CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-EXO-17-011
Search for a heavy right-handed W boson and a heavy neutrino in events with two same-flavor leptons and two jets at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV
Abstract: A search for a heavy right-handed W gauge boson and a heavy right-handed neutrino at the CERN LHC has been conducted by the CMS collaboration in events with two same-flavor leptons (e or $\mu$) and two jets, using 2016 proton-proton collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. No excess above the standard model expectation is seen in the invariant mass distribution of the dilepton plus dijet system. Assuming identical couplings and decay branching fractions as the standard model W gauge boson, and that only one heavy neutrino flavor ${\mathrm N}_R$ contributes significantly to the ${\mathrm W}_R$ decay width, the region in the two-dimensional ($m_{{\mathrm W}_R}$, $m_{{\mathrm N}_R}$) mass plane excluded at a 95% confidence level extends to approximately $m_{{\mathrm W}_R}= $ 4.4 TeV and covers a large range of neutrino masses below the ${\mathrm W}_R$ boson mass. This analysis provides the most stringent limits to date.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Distribution of kinematic quantities for events in the low-dilepton mass control region. The four-object invariant mass (on the top) and the dilepton transverse momentum (on the bottom) for the DY $\mu \mu $ plus two jets selection are shown on the left. The dilepton mass (on the top) and the scalar sum of all jets $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ (on the bottom) for the DY ee plus two jets selection are shown on the right. The error bands on the MC histograms only include statistical uncertainties. The error bars in the ratio represent the statistical uncertainties of data and MC calculated with the standard error propagation of $\frac {N_d}{N_s}$ given $N_d$ the number of data events in the bin and $N_s$ the number of simulated events in the bin.

png
Figure 1-a:
Distribution of kinematic quantities for events in the low-dilepton mass control region. The four-object invariant mass (on the top) and the dilepton transverse momentum (on the bottom) for the DY $\mu \mu $ plus two jets selection are shown on the left. The dilepton mass (on the top) and the scalar sum of all jets $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ (on the bottom) for the DY ee plus two jets selection are shown on the right. The error bands on the MC histograms only include statistical uncertainties. The error bars in the ratio represent the statistical uncertainties of data and MC calculated with the standard error propagation of $\frac {N_d}{N_s}$ given $N_d$ the number of data events in the bin and $N_s$ the number of simulated events in the bin.

png
Figure 1-b:
Distribution of kinematic quantities for events in the low-dilepton mass control region. The four-object invariant mass (on the top) and the dilepton transverse momentum (on the bottom) for the DY $\mu \mu $ plus two jets selection are shown on the left. The dilepton mass (on the top) and the scalar sum of all jets $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ (on the bottom) for the DY ee plus two jets selection are shown on the right. The error bands on the MC histograms only include statistical uncertainties. The error bars in the ratio represent the statistical uncertainties of data and MC calculated with the standard error propagation of $\frac {N_d}{N_s}$ given $N_d$ the number of data events in the bin and $N_s$ the number of simulated events in the bin.

png
Figure 1-c:
Distribution of kinematic quantities for events in the low-dilepton mass control region. The four-object invariant mass (on the top) and the dilepton transverse momentum (on the bottom) for the DY $\mu \mu $ plus two jets selection are shown on the left. The dilepton mass (on the top) and the scalar sum of all jets $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ (on the bottom) for the DY ee plus two jets selection are shown on the right. The error bands on the MC histograms only include statistical uncertainties. The error bars in the ratio represent the statistical uncertainties of data and MC calculated with the standard error propagation of $\frac {N_d}{N_s}$ given $N_d$ the number of data events in the bin and $N_s$ the number of simulated events in the bin.

png
Figure 1-d:
Distribution of kinematic quantities for events in the low-dilepton mass control region. The four-object invariant mass (on the top) and the dilepton transverse momentum (on the bottom) for the DY $\mu \mu $ plus two jets selection are shown on the left. The dilepton mass (on the top) and the scalar sum of all jets $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ (on the bottom) for the DY ee plus two jets selection are shown on the right. The error bands on the MC histograms only include statistical uncertainties. The error bars in the ratio represent the statistical uncertainties of data and MC calculated with the standard error propagation of $\frac {N_d}{N_s}$ given $N_d$ the number of data events in the bin and $N_s$ the number of simulated events in the bin.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Kinematic distributions for events in the flavor control region. The dilepton mass (top left), the four-object mass (top right), the scalar sum of all jets $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ (bottom left) and the number of jets (bottom right) are shown. The error bands on the MC histograms only include statistical uncertainties. The error bars in the ratio represent the statistical uncertainties of data and MC calculated with the standard error propagation of $\frac {N_d}{N_s}$ given $N_d$ the number of data events in the bin and $N_s$ the number of simulated events in the bin.

png
Figure 2-a:
Kinematic distributions for events in the flavor control region. The dilepton mass (top left), the four-object mass (top right), the scalar sum of all jets $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ (bottom left) and the number of jets (bottom right) are shown. The error bands on the MC histograms only include statistical uncertainties. The error bars in the ratio represent the statistical uncertainties of data and MC calculated with the standard error propagation of $\frac {N_d}{N_s}$ given $N_d$ the number of data events in the bin and $N_s$ the number of simulated events in the bin.

png
Figure 2-b:
Kinematic distributions for events in the flavor control region. The dilepton mass (top left), the four-object mass (top right), the scalar sum of all jets $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ (bottom left) and the number of jets (bottom right) are shown. The error bands on the MC histograms only include statistical uncertainties. The error bars in the ratio represent the statistical uncertainties of data and MC calculated with the standard error propagation of $\frac {N_d}{N_s}$ given $N_d$ the number of data events in the bin and $N_s$ the number of simulated events in the bin.

png
Figure 2-c:
Kinematic distributions for events in the flavor control region. The dilepton mass (top left), the four-object mass (top right), the scalar sum of all jets $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ (bottom left) and the number of jets (bottom right) are shown. The error bands on the MC histograms only include statistical uncertainties. The error bars in the ratio represent the statistical uncertainties of data and MC calculated with the standard error propagation of $\frac {N_d}{N_s}$ given $N_d$ the number of data events in the bin and $N_s$ the number of simulated events in the bin.

png
Figure 2-d:
Kinematic distributions for events in the flavor control region. The dilepton mass (top left), the four-object mass (top right), the scalar sum of all jets $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ (bottom left) and the number of jets (bottom right) are shown. The error bands on the MC histograms only include statistical uncertainties. The error bars in the ratio represent the statistical uncertainties of data and MC calculated with the standard error propagation of $\frac {N_d}{N_s}$ given $N_d$ the number of data events in the bin and $N_s$ the number of simulated events in the bin.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Four-object mass distribution in the signal region for the electron channel on the left and for the muon channel on the right. The error bands on the MC histograms only include statistical uncertainties. The error bars in the ratio represent the statistical uncertainties of data and MC calculated with the standard error propagation of $\frac {N_d}{N_s}$ given $N_d$ the number of data events in the bin and $N_s$ the number of simulated events in the bin. The gray error band around 1 represents instead the systematic uncertainty of the simulation.

png
Figure 3-a:
Four-object mass distribution in the signal region for the electron channel on the left and for the muon channel on the right. The error bands on the MC histograms only include statistical uncertainties. The error bars in the ratio represent the statistical uncertainties of data and MC calculated with the standard error propagation of $\frac {N_d}{N_s}$ given $N_d$ the number of data events in the bin and $N_s$ the number of simulated events in the bin. The gray error band around 1 represents instead the systematic uncertainty of the simulation.

png
Figure 3-b:
Four-object mass distribution in the signal region for the electron channel on the left and for the muon channel on the right. The error bands on the MC histograms only include statistical uncertainties. The error bars in the ratio represent the statistical uncertainties of data and MC calculated with the standard error propagation of $\frac {N_d}{N_s}$ given $N_d$ the number of data events in the bin and $N_s$ the number of simulated events in the bin. The gray error band around 1 represents instead the systematic uncertainty of the simulation.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Limit on $\sigma (pp\rightarrow \mathrm{W}_{R}) \times BR(\mathrm{W}_{R} \rightarrow \ell \ell \text {jj})$ with systematic uncertainties for the electron channel on the left and for the muon channel on the right. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing, respectively, the 68% and 95% of the distribution of limits expected under the signal plus background hypothesis. Right-handed bosons with $m_{\mathrm{W}_{R}} < $ 4.4 TeV are excluded.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Limit on $\sigma (pp\rightarrow \mathrm{W}_{R}) \times BR(\mathrm{W}_{R} \rightarrow \ell \ell \text {jj})$ with systematic uncertainties for the electron channel on the left and for the muon channel on the right. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing, respectively, the 68% and 95% of the distribution of limits expected under the signal plus background hypothesis. Right-handed bosons with $m_{\mathrm{W}_{R}} < $ 4.4 TeV are excluded.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Limit on $\sigma (pp\rightarrow \mathrm{W}_{R}) \times BR(\mathrm{W}_{R} \rightarrow \ell \ell \text {jj})$ with systematic uncertainties for the electron channel on the left and for the muon channel on the right. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing, respectively, the 68% and 95% of the distribution of limits expected under the signal plus background hypothesis. Right-handed bosons with $m_{\mathrm{W}_{R}} < $ 4.4 TeV are excluded.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Upper limit on the cross section for different $ \mathrm{W}_{R} $ and ${{{\mathrm N}_R}}$ mass hypothesis, for the electron channel on the left and for the muon channel on the right. The expected and observed exclusions are shown as the dotted (blue) curve and the solid (red) curve, respectively. The thin dotted (blue) curves indicate the region containing the 68% of the distribution of limits expected under the signal plus background hypothesys.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Upper limit on the cross section for different $ \mathrm{W}_{R} $ and ${{{\mathrm N}_R}}$ mass hypothesis, for the electron channel on the left and for the muon channel on the right. The expected and observed exclusions are shown as the dotted (blue) curve and the solid (red) curve, respectively. The thin dotted (blue) curves indicate the region containing the 68% of the distribution of limits expected under the signal plus background hypothesys.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Upper limit on the cross section for different $ \mathrm{W}_{R} $ and ${{{\mathrm N}_R}}$ mass hypothesis, for the electron channel on the left and for the muon channel on the right. The expected and observed exclusions are shown as the dotted (blue) curve and the solid (red) curve, respectively. The thin dotted (blue) curves indicate the region containing the 68% of the distribution of limits expected under the signal plus background hypothesys.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Transfer factor applied to the number of events in flavor control region to estimate the number of ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ events in the $\mathrm{e} \mathrm{e} \text {jj}$ and $\mu \mu \text {jj}$ signal regions.

png pdf
Table 2:
Effect of object reconstruction's systematic uncertainties on signal and background yields.

png pdf
Table 3:
Uncertainties affecting $m_{\ell \ell \text {jj}}$ shape and normalization. The $ {\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} $ SFs affect the $ {\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} $ background, the DY PDF, factorization, and renormalization scales affect the DY + jets background and the luminosity affects both signal and backgrounds.

png pdf
Table 4:
Observed number of events and magnitudes of systematic and statistical uncertainties for the expected events in different $ \mathrm{W}_{R} $ mass windows. All uncertainties are in number of events. In each table cell, the entry is of the form (mean $\pm $ stat. $\pm $ syst.).
Summary
In summary, a search for a right-handed W analogue to the W gauge boson in the decay channel of two leptons and two jets has been presented. No excess over standard model backgrounds are observed. A new W boson-like particle, with standard model couplings, decaying via a new heavy neutrino, up to a mass of 4.4 TeV, is excluded at 95% confidence level by the data, providing the most stringent limits to date.
References
1 J. C. Pati and A. Salam Lepton Number as the Fourth Color PRD 10 (1974) 275, .[Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 11, 703 (1975)]
2 R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati A Natural Left-Right Symmetry PRD 11 (1975) 2558
3 G. Senjanovic and R. N. Mohapatra Exact Left-Right Symmetry and Spontaneous Violation of Parity PRD 12 (1975) 1502
4 W.-Y. Keung and G. Senjanovic Majorana Neutrinos and the Production of the Right-handed Charged Gauge Boson PRL 50 (1983) 1427
5 P. Adhya, D. R. Chaudhuri, and A. Raychaudhuri Decay and decoupling of heavy right-handed Majorana neutrinos in the L-R model EPJC19 (2001) 183--190 hep-ph/0006260
6 P. S. B. Dev, R. N. Mohapatra, and Y. Zhang Heavy right-handed neutrino dark matter in left-right models MPLA32 (2017) 1740007 1610.05738
7 R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Violation PRL 44 (1980) 912
8 M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky Complex Spinors and Unified Theories Conf. Proc. C 790927 (1979) 315 1306.4669
9 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy neutrinos and $ \mathrm {W} $ bosons with right-handed couplings in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV EPJC 74 (2014) 3149 CMS-EXO-13-008
1407.3683
10 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy neutrinos and $ \mathrm{W} $ bosons with right handed couplings in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-EXO-16-045 CMS-PAS-EXO-16-045
11 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy neutrinos or third-generation leptoquarks in final states with two hadronically decaying $ \tau $ leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 03 (2017) 077 CMS-EXO-16-016
1612.01190
12 CMS Collaboration Search for the third-generation scalar leptoquarks and heavy right-handed neutrinos in final states with two tau leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS-EXO-16-023
1703.03995
13 CMS Collaboration Search for a heavy composite Majorana neutrino in the final state with two leptons and two quarks at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV CMS-EXO-16-026
1706.08578
14 ATLAS Collaboration Search for heavy neutrinos and right-handed $ W $ bosons in events with two leptons and jets in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC72 (2012) 2056 1203.5420
15 ATLAS Collaboration Search for third generation scalar leptoquarks in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 06 (2013) 033 1303.0526
16 ATLAS Collaboration Search for heavy Majorana neutrinos with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV JHEP 07 (2015) 162 1506.06020
17 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
18 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
19 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the cms detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
20 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the particle-flow event reconstruction with the first LHC collisions recorded in the CMS detector CMS-PAS-PFT-10-001
21 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in $ pp $ collision events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
22 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
23 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
24 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
25 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
26 CMS Collaboration Jet performance in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV CMS-PAS-JME-10-003
27 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
28 S. Agostinelli et al. GEANT4---a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
29 T. Sjöstrand et al. An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159--177 1410.3012
30 S. Frixione and B. R. Webber Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations JHEP 06 (2002) 029 hep-ph/0204244
31 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
32 J. Alwall et al. MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond JHEP 06 (2011) 128 1106.0522
33 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
34 E. Re Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
35 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC76 (2016), no. 3, 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
36 L. Moneta et al. The RooStats Project PoS ACAT2010 (2010) 057 1009.1003
37 CMS Collaboration CMS Luminosity Measurements for the 2016 Data Taking Period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
38 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
39 The ATLAS Collaboration, The CMS Collaboration, The LHC Higgs Combination Group Collaboration Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 CMS-NOTE-2011-005
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN