CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-EXO-17-016 ; CERN-EP-2018-272
Search for heavy neutrinos and third-generation leptoquarks in hadronic states of two $\tau$ leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV
JHEP 03 (2019) 170
Abstract: A search for new particles has been conducted using events with two high transverse momentum $\tau$ leptons that decay hadronically and at least two energetic jets. The analysis is performed using data from proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV, collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC in 2016 and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The observed data are consistent with standard model expectations. The results are interpreted in the context of two physics models. The first model involves right-handed charged bosons, $\mathrm{W}_{R}$, that decay to heavy right-handed Majorana neutrinos, ${\mathrm{N}_{\ell}} $ ($\ell= \mathrm{e}$, $\mu$, $\tau$), arising in a left-right symmetric extension of the standard model. The model considers that ${\mathrm{N}_{\mathrm{e}}} $ and ${\mathrm{N}_{\mu}} $ are too heavy to be detected at the LHC. Assuming that the ${\mathrm{N}_{\tau}} $ mass is half of the $\mathrm{W}_{R}$ mass, masses of the $\mathrm{W}_{R}$ boson below 3.50 TeV are excluded at 95% confidence level. Exclusion limits are also presented considering different scenarios for the mass ratio between ${\mathrm{N}_{\tau}} $ and $\mathrm{W}_{R}$, as a function of $\mathrm{W}_{R}$ mass. In the second model, pair production of third-generation scalar leptoquarks that decay into $\tau\tau\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b}$ is considered, resulting in an observed exclusion region with leptoquark masses below 1.02 TeV, assuming a 100% branching fraction for the leptoquark decay to a $\tau$ lepton and a bottom quark. These results represent the most stringent limits to date on these models.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Leading order Feynman diagram for the production of a right-handed $ {\mathrm {W_R}}$ that decays to a heavy neutrino $ {\mathrm {N}_{{\tau}}} $, with a final state of two $\tau $ leptons and two jets.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Leading order Feynman diagrams for the pair-production of LQs, leading to final states with two $\tau $ leptons and two b quarks.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Leading order Feynman diagram for the pair-production of LQs, leading to final states with two $\tau $ leptons and two b quarks.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Leading order Feynman diagram for the pair-production of LQs, leading to final states with two $\tau $ leptons and two b quarks.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
Leading order Feynman diagram for the pair-production of LQs, leading to final states with two $\tau $ leptons and two b quarks.

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
Leading order Feynman diagram for the pair-production of LQs, leading to final states with two $\tau $ leptons and two b quarks.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Distributions in $m(\tau _{\mathrm {h},1},\tau _{\mathrm {h},2},\mathrm {j}_{1}, \mathrm {j}_{2}, {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}})$ (left), for the $ {\mathrm {Z}} (\tau \tau)$ control sample with relaxed $ {{\tau} _\mathrm {h}} $ candidate ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ thresholds and $m(\tau _{\mathrm {h},1},\tau _{\mathrm {h},2}) < $ 100 GeV, and $S^{\mathrm {MET}}_{\mathrm {T}}$ (right), for the $ {{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} (\mu \mu \mathrm {jj})$ control sample. The bottom frames show the ratio between the observed data in the control samples and the total background (Bkg) predictions. The bands correspond to the statistical uncertainty for the background.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Distribution in $m(\tau _{\mathrm {h},1},\tau _{\mathrm {h},2},\mathrm {j}_{1}, \mathrm {j}_{2}, {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}})$, for the $ {\mathrm {Z}} (\tau \tau)$ control sample with relaxed $ {{\tau} _\mathrm {h}} $ candidate ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ thresholds and $m(\tau _{\mathrm {h},1},\tau _{\mathrm {h},2}) < $ 100 GeV. The bottom frame shows the ratio between the observed data in the control samples and the total background (Bkg) predictions. The band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty for the background.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Distribution in $S^{\mathrm {MET}}_{\mathrm {T}}$, for the $ {{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} (\mu \mu \mathrm {jj})$ control sample. The bottom frame shows the ratio between the observed data in the control samples and the total background (Bkg) predictions. The band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty for the background.

png pdf
Figure 4:
QCD multijet background validation test, using the distributions in CR $B$ $m(\tau _{\mathrm {h},1},\tau _{\mathrm {h},2},\mathrm {j}_{1},\mathrm {j}_{2}, {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}})$ (left) and $S_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {MET}}$ (right). The shape of the QCD background is found from data in the loose $ {{\tau} _\mathrm {h}} $ region, CR $A$ and then applied to CR $B$, defined by $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{miss} < $ 50 GeV and tight $ {{\tau} _\mathrm {h}} $ isolation. For both samples, the non-QCD contributions are estimated from simulation. Note that the normalizations match by construction. The bottom frame shows the ratio between the observed data in CR $B$ and the total background estimation.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
QCD multijet background validation test, using the distribution in CR $B$ $m(\tau _{\mathrm {h},1},\tau _{\mathrm {h},2},\mathrm {j}_{1},\mathrm {j}_{2}, {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}})$. shape of the QCD background is found from data in the loose $ {{\tau} _\mathrm {h}} $ region, CR $A$ and then applied to CR $B$, defined by $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{miss} < $ 50 GeV and tight $ {{\tau} _\mathrm {h}} $ isolation. The non-QCD contributions are estimated from simulation. Note that the normalizations match by construction. The bottom frame shows the ratio between the observed data in CR $B$ and the total background estimation.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
QCD multijet background validation test, using the distribution in CR $B$ $S_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {MET}}$. The shape of the QCD background is found from data in the loose $ {{\tau} _\mathrm {h}} $ region, CR $A$ and then applied to CR $B$, defined by $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{miss} < $ 50 GeV and tight $ {{\tau} _\mathrm {h}} $ isolation. The non-QCD contributions are estimated from simulation. Note that the normalizations match by construction. The bottom frame shows the ratio between the observed data in CR $B$ and the total background estimation.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Distributions in $m(\tau _{\mathrm {h},1},\tau _{\mathrm {h},2},\mathrm {j}_{1},\mathrm {j}_{2}, {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}})$ (left) and $S_{T}^{\mathrm {MET}}$ (right) for the estimated background in the signal region. The heavy neutrino model with $m({\mathrm {W_R}}) = $ 3 TeV and $m({\mathrm {N}_{{\tau}}}) = $ 1.5 TeV is used as a benchmark in the $m(\tau _{\mathrm {h},1},\tau _{\mathrm {h},2},\mathrm {j}_{1},\mathrm {j}_{2}, {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}})$ distribution, while the leptoquark model with $m({\mathrm {LQ}}) = $ 1 TeV is used as a benchmark in the $S_{T}^{\mathrm {MET}}$ distribution. The bottom frame shows the ratio between the observed data and the background estimation; the band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty in the background. The ${{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}$, QCD multijet, and Z+jets contributions are estimated employing control regions in data and simulation, while the other contributions are obtained fully from the simulation.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Distribution in $m(\tau _{\mathrm {h},1},\tau _{\mathrm {h},2},\mathrm {j}_{1},\mathrm {j}_{2}, {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}})$ for the estimated background in the signal region. The heavy neutrino model with $m({\mathrm {W_R}}) = $ 3 TeV and $m({\mathrm {N}_{{\tau}}}) = $ 1.5 TeV is used as a benchmark in the $m(\tau _{\mathrm {h},1},\tau _{\mathrm {h},2},\mathrm {j}_{1},\mathrm {j}_{2}, {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}})$ distribution, while the leptoquark model with $m({\mathrm {LQ}}) = $ 1 TeV is used as a benchmark in the $S_{T}^{\mathrm {MET}}$ distribution. The bottom frame shows the ratio between the observed data and the background estimation; the band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty in the background. The ${{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}$, QCD multijet, and Z+jets contributions are estimated employing control regions in data and simulation, while the other contributions are obtained fully from the simulation.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Distribution in $S_{T}^{\mathrm {MET}}$ for the estimated background in the signal region. The heavy neutrino model with $m({\mathrm {W_R}}) = $ 3 TeV and $m({\mathrm {N}_{{\tau}}}) = $ 1.5 TeV is used as a benchmark in the $m(\tau _{\mathrm {h},1},\tau _{\mathrm {h},2},\mathrm {j}_{1},\mathrm {j}_{2}, {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}})$ distribution, while the leptoquark model with $m({\mathrm {LQ}}) = $ 1 TeV is used as a benchmark in the $S_{T}^{\mathrm {MET}}$ distribution. The bottom frame shows the ratio between the observed data and the background estimation; the band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty in the background. The ${{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}$, QCD multijet, and Z+jets contributions are estimated employing control regions in data and simulation, while the other contributions are obtained fully from the simulation.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and the branching fraction for the production of $ {\mathrm {W_R}}$ (left) decaying to $ {\mathrm {N}_{{\tau}}} $ and for a pair of leptoquarks each decaying to $\tau {\mathrm {b}} $ (right), as functions of the produced particle mass. The observed limits are shown as solid black lines. Expected limits and their one- (two-) standard deviation limits are shown by dashed lines with green (yellow) bands. The theoretical cross sections are indicated by the solid blue lines.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Upper limit at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and the branching fraction for the production of $ {\mathrm {W_R}}$ decaying to $ {\mathrm {N}_{{\tau}}} $, as function of the produced $ {\mathrm {W_R}}$ mass. The observed limit is shown as a solid black line. The expected limit and its one- (two-) standard deviation limits are shown by a dashed line with green (yellow) bands. The theoretical cross section is indicated by the solid blue line.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Upper limit at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and the branching fraction for the production a pair of leptoquarks each decaying to $\tau {\mathrm {b}} $, as function of the produced leptoquark mass. The observed limit is shown as a solid black line. The expected limits and its one- (two-) standard deviation limits are shown by a dashed line with green (yellow) bands. The theoretical cross section is indicated by the solid blue line.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and the branching fraction ($ {\mathrm {W_R}}\to \tau {\mathrm {N}_{{\tau}}} $) as a function of $m({\mathrm {W_R}})$ and $m({\mathrm {N}_{{\tau}}})/m({\mathrm {W_R}})$.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of systematic uncertainties, given in percent. The $ {{\tau} _\mathrm {h}} $ identification, JES, and TES uncertainties are also considered as uncertainties in the shapes of the $m(\tau _{\mathrm {h},1},\tau _{\mathrm {h},2},\mathrm {j}_{1},\mathrm {j}_{2}, {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}})$ and $S^{\mathrm {MET}}_{\mathrm {T}}$ distributions. Not included in the table are the bin-by-bin statistical uncertainties, which increase with larger values of mass and $S_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {MET}}$.

png pdf
Table 2:
Estimated background and signal yields in the SR and their total uncertainties. The expected number of events for the $ {\mathrm {W_R}}$ signal sample assumes $m({\mathrm {N}_{{\tau}}}) = m({\mathrm {W_R}})/2$.
Summary
A search is performed for physics beyond the standard model in events with two energetic $\tau$ leptons and two energetic jets, using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ collected in 2016 with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV. The search focuses on two benchmark scenarios: (1) the production of heavy right-handed Majorana neutrinos, ${\mathrm{N}_{\ell}} $, and right-handed $\mathrm{W}_{R}$ bosons, which arise in the left-right symmetric extensions of the standard model and where the $\mathrm{W}_{R}$ and ${\mathrm{N}_{\ell}} $ decay chains result in a pair of high transverse momentum $\tau$ leptons; and (2) the pair production of third-generation scalar leptoquarks that decay to $\tau\tau\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b}$. The observed $m(\tau_{\mathrm{h},1},\tau_{\mathrm{h},2},\mathrm{j}_{1},\mathrm{j}_{2},p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}})$ and $S^{\mathrm{MET}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ distributions do not reveal any evidence for physics beyond the standard model. Assuming that only the ${\mathrm{N}_{\tau}} $ flavor contributes significantly to the $\mathrm{W}_{R}$ decay width, $\mathrm{W}_{R}$ masses below 3.52 (2.75) TeV are excluded at 95% confidence level, assuming the ${\mathrm{N}_{\tau}} $ mass is 0.8 (0.2) times the mass of the $\mathrm{W}_{R}$ boson. In the second beyond the standard model scenario, leptoquarks with a mass less than 1.02 TeV are excluded at 95% confidence level, to be compared with an expected mass limit of 1.00 TeV. Both of these results represent the most stringent limits to date for $\tau \tau \mathrm{j} \mathrm{j}$ final states.
References
1 Particle Data Group, C. Patrignani et al. Review of particle physics CPC 40 (2016) 100001
2 M. Lindner, T. Ohlsson, and G. Seidl Seesaw mechanisms for Dirac and Majorana neutrino masses PRD 65 (2002) 053014 hep-ph/0109264
3 P. Minkowski $ \mu \to e\gamma $ at a rate of one out of $ 10^{9} $ muon decays? PLB 67 (1977) 421
4 R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity nonconservation PRL 44 (1980) 912
5 M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky Complex spinors and unified theories in Supergravity, p. 315 Elsevier Science Ltd, New York, September, 1979 Conference number C79-09-27 1306.4669
6 T. Yanagida Horizontal symmetry and masses of neutrinos Prog. Theor. Phys. 64 (1980) 1103
7 R. N. Mohapatra and R. E. Marshak Local B-L Symmetry of electroweak interactions, Majorana neutrinos and neutron oscillations PRL 44 (1980) 1316, .[Erratum: \DOI10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.1316]
8 J. C. Pati and A. Salam Unified lepton-hadron symmetry and a gauge theory of the basic interactions PRD 8 (1973) 1240
9 J. C. Pati and A. Salam Lepton number as the fourth color PRD 10 (1974) 275, . [Erratum: \DOI10.1103/PhysRevD.11.703.2]
10 H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow Unity of all elementary particle forces PRL 32 (1974) 438
11 H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski Unified interactions of leptons and hadrons Ann. Phys. 93 (1975) 193
12 S. Dimopoulos and L. Susskind Mass without scalars NPB 155 (1979) 237
13 S. Dimopoulos Technicolored signatures NPB 168 (1980) 69
14 E. Farhi and L. Susskind Technicolor PR 74 (1981) 277
15 K. D. Lane and M. V. Ramana Walking technicolor signatures at hadron colliders PRD 44 (1991) 2678
16 B. Schrempp and F. Schrempp Light leptoquarks PLB 153 (1985) 101
17 B. Gripaios Composite leptoquarks at the LHC JHEP 02 (2010) 045 0910.1789
18 G. R. Farrar and P. Fayet Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with supersymmetry PLB 76 (1978) 575
19 P. Ramond Dual theory for free fermions PRD 3 (1971) 2415
20 Y. A. Golfand and E. P. Likhtman Extension of the algebra of Poincare group generators and violation of p invariance JEPTL 13 (1971)323
21 A. Neveu and J. H. Schwarz Factorizable dual model of pions NPB 31 (1971) 86
22 D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov Possible universal neutrino interaction JEPTL 16 (1972)438
23 J. Wess and B. Zumino A Lagrangian model invariant under supergauge transformations PLB 49 (1974) 52
24 J. Wess and B. Zumino Supergauge transformations in four dimensions NPB 70 (1974) 39
25 P. Fayet Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino NPB 90 (1975) 104
26 H. P. Nilles Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics PR 110 (1984) 1
27 R. Barbier et al. R-parity violating supersymmetry PR 420 (2005) 1 hep-ph/0406039
28 W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler Constraints on SU(5)-type leptoquarks PLB 177 (1986) 377
29 O. U. Shanker $ \pi \ell $2, $ K \ell $3 and $ K^{0}-\bar{K}^{0} $ constraints on leptoquarks and supersymmetric particles NPB 204 (1982) 375
30 BaBar Collaboration Evidence for an excess of $ \bar{B} \to D^{(*)} \tau^-\bar{\nu}_\tau $ decays PRL 109 (2012) 101802 1205.5442
31 BaBar Collaboration Measurement of an excess of $ \bar{B} \to D^{(*)}\tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau $ decays and implications for charged Higgs bosons PRD 88 (2013) 072012 1303.0571
32 Belle Collaboration Observation of $ B^0 \to D^{*-} \tau^+ \nu_\tau $ decay at Belle PRL 99 (2007) 191807 0706.4429
33 Belle Collaboration Observation of $ B^+ \to \bar{D}^{*0} \tau^+ \nu_\tau $ and evidence for $ B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 \tau^+ \nu_\tau $ at Belle PRD 82 (2010) 072005 1005.2302
34 Belle Collaboration Measurement of the branching ratio of $ \bar{B} \to D^{(\ast)} \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau $ relative to $ \bar{B} \to D^{(\ast)} \ell^- \bar{\nu}_\ell $ decays with hadronic tagging at Belle PRD 92 (2015) 072014 1507.03233
35 Belle Collaboration Measurement of the $ \tau $ lepton polarization and $ R(D^*) $ in the decay $ \bar{B} \to D^* \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau $ PRL 118 (2017) 211801 1612.00529
36 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of form-factor-independent observables in the decay $ B^{0} \to K^{*0} \mu^+ \mu^- $ PRL 111 (2013) 191801 1308.1707
37 LHCb Collaboration Test of lepton universality using $ B^{+}\rightarrow K^{+}\ell^{+}\ell^{-} $ decays PRL 113 (2014) 151601 1406.6482
38 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions $ \mathcal{B}(\bar{B}^0 \to D^{*+}\tau^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\tau})/\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}^0 \to D^{*+}\mu^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\mu}) $ PRL 115 (2015) 111803 1506.08614
39 LHCb Collaboration Angular analysis of the $ B^{0} \to K^{*0} \mu^{+} \mu^{-} $ decay using 3 fb$ ^{-1} $ of integrated luminosity JHEP 02 (2016) 104 1512.04442
40 LHCb Collaboration Test of lepton universality with $ B^{0} \rightarrow K^{*0}\ell^{+}\ell^{-} $ decays JHEP 08 (2017) 055 1705.05802
41 M. Tanaka and R. Watanabe New physics in the weak interaction of $ \bar B\to D^{(*)}\tau\bar\nu $ PRD 87 (2013) 034028 1212.1878
42 Y. Sakaki, M. Tanaka, A. Tayduganov, and R. Watanabe Testing leptoquark models in $ \bar B \to D^{(*)} \tau \bar\nu $ PRD 88 (2013) 094012 1309.0301
43 I. Dorsner, S. Fajfer, N. Kosnik, and I. Nisandzic Minimally flavored colored scalar in $ \bar B \to D^{(*)} \tau \bar \nu $ and the mass matrices constraints JHEP 11 (2013) 084 1306.6493
44 B. Gripaios, M. Nardecchia, and S. A. Renner Composite leptoquarks and anomalies in $ B $-meson decays JHEP 05 (2015) 006 1412.1791
45 ATLAS Collaboration Search for heavy neutrinos and right-handed $ W $ bosons in events with two leptons and jets in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC 72 (2012) 2056 1203.5420
46 ATLAS Collaboration Search for heavy Majorana neutrinos with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV JHEP 07 (2015) 162 1506.06020
47 ATLAS Collaboration Search for third generation scalar leptoquarks in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 06 (2013) 033 1303.0526
48 CMS Collaboration Search for a heavy right-handed W boson and a heavy neutrino in events with two same-flavor leptons and two jets at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 05 (2018) 148 CMS-EXO-17-011
1803.11116
49 CMS Collaboration Search for a heavy composite Majorana neutrino in the final state with two leptons and two quarks at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PLB 775 (2017) 315 CMS-EXO-16-026
1706.08578
50 CMS Collaboration Search for third-generation scalar leptoquarks and heavy right-handed neutrinos in final states with two tau leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2017) 121 CMS-EXO-16-023
1703.03995
51 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy neutrinos or third-generation leptoquarks in final states with two hadronically decaying $ \tau $ leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 03 (2017) 077 CMS-EXO-16-016
1612.01190
52 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy neutrinos and $ \mathrm {W} $ bosons with right-handed couplings in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV EPJC 74 (2014) 3149 CMS-EXO-13-008
1407.3683
53 CMS Collaboration Search for third-generation scalar leptoquarks decaying to a top quark and a $ \tau $ lepton at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV EPJC 78 (2018) 707 CMS-B2G-16-028
1803.02864
54 CMS Collaboration Constraints on models of scalar and vector leptoquarks decaying to a quark and a neutrino at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PRD 98 (2018) 032005 CMS-SUS-18-001
1805.10228
55 CMS Collaboration Search for a singly produced third-generation scalar leptoquark decaying to a $ \tau $ lepton and a bottom quark in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 115 CMS-EXO-17-029
1806.03472
56 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 03 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
57 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the cms detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
58 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ {k_{\mathrm{T}}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
59 CMS Collaboration Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data CMS-PAS-JME-16-003 CMS-PAS-JME-16-003
60 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) 11002 CMS-JME-10-011
1107.4277
61 CMS Collaboration Study of pileup removal algorithms for jets CMS-PAS-JME-14-001 CMS-PAS-JME-14-001
62 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
63 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
64 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
65 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2008) 119 0707.1378
66 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
67 CMS Collaboration Performance of reconstruction and identification of $ \tau $ leptons decaying to hadrons and $ \nu_\tau $ in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P10005 CMS-TAU-16-003
1809.02816
68 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector CMS-PAS-JME-17-001 CMS-PAS-JME-17-001
69 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
70 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
71 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
72 M. Kramer, T. Plehn, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas Pair production of scalar leptoquarks at the CERN LHC PRD 71 (2005) 057503 hep-ph/0411038
73 F. del Aguila, J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, and R. Pittau Heavy neutrino signals at large hadron colliders JHEP 10 (2007) 047 hep-ph/0703261
74 J. Pumplin et al. New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis JHEP 07 (2002) 012 hep-ph/0201195
75 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive Z cross section via decays to tau pairs in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 08 (2011) 117 CMS-EWK-10-013
1104.1617
76 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
77 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
78 S. Alekhin et al. The PDF4LHC working group interim report 1101.0536
79 M. Botje et al. The PDF4LHC working group interim recommendations 1101.0538
80 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
81 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ CL_s $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
82 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 CMS-NOTE-2011-005
83 R. J. Barlow and C. Beeston Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples CPC 77 (1993) 219
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN