Z cross section ratios, is not included in the table.

png pdf
Table 9:
Comparison of the theory calculations and the measured fiducial cross sections at 5.02 TeV, units in pb. The uncertainties in the theoretical predictions include the statistical uncertainty, and the PDF, $ \alpha_{s} $, and renormalization and factorization scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Table 10:
Comparison of the theory calculations and the measured fiducial cross sections and ratios at 13 TeV, units in pb. The uncertainties in the theoretical predictions include the statistical uncertainty, and the PDF, $ \alpha_{s} $, and renormalization and factorization scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Table 11:
Comparison of the theory calculations and the measured fiducial cross section ratios between 13 TeV and 5.02 TeV. The uncertainties in the theoretical predictions include the statistical uncertainty, and the PDF, $ \alpha_{s} $, and renormalization and factorization scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Table 12:
Comparison of the theory calculations and the measured total inclusive cross sections and ratios at 5.02 TeV, unit in pb. The uncertainties in the theoretical predictions include the statistical uncertainty, and the PDF, $ \alpha_{s} $, and renormalization and factorization scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Table 13:
Comparison of the theory calculations and the measured total inclusive cross sections and ratios at 13 TeV, unit in pb. The uncertainties in the theoretical predictions include the statistical uncertainty, and the PDF, $ \alpha_{s} $, and renormalization and factorization scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Table 14:
Comparison of the theory calculations and the measured total inclusive cross section ratios and double ratios between 13 TeV and 5.02 TeV. The uncertainties in the theoretical predictions include the statistical uncertainty, and the PDF, $ \alpha_{s} $, and renormalization and factorization scale uncertainties.
Summary
Measurements of total inclusive and fiducial W and Z boson production cross sections in proton-proton collisions at 5.02 TeV and 13 TeV are presented. Electron and muon decay modes are studied in the data collected with the CMS detector in 2017, in dedicated runs with reduced instantaneous luminosity. The data sets correspond to integrated luminosities of 298 $ \pm $ 6 pb$^{-1}$ at 5.02 TeV and 201 $ \pm $ 3 pb$^{-1}$ at 13 TeV. The products of the measured total inclusive cross sections and the branching fractions are $ \sigma(\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \to \mathrm{W}^{\pm} + X)\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{W}^{\pm} \to \ell^{\pm}\nu ) = $ 7300 $ \pm $ 10 (stat) $\pm$ 30 (syst) $\pm$ 140 (lum) pb, and $ \sigma(\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \to \mathrm{Z} + X)\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z} \to \ell^+\ell^-) = $ 669 $ \pm $ 2 (stat) $\pm$ 6 (syst) $\pm$ 13 (lum) pb for the dilepton invariant mass in the range of 60 to 120 GeV at 5.02 TeV, and correspondingly 21040 $ \pm $ 10 (stat) $\pm$ 180 (syst) $\pm$ 360 (lum) pb and 2006 $ \pm $ 4 (stat) $\pm$ 18 (syst) $\pm$ 33 (lum) pb at 13 TeV. The measured values agree with cross section calculations at next-to-next-to-leading-order in perturbative QCD. Inclusive and fiducial cross sections, ratios of cross sections of W$^{\pm} $ to Z and W$^{+} $ to W$^{-} $, and the double ratios at different center-of-mass energies are reported.
References
1 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
2 S. Bailey et al. Parton distributions from LHC, HERA, Tevatron and fixed target data: MSHT20 PDFs EPJC 81 (2021) 341 2012.04684
3 T.-J. Hou et al. Progress in the CTEQ-TEA NNLO global QCD analysis 1908.11394
4 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
5 K. Melnikov and F. Petriello Electroweak gauge boson production at hadron colliders through $ \mathcal{O}(\alpha_{\mathrm{s}}^2) $ PRD 74 (2006) 114017 hep-ph/0609070
6 S. Catani et al. Vector boson production at hadron colliders: a fully exclusive QCD calculation at NNLO PRL 103 (2009) 082001 0903.2120
7 J. Baglio, C. Duhr, B. Mistlberger, and R. Szafron Inclusive production cross sections at N$ ^{3} $LO JHEP 12 (2022) 066 2209.06138
8 C. Anastasiou, L. J. Dixon, K. Melnikov, and F. Petriello High precision QCD at hadron colliders: Electroweak gauge boson rapidity distributions at NNLO PRD 69 (2004) 094008 hep-ph/0312266
9 S. Dittmaier, A. Huss, and C. Schwinn Mixed QCD-electroweak $ \mathcal{O}(\alpha_s\alpha) $ corrections to Drell-Yan processes in the resonance region: pole approximation and non-factorizable corrections NPB 885 (2014) 318 1403.3216
10 J. M. Lindert et al. Precise predictions for V+jets dark matter backgrounds EPJC 77 (2017) 829 1705.04664
11 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
12 CMS Collaboration Study of Z production in PbPb and pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}= $ 2.76 TeV in the dimuon and dielectron decay channels JHEP 03 (2015) 022 CMS-HIN-13-004
1410.4825
13 CMS Collaboration Study of $ W $ Boson Production in PbPb and $ pp $ Collisions at $ \sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}= $ 2.76 TeV PLB 715 (2012) 66 CMS-HIN-11-008
1205.6334
14 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of $ \mathrm{W}^{\pm} $-boson and Z-boson production cross-sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC 79 (2019) 901 1907.03567
15 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of W and Z boson production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC 79 (2019) 128 1810.08424
16 ATLAS Collaboration Precision measurement and interpretation of inclusive $ \mathrm{W}^+ $, $ \mathrm{W}^- $ and $ \mathrm{Z}/\gamma ^* $ production cross sections with the ATLAS detector EPJC 77 (2017) 367 1612.03016
17 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive W and Z production cross sections in pp Collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 10 (2011) 132 CMS-EWK-10-005
1107.4789
18 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the forward W boson cross-section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 12 (2014) 079 1408.4354
19 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the cross-section for $ \mathrm{Z} \to e^+e^- $ production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 02 (2013) 106 1212.4620
20 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the forward Z boson production cross-section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 08 (2015) 039 1505.07024
21 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of forward $ \mathrm{W}\to e\nu $ production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV JHEP 10 (2016) 030 1608.01484
22 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the forward Z boson production cross-section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 09 (2016) 136 1607.06495
23 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of forward W and Z boson production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV JHEP 01 (2016) 155 1511.08039
24 CMS Collaboration Measurement of inclusive W and Z boson production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV PRL 112 (2014) 191802 CMS-SMP-12-011
1402.0923
25 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of $ \mathrm{W}^{\pm} $ and Z-boson production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 759 (2016) 601 1603.09222
26 CMS Collaboration Measurements of differential Z boson production cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV JHEP 12 (2019) 061 CMS-SMP-17-010
1909.04133
27 CMS Collaboration Measurements of the $ W $ boson rapidity, helicity, double-differential cross sections, and charge asymmetry in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt {s} $ = 13 TeV PRD 102 (2020) 092012 CMS-SMP-18-012
2008.04174
28 CMS Collaboration Measurement of inclusive W and Z boson production cross sections in pp collisions at sqrt(s)=13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2015
CMS-PAS-SMP-15-004
CMS-PAS-SMP-15-004
29 ATLAS Collaboration Precise measurements of $ W $ and $ Z $ transverse momentum spectra with the ATLAS detector at $ \sqrt{s} = 5.02\, $ TeV and 13 $ \, $TeV Technical Report ATLAS-CONF-2023-028, 2023
30 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
31 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
32 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
33 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
34 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
35 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG JHEP 07 (2008) 060 0805.4802
36 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
37 T. Sjöstrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
38 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
39 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA 8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
40 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
41 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
42 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
43 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
44 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
45 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
46 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
47 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
48 A. Bodek et al. Extracting muon momentum scale corrections for hadron collider experiments EPJC 72 (2012) 2194 1208.3710
49 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2017
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
50 CMS Collaboration Luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at 5.02 TeV in 2017 at CMS CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2021
link
CMS-PAS-LUM-19-001
51 P. Golonka and Z. Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo: A precision tool for QED corrections in Z and W decays EPJC 45 (2006) 97 hep-ph/0506026
52 R. Barlow and C. Beeston Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples Comput. Phys. Comm. 77 (1993) 219
53 J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. F. Sterman Transverse momentum distribution in Drell-Yan pair and W and Z boson production NPB 250 (1985)
54 T. Gleisberg et al. Event generation with SHERPA 1.1 JHEP 02 (2009) 007 0811.4622
55 M. B ä hr et al. Herwig++ physics and manual EPJC 58 (2008) 639 0803.0883
56 S. Frixione and B. R. Webber Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations JHEP 06 (2002) 029 hep-ph/0204244
57 C. Balazs, J.-W. Qiu, and C. P. Yuan Effects of QCD resummation on distributions of leptons from the decay of electroweak vector bosons PLB 355 (1995) 548 hep-ph/9505203
58 S. Catani, D. de Florian, G. Ferrera, and M. Grazzini Vector boson production at hadron colliders: transverse-momentum resummation and leptonic decay JHEP 12 (2015) 047 1507.06937
59 S. Camarda et al. DYTurbo: Fast predictions for Drell-Yan processes EPJC 80 (2020) 251 1910.07049
60 S. Camarda, L. Cieri, and G. Ferrera Drell-Yan lepton-pair production: qT resummation at N3LL accuracy and fiducial cross sections at N3LO PRD 104 (2021) L111503 2103.04974
61 S. Camarda, L. Cieri, and G. Ferrera Fiducial perturbative power corrections within the $ \mathbf{q}_T $ subtraction formalism EPJC 82 (2022) 575 2111.14509
62 S. Camarda, L. Cieri, and G. Ferrera Drell-Yan lepton-pair production: $ q_T $ resummation at approximate N$ ^4 $LL+N$ ^4 $LO accuracy 2303.12781
63 NNPDF Collaboration The path to proton structure at 1\% accuracy EPJC 82 (2022) 428 2109.02653
64 T.-J. Hou et al. New CTEQ global analysis of quantum chromodynamics with high-precision data from the LHC 1912.10053
65 UA1 Collaboration Intermediate Vector Boson Cross-Sections at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron Collider and the Number of Neutrino Types PLB 198 (1987) 271
66 UA2 Collaboration Measurement of W and Z Production Cross-sections at the CERN $ \bar{p}p $ Collider Z. Phys. C 47 (1990) 11
67 D0 Collaboration Extraction of the width of the $ W $ boson from measurements of $ \sigma(p\bar{p} \to W + X) \times B(W \to e \nu) $ and $ \sigma(p\bar{p} \to Z + X) \times B(Z \to e e) $ and their ratio PRD 61 (2000) 072001 hep-ex/9906025
68 CDF Collaboration First measurements of inclusive $ W $ and $ Z $ cross sections from Run II of the Tevatron collider PRL 94 (2005) 091803 hep-ex/0406078
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN