CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-HIG-18-011 ; CERN-EP-2018-309
Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state with two muons and two b quarks in pp collisions at 13 TeV
Phys. Lett. B 795 (2019) 398
Abstract: A search for exotic decays of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalar particles ${{\mathrm{a}_1}} $ is performed under the hypothesis that one of the pseudoscalars decays to a pair of opposite sign muons and the other decays to $\mathrm{b\bar{b}}$. Such signatures are predicted in a number of extensions of the standard model (SM), including next-to-minimal supersymmetry and two-Higgs-doublet models with an additional scalar singlet. The results are based on a data set of proton-proton collisions corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$, accumulated with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC in 2016 at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. No statistically significant excess is observed with respect to the SM backgrounds in the search region for pseudoscalar masses from 20 GeV to half of the Higgs boson mass. Upper limits at 95% confidence level are set on the product of the production cross section and branching fraction, $\sigma_{\mathrm{h}}\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{h}\to {{\mathrm{a}_1}} {{\mathrm{a}_1}} \to\mu^{+}\mu^{-}\mathrm{b\bar{b}})$, ranging from 5 to 36 fb, depending on the pseudoscalar mass. Corresponding limits on the branching fraction, assuming the SM prediction for $\sigma_{\mathrm{h}}$, are (1-6)$\times 10^{-4}$.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
The distribution of $ {\chi ^2} $ in simulated background processes and the signal process with $ {m_{{\mathrm {a}} _1}} = $ 40 GeV. The samples are normalized to unity.

png pdf
Figure 2:
The distribution of $ {\chi _{{\mathrm {b}} {\mathrm {b}}}} $ versus $ {\chi _{{\mathrm {h}}}} $ as defined in Eq. (2) for (left) simulated background processes and (right) the signal process with $ {m_{{\mathrm {a}} _1}} = $ 40 GeV. The contours encircle the area with $ {\chi ^2} < $ 5. The grey scale represents the expected yields at 35.9 fb$^{-1}$.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
The distribution of $ {\chi _{{\mathrm {b}} {\mathrm {b}}}} $ versus $ {\chi _{{\mathrm {h}}}} $ as defined in Eq. (2) for simulated background processes. The contours encircle the area with $ {\chi ^2} < $ 5. The grey scale represents the expected yields at 35.9 fb$^{-1}$.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
The distribution of $ {\chi _{{\mathrm {b}} {\mathrm {b}}}} $ versus $ {\chi _{{\mathrm {h}}}} $ as defined in Eq. (2) for the signal process with $ {m_{{\mathrm {a}} _1}} = $ 40 GeV. The contours encircle the area with $ {\chi ^2} < $ 5. The grey scale represents the expected yields at 35.9 fb$^{-1}$.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The distribution of the $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ of the (top left) dimuon and (top right) di- b-jet system, the mass of the (middle left) di- b-jet and (middle right) $ {{\mu}} {{\mu}}{{\mathrm {b}} {\mathrm {b}}}$ system, and (bottom left) the $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ of the $ {{\mu}} {{\mu}}{{\mathrm {b}} {\mathrm {b}}}$ system, all after requiring two muons and two b-tagged jets in the event. Simulated samples are normalised to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ using their theoretical cross sections.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The distribution of the $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ of the dimuon, after requiring two muons and two b-tagged jets in the event. Simulated samples are normalised to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ using their theoretical cross sections (see Legend in Fig.3-f).

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The distribution of the $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ di- b-jet system, after requiring two muons and two b-tagged jets in the event. Simulated samples are normalised to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ using their theoretical cross sections (see Legend in Fig.3-f).

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
The distribution of the mass of the di- b-jet system, after requiring two muons and two b-tagged jets in the event. Simulated samples are normalised to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ using their theoretical cross sections (see Legend in Fig.3-f).

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
The distribution of the mass of the $ {{\mu}} {{\mu}}{{\mathrm {b}} {\mathrm {b}}}$ system, after requiring two muons and two b-tagged jets in the event. Simulated samples are normalised to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ using their theoretical cross sections (see Legend in Fig.3-f).

png pdf
Figure 3-e:
The distribution of the $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ of the $ {{\mu}} {{\mu}}{{\mathrm {b}} {\mathrm {b}}}$ system, after requiring two muons and two b-tagged jets in the event. Simulated samples are normalised to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ using their theoretical cross sections (see Legend in Fig.3-f).

png pdf
Figure 3-f:
Legend for Figs. 3 a-e.

png pdf
Figure 4:
The best fit output to the data under the background-only hypothesis for the (top-left) TL category, (top right) TM category, (bottom left) TT category and (bottom right) all categories, presented together with 68% CL uncertainty band for the background model.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The best fit output to the data under the background-only hypothesis for the TL category, presented together with 68% CL uncertainty band for the background model.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The best fit output to the data under the background-only hypothesis for the TM category, presented together with 68% CL uncertainty band for the background model.

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
The best fit output to the data under the background-only hypothesis for the TT category, presented together with 68% CL uncertainty band for the background model.

png pdf
Figure 4-d:
The best fit output to the data under the background-only hypothesis for all categories, presented together with 68% CL uncertainty band for the background model.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the (left) product of the Higgs boson production cross section and $ {\mathcal {B}({{\mathrm {h}}}\to {{{{\mathrm {a}} _1}} {{{\mathrm {a}} _1}}}\to {{{\mu ^+}} {{\mu ^-}}} {{{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}})} $ and (right) the branching fraction as a function of $ {m_{{\mathrm {a}} _1}} $. The inner and outer bands indicate the regions containing the distribution of limits located within 68 and 95% confidence intervals, respectively, of the expectation under the background-only hypothesis.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the Higgs boson production cross section and $ {\mathcal {B}({{\mathrm {h}}}\to {{{{\mathrm {a}} _1}} {{{\mathrm {a}} _1}}}\to {{{\mu ^+}} {{\mu ^-}}} {{{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}})} $. The inner and outer bands indicate the regions containing the distribution of limits located within 68 and 95% confidence intervals, respectively, of the expectation under the background-only hypothesis.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the the branching fraction as a function of $ {m_{{\mathrm {a}} _1}} $. The inner and outer bands indicate the regions containing the distribution of limits located within 68 and 95% confidence intervals, respectively, of the expectation under the background-only hypothesis.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Observed upper limits at 95% CL on $\mathcal {B}({\mathrm {h}} \to {{{\mathrm {a}} _1}} {{{\mathrm {a}} _1}})$ in the plane of ($ {m_{{\mathrm {a}} _1}}, {\tan\beta} $) for (left) type-III and (right) type-IV 2HDM+S, using only the $ {{{{\mu ^+}} {{\mu ^-}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}} $ signal.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Observed upper limits at 95% CL on $\mathcal {B}({\mathrm {h}} \to {{{\mathrm {a}} _1}} {{{\mathrm {a}} _1}})$ in the plane of ($ {m_{{\mathrm {a}} _1}}, {\tan\beta} $) for type-III 2HDM+S, using only the $ {{{{\mu ^+}} {{\mu ^-}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}} $ signal.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Observed upper limits at 95% CL on $\mathcal {B}({\mathrm {h}} \to {{{\mathrm {a}} _1}} {{{\mathrm {a}} _1}})$ in the plane of ($ {m_{{\mathrm {a}} _1}}, {\tan\beta} $) for type-IV 2HDM+S, using only the $ {{{{\mu ^+}} {{\mu ^-}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}} $ signal.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Observed upper limits at 95% CL on $\mathcal {B}({\mathrm {h}} \to {{{\mathrm {a}} _1}} {{{\mathrm {a}} _1}})$ in the plane of ($ {m_{{\mathrm {a}} _1}}, {\tan\beta} $) for type-III 2HDM+S, including $ {{{{\mu ^+}} {{\mu ^-}}} {{\tau}^{+} {\tau}^{-}}} $ signal that is misidentified as ${{{{\mu ^+}} {{\mu ^-}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}}$.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Event yields for simulated processes and data after requiring two muons and two b jets (${{{{\mu ^+}} {{\mu ^-}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}}$ selection) and after the final selection. The expected number of simulated events is normalised to the integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. Uncertainties are only statistical.
Summary
A search for the Higgs boson decay to a pair of new pseudoscalars ${\mathrm{h}}\to{{\mathrm{a}_1}} {{\mathrm{a}_1}} \to mmbb$, motivated by the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model and other extensions to two-Higgs-doublet models, is carried out using a sample of proton-proton collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ at 13 TeV centre-of-mass energy. No statistically significant excess is found in data with respect to the background prediction. The results of the analysis are presented in the form of upper limits, at 95% confidence level, on the product of the Higgs boson production cross section and branching fraction, $\sigma_{\mathrm{h}}\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{h}\to {{\mathrm{a}_1}} {{\mathrm{a}_1}} \to\mu^{+}\mu^{-}\mathrm{b\bar{b}})$, as well as on the Higgs boson branching fraction assuming the SM prediction of $\sigma_{\mathrm{h}}$. The former ranges between 5 to 36 fb, depending on ${m_{\mathrm{a}_1}} $. The corresponding limits on the branching fraction are (1-6)$\times 10^{-4}$ for the mass range of 20 $\leq{m_{\mathrm{a}_1}} \leq $ 62.5 GeV. In an analysis performed by ATLAS [18], the limits on the branching fraction range between $2\times10^{-4}$ and $10^{-3}$. Compared with the similar analysis in Run I [14], the expected upper limits on the branching fraction are improved by more than a factor of two.
References
1 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 1 1207.7214
2 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 30 CMS-HIG-12-028
1207.7235
3 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 06 (2013) 081 CMS-HIG-12-036
1303.4571
4 L. Evans and P. Bryant LHC machine JINST 3 (2008) S08001
5 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the Higgs boson coupling properties in the $ {\mathrm{H}}\rightarrow {\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}}^{*} \rightarrow 4\ell $ decay channel at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 03 (2018) 095 1712.02304
6 CMS Collaboration Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying into the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 11 (2017) 047 CMS-HIG-16-041
1706.09936
7 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 08 (2016) 045 1606.02266
8 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and coupling strengths using pp collision data at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV in the ATLAS experiment EPJC 76 (2016) 6 1507.04548
9 CMS Collaboration Study of the mass and spin-parity of the Higgs boson candidate via its decays to $ {Z} $ boson pairs PRL 110 (2013) 081803 CMS-HIG-12-041
1212.6639
10 CMS Collaboration Combined measurements of Higgs boson couplings in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV Submitted to EPJC CMS-HIG-17-031
1809.10733
11 ATLAS Collaboration Search for Higgs bosons decaying to $ aa $ in the $ \mu\mu\tau\tau $ final state in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS experiment PRD 92 (2015) 052002 1505.01609
12 CMS Collaboration A search for pair production of new light bosons decaying into muons PLB 752 (2016) 146 CMS-HIG-13-010
1506.00424
13 CMS Collaboration Search for a very light NMSSM Higgs boson produced in decays of the 125 GeV scalar boson and decaying into $ \tau $ leptons in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV JHEP 01 (2016) 079 CMS-HIG-14-019
1510.06534
14 CMS Collaboration Search for light bosons in decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV JHEP 10 (2017) 076 CMS-HIG-16-015
1701.02032
15 ATLAS Collaboration Search for the Higgs boson produced in association with a W boson and decaying to four b-quarks via two spin-zero particles in pp collisions at 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC 76 (2016) 605 1606.08391
16 ATLAS Collaboration Search for Higgs boson decays to beyond-the-Standard-Model light bosons in four-lepton events with the ATLAS detector at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 06 (2018) 166 1802.03388
17 ATLAS Collaboration Search for Higgs boson decays into pairs of light (pseudo)scalar particles in the $ \gamma\gamma {\rm jj} $ final state in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 782 (2018) 750 1803.11145
18 ATLAS Collaboration Search for Higgs boson decays into a pair of light bosons in the $ \mathrm{b}\mathrm{b}\mu\mu $ final state in pp collision at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector Submitted to PLB 1807.00539
19 CMS Collaboration Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state with two b quarks and two $ \tau $ leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PLB 785 (2018) 462 CMS-HIG-17-024
1805.10191
20 CMS Collaboration Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state of two muons and two $ \tau $ leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 11 (2018) 018 CMS-HIG-17-029
1805.04865
21 D. Curtin et al. Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson PRD 90 (2014) 075004 1312.4992
22 M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki A simple solution to the strong CP problem with a harmless axion PLB 104 (1981) 199
23 J. E. Kim and H. P. Nilles The $ \mu $-problem and the strong CP-problem PLB 138 (1984) 150
24 U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie, and A. M. Teixeira The next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model Phys. Rep. 496 (2010) 1 0910.1785
25 D. de Florian et al. Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector CERN-2017-002-M 1610.07922
26 D. Curtin, R. Essig, and Y.-M. Zhong Uncovering light scalars with exotic Higgs decays to $ {\mathrm{b}}\overline{\mathrm{b}}{\mu^{+}}{\mu^{-}} $ JHEP 06 (2015) 025 1412.4779
27 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
28 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
29 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
30 Y. Li and F. Petriello Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in $ FEWZ $ PRD 86 (2012) 094034 1208.5967
31 E. Re Single-top W t-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
32 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
33 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: $ s $- and $ t $-channel contributions JHEP 09 (2009) 111 0907.4076
34 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
35 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
36 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
37 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
38 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
39 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4--a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
40 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
41 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ {k_{\mathrm{T}}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
42 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
43 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
44 CMS Collaboration Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data CMS-PAS-JME-16-003 CMS-PAS-JME-16-003
45 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) P11002 CMS-JME-10-011
1107.4277
46 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
47 G. Pagnini and R. K. Saxena A note on the Voigt profile function 0805.2274
48 M. J. Oreglia A study of the reactions $\psi' \to \gamma\gamma \psi$ PhD thesis, Stanford University, 1980 SLAC Report SLAC-R-236, see A
49 P. D. Dauncey, M. Kenzie, N. Wardle, and G. J. Davies Handling uncertainties in background shapes: the discrete profiling method JINST 10 (2015) P04015 1408.6865
50 CMS Collaboration Observation of the diphoton decay of the Higgs boson and measurement of its properties EPJC 74 (2014) 3076 CMS-HIG-13-001
1407.0558
51 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Combined measurement of the Higgs boson mass in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS experiments PRL 114 (2015) 191803 1503.07589
52 F. James Statistical methods in experimental physics Hackensack, USA: World Scientific, 2006
53 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 161 CMS-FSQ-15-005
1802.02613
54 CMS Collaboration Measurements of inclusive W and Z cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 01 (2011) 080 CMS-EWK-10-002
1012.2466
55 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
56 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
57 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ \mathrm{CL_s} $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
58 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN