CMS-EXO-19-006

CMS-EXO-19-006 ; CERN-EP-2024-002
Search for fractionally charged particles in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
CMS Collaboration
15 February 2024
Submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.
Abstract: A search is presented for fractionally charged particles with charge below 1$ e $, using their small energy loss in the tracking detector as a key variable to observe a signal. The analyzed data set corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $ of proton-proton collisions collected at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in 2016-2018 at the CERN LHC. This is the first search at the LHC for new particles with charges between $ e/ $3 and $ e $. Masses up to 640 GeV and charges as low as $ e/ $3 are excluded at 95% confidence level. These are the most stringent limits to date for the considered Drell-Yan-like production mode.
Links: e-print arXiv:2402.09932 [hep-ex] (PDF) ; CDS record ; inSPIRE record ; HepData record ; CADI line (restricted) ;

Figures & Tables	Summary	References	CMS Publications

Figures
png pdf	Figure 1: The d$E$/d$x$ distribution for hits on candidate tracks in the CR and SR in 2018 data. The last bin is an overflow bin. The vertical bars and the shaded area correspond to the statistical uncertainty in the SR and the CR, respectively.
png pdf	Figure 2: Distribution of $ N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low}\ \mathrm{d}E/\mathrm{d}x } $ in the SR and the CR for the 2018 data set, as well as for an FCP signal at a mass of 100 GeV and different charge scenarios. The vertical bars and the shaded area correspond to the statistical uncertainty in the SR and the CR, respectively. The $ p $-value of the fit is 9%. The two lower panels show the ratio of the number of tracks observed in the CR (upper) and SR (lower), and the fit function. The vertical bars correspond to the uncertainty from statistical sources, while the shaded area shows the systematic uncertainty in the binomial fit (see text).
png pdf	Figure 3: Exclusion region (hatched) at 95% CL in the FCP charge-mass plane for the considered signal. The expected exclusion is shown with the associated 1 (green) and 2 (orange) standard deviations bands. Signal points at charges 0.9, 0.8, 2/3, 0.5, and 1 $ /3e $ are connected by straight lines to guide the eye. This is a conservative interpolation. Previous exclusions from CMS [5,6] as well as OPAL [10] are given for comparison.
png pdf	Figure A1: Distribution of $ N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low}\ \mathrm{d}E/\mathrm{d}x } $ in the SR and the CR for the early 2016 data set, as well as for an FCP signal at a mass of 100 GeV and different charge scenarios. The vertical bars and the shaded area correspond to the statistical uncertainty in the SR and the CR, respectively. The $ p $-value of the fit is 6%. The two lower panels show the ratio of the number of tracks observed in the CR (upper) and SR (lower), and the fit function. The vertical bars correspond to the uncertainty from statistical sources, while the shaded area shows the systematic uncertainty in the fit due to the choice of the fitting function and the binomial fit range as explained in the main text. Comparing with respect to the binomial fit starting at $ N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low}\ \mathrm{d}E/\mathrm{d}x } = $ 2, and not $ N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low}\ \mathrm{d}E/\mathrm{d}x } = $ 1, is needed to account for the fact that early 2016 data is more strongly affected by instrumental effects that widen the $ N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low}\ \mathrm{d}E/\mathrm{d}x } $ distribution.
png pdf	Figure A2: Distribution of $ N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low}\ \mathrm{d}E/\mathrm{d}x } $ in the SR and the CR for the late 2016 data set, as well as for an FCP signal at a mass of 100 GeV and different charge scenarios. The vertical bars and the shaded area correspond to the statistical uncertainty in the SR and the CR, respectively. The $ p $-value of the fit is 78%. The two lower panels show the ratio of the number of tracks observed in the CR (upper) and SR (lower), and the fit function. The vertical bars correspond to the uncertainty from statistical sources, while the shaded area shows the systematic uncertainty in the fit due to the choice of the fitting function and the binomial fit range as explained in the main text.
png pdf	Figure A3: Distribution of $ N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low}\ \mathrm{d}E/\mathrm{d}x } $ in the SR and the CR for the 2017 data set, as well as for an FCP signal at a mass of 100 GeV and different charge scenarios. The vertical bars and the shaded area correspond to the statistical uncertainty on the SR and the CR, respectively. The $ p $-value of the fit is 65%. The two lower panels show the ratio of the number of tracks observed in the CR (upper) and SR (lower), and the fit function. The vertical bars correspond to the uncertainty from statistical sources, while the shaded area shows the systematic uncertainty in the fit due to the choice of the fitting function and the binomial fit range as explained in the main text.

Tables
png pdf	Table 1: Number of tracks observed and expected for background and signal events, in the $ N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low}\ \mathrm{d}E/\mathrm{d}x } $ bin with highest signal significance ($ \geq $7), for 2018 data. The corresponding systematic uncertainties are also listed. The results are shown for FCP scenarios at a mass of 100 GeV with a charge of 2$ e/ $3 (the most sensitive scenario) and $ e/ $3 (the lowest considered charge).
png pdf	Table 2: Number of tracks observed and expected for background and signal events, in the $ N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low}\ \mathrm{d}E/\mathrm{d}x } $ bin with highest signal significance ($ \geq $9), for early 2016 data. The corresponding systematic uncertainties are also listed. The results are shown for FCP scenarios at a mass of 100 GeV with a charge of 2$ e $/3 (the most sensitive scenario) and $ e $/3 (the lowest considered charge).
png pdf	Table 3: Number of tracks observed and expected for background and signal events, in the $ N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low}\ \mathrm{d}E/\mathrm{d}x } $ bin with highest signal significance ($ \geq $7), for late 2016 data. The corresponding systematic uncertainties are also listed. The results are shown for FCP scenarios at a mass of 100 GeV with a charge of 2$ e/ $3 (the most sensitive scenario) and $ e/ $3 (the lowest considered charge).
png pdf	Table 4: Number of tracks observed and expected for background and signal events, in the $ N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low}\ \mathrm{d}E/\mathrm{d}x } $ bin with highest signal significance ($ \geq $7), for 2017 data. The corresponding systematic uncertainties are also listed. The results are shown for FCP scenarios at a mass of 100 GeV with a charge of 2$ e/ $3 (the most sensitive scenario) and $ e/ $3 (the lowest considered charge).

Summary

In summary, we presented a search for fractionally charged particles using proton-proton collisions corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $, collected at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the CMS detector. The key feature of low ionization energy in the CMS tracker detector is used to discriminate a potential signal from the background. No significant deviation is observed in data with respect to the expected background. The search presents for the first time a scan of the new particle charge between $ e/ $3 and $ e $. The existence of fractionally charged particles arising from the considered DY-like pair production is excluded in the mass range between 50 and 640 (60) GeV for a signal of charge $ Q = $ 2$e/$3 ($e/ $3). These are the most stringent limits to date for this production mode.

References
1	B. Holdom	Two U(1)'s and $ \epsilon $ charge shifts	PLB 166 (1986) 196
2	S. A. Abel et al.	Kinetic mixing of the photon with hidden U(1)s in string phenomenology	JHEP 07 (2008) 124	0803.1449
3	P. Langacker	The physics of heavy $ \mathrm{Z}^{'} $ gauge bosons	Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 1199	0801.1345
4	D. E. Morrissey, D. Poland, and K. M. Zurek	Abelian hidden sectors at a GeV	JHEP 07 (2009) 050	0904.2567
5	CMS Collaboration	Search for fractionally charged particles in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV	PRD 87 (2013) 092008	CMS-EXO-11-074 1210.2311
6	CMS Collaboration	Searches for long-lived charged particles in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV	JHEP 07 (2013) 122	CMS-EXO-12-026 1305.0491
7	S. L. Dubovsky, D. S. Gorbunov, and G. I. Rubtsov	Narrowing the window for millicharged particles by CMB anisotropy	JETP Lett. 79 (2004) 1	hep-ph/0311189
8	N. Vinyoles and H. Vogel	Minicharged particles from the Sun: a cutting-edge bound	JCAP 03 (2016) 002	1511.01122
9	S. Davidson, S. Hannestad, and G. Raffelt	Updated bounds on millicharged particles	JHEP 05 (2000) 003	hep-ph/0001179
10	OPAL Collaboration	Search for stable and long-lived massive charged particles in e+e- collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 130--209 GeV	PLB 572 (2003) 8	hep-ex/0305031
11	A. Haas, C. S. Hill, E. Izaguirre, and I. Yavin	Looking for milli-charged particles with a new experiment at the LHC	PLB 746 (2015) 117	1410.6816
12	A. Ball et al.	A letter of intent to install a milli-charged particle detector at LHC P5		1607.04669
13	A. Ball et al.	Search for millicharged particles in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV	PRD 102 (2020) 032002	2005.06518
14	V. A. Mitsou et al.	Searching for minicharged particles at the energy frontier with the MoEDAL-MAPP experiment at the LHC		2311.02185
15	P.-K. Hu, A. Kusenko, and V. Takhistov	Dark cosmic rays	PLB 768 (2017) 18	1611.04599
16	The Tracker Group of the CMS Collaboration	The CMS phase-1 pixel detector upgrade	JINST 16 (2021) P02027	2012.14304
17	CMS Collaboration	The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC	JINST 3 (2008) S08004
18	CMS Collaboration	Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV	JINST 13 (2018) P06015	CMS-MUO-16-001 1804.04528
19	T. Sjöstrand et al.	An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2	Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159	1410.3012
20	J. Alwall et al.	The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations	JHEP 07 (2014) 079	1405.0301
21	NNPDF Collaboration	Parton distributions from high-precision collider data	EPJC 77 (2017) 663	1706.00428
22	CMS Collaboration	Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements	EPJC 76 (2016) 155	CMS-GEN-14-001 1512.00815
23	CMS Collaboration	Investigations of the impact of the parton shower tuning in PYTHIA8 in the modelling of $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 and 13 TeV	CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2016 CDS
24	CMS Collaboration	Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements	EPJC 80 (2020) 4	CMS-GEN-17-001 1903.12179
25	GEANT4 Collaboration	GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit	NIM A 506 (2003) 250
26	CMS Collaboration	The CMS trigger system	JINST 12 (2017) P01020	CMS-TRG-12-001 1609.02366
27	CMS Collaboration	Strategies and performance of the CMS silicon tracker alignment during LHC Run 2	NIM A 1037 (2022) 166795	CMS-TRK-20-001 2111.08757
28	CMS Collaboration	Simulation of the silicon strip tracker pre-amplifier in early 2016 data	CMS Detector Performance Summary CMS-DP-2020-045, 2020 CDS
29	CMS Collaboration	Operation and performance of the CMS outer tracker	PoS Vertex 2017 (2018) 013
30	CMS Collaboration	See the Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for additional figures reporting the $ N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low}\ \mathrm{d}E/\mathrm{d}x } $ distributions for 2016 and 2017 data sets, as well as tables with the corresponding observed and expected event yields for both signal and background.
31	CMS Collaboration	HEPData record for this analysis	link
32	E. Gross and O. Vitells	Trial factors for the look elsewhere effect in high energy physics	EPJC 70 (2010) 525	1005.1891
33	CMS Collaboration	Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS	EPJC 81 (2021) 800	CMS-LUM-17-003 2104.01927
34	CMS Collaboration	CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV	CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2018 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004	CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
35	CMS Collaboration	CMS luminosity measurements for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV	CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2018 CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002	CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
36	T. Junk	Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics	NIM A 434 (1999) 435	hep-ex/9902006
37	A. L. Read	Presentation of search results: the $ \text{CL}_\text{s} $ technique	JPG 28 (2002) 2693