Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN
Visit us: CMS Public Website, CMS Physics ;
Contact us: CMS Publications Committee
| CMS-PAS-EXO-17-016 | ||
| Search for heavy neutrinos and third-generation leptoquarks in final states with two hadronically decaying $\tau$ leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV | ||
| CMS Collaboration | ||
| July 2018 | ||
| Abstract: A search for new particles has been conducted using events with two high transverse momentum ($p_{\textrm{T}}$) $\tau$ leptons that decay hadronically, at least two high-$p_{\textrm{T}}$ jets, and missing transverse momentum from the $\tau$ lepton decays. The analysis is performed using data from proton-proton collisions, collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC in 2016 at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The observed data are consistent with the standard model expectation. The results are interpreted with two physics models. The first model involves right-handed charged bosons, $\textrm{W}_\mathrm{R}$, that decay to heavy right-handed neutrinos, $N_{\ell}$ ($\ell = \textrm{e}$, $\mu$, $\tau$), arising in a left-right symmetric extension of the standard model. The model considers that $\textrm{N}_{\textrm{e}}$ and $\textrm{N}_{\mu}$ are too heavy to be detected at the LHC. Assuming that the $\textrm{N}_{\tau}$ mass is half of the $\textrm{W}_\mathrm{R}$ mass, masses of the $\textrm{W}_\mathrm{R}$ boson below 3.5 TeV are excluded at a 95% confidence level (expected exclusion of 3.5 TeV). Exclusion bounds are also presented considering different scenarios for the mass ratio between $\textrm{N}_{\tau}$ and $\textrm{W}_\mathrm{R}$ as function of $\textrm{W}_\mathrm{R}$ mass. In the second model, pair production of third-generation scalar leptoquarks that decay into $\tau\tau\textrm{b}\textrm{b}$ is considered, resulting in an observed (expected) exclusion region with leptoquark masses below 1.02 (1.0) TeV, assuming a 100% branching fraction for the leptoquark decay to a $\tau$ lepton and a bottom quark. These results represent the most stringent limits to date. | ||
|
Links:
CDS record (PDF) ;
inSPIRE record ;
CADI line (restricted) ;
These preliminary results are superseded in this paper, JHEP 03 (2019) 170. The superseded preliminary plots can be found here. |
||
| Figures | |
png pdf |
Figure 1:
Distributions in (left) $S^{MET}_{\textrm {T}}$, for the $\mathrm{ t \bar{t} } (\mu \mu \textrm {j j})$ control sample, and (right) $m(\tau _{\textrm {h},1},\tau _{\textrm {h},2},\textrm {j}_{1}, \textrm {j}_{2},p_{\textrm {T}}^{\textrm {miss}})$ (right) for the $\textrm {Z} (\tau \tau)$ control sample with relaxed $\tau _{\textrm {h}}$ $ p_{\textrm {T}} $ thresholds and $m(\tau _{\textrm {h},1},\tau _{\textrm {h},2}) < $ 100 GeV. |
png pdf |
Figure 1-a:
Distributions in (left) $S^{MET}_{\textrm {T}}$, for the $\mathrm{ t \bar{t} } (\mu \mu \textrm {j j})$ control sample, and (right) $m(\tau _{\textrm {h},1},\tau _{\textrm {h},2},\textrm {j}_{1}, \textrm {j}_{2},p_{\textrm {T}}^{\textrm {miss}})$ (right) for the $\textrm {Z} (\tau \tau)$ control sample with relaxed $\tau _{\textrm {h}}$ $ p_{\textrm {T}} $ thresholds and $m(\tau _{\textrm {h},1},\tau _{\textrm {h},2}) < $ 100 GeV. |
png pdf |
Figure 1-b:
Distributions in (left) $S^{MET}_{\textrm {T}}$, for the $\mathrm{ t \bar{t} } (\mu \mu \textrm {j j})$ control sample, and (right) $m(\tau _{\textrm {h},1},\tau _{\textrm {h},2},\textrm {j}_{1}, \textrm {j}_{2},p_{\textrm {T}}^{\textrm {miss}})$ (right) for the $\textrm {Z} (\tau \tau)$ control sample with relaxed $\tau _{\textrm {h}}$ $ p_{\textrm {T}} $ thresholds and $m(\tau _{\textrm {h},1},\tau _{\textrm {h},2}) < $ 100 GeV. |
png pdf |
Figure 2:
QCD multijet validation test in CR$B$ defined by $\textrm {N}_{\textrm {j}} \ge $ 2, $p_{\textrm {t}^{miss}} < $ 50 GeV, tight $\tau _{\textrm {h}}$ isolation, comparing the observed $m(\tau _{\textrm {h},1},\tau _{\textrm {h},2},\textrm {j}_{1},\textrm {j}_{2},p_{\textrm {T}}^{\textrm {miss}})$ (left) and $S_{\textrm {T}}^{MET}$ (right) shapes against extrapolation from the loose $\tau _{\textrm {h}}$ region, CR$A$. For both samples non-QCD contributions estimated from simulation have been subtracted, as discussed in the text. Note that the normalizations match by construction. The bottom frame shows the ratio between the observed "Data" in CR$B$ and the total background estimation. |
png pdf |
Figure 2-a:
QCD multijet validation test in CR$B$ defined by $\textrm {N}_{\textrm {j}} \ge $ 2, $p_{\textrm {t}^{miss}} < $ 50 GeV, tight $\tau _{\textrm {h}}$ isolation, comparing the observed $m(\tau _{\textrm {h},1},\tau _{\textrm {h},2},\textrm {j}_{1},\textrm {j}_{2},p_{\textrm {T}}^{\textrm {miss}})$ (left) and $S_{\textrm {T}}^{MET}$ (right) shapes against extrapolation from the loose $\tau _{\textrm {h}}$ region, CR$A$. For both samples non-QCD contributions estimated from simulation have been subtracted, as discussed in the text. Note that the normalizations match by construction. The bottom frame shows the ratio between the observed "Data" in CR$B$ and the total background estimation. |
png pdf |
Figure 2-b:
QCD multijet validation test in CR$B$ defined by $\textrm {N}_{\textrm {j}} \ge $ 2, $p_{\textrm {t}^{miss}} < $ 50 GeV, tight $\tau _{\textrm {h}}$ isolation, comparing the observed $m(\tau _{\textrm {h},1},\tau _{\textrm {h},2},\textrm {j}_{1},\textrm {j}_{2},p_{\textrm {T}}^{\textrm {miss}})$ (left) and $S_{\textrm {T}}^{MET}$ (right) shapes against extrapolation from the loose $\tau _{\textrm {h}}$ region, CR$A$. For both samples non-QCD contributions estimated from simulation have been subtracted, as discussed in the text. Note that the normalizations match by construction. The bottom frame shows the ratio between the observed "Data" in CR$B$ and the total background estimation. |
png pdf |
Figure 3:
Distributions in $m(\tau _{\textrm {h},1},\tau _{\textrm {h},2},\textrm {j}_{1},\textrm {j}_{2},p_{\textrm {T}}^{\textrm {miss}})$ (left) and $S_{T}^{MET}$ (right) for the estimated background in the signal region. The bottom frame shows the ratio between the observed data and the background estimation; the band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty for the background. The $\mathrm{ t \bar{t} }$, QCD multijet and \textrm {Z}+jets contributions are estimated employing MC and data driven techniques, while the other contributions are obtained from the MC prediction. |
png pdf |
Figure 3-a:
Distributions in $m(\tau _{\textrm {h},1},\tau _{\textrm {h},2},\textrm {j}_{1},\textrm {j}_{2},p_{\textrm {T}}^{\textrm {miss}})$ (left) and $S_{T}^{MET}$ (right) for the estimated background in the signal region. The bottom frame shows the ratio between the observed data and the background estimation; the band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty for the background. The $\mathrm{ t \bar{t} }$, QCD multijet and \textrm {Z}+jets contributions are estimated employing MC and data driven techniques, while the other contributions are obtained from the MC prediction. |
png pdf |
Figure 3-b:
Distributions in $m(\tau _{\textrm {h},1},\tau _{\textrm {h},2},\textrm {j}_{1},\textrm {j}_{2},p_{\textrm {T}}^{\textrm {miss}})$ (left) and $S_{T}^{MET}$ (right) for the estimated background in the signal region. The bottom frame shows the ratio between the observed data and the background estimation; the band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty for the background. The $\mathrm{ t \bar{t} }$, QCD multijet and \textrm {Z}+jets contributions are estimated employing MC and data driven techniques, while the other contributions are obtained from the MC prediction. |
png pdf |
Figure 4:
Upper limits at the 95% confidence level on the cross section times branching fraction for production of (above) $\textrm {W}_{\textrm {R}}$ decaying to $\textrm {N}_{\tau}$ and (below) a pair of leptoquarks each decaying to $\tau \textrm {b}$, as functions of the produced particle mass. The observed limits are shown as solid black lines. Expected limits and their one- (two-) standard deviation limits are shown by dashed lines with green (yellow) bands. The theoretical cross sections are indicated by the solid blue lines. |
png pdf |
Figure 4-a:
Upper limits at the 95% confidence level on the cross section times branching fraction for production of (above) $\textrm {W}_{\textrm {R}}$ decaying to $\textrm {N}_{\tau}$ and (below) a pair of leptoquarks each decaying to $\tau \textrm {b}$, as functions of the produced particle mass. The observed limits are shown as solid black lines. Expected limits and their one- (two-) standard deviation limits are shown by dashed lines with green (yellow) bands. The theoretical cross sections are indicated by the solid blue lines. |
png pdf |
Figure 4-b:
Upper limits at the 95% confidence level on the cross section times branching fraction for production of (above) $\textrm {W}_{\textrm {R}}$ decaying to $\textrm {N}_{\tau}$ and (below) a pair of leptoquarks each decaying to $\tau \textrm {b}$, as functions of the produced particle mass. The observed limits are shown as solid black lines. Expected limits and their one- (two-) standard deviation limits are shown by dashed lines with green (yellow) bands. The theoretical cross sections are indicated by the solid blue lines. |
png pdf |
Figure 5:
Expected and observed limits at the 95% confidence level as a function of $m(\textrm {W}_{\textrm {R}})$ and $x=m(\textrm {N}_{\tau})/m(\textrm {W}_{\textrm {R}})$. |
| Tables | |
png pdf |
Table 1:
Summary of systematic uncertainties. Values are given in percent. "s'' indicates a shape uncertainty. For example, "12,s" means the normalization uncertainty is 12%, but varied mass and $S_{\textrm {T}}^{MET}$ distributions are also considered to account for shape systematics. These varied mass and $S_{\textrm {T}}^{MET}$ distributions are normalized to the predicted background yields outlined in Section 6 and Table xxxxx. |
png pdf |
Table 2:
Estimated pre-fit background and signal yields in the SR and their statistical uncertainties. The \textrm {Z}+jets and $\mathrm{ t \bar{t} }$ background normalizations are determined by correcting the predictions obtained from the simulated samples with scale factors, $SF^{\textrm {Z}\to \mu \mu}_{dijet}$ and $SF^{\mathrm{ t \bar{t} }}$, determined in dedicated data control samples. The QCD multijet background event rate is determined with a data-driven method utilizing the number of QCD multijet events containing two non-isolated $\tau _{\textrm {h}}$ candidates and scaled by the TL ratio. The expected number of events for the $ {\mathrm {W}}_\mathrm {R}$ signal sample assume $m(\textrm {N}_{\tau}) = m({\mathrm {W}}_\mathrm {R})/2$. |
| Summary |
| A search is performed for physics beyond the standard model (BSM) in events with two energetic $\tau$ leptons, two energetic jets, and large momentum imbalance, using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ collected in 2016 by the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV. The search focuses on two benchmark scenarios: (1) production of heavy right-handed neutrinos, $\textrm{N}_{\ell}$, and right-handed $\textrm{W}_{\textrm{R}}$ bosons, which arise in the left-right symmetric extensions of the SM and where the $\textrm{W}_{\textrm{R}}$ and $\textrm{N}_{\ell}$ decay chains result in a pair of high-transverse momentum $\tau$ leptons; (2) pair production of third-generation scalar leptoquarks that decay to $\tau\tau$\textrm{bb}. The observed $m(\tau_{\textrm{h},1},\tau_{\textrm{h},2},\textrm{j}_{1},\textrm{j}_{2},p_{\textrm{T}}^{\textrm{miss}})$ and $S^{MET}_{\textrm{T}}$ distributions do not reveal any evidence for physics beyond the SM. Assuming that only the $\textrm{N}_{\tau}$ flavor contributes significantly to the $\mathrm{W}_\mathrm{R}$ decay width, $\mathrm{W}_\mathrm{R}$ masses below 3.45 (2.75) TeV are excluded at the 95% confidence level, assuming the $\textrm{N}_{\tau}$ mass is 0.8 (0.2) times the mass of $\mathrm{W}_\mathrm{R}$ boson. In the second BSM scenario, leptoquarks with a mass less than 1.02 TeV are excluded at the 95% confidence level, to be compared with an expected mass limit of 1.00 TeV. Both of these results represent the most stringent limits to date in $\tau \tau \textrm{j} \textrm{j}$ final states, exceeding the previous limits by CMS using 12.9 fb$^{-1}$ of data recorded at 13 TeV [48]. |
| References | ||||
| 1 | M. Lindner, T. Ohlsson, and G. Seidl | Seesaw mechanisms for Dirac and Majorana neutrino masses | PRD 65 (2002) 053014 | hep-ph/0109264 |
| 2 | P. Minkowski | $ \mu \to e\gamma $ at a Rate of One Out of $ 10^{9} $ Muon Decays? | PLB 67 (1977) 421--428 | |
| 3 | R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic | Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Violation | PRL 44 (1980) 912 | |
| 4 | J. C. Pati and A. Salam | Unified lepton-hadron symmetry and a gauge theory of the basic interactions | PRD 8 (1973) 1240 | |
| 5 | J. C. Pati and A. Salam | Lepton number as the fourth color | PRD 10 (1974) 275, . [Erratum: \DOI10.1103/PhysRevD.11.703.2] | |
| 6 | H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow | Unity of all elementary particle forces | PRL 32 (1974) 438 | |
| 7 | H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski | Unified interactions of leptons and hadrons | Ann. Phys. 93 (1975) 193 | |
| 8 | S. Dimopoulos and L. Susskind | Mass without scalars | NPB 155 (1979) 237 | |
| 9 | S. Dimopoulos | Technicolored signatures | NPB 168 (1980) 69 | |
| 10 | E. Farhi and L. Susskind | Technicolor | PR 74 (1981) 277 | |
| 11 | K. D. Lane and M. V. Ramana | Walking technicolor signatures at hadron colliders | PRD 44 (1991) 2678 | |
| 12 | B. Schrempp and F. Schrempp | Light leptoquarks | PLB 153 (1985) 101 | |
| 13 | B. Gripaios | Composite leptoquarks at the LHC | JHEP 02 (2010) 045 | 0910.1789 |
| 14 | G. R. Farrar and P. Fayet | Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with supersymmetry | PLB 76 (1978) 575 | |
| 15 | P. Ramond | Dual theory for free fermions | PRD 3 (1971) 2415 | |
| 16 | Y. A. Golfand and E. P. Likhtman | Extension of the algebra of Poincar$ \'e $ group generators and violation of p invariance | JEPTL 13 (1971)323 | |
| 17 | A. Neveu and J. H. Schwarz | Factorizable dual model of pions | NPB 31 (1971) 86 | |
| 18 | D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov | Possible universal neutrino interaction | JEPTL 16 (1972)438 | |
| 19 | J. Wess and B. Zumino | A Lagrangian model invariant under supergauge transformations | PLB 49 (1974) 52 | |
| 20 | J. Wess and B. Zumino | Supergauge transformations in four dimensions | NPB 70 (1974) 39 | |
| 21 | P. Fayet | Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino | NPB 90 (1975) 104 | |
| 22 | H. P. Nilles | Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics | PR 110 (1984) 1 | |
| 23 | R. Barbier et al. | R-parity violating supersymmetry | PR 420 (2005) 1 | hep-ph/0406039 |
| 24 | J. Pati and A. Salam | Lepton number as the fourth color | PRD 10 (1974) 275 | |
| 25 | B. Gripaios | Composite leptoquarks at the lhc | JHEP 02 (2010) 045 | |
| 26 | W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler | Constraints on SU(5)-type leptoquarks | PLB 177 (1986) 377 | |
| 27 | O. U. Shanker | $ \pi \ell $2, $ K \ell $3 and $ K^0 - \bar{K}^{0} $ constraints on leptoquarks and supersymmetric particles | NPB 204 (1982) 375 | |
| 28 | BaBar Collaboration | Evidence for an excess of $ \bar{B} \to D^{(*)} \tau^-\bar{\nu}_\tau $ decays | PRL 109 (2012) 101802 | 1205.5442 |
| 29 | BaBar Collaboration | Measurement of an excess of $ \bar{B} \to D^{(*)}\tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau $ decays and implications for charged Higgs bosons | PRD 88 (2013) 072012 | 1303.0571 |
| 30 | Belle Collaboration | Observation of $ B^0 \to D^{*-} \tau^+ \nu_\tau $ decay at Belle | PRL 99 (2007) 191807 | 0706.4429 |
| 31 | Belle Collaboration | Observation of $ B^+ \to \bar{D}^{*0} \tau^+ \nu_\tau $ and evidence for $ B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 \tau^+ \nu_\tau $ at Belle | PRD 82 (2010) 072005 | 1005.2302 |
| 32 | Belle Collaboration | Measurement of the branching ratio of $ \bar{B} \to D^{(\ast)} \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau $ relative to $ \bar{B} \to D^{(\ast)} \ell^- \bar{\nu}_\ell $ decays with hadronic tagging at Belle | PRD 92 (2015) 072014 | 1507.03233 |
| 33 | Belle Collaboration | Measurement of the $ \tau $ lepton polarization and $ R(D^*) $ in the decay $ \bar{B} \to D^* \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau $ | PRL 118 (2017) 211801 | 1612.00529 |
| 34 | LHCb Collaboration | Measurement of form-factor-independent observables in the decay $ B^{0} \to K^{*0} \mu^+ \mu^- $ | PRL 111 (2013) 191801 | 1308.1707 |
| 35 | LHCb Collaboration | Test of lepton universality using $ B^{+}\rightarrow K^{+}\ell^{+}\ell^{-} $ decays | PRL 113 (2014) 151601 | 1406.6482 |
| 36 | LHCb Collaboration | Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions $ \mathcal{B}(\bar{B}^0 \to D^{*+}\tau^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\tau})/\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}^0 \to D^{*+}\mu^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\mu}) $ | PRL 115 (2015) 111803 | 1506.08614 |
| 37 | LHCb Collaboration | Angular analysis of the $ B^{0} \to K^{*0} \mu^{+} \mu^{-} $ decay using 3 fb$ ^{-1} $ of integrated luminosity | JHEP 02 (2016) 104 | 1512.04442 |
| 38 | LHCb Collaboration | Test of lepton universality with $ B^{0} \rightarrow K^{*0}\ell^{+}\ell^{-} $ decays | JHEP 08 (2017) 055 | 1705.05802 |
| 39 | M. Tanaka and R. Watanabe | New physics in the weak interaction of $ \bar B\to D^{(*)}\tau\bar\nu $ | PRD 87 (2013) 034028 | 1212.1878 |
| 40 | Y. Sakaki, M. Tanaka, A. Tayduganov, and R. Watanabe | Testing leptoquark models in $ \bar B \to D^{(*)} \tau \bar\nu $ | PRD 88 (2013) 094012 | 1309.0301 |
| 41 | I. Dor\vsner, S. Fajfer, N. Ko\vsnik, and I. Ni\vsand\vzi\'c | Minimally flavored colored scalar in $ \bar B \to D^{(*)} \tau \bar \nu $ and the mass matrices constraints | JHEP 11 (2013) 084 | 1306.6493 |
| 42 | B. Gripaios, M. Nardecchia, and S. A. Renner | Composite leptoquarks and anomalies in $ B $-meson decays | JHEP 05 (2015) 006 | 1412.1791 |
| 43 | ATLAS Collaboration | Search for heavy neutrinos and right-handed $ W $ bosons in events with two leptons and jets in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector | EPJC 72 (2012) 2056 | 1203.5420 |
| 44 | ATLAS Collaboration | Search for heavy Majorana neutrinos with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV | JHEP 07 (2015) 162 | 1506.06020 |
| 45 | ATLAS Collaboration | Search for third generation scalar leptoquarks in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector | JHEP 06 (2013) 033 | 1303.0526 |
| 46 | CMS Collaboration | Search for a heavy right-handed W boson and a heavy neutrino in events with two same-flavor leptons and two jets at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV | JHEP 05 (2018) 148 | CMS-EXO-17-011 1803.11116 |
| 47 | CMS Collaboration | Search for a heavy composite Majorana neutrino in the final state with two leptons and two quarks at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV | CMS-EXO-16-026 1706.08578 |
|
| 48 | CMS Collaboration | Search for third-generation scalar leptoquarks and heavy right-handed neutrinos in final states with two tau leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV | JHEP 07 (2017) 121 | CMS-EXO-16-023 1703.03995 |
| 49 | CMS Collaboration | Search for heavy neutrinos or third-generation leptoquarks in final states with two hadronically decaying $ \tau $ leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV | JHEP 03 (2017) 077 | CMS-EXO-16-016 1612.01190 |
| 50 | CMS Collaboration | Search for third-generation scalar leptoquarks decaying to a top quark and a $ \tau $ lepton at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV | Submitted to \it EPJC | CMS-B2G-16-028 1803.02864 |
| 51 | CMS Collaboration | Constraints on models of scalar and vector leptoquarks decaying to a quark and a neutrino at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV | CMS-SUS-18-001 1805.10228 |
|
| 52 | CMS Collaboration | Search for a singly produced third-generation scalar leptoquark decaying to a $ \tau $ lepton and a bottom quark in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV | CMS-EXO-17-029 1806.03472 |
|
| 53 | CMS Collaboration | Search for heavy neutrinos and $ \mathrm {W} $ bosons with right-handed couplings in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV | EPJC 74 (2014) 3149 | CMS-EXO-13-008 1407.3683 |
| 54 | CMS Collaboration | The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC | JINST 03 (2008) S08004 | CMS-00-001 |
| 55 | CMS Collaboration | Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the cms detector | JINST 12 (2017) P10003 | CMS-PRF-14-001 1706.04965 |
| 56 | M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez | The anti-$ {k_{\mathrm{T}}} $ jet clustering algorithm | JHEP 04 (2008) 063 | 0802.1189 |
| 57 | CMS Collaboration | Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data | CMS-PAS-JME-16-003 | CMS-PAS-JME-16-003 |
| 58 | CMS Collaboration | Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS | JINST 6 (2011) 11002 | CMS-JME-10-011 1107.4277 |
| 59 | CMS Collaboration | Study of pileup removal algorithms for jets | CMS-PAS-JME-14-001 | CMS-PAS-JME-14-001 |
| 60 | CMS Collaboration | Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV | JINST 13 (2018) P05011 | CMS-BTV-16-002 1712.07158 |
| 61 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV | JINST 10 (2015) P06005 | CMS-EGM-13-001 1502.02701 |
| 62 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV | JINST 13 (2018) P06015 | CMS-MUO-16-001 1804.04528 |
| 63 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of $ \tau $-lepton reconstruction and identification in CMS | JINST \bf 07 (2012) P01001 | |
| 64 | CMS Collaboration Collaboration | Performance of reconstruction and identification of tau leptons in their decays to hadrons and tau neutrino in LHC Run-2 | CMS-PAS-TAU-16-002, CERN, Geneva | |
| 65 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of missing energy reconstruction in 13 TeV pp collision data using the CMS detector | CMS-PAS-JME-16-004 | CMS-PAS-JME-16-004 |
| 66 | J. Alwall et al. | The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations | JHEP 07 (2014) 079 | 1405.0301 |
| 67 | T. Sjostrand et al. | An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 | CPC 191 (2015) 159 | 1410.3012 |
| 68 | M. Kramer, T. Plehn, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas | Pair production of scalar leptoquarks at the CERN LHC | PRD 71 (2005) 057503 | |
| 69 | F. del Aguila, J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, and R. Pittau | Heavy neutrino signals at large hadron colliders | JHEP 10 (2007) 047 | hep-ph/0703261 |
| 70 | J. Pumplin et al. | New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis | JHEP 07 (2002) 012 | hep-ph/0201195 |
| 71 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of the inclusive Z cross section via decays to tau pairs in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV | JHEP 08 (2011) 117 | |
| 72 | ATLAS Collaboration | A search for prompt lepton-jets in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the atlas detector | JHEP 02 (2016) 062 | |
| 73 | CMS Collaboration Collaboration | CMS Luminosity Measurements for the 2016 Data Taking Period | CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001, CERN, Geneva | |
| 74 | S. Alekhin et al. | The PDF4LHC Working Group Interim Report | 1101.0536 | |
| 75 | M. Botje et al. | The PDF4LHC Working Group Interim Recommendations | 1101.0538 | |
| 76 | P. M. Nadolsky et al. | Implications of CTEQ global analysis for collider observables | PRD 78 (2008) 013004 | 0802.0007 |
| 77 | A. D. Martin, W. J. Stirling, R. S. Thorne, and G. Watt | Update of parton distributions at NNLO | PLB 652 (2007) 292 | |
| 78 | M. Ubiali | NNPDF1.0 parton set for the LHC | NPPS 186 (2009) 62 | |
| 79 | T. Junk | Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics | NIMA 434 (1999) 435 | hep-ex/9902006 |
| 80 | A. L. Read | Presentation of search results: the $ CL_s $ technique | JPG 28 (2002) 2693 | |
| 81 | ATLAS and CMS Collaborations | Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 | CMS-NOTE-2011-005 | |
| 82 | R. J. Barlow and C. Beeston | Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples | CPC 77 (1993) | |
| 83 | M. Kramer, T. Plehn, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas | Pair production of scalar leptoquarks at the CERN LHC | PRD 71 (2005) 057503 | hep-ph/0411038 |
|
|
Compact Muon Solenoid LHC, CERN |
|
|
|
|
|
|