CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-SMP-19-004 ; CERN-EP-2019-262
Measurement of the associated production of a Z boson with charm or bottom quark jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV
Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 032007
Abstract: Ratios of cross sections, $\sigma(\mathrm{Z+c\ \text{jets}})/\sigma(\mathrm{Z+ \text{jets}})$, $\sigma(\mathrm{Z+b\ \text{jets}})/\sigma(\mathrm{Z+ \text{jets}})$, and $\sigma(\mathrm{Z+c\ \text{jets}})/\sigma(\mathrm{Z+b\ \text{jets}})$ in the associated production of a Z boson with at least one charm or bottom quark jet are measured in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV. The data sample, collected by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC, corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$, with a fiducial volume of ${p_{\mathrm{T}}} > $ 30 GeV and $|\eta| < $ 2.4 for the jets, where ${p_{\mathrm{T}}}$ and $\eta$ represent transverse momentum and pseudorapidity, respectively. The Z boson candidates come from leptonic decays into electrons or muons with ${p_{\mathrm{T}}} > $ 25 GeV and $|{\eta}| < $ 2.4, and the dilepton mass satisfies 71 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}} < $ 111 GeV. The measured values are $\sigma(\mathrm{Z+c\ \text{jets}})/\sigma(\mathrm{Z+ \text{jets}}) = $ 0.102 $\pm$ 0.002 $\pm$ 0.009, $\sigma(\mathrm{Z+b\ \text{jets}})/\sigma(\mathrm{Z+ \text{jets}}) = $ 0.0633 $\pm$ 0.0004 $\pm$ 0.0015, and $\sigma(\mathrm{Z+c\ \text{jets}})/\sigma(\mathrm{Z+b\ \text{jets}}) = $ 1.62 $\pm$ 0.03 $\pm$ 0.15. Results on the inclusive and differential cross section ratios as functions of jet and Z boson transverse momentum are compared with predictions from leading and next-to-leading order perturbative quantum chromodynamics calculations. These are the first measurements of the cross section ratios at 13 TeV, and the measurement precision is better than that of the current theoretical predictions.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Comparisons of c jet (left) and b jet (right) ${M_\ \text {SV}}$ distributions for data and simulation. A shape correction is applied to the data-driven distribution in the right panel to account for the difference between the jets in ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ and $\mathrm{Z+b \ \text{jets}}$ processes.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Comparisons of c jet (left) and b jet (right) ${M_\ \text {SV}}$ distributions for data and simulation. A shape correction is applied to the data-driven distribution in the right panel to account for the difference between the jets in ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ and $\mathrm{Z+b \ \text{jets}}$ processes.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Comparisons of c jet (left) and b jet (right) ${M_\ \text {SV}}$ distributions for data and simulation. A shape correction is applied to the data-driven distribution in the right panel to account for the difference between the jets in ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ and $\mathrm{Z+b \ \text{jets}}$ processes.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Secondary vertex invariant mass distributions for the electron (left) and muon (right) channels derived from fits using the inclusive $\mathrm{Z+\ \text{HF jets}}$ data sample. The post-fit uncertainty bands indicate the total uncertainties, added in quadrature, of the best-fit values of signal and background process rates.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Secondary vertex invariant mass distributions for the electron (left) and muon (right) channels derived from fits using the inclusive $\mathrm{Z+\ \text{HF jets}}$ data sample. The post-fit uncertainty bands indicate the total uncertainties, added in quadrature, of the best-fit values of signal and background process rates.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Secondary vertex invariant mass distributions for the electron (left) and muon (right) channels derived from fits using the inclusive $\mathrm{Z+\ \text{HF jets}}$ data sample. The post-fit uncertainty bands indicate the total uncertainties, added in quadrature, of the best-fit values of signal and background process rates.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Unfolded, particle-level mg5\_aMC, and parton-level mcfm R(c/j) cross section ratios versus jet (left) and Z boson (right) transverse momentum. The vertical error bars for the data points are statistical while the hatched band represents the total uncertainties. The predictions are slightly shifted along the $x$-axis for readability in the upper plots, and their total PDF and scale uncertainties are shown as error bands in the ratio plots.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Unfolded, particle-level mg5\_aMC, and parton-level mcfm R(c/j) cross section ratios versus jet (left) and Z boson (right) transverse momentum. The vertical error bars for the data points are statistical while the hatched band represents the total uncertainties. The predictions are slightly shifted along the $x$-axis for readability in the upper plots, and their total PDF and scale uncertainties are shown as error bands in the ratio plots.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Unfolded, particle-level mg5\_aMC, and parton-level mcfm R(c/j) cross section ratios versus jet (left) and Z boson (right) transverse momentum. The vertical error bars for the data points are statistical while the hatched band represents the total uncertainties. The predictions are slightly shifted along the $x$-axis for readability in the upper plots, and their total PDF and scale uncertainties are shown as error bands in the ratio plots.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Unfolded, particle-level mg5\_aMC, and parton-level mcfm R(b/j) cross section ratio versus jet (left) and Z boson (right) transverse momentum. The vertical error bars for the data points are statistical while the hatched band presents the total uncertainties. The predictions are slightly shifted along the $x$-axis for readability in the upper plots, and their total PDF and scale uncertainties are shown as error bands in the ratio plots.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Unfolded, particle-level mg5\_aMC, and parton-level mcfm R(b/j) cross section ratio versus jet (left) and Z boson (right) transverse momentum. The vertical error bars for the data points are statistical while the hatched band presents the total uncertainties. The predictions are slightly shifted along the $x$-axis for readability in the upper plots, and their total PDF and scale uncertainties are shown as error bands in the ratio plots.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Unfolded, particle-level mg5\_aMC, and parton-level mcfm R(b/j) cross section ratio versus jet (left) and Z boson (right) transverse momentum. The vertical error bars for the data points are statistical while the hatched band presents the total uncertainties. The predictions are slightly shifted along the $x$-axis for readability in the upper plots, and their total PDF and scale uncertainties are shown as error bands in the ratio plots.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Unfolded, particle-level mg5\_aMC, and parton-level mcfm R(c/b) cross section ratio versus jet (left) and Z boson (right) transverse momentum. The vertical error bars for the data points are statistical while the hatched band represents the total uncertainties. The predictions are slightly shifted along the $x$-axis for readability in the upper plots, and their total PDF and scale uncertainties are shown as error bands in the ratio plots.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Unfolded, particle-level mg5\_aMC, and parton-level mcfm R(c/b) cross section ratio versus jet (left) and Z boson (right) transverse momentum. The vertical error bars for the data points are statistical while the hatched band represents the total uncertainties. The predictions are slightly shifted along the $x$-axis for readability in the upper plots, and their total PDF and scale uncertainties are shown as error bands in the ratio plots.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Unfolded, particle-level mg5\_aMC, and parton-level mcfm R(c/b) cross section ratio versus jet (left) and Z boson (right) transverse momentum. The vertical error bars for the data points are statistical while the hatched band represents the total uncertainties. The predictions are slightly shifted along the $x$-axis for readability in the upper plots, and their total PDF and scale uncertainties are shown as error bands in the ratio plots.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Numbers of events that satisfy the $\mathrm{Z+ \text{jets}}$ and $\mathrm{Z+\ \text{HF jets}}$ selection criteria in the electron and muon channels. The uncertainties are statistical only.

png pdf
Table 2:
The ${\mathrm {SF}_{\mathrm{c}}}$ and ${\mathrm {SF}_{\mathrm{b}}}$ scale factor fit results for electron, muon, and combined channels in jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ bins. The first and second uncertainty values correspond to the statistical and systematic contributions, respectively. The fractions of the observed number of $\mathrm{Z+c \ \text{jets}}$ and $\mathrm{Z+b \ \text{jets}}$ in the total number of $\mathrm{Z+ \text{jets}}$ events selected in the $\mathrm{Z+\ \text{HF jets}}$ sample are shown in the parentheses and are determined by applying the scale factors to the corresponding MC events.

png pdf
Table 3:
The ${\mathrm {SF}_{\mathrm{c}}}$ and ${\mathrm {SF}_{\mathrm{b}}}$ scale factor fit results for electron, muon, and combined channels in Z ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ bins. The first and second uncertainty values correspond to the statistical and systematic contributions, respectively. The fraction of the observed number of $\mathrm{Z+c \ \text{jets}}$ and $\mathrm{Z+b \ \text{jets}}$ in the total number of $\mathrm{Z+ \text{jets}}$ events selected in the $\mathrm{Z+\ \text{HF jets}}$ sample are shown in the parentheses and are derived by applying the scale factors to the corresponding MC events.

png pdf
Table 4:
Systematic uncertainties in the scale factor measurements. The uncertainty ranges correspond to variations across jet and Z ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ bins.

png pdf
Table 5:
The systematic uncertainties in the cross section ratio measurements. The uncertainty ranges correspond to variations across jet and Z ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ bins.

png pdf
Table 6:
Cross section ratios measured in the electron and muon channels, along with the combined results. The first and second uncertainty values correspond to the statistical and systematic contributions, respectively.

png pdf
Table 7:
Unfolded cross section ratios in the electron and muon channels, along with the combined results. The first and second uncertainty values correspond to the statistical and systematic contributions, respectively.

png pdf
Table 8:
Predicted cross section ratios from mg5\_aMC and mcfm at LO and NLO accuracy. The first and second sets of uncertainties correspond to PDF and scale variations, respectively.

png pdf
Table 9:
The cross section ratios for the electron, muon, and combined channels in jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ bins.

png pdf
Table 10:
The cross section ratios in the electron, muon and combined channels in the Z boson ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ bins.
Summary
Ratios of cross sections, $\sigma(\mathrm{Z+c\ \text{jets}})/\sigma(\mathrm{Z+ \text{jets}})$, $\sigma(\mathrm{Z+b\ \text{jets}})/\sigma(\mathrm{Z+ \text{jets}})$, and $\sigma(\mathrm{Z+c\ \text{jets}})/\sigma(\mathrm{Z+b\ \text{jets}})$ in the associated production of a Z boson with at least one charm or bottom quark jet have been measured in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC. The fiducial volume of the measurement is defined by ${p_{\mathrm{T}}} > $ 30 GeV and $|\eta| < $ 2.4 for the jets, where ${p_{\mathrm{T}}}$ and $\eta$ represent transverse momentum and pseudorapidity, respectively. The Z bosons are selected within the mass range of 71 and 111 GeV requiring leptons (electrons or muons) with ${p_{\mathrm{T}}} > $ 25 GeV and $|{\eta}| < $ 2.4. The measured values are $\sigma(\mathrm{Z+c\ \text{jets}})/\sigma(\mathrm{Z+ \text{jets}}) = $ 0.102 $\pm$ 0.002 $\pm$ 0.009, $\sigma(\mathrm{Z+b\ \text{jets}})/\sigma(\mathrm{Z+ \text{jets}}) = $ 0.0633 $\pm$ 0.0004 $\pm$ 0.0015, and $\sigma(\mathrm{Z+c\ \text{jets}})/\sigma(\mathrm{Z+b\ \text{jets}}) = $ 1.62 $\pm$ 0.03 $\pm$ 0.15. Results for the inclusive and differential cross section ratios as functions of jet and Z boson transverse momentum are compared with predictions from leading and next-to-leading order perturbative quantum chromodynamics calculations. These are the first results of this kind at 13 TeV, and the measurement precision exceeds that of the current theoretical predictions.
References
1 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, F. Maltoni, and S. Willenbrock Associated production of a Z boson and a single heavy quark jet PRD 69 (2004) 074021 hep-ph/0312024
2 F. Febres Cordero, L. Reina, and D. Wackeroth W and Z boson production with a massive bottom-quark pair at the Large Hadron Collider PRD 80 (2009) 034015 0906.1923
3 F. Maltoni, G. Ridolfi, and M. Ubiali b-initiated processes at the LHC: a reappraisal JHEP 07 (2012) 022 1203.6393
4 CDF Collaboration Measurement of cross sections for $ \mathrm{b} $ jet production in events with a Z boson in $ \mathrm{p}\bar{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRD 79 (2009) 052008 0812.4458
5 D0 Collaboration Measurement of associated production of Z bosons with charm quark jets in $ \mathrm{p}\bar{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 1.96 TeV PRL 112 (2014) 042001 1308.4384
6 D0 Collaboration Measurement of the ratio of inclusive cross sections $ \sigma (\mathrm{p}\bar{\mathrm{p}} \rightarrow \mathrm{Z} + 2 \mathrm{b}\ \text{jets}) / \sigma (\mathrm{p}\bar{\mathrm{p}} \rightarrow \mathrm{Z} + \text{2 jets}) $ in $ \mathrm{p}\bar{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt s= $ 1.96 TeV PRD 91 (2015) 052010 1501.05325
7 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of differential production cross-sections for a Z boson in association with b jets in 7 TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector JHEP 10 (2014) 141 1407.3643
8 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the production cross sections for a Z boson and one or more b jets in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 06 (2014) 120 CMS-SMP-13-004
1402.1521
9 CMS Collaboration Measurement of associated $ \mathrm{Z} $ + charm production in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV EPJC 78 (2018) 287 CMS-SMP-15-009
1711.02143
10 J. Alwall et al. Madgraph 5: going beyond JHEP 06 (2011) 128 1106.0522
11 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
12 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
13 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
14 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
15 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4--a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
16 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
17 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
18 K. Melnikov and F. Petriello Electroweak gauge boson production at hadron colliders through $ \mathcal{O}(\alpha_S^2) $ PRD 74 (2006) 114017 hep-ph/0609070
19 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
20 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
21 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
22 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction JHEP 09 (2007) 126 0707.3088
23 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders CPC 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
24 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams Vector boson pair production at the LHC JHEP 07 (2011) 018 1105.0020
25 N. Kidonakis Top quark production in Proceedings, Helmholtz International Summer School on Physics of Heavy Quarks and Hadrons (HQ 2013)JINR, Dubna, Russia, 2013 1311.0283
26 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
27 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
28 CMS Collaboration Investigations of the impact of the parton shower tuning in PYTHIA 8 in the modelling of $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 and 13 TeV CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021 CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021
29 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
30 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
31 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
32 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
33 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
34 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2008) 119 0707.1378
35 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) P11002 CMS-JME-10-011
1107.4277
36 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
37 CMS Collaboration Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data CMS-PAS-JME-16-003 CMS-PAS-JME-16-003
38 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
39 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
40 W. Waltenberger Adaptive vertex reconstruction CMS-NOTE-2008-033
41 CMS Collaboration Identification of b-quark jets with the CMS experiment JINST 8 (2013) P04013 CMS-BTV-12-001
1211.4462
42 S. Schmitt TUnfold: an algorithm for correcting migration effects in high energy physics JINST 7 (2012) T10003 1205.6201
43 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 161 CMS-FSQ-15-005
1802.02613
44 ALEPH Collaboration A measurement of the gluon splitting rate into $ \mathrm{c\bar{c}} $ pairs in hadronic $ \mathrm{Z} $ decays PLB 561 (2003) 213 hep-ex/0302003
45 ALEPH Collaboration A measurement of the gluon splitting rate into $ \mathrm{b\bar{b}} $ pairs in hadronic $ \mathrm{Z} $ decays PLB 434 (1998) 437
46 M. Bahr et al. Herwig++ physics and manual EPJC 58 (2008) 639 0803.0883
47 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
48 J. Alwall, S. de Visscher, and F. Maltoni QCD radiation in the production of heavy colored particles at the LHC JHEP 02 (2009) 017 0810.5350
49 J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis An update on vector boson pair production at hadron colliders PRD 60 (1999) 113006 hep-ph/9905386
50 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and W. Giele A multi-threaded version of MCFM EPJC 75 (2015) 246 1503.06182
51 L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, P. Motylinski, and R. S. Thorne Parton distributions in the LHC era: MMHT 2014 PDFs EPJC 75 (2015) 204 1412.3989
52 CMS Collaboration Measurements of the associated production of a $ \mathrm{Z} $ boson and b jets in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV EPJC 77 (2017) 751 CMS-SMP-14-010
1611.06507
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN