CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-B2G-16-004 ; CERN-EP/2016-296
Search for massive resonances decaying into WW, WZ or ZZ bosons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
JHEP 03 (2017) 162
Abstract: A search is presented for new massive resonances decaying to WW, WZ or ZZ bosons in $\ell\nu\mathrm{q\bar{q}}$ and $\mathrm{q\bar{q}}\mathrm{q\bar{q}}$ final states. Results are based on data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.3-2.7 fb$^{-1}$ recorded in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the CMS detector at the LHC. Decays of spin-1 and spin-2 resonances into two vector bosons are sought in the mass range 0.6-4.0 TeV. No significant excess over the standard model background is observed. Combining the results of the $\ell\nu\mathrm{q\bar{q}}$ and $\mathrm{q\bar{q}}\mathrm{q\bar{q}}$ final states, cross section and mass exclusion limits are set for models that predict heavy spin-1 and spin-2 resonances. This is the first search for a narrow-width spin-2 resonance at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Final ${m_\mathrm {jj}}$ distributions for the dijet analysis in six signal regions. The high-purity (on the left) and the low-purity (on the right) categories are shown for the WW (top row), WZ (central row), and ZZ (bottom row) ${m_{\text {jet}}}$ regions. The solid curve represents a background-only fit to the data distribution, where the filled red area corresponds to the $\pm $1 standard deviation statistical uncertainties of the fit. The data are represented by the black points. For the ZZ high-purity category (bottom left), we also show the background-only fit using the two-parameter functional form (blue solid line), for comparison. Signal benchmarks for a mass of 2 TeV are also shown with black dashed lines. In the lower panel of each plot, the bin-by-bin fit residuals, $(N_\text {data} - N_\text {fit})/\sigma _\text {data}$, are shown.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Final ${m_\mathrm {jj}}$ distributions for the dijet analysis: high-purity category for the WW ${m_{\text {jet}}}$ region. The solid curve represents a background-only fit to the data distribution, where the filled red area corresponds to the $\pm $1 standard deviation statistical uncertainties of the fit. The data are represented by the black points. Signal benchmark for a mass of 2 TeV is also shown with black dashed lines. In the lower panel, the bin-by-bin fit residuals, $(N_\text {data} - N_\text {fit})/\sigma _\text {data}$, are shown.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Final ${m_\mathrm {jj}}$ distributions for the dijet analysis: low-purity category for the WW ${m_{\text {jet}}}$ region. The solid curve represents a background-only fit to the data distribution, where the filled red area corresponds to the $\pm $1 standard deviation statistical uncertainties of the fit. The data are represented by the black points. Signal benchmark for a mass of 2 TeV is also shown with black dashed lines. In the lower panel, the bin-by-bin fit residuals, $(N_\text {data} - N_\text {fit})/\sigma _\text {data}$, are shown.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
Final ${m_\mathrm {jj}}$ distributions for the dijet analysis: high-purity category for the WZ ${m_{\text {jet}}}$ region. The solid curve represents a background-only fit to the data distribution, where the filled red area corresponds to the $\pm $1 standard deviation statistical uncertainties of the fit. The data are represented by the black points. Signal benchmark for a mass of 2 TeV is also shown with black dashed lines. In the lower panel, the bin-by-bin fit residuals, $(N_\text {data} - N_\text {fit})/\sigma _\text {data}$, are shown.

png pdf
Figure 1-d:
Final ${m_\mathrm {jj}}$ distributions for the dijet analysis: low-purity category for the WZ ${m_{\text {jet}}}$ region. The solid curve represents a background-only fit to the data distribution, where the filled red area corresponds to the $\pm $1 standard deviation statistical uncertainties of the fit. The data are represented by the black points. Signal benchmark for a mass of 2 TeV is also shown with black dashed lines. In the lower panel, the bin-by-bin fit residuals, $(N_\text {data} - N_\text {fit})/\sigma _\text {data}$, are shown.

png pdf
Figure 1-e:
Final ${m_\mathrm {jj}}$ distributions for the dijet analysis: high-purity category for the ZZ ${m_{\text {jet}}}$ region. The solid curve represents a background-only fit to the data distribution, where the filled red area corresponds to the $\pm $1 standard deviation statistical uncertainties of the fit. The data are represented by the black points. We also show the background-only fit using the two-parameter functional form (blue solid line), for comparison. Signal benchmark for a mass of 2 TeV is also shown with black dashed lines. In the lower panel, the bin-by-bin fit residuals, $(N_\text {data} - N_\text {fit})/\sigma _\text {data}$, are shown.

png pdf
Figure 1-f:
Final ${m_\mathrm {jj}}$ distributions for the dijet analysis: low-purity category for the ZZ ${m_{\text {jet}}}$ region. The solid curve represents a background-only fit to the data distribution, where the filled red area corresponds to the $\pm $1 standard deviation statistical uncertainties of the fit. The data are represented by the black points. Signal benchmark for a mass of 2 TeV is also shown with black dashed lines. In the lower panel, the bin-by-bin fit residuals, $(N_\text {data} - N_\text {fit})/\sigma _\text {data}$, are shown.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Distributions in $N$-subjettiness ratio $ {\tau _{21}}$ (left) and pruned $ {m_{\text {jet}}}$ (right) from the top quark enriched control sample in the muon channel. The ${\mathrm{ t } \mathrm{ \bar{t} } }$ background is rescaled such that the total number of background events matches the number of events in data. In the lower panel of each plot, the ratio between data and simulation is shown together with the statistical uncertainty in the simulation normalized by its central value.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Distribution in $N$-subjettiness ratio $ {\tau _{21}}$ from the top quark enriched control sample in the muon channel. The ${\mathrm{ t } \mathrm{ \bar{t} } }$ background is rescaled such that the total number of background events matches the number of events in data. In the lower panel, the ratio between data and simulation is shown together with the statistical uncertainty in the simulation normalized by its central value.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Distribution in $pruned $ {m_{\text {jet}}}$ from the top quark enriched control sample in the muon channel. The ${\mathrm{ t } \mathrm{ \bar{t} } }$ background is rescaled such that the total number of background events matches the number of events in data. In the lower panel, the ratio between data and simulation is shown together with the statistical uncertainty in the simulation normalized by its central value.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Distributions of the pruned jet mass $ {m_{\text {jet}}}$ in the ${\ell \nu }$+jet high-mass (left) and low-mass (right) analyses in the muon channel. All selections are applied except the requirement on $ {m_{\text {jet}}}$ signal window. Data are shown as black points. The signal regions and $ {m_{\text {jet}}}$ categories of the analyses are indicated by the vertical dotted lines. The shaded $ {m_{\text {jet}}}$ region 105 -135 GeV is not used in these analyses. In the lower panel of each plot, the bin-by-bin fit residuals, $(N_\text {data}- N_\text {fit})/\sigma _\text {data}$, are shown together with the uncertainty band of the fit normalized by the statistical uncertainty of data points, $\sigma _\text {data}$.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Distribution of the pruned jet mass $ {m_{\text {jet}}}$ in the ${\ell \nu }$+jet high-mass analysis in the muon channel. All selections are applied except the requirement on $ {m_{\text {jet}}}$ signal window. Data are shown as black points. The signal regions and $ {m_{\text {jet}}}$ categories of the analyses are indicated by the vertical dotted lines. The shaded $ {m_{\text {jet}}}$ region 105 -135 GeV is not used in these analyses. In the lower panel, the bin-by-bin fit residuals, $(N_\text {data}- N_\text {fit})/\sigma _\text {data}$, are shown together with the uncertainty band of the fit normalized by the statistical uncertainty of data points, $\sigma _\text {data}$.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Distribution of the pruned jet mass $ {m_{\text {jet}}}$ in the ${\ell \nu }$+jet low-mass analysis in the muon channel. All selections are applied except the requirement on $ {m_{\text {jet}}}$ signal window. Data are shown as black points. The signal regions and $ {m_{\text {jet}}}$ categories of the analyses are indicated by the vertical dotted lines. The shaded $ {m_{\text {jet}}}$ region 105 -135 GeV is not used in these analyses. In the lower panel, the bin-by-bin fit residuals, $(N_\text {data}- N_\text {fit})/\sigma _\text {data}$, are shown together with the uncertainty band of the fit normalized by the statistical uncertainty of data points, $\sigma _\text {data}$.

png pdf
Figure 4:
(Upper plots) Final $ {m_{ {\mathrm {V}} {\mathrm {V}} }} $ distributions for data and expected backgrounds in the high-mass analysis obtained from the combined muon and electron channels in the WW-enriched (left) and WZ-enriched (right) signal regions. (Lower plot) Final $ {m_{ {\mathrm {V}} {\mathrm {V}} }} $ distributions for data and expected backgrounds in the signal region of the low-mass analysis obtained from the combined muon and electron channels. In each plot the solid curve represents the background estimation provided by the $\alpha $ ratio method. The hatched band includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties. The data are shown as black points. Signal benchmarks for a mass of 2 TeV (0.75 TeV) are also shown with black dashed lines for the upper (lower) plots. In the lower panel of each plot are the bin-by-bin fit residuals, ($N_\text {data}- N_\text {fit}$)/$\sigma _\text {data}$, shown together with the uncertainty band of the fit normalized by the statistical uncertainty of data, $\sigma _\text {data}$.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Final $ {m_{ {\mathrm {V}} {\mathrm {V}} }} $ distribution for data and expected backgrounds in the high-mass analysis obtained from the combined muon and electron channels in the WW-enriched signal region. The solid curve represents the background estimation provided by the $\alpha $ ratio method. The hatched band includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties. The data are shown as black points. Signal benchmarks for a mass of 2 TeV (0.75 TeV) are also shown with black dashed lines for the upper (lower) plots. In the lower panel are the bin-by-bin fit residuals, ($N_\text {data}- N_\text {fit}$)/$\sigma _\text {data}$, shown together with the uncertainty band of the fit normalized by the statistical uncertainty of data, $\sigma _\text {data}$.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Final $ {m_{ {\mathrm {V}} {\mathrm {V}} }} $ distribution for data and expected backgrounds in the high-mass analysis obtained from the combined muon and electron channels in the WZ-enriched signal region. The solid curve represents the background estimation provided by the $\alpha $ ratio method. The hatched band includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties. The data are shown as black points. Signal benchmarks for a mass of 2 TeV (0.75 TeV) are also shown with black dashed lines for the upper (lower) plots. In the lower panel are the bin-by-bin fit residuals, ($N_\text {data}- N_\text {fit}$)/$\sigma _\text {data}$, shown together with the uncertainty band of the fit normalized by the statistical uncertainty of data, $\sigma _\text {data}$.

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
Final $ {m_{ {\mathrm {V}} {\mathrm {V}} }} $ distribution for data and expected backgrounds in the signal region of the low-mass analysis obtained from the combined muon and electron channels. The solid curve represents the background estimation provided by the $\alpha $ ratio method. The hatched band includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties. The data are shown as black points. Signal benchmarks for a mass of 2 TeV (0.75 TeV) are also shown with black dashed lines for the upper (lower) plots. In the lower panel are the bin-by-bin fit residuals, ($N_\text {data}- N_\text {fit}$)/$\sigma _\text {data}$, shown together with the uncertainty band of the fit normalized by the statistical uncertainty of data, $\sigma _\text {data}$.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Dijet invariant mass (left) and $m_{\ell \nu +{\rm jet}}$ (right) distributions expected for different signal mass hypotheses.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Dijet invariant mass distribution expected for different signal mass hypotheses.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
$m_{\ell \nu +{\rm jet}}$ distribution expected for different signal mass hypotheses.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Observed (black solid) and expected (black dashed) 95% CL upper limits on the production of a narrow-width resonance decaying to a pair of vector bosons for different signal hypotheses. In the upper plots, limits are set in the context of a spin-1 neutral Z' (left) and charged W' (right) resonances, and compared with the prediction of the HVT Models A and B. In the lower left plot, limits are set in the same model under the triplet hypothesis (W' and Z'). In the lower right plot, limits are set in the context of a bulk graviton with $ {k/\overline {M}_\mathrm {Pl}} =$ 0.5 and compared with the prediction. For $\mathrm {G}_\text {bulk}$, Z' and triplet signals (W' signal) with masses <0.8 TeV (<0.75 TeV), the limits are obtained from the low-mass ${\ell \nu }$+jet channel, while for the higher masses they are obtained from the high-mass ${\ell \nu }$+jet and dijet channels.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Observed (black solid) and expected (black dashed) 95% CL upper limits on the production of a narrow-width resonance decaying to a pair of vector bosons in the context of a spin-1 neutral Z' resonance, compared with the prediction of the HVT Models A and B.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Observed (black solid) and expected (black dashed) 95% CL upper limits on the production of a narrow-width resonance decaying to a pair of vector bosons in the context of a spin-1 charged W' resonance, compared with the prediction of the HVT Models A and B.

png pdf
Figure 6-c:
Observed (black solid) and expected (black dashed) 95% CL upper limits on the production of a narrow-width resonance decaying to a pair of vector bosons for the HVT Models A and B under the triplet hypothesis (W' and Z').

png pdf
Figure 6-d:
Observed (black solid) and expected (black dashed) 95% CL upper limits on the production of a narrow-width resonance decaying to a pair of vector bosons in the context of a bulk graviton with $ {k/\overline {M}_\mathrm {Pl}} =$ 0.5 and compared with the prediction. .

png pdf
Figure 7:
Exclusion regions in the plane of the HVT couplings ($g^2c_\mathrm {F}/g_{ {\mathrm {V}}},g_{ {\mathrm {V}}}c_\mathrm {H}$) for three resonance masses, 1.5, 2.0, and 3.5 TeV . Model points A and B of the benchmarks used in the analysis are also shown. The solid, dashed, and dashed-dotted lines represent the boundaries of the regions excluded by this search for different resonance masses (the region outside these lines is excluded). The areas indicated by the solid shading correspond to regions where the resonance width is predicted to be more than 5% of the resonance mass and the narrow-resonance assumption is not satisfied.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL on the number of events for a $\mathrm{ W } {\mathrm {V}}\to {\ell \nu }$+jet (left) and a $ {\mathrm {V}} {\mathrm {V}}\to \text {dijet}$ (right) resonance, as a function of its mass and normalized width. The dark shaded area denotes the kinematic regime where the limit is valid only for the quark-antiquark annihilation processes.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL on the number of events for a $\mathrm{ W } {\mathrm {V}}\to {\ell \nu }$+jet (left) and a $ {\mathrm {V}} {\mathrm {V}}\to \text {dijet}$ (right) resonance, as a function of its mass and normalized width. The dark shaded area denotes the kinematic regime where the limit is valid only for the quark-antiquark annihilation processes.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL on the number of events for a $\mathrm{ W } {\mathrm {V}}\to {\ell \nu }$+jet (left) and a $ {\mathrm {V}} {\mathrm {V}}\to \text {dijet}$ (right) resonance, as a function of its mass and normalized width. The dark shaded area denotes the kinematic regime where the limit is valid only for the quark-antiquark annihilation processes.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Data-to-simulation scale factors for the efficiency of the ${\tau _{21}}$ selection used in the analyses, as extracted from top quark enriched data and from simulation.

png pdf
Table 2:
The W jet mass peak position and resolution, as extracted from top quark enriched data and from simulation. These results are used to apply corrections in the V tagging procedure.

png pdf
Table 3:
Summary of the final selections and categories for the ${\ell \nu }$+jet channel. The values indicated in parentheses correspond to the low-mass analysis.

png pdf
Table 4:
Summary of the final selections and categories for the dijet analyses.

png pdf
Table 5:
Data-to-simulation scale factors for ${\mathrm{ t } \mathrm{ \bar{t} } }$ and single top quark background processes, extracted from the comparison between data and simulation in the top quark enriched control sample.

png pdf
Table 6:
Summary of signal efficiencies for all analysis channels and all signal models. The quoted efficiencies are in percent, and include the branching fractions of the two vector bosons to the final state of the analysis channel, effects from detector acceptance, as well as reconstruction and selection efficiencies. Values are not indicated for categories and masses where the analysis channel has no sensitivity.

png pdf
Table 7:
Summary of the systematic uncertainties in the contribution from signal in the dijet analysis and their impact on the event yield in the signal region and on the reconstructed distribution in ${m_{ {\mathrm {V}} {\mathrm {V}} }}$ (mean and width). The last three uncertainties result in migrations between event categories, but do not affect the overall signal efficiency.

png pdf
Table 8:
Summary of the signal systematic uncertainties for the ${\ell \nu }$+jet analyses and their impact on the event yield in the signal region and on the reconstructed ${m_{ {\mathrm {V}} {\mathrm {V}} }}$ shape (mean and width) for both muon and electron channels. The last three uncertainties result in migrations between event categories, but do not affect the overall signal efficiency. The correlations among different categories are taken into account.

png pdf
Table 9:
Generator-level requirements for the ${\ell \nu }$+jet analysis, to be used for the computation of the efficiency parametrization. The vector sum of the transverse neutrino momenta $\vec{p}_{\mathrm {T},\nu }$ is taken over all the neutrinos in the final state, coming either from $\mathrm{ W } \to \ell \nu $ or $\mathrm{W} \to \tau \nu \to \ell \nu \nu \nu $ decays with $\ell =\mu $ or e.

png pdf
Table 10:
Generator-level requirements for the dijet analysis, to be used for the computation of the efficiency parametrization.

png pdf
Table 11:
Reconstruction and identification efficiency for the (upper table) $\mathrm{ W } \to \mu \nu $ and $\mathrm{ W } \to \tau \nu \to \mu \nu \nu \nu $, and (lower table) $\mathrm{ W } \to \mathrm{ e } \nu $ and $\mathrm{ W } \to \tau \nu \to \mathrm{ e } \nu \nu \nu $ decays as function of generated $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\mathrm{ W } $ and $ {| \eta _\mathrm{ W } | }$. Uncertainties in the efficiencies are included in the generic limit calculation as discussed in the text.

png pdf
Table 12:
Reconstruction and identification efficiency for the (upper table) $\mathrm{ W } _{\text {L}}\to {\mathrm{ q } \mathrm{ \bar{q} } } $ and (lower table) $\mathrm{ Z } _{\text {L}}\to {\mathrm{ q } \mathrm{ \bar{q} } } $ decay as a function of generated $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^ {\mathrm {V}} $ and $ {| \eta _ {\mathrm {V}} | }$ applying the V tagging requirements used in the ${\ell \nu }$+jet analysis ($ {\tau _{21}}<$ 0.6). Uncertainties in the efficiencies are included in the generic limit calculation as discussed in the text.

png pdf
Table 13:
Reconstruction and identification efficiency for the (upper table) $\mathrm{ W } _{\text {L}}\to {\mathrm{ q } \mathrm{ \bar{q} } } $ and (lower table) $\mathrm{ Z } _{\text {L}}\to {\mathrm{ q } \mathrm{ \bar{q} } } $ decays as a function of generated $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^ {\mathrm {V}} $ and $ {| \eta _ {\mathrm {V}} | }$ applying the V tagging requirements used in the dijet analysis ($ {\tau _{21}}<$ 0.45). Uncertainties in the efficiencies are included in the generic limit calculation as discussed in the text.

png pdf
Table 14:
Simplified limits on the number of visible events from generic resonances decaying to pairs of V bosons in the ${\ell \nu }$+jet (left) and dijet (right) channels as a function of resonance mass, $M_\mathrm {X}$, and normalized width, $\Gamma _\mathrm {X}/M_\mathrm {X}$. Shown are limits on the visible number of events at 95% CL using the asymptotic $\mathrm {CL_S}$ approach. Results with $\Gamma _\mathrm {X}/M_\mathrm {X}=$ 0 are obtained using the resolution function only.
Summary
A search has been presented for new resonances decaying to WW, ZZ, or WZ boson pairs in which at least one of the bosons decays into quarks. The final states involve dijet and ${\ell \nu}$+jet events with $\ell=\mu $ or e. The results include the $\mathrm{ W }\to\tau\nu$ contribution with subsequent decay $\tau\to\ell\nu\bar{\nu}$. The W and Z bosons that decay to quarks are selected by requiring a jet with mass compatible with the W or Z boson mass, respectively. Additional information from jet substructure is used to suppress background from W+jets and multijet processes. No evidence for a signal is found. In particular, the excesses at a resonance mass of 2 TeV observed in previous searches are not confirmed. The result is interpreted as an upper limit on the production cross section of a narrow-width resonance as a function its mass, in the context of the bulk graviton model (with decays to WW or ZZ), heavy vector-triplet Models A and B, and W' and Z' singlet models. The upper limits are based on the statistical combination of the two channels. For the heavy vector-triplet, we exclude W' and Z' resonances with respective masses <2.0 and <1.6 TeV for Model A, <2.2 and <1.7 TeV for Model B. Under the triplet hypothesis, spin-1 resonances with masses below 2.3 and 2.4 TeV are excluded for heavy vector-triplet Model A and B, respectively. In the narrow-width bulk graviton model, cross sections are excluded in the range of 3-1200 fb. This is the first search for a narrow-width bulk graviton with $\tilde{k} = $ 0.5 at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV. Tabulated efficiencies for the reconstruction of the vector bosons within the kinematic acceptance of the analysis are also provided, allowing for a reintepretation of the exclusion limits in a generic phenomenological model.
References
1 K. Agashe, H. Davoudiasl, G. Perez, and A. Soni Warped gravitons at the LHC and beyond PRD 76 (2007) 036006 hep-ph/0701186
2 A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, L. Randall, and L.-T. Wang Searching for the Kaluza-Klein graviton in bulk RS models JHEP 09 (2007) 013 hep-ph/0701150
3 O. Antipin, D. Atwood, and A. Soni Search for RS gravitons via $ \mathrm{ W }_L\mathrm{ W }_L $ decays PLB 666 (2008) 155 0711.3175
4 L. Randall and R. Sundrum A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension PRL 83 (1999) 3370 hep-ph/9905221
5 L. Randall and R. Sundrum An Alternative to Compactification PRL 83 (1999) 4690 hep-th/9906064
6 D. Pappadopulo, A. Thamm, R. Torre, and A. Wulzer Heavy vector triplets: bridging theory and data JHEP 09 (2014) 060 1402.4431
7 G. Altarelli, B. Mele, and M. Ruiz-Altaba Searching for new heavy vector bosons in $ \rm p\bar{p} $ colliders Z. Phys. C 45 (1989) 109
8 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new resonances decaying to a W or Z boson and a Higgs boson in the $ \ell^+\ell^-\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } $, $ \ell\nu\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } $, and $ \nu\bar{\nu}\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } $ channels with $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 13 $ TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 765 (2017) 32 1607.05621
9 ATLAS Collaboration Searches for heavy diboson resonances in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=13 $ TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 09 (2016) 173 1606.04833
10 CMS Collaboration Search for new resonances decaying via WZ to leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt s = $ 8 TeV PLB 740 (2015) 83 CMS-EXO-12-025
1407.3476
11 CMS Collaboration Search for massive resonances decaying into pairs of boosted bosons in semi-leptonic final states at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JHEP 08 (2014) 174 CMS-EXO-13-009
1405.3447
12 CMS Collaboration Search for massive resonances in dijet systems containing jets tagged as W or Z boson decays in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV JHEP 08 (2014) 173 CMS-EXO-12-024
1405.1994
13 CMS Collaboration Search for massive WH resonances decaying into the $ \ell \nu \mathrm{b} \overline{\mathrm{b}} $ final state at $ \sqrt{s}=8 $ $ \text {TeV} $ EPJC 76 (2016) 237 CMS-EXO-14-010
1601.06431
14 CMS Collaboration Search for a massive resonance decaying into a Higgs boson and a W or Z boson in hadronic final states in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=8 $ TeV JHEP 02 (2016) 145 CMS-EXO-14-009
1506.01443
15 CMS Collaboration Search for narrow high-mass resonances in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV decaying to a Z and a Higgs boson PLB 748 (2015) 255 CMS-EXO-13-007
1502.04994
16 ATLAS Collaboration Search for high-mass diboson resonances with boson-tagged jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=8 $ TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 12 (2015) 055 1506.00962
17 ATLAS Collaboration Search for production of WW/WZ resonances decaying to a lepton, neutrino and jets in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=8 $ TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC 75 (2015) 209, , [Erratum: \DOI10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3593-4] 1503.04677
18 ATLAS Collaboration Search for WZ resonances in the fully leptonic channel using $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 737 (2014) 223 1406.4456
19 ATLAS Collaboration Search for a new resonance decaying to a W or Z boson and a Higgs boson in the $ \ell\ell / \ell\nu / \nu\nu + \mathrm{ b \bar{b} } $ final states with the ATLAS detector EPJC 75 (2015) 263 1503.08089
20 CMS Collaboration V Tagging Observables and Correlations CMS-PAS-JME-14-002 CMS-PAS-JME-14-002
21 CMS Collaboration Identification techniques for highly boosted W bosons that decay into hadrons JHEP 12 (2014) 017 CMS-JME-13-006
1410.4227
22 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow event reconstruction in CMS and performance for jets, taus, and MET CDS
23 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the particle-flow event reconstruction with the first LHC collisions recorded in the CMS detector CDS
24 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
25 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
26 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
27 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
28 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
29 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: $ s $- and $ t $-channel contributions JHEP 09 (2009) 111, , [Erratum: \DOI10.1007/JHEP02(2010)011] 0907.4076
30 E. Re Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
31 S. Alioli, S.-O. Moch, and P. Uwer Hadronic top-quark pair-production with one jet and parton showering JHEP 01 (2012) 137 1110.5251
32 T. Sj\"ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual JHEP 05 (2006) 026 hep-ph/0603175
33 T. Sj\"ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 CPC 178 (2008) 852 0710.3820
34 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
35 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
36 R. D. Ball et al. Impact of heavy quark masses on parton distributions and LHC phenomenology Nucl. Phys. B 849 (2011) 296 1101.1300
37 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4---a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
38 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and D. L. Rainwater Next-to-leading order QCD predictions for $ W $ + 2 jet and $ Z $ + 2 jet production at the CERN LHC PRD 68 (2003) 094021 hep-ph/0308195
39 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams Vector boson pair production at the LHC JHEP 07 (2011) 018 1105.0020
40 J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis Top-quark processes at NLO in production and decay JPG 42 (2015) 015005 1204.1513
41 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and F. Tramontano Single top production and decay at next-to-leading order PRD 70 (2004) 094012 hep-ph/0408158
42 Y. Li and F. Petriello Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in FEWZ PRD 86 (2012) 094034 1208.5967
43 CMS Collaboration Measurements of inclusive W and Z cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=7 $ TeV JHEP 01 (2011) 080 CMS-EWK-10-002
1012.2466
44 CMS Collaboration Identification of b quark jets at the CMS Experiment in the LHC Run 2 CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001 CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001
45 CMS Collaboration CMS Luminosity Measurement for the 2015 Data Taking Period CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001
46 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
47 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
48 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
49 CMS Collaboration Identification of b-quark jets with the CMS experiment JINST 8 (2013) P04013 CMS-BTV-12-001
1211.4462
50 CMS Collaboration Determination of Jet Energy Calibration and Transverse Momentum Resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) P11002 CMS-JME-10-011
1107.4277
51 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s}=7 $ TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
52 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=8 $ TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
53 CMS Collaboration Search for leptonic decays of W' bosons in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=7 $ TeV JHEP 08 (2012) 023 CMS-EXO-11-024
1204.4764
54 CMS Collaboration Missing transverse energy performance of the CMS detector JINST 6 (2011) P09001 CMS-JME-10-009
1106.5048
55 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS missing transverse momentum reconstruction in pp data at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P02006 CMS-JME-13-003
1411.0511
56 CMS Collaboration Studies of jet mass in dijet and W/Z + jet events JHEP 05 (2013) 090 CMS-SMP-12-019
1303.4811
57 S. D. Ellis, C. K. Vermilion, and J. R. Walsh Techniques for improved heavy particle searches with jet substructure PRD 80 (2009) 051501 0903.5081
58 S. D. Ellis, C. K. Vermilion, and J. R. Walsh Recombination Algorithms and Jet Substructure: Pruning as a Tool for Heavy Particle Searches PRD 81 (2010) 094023 0912.0033
59 D. Krohn, J. Thaler, and L.-T. Wang Jet Trimming JHEP 02 (2010) 084 0912.1342
60 S. Catani, Y. L. Dokshitzer, M. H. Seymour, and B. R. Webber Longitudinally invariant $ k_t $ clustering algorithms for hadron hadron collisions Nucl. Phys. B 406 (1993) 187
61 Y. L. Dokshitzer, G. D. Leder, S. Moretti, and B. R. Webber Better jet clustering algorithms JHEP 08 (1997) 001 hep-ph/9707323
62 J. Thaler and K. Van Tilburg Identifying boosted objects with N-subjettiness JHEP 03 (2011) 015 1011.2268
63 S. D. Ellis and D. E. Soper Successive combination jet algorithm for hadron collisions PRD 48 (1993) 3160 hep-ph/9305266
64 M. B\"ahr et al. Herwig++ physics and manual EPJC 58 (2008) 639 0803.0883
65 Particle Data Group Collaboration Review of Particle Physics CPC 38 (2014) 090001
66 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy resonances decaying into a vector boson and a Higgs boson in final states with charged leptons, neutrinos, and b quarks Submitted to PLB CMS-B2G-16-003
1610.08066
67 M. J. Oreglia PhD thesis, Stanford University, 1980 SLAC Report SLAC-R-236
68 M. Cacciari et al. The $ \mathrm{ t \bar{t} } $ cross-section at 1.8 TeV and 1.96 TeV: a study of the systematics due to parton densities and scale dependence JHEP 04 (2004) 068 hep-ph/0303085
69 S. Catani, D. de Florian, M. Grazzini, and P. Nason Soft gluon resummation for Higgs boson production at hadron colliders JHEP 07 (2003) 028 hep-ph/0306211
70 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554, , [Erratum: \DOI10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2501-z] 1007.1727
71 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: The $ {CL_S} $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
72 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
73 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Combined Measurement of the Higgs Boson Mass in pp Collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=7 $ and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS Experiments PRL 114 (2015) 191803 1503.07589
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN