CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-SUS-16-043 ; CERN-EP-2017-113
Search for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos in WH events in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
JHEP 11 (2017) 029
Abstract: Results are reported from a search for physics beyond the standard model in proton-proton collision events with a charged lepton (electron or muon), two jets identified as originating from a bottom quark decay, and significant imbalance in the transverse momentum. The search was performed using a data sample corresponding to 35.9 fb$^{-1}$, collected by the CMS experiment in 2016 at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV. Events with this signature can arise, for example, from the electroweak production of gauginos, which are predicted in models based on supersymmetry. The event yields observed in data are consistent with the estimated standard model backgrounds. Limits are obtained on the cross sections for chargino-neutralino ($\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_2 $) production in a simplified model of supersymmetry with the decays $\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \to\mathrm{ W }^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}^0_1 $ and $\tilde{\chi}^0_2 \to\mathrm{ H } \tilde{\chi}^0_1 $. Values of $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 }$ between 220 and 490 GeV are excluded at 95% confidence level by this search when the $\tilde{\chi}^0_1 $ is massless, and values of $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 }$ are excluded up to 110 GeV for $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 } \approx $ 450 GeV.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Additional information on efficiencies needed for reinterpretation of these results are available here.
Additional technical material for CMS speakers can be found here.
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Diagram corresponding to the SUSY simplified model targeted by this analysis, i.e., chargino-neutralino production, with the chargino decaying to a $\mathrm{ W } $ boson and an LSP, while the heavier neutralino decays to a Higgs boson and an LSP.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Distributions in $ {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} $ (top left), $ {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} $ (top right), $ {M_{\mathrm {T}}} $ (bottom left), and $ {M_{\mathrm {CT}}} $ (bottom right) for signal and background events in simulation after the preselection. The $ {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} $, $ {M_{\mathrm {T}}} $, and $ {M_{\mathrm {CT}}} $ distributions are shown after the 90 $ < {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} < $ 150 GeV requirement. Expected signal distributions are also overlaid as open histograms for various mass points, with the signal cross section scaled up by a factor of 50 for display purposes. The legend entries for signal give the masses $(m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ in GeV and the factor by which the signal cross section has been scaled.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Distribution in $ {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} $ for signal and background events in simulation after the preselection. Expected signal distributions are also overlaid as open histograms for various mass points, with the signal cross section scaled up by a factor of 50 for display purposes. The legend entries for signal give the masses $(m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ in GeV and the factor by which the signal cross section has been scaled.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Distribution in $ {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} $ for signal and background events in simulation after the preselection. The distribution is shown after the 90 $ < {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} < $ 150 GeV requirement. Expected signal distributions are also overlaid as open histograms for various mass points, with the signal cross section scaled up by a factor of 50 for display purposes. The legend entries for signal give the masses $(m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ in GeV and the factor by which the signal cross section has been scaled.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
Distribution in $ {M_{\mathrm {T}}} $ for signal and background events in simulation after the preselection. The distribution is shown after the 90 $ < {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} < $ 150 GeV requirement. Expected signal distributions are also overlaid as open histograms for various mass points, with the signal cross section scaled up by a factor of 50 for display purposes. The legend entries for signal give the masses $(m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ in GeV and the factor by which the signal cross section has been scaled.

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
Distribution in $ {M_{\mathrm {CT}}} $ for signal and background events in simulation after the preselection. The distribution is shown after the 90 $ < {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} < $ 150 GeV requirement. Expected signal distributions are also overlaid as open histograms for various mass points, with the signal cross section scaled up by a factor of 50 for display purposes. The legend entries for signal give the masses $(m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ in GeV and the factor by which the signal cross section has been scaled.

png pdf
Figure 3:
(left) Distribution in $ {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} $ in $ {\mathrm {CR}2\ell } $ after the selections in Table 1, comparing data to MC simulation. (right) Distribution in $ {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} $ in $ {\mathrm {CRM} {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } } $ after preselection with the $ {M_{\mathrm {T}}} $ requirement tightened to be 150 GeV. The signal region range of 90 $ \leq {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} \leq $ 150 GeV has been removed from the plot.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Distribution in $ {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} $ in $ {\mathrm {CR}2\ell } $ after the selections in Table 1, comparing data to MC simulation.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Distribution in $ {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} $ in $ {\mathrm {CRM} {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } } $ after preselection with the $ {M_{\mathrm {T}}} $ requirement tightened to be 150 GeV. The signal region range of 90 $ \leq {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} \leq $ 150 GeV has been removed from the plot.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Distribution in $ {M_{\mathrm {T}}} $ in $ {\mathrm {CR}0\mathrm{ b } } $ after requiring the analysis preselection, the dijet mass window selection, and $ {M_{\mathrm {CT}}} > $ 170 GeV.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Distributions in $ {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} $ after all signal region kinematic requirements for the two exclusive $ {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} $ bins (left: 125 $ \leq {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} < $ 200 GeV, right: $ {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} \geq $ 200 GeV). The signal region is 90 $ \leq {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} \leq $ 150 GeV. The hatched band shows the total uncertainty in the background prediction, including statistical and systematic components. The expected signal distribution for a reference SUSY model is overlaid as an open histogram, and the legend (on the last line) gives the masses as $(m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ in GeV.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Distributions in $ {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} $ after all signal region kinematic requirements for the two exclusive $ {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} $ bins (125 $ \leq {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} < $ 200 GeV). The signal region is 90 $ \leq {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} \leq $ 150 GeV. The hatched band shows the total uncertainty in the background prediction, including statistical and systematic components. The expected signal distribution for a reference SUSY model is overlaid as an open histogram, and the legend (on the last line) gives the masses as $(m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ in GeV.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Distributions in $ {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} $ after all signal region kinematic requirements for the two exclusive $ {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} $ bins ($ {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} \geq $ 200 GeV). The signal region is 90 $ \leq {M_{ {\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } }} \leq $ 150 GeV. The hatched band shows the total uncertainty in the background prediction, including statistical and systematic components. The expected signal distribution for a reference SUSY model is overlaid as an open histogram, and the legend (on the last line) gives the masses as $(m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ in GeV.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Exclusion limits at the 95% CL in the plane of $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 }$ and $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 }$. The area below the thick black (dashed red) curve represents the observed (expected) exclusion region. The thin dashed red line indicates the +1 s.d.$_{\text {exp.}}$ experimental uncertainty. The -1 s.d.$_{\text {exp.}}$ line does not appear as no mass points would be excluded in that case. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties ($\pm $1 s.d.$_{\text {theory}}$) on the signal cross section.

png pdf root
Figure 6-a:
Cross section exclusion limits at the 95% CL are shown for $\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_2 \to \mathrm{ W } ^{\pm }\mathrm{ H } \tilde{\chi}^0_1 \tilde{\chi}^0_1 $ as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 }$, assuming $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 } = 1$ GeV. The solid black line and points represent the observed exclusion. The dashed black line represents the expected exclusion, while the green and yellow bands indicate the $\pm $1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) uncertainties in the expected limit. The magenta line shows the theoretical cross section with its uncertainty.

png pdf root
Figure 6-b:
Exclusion limits at the 95% CL in the plane of $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 }$ and $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 }$. The area below the thick black (dashed red) curve represents the observed (expected) exclusion region. The thin dashed red line indicates the +1 s.d.$_{\text {exp.}}$ experimental uncertainty. The -1 s.d.$_{\text {exp.}}$ line does not appear as no mass points would be excluded in that case. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties ($\pm $1 s.d.$_{\text {theory}}$) on the signal cross section.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Event selections in signal and control regions.

png pdf
Table 2:
Expected and observed event yields in the signal regions. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic sources. The correlation coefficient for the background prediction between the two bins is 0.61. Predicted yields are shown also for several signal models with the masses $(m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ indicated in GeV and with statistical-only uncertainties.

png pdf
Table 3:
Sources of systematic uncertainty in the estimated signal yield, along with their typical values. The ranges represent variation across the signal masses probed.
Summary
A search is performed for beyond the standard model physics in events with a leptonically decaying W boson, a Higgs boson decaying to a $\mathrm{ b \bar{b} }$ pair, and large transverse momentum imbalance. The search uses proton-proton collision data recorded by the CMS experiment in 2016 at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The event yields observed in data are consistent with the estimated standard model backgrounds. The results are used to set cross section limits on chargino-neutralino production in a simplified supersymmetric model with degenerate masses for $\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 $ and $\tilde{\chi}^0_2 $ and with the decays $\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 \to\mathrm{ W }^{\pm}\tilde{\chi}^0_1 $ and $\tilde{\chi}^0_2 \to\mathrm{ H }\tilde{\chi}^0_1 $. Values of $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 }$ between 220 and 490 GeV are excluded at 95% confidence level by this search when the $\tilde{\chi}^0_1 $ is massless, and values of $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 }$ are excluded up to 110 GeV for $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 } \approx $ 450 GeV. These results significantly extend the previous best limits, by up to 270 GeV in $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1 }$ and up to 90 GeV in $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 }$.
Additional Tables

png pdf
Additional Table 1:
Cutflow of yields with 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ data for various signal model points, given as $(m_{\tilde{\chi }_{1}^{\pm }},m_{ {\tilde{\chi }_{1}^{0}}})$. The yields are normalized to the theoretical cross sections. The "All events'' category below starts from all generated events where the W boson decays leptonically and the Higgs boson decays to ${\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } $, taking into account a branching ratio of 0.175.
References
1 P. Ramond Dual theory for free fermions PRD 3 (1971) 2415
2 Y. A. Gol'fand and E. P. Likhtman Extension of the algebra of Poincar$ \'e $ group generators and violation of P invariance JEPTL 13 (1971)323
3 A. Neveu and J. H. Schwarz Factorizable dual model of pions NPB 31 (1971) 86
4 D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov Possible universal neutrino interaction JEPTL 16 (1972)438
5 J. Wess and B. Zumino A Lagrangian model invariant under supergauge transformations PLB 49 (1974) 52
6 J. Wess and B. Zumino Supergauge transformations in four dimensions NPB 70 (1974) 39
7 P. Fayet Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino NPB 90 (1975) 104
8 H. P. Nilles Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics Phys. Rep. 110 (1984) 1
9 G. R. Farrar and P. Fayet Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with supersymmetry PLB 76 (1978) 575
10 C. Boehm, A. Djouadi, and M. Drees Light scalar top quarks and supersymmetric dark matter PRD 62 (2000) 035012 hep-ph/9911496
11 C. Bal\'azs, M. Carena, and C. E. M. Wagnerr Dark matter, light top squarks, and electroweak baryogenesis PRD 70 (2004) 015007 hep-ph/403224
12 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new phenomena in final states with large jet multiplicities and missing transverse momentum with ATLAS using $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV proton-proton collisions PLB 757 (2016) 334 1602.06194
13 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new phenomena in final states with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector PRD 94 (2016) 032005 1604.07773
14 ATLAS Collaboration Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC 76 (2016) 392 1605.03814
15 ATLAS Collaboration Search for pair production of gluinos decaying via stop and sbottom in events with b jets and large missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 94 (2016) 032003 1605.09318
16 CMS Collaboration Search for new physics with the M$ _{T2} $ variable in all-jets final states produced in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 10 (2016) 006 CMS-SUS-15-003
1603.04053
17 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in multijet events with missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV Submitted to \it PRD CMS-SUS-16-033
1704.07781
18 CMS Collaboration Inclusive search for supersymmetry using razor variables in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRD 95 (2017) 012003 CMS-SUS-15-004
1609.07658
19 CMS Collaboration A search for new phenomena in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in final states with missing transverse momentum and at least one jet using the $ \alpha _{\mathrm {T}} $ variable EPJC 77 (2017) 294 CMS-SUS-15-005
1611.00338
20 ATLAS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV in final states with jets and two same-sign leptons or three leptons with the ATLAS detector EPJC 76 (2016) 259 1602.09058
21 CMS Collaboration Search for physics beyond the standard model in events with two leptons of same sign, missing transverse momentum, and jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 ~TeV Submitted to \it EPJC CMS-SUS-16-035
1704.07323
22 ATLAS Collaboration Search for top squarks in final states with one isolated lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum in $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector PRD 94 (2016) 052009 1606.03903
23 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new phenomena in final states with large jet multiplicities and missing transverse momentum with ATLAS using $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV proton-proton collisions PLB 757 (2016) 334 1602.06194
24 ATLAS Collaboration Search for gluinos in events with an isolated lepton, jets and missing transverse momentum at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 Te V with the ATLAS detector EPJC 76 (2016) 565 1605.04285
25 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in the all-hadronic final state using top quark tagging in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV Submitted to \it PRD CMS-SUS-16-009
1701.01954
26 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in events with one lepton and multiple jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRD 95 (2017) 012011 CMS-SUS-15-006
1609.09386
27 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry with multiple charged leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV Submitted to \it Eur. J. Phys. C CMS-SUS-16-003
1701.06940
28 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV in the single-lepton final state using the sum of masses of large-radius jets JHEP 08 (2016) 122 CMS-SUS-15-007
1605.04608
29 ATLAS, CMS Collaboration Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 08 (2016) 045 1606.02266
30 S. P. Martin A supersymmetry primer in Perspectives on Supersymmetry II, G. L. Kane, ed., p. 1 World Scientific, 2010 Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys., vol. 21 hep-ph/9709356
31 N. Arkani-Hamed et al. MARMOSET: The Path from LHC Data to the New Standard Model via On-Shell Effective Theories hep-ph/0703088
32 J. Alwall, P. Schuster, and N. Toro Simplified models for a first characterization of new physics at the LHC PRD 79 (2009) 075020 0810.3921
33 J. Alwall, M.-P. Le, M. Lisanti, and J. G. Wacker Model-independent jets plus missing energy searches PRD 79 (2009) 015005 0809.3264
34 D. Alves et al. Simplified models for LHC new physics searches JPG 39 (2012) 105005 1105.2838
35 CMS Collaboration Interpretation of searches for supersymmetry with simplified models PRD 88 (2013) 052017 CMS-SUS-11-016
1301.2175
36 CMS Collaboration Searches for electroweak neutralino and chargino production in channels with Higgs, Z, and W bosons in pp collisions at 8 TeV PRD 90 (2014) 092007 CMS-SUS-14-002
1409.3168
37 CMS Collaboration Searches for electroweak production of charginos, neutralinos, and sleptons decaying to leptons and W, Z, and Higgs bosons in pp collisions at 8 TeV EPJC 74 (2014) 3036 CMS-SUS-13-006
1405.7570
38 ATLAS Collaboration Search for the electroweak production of supersymmetric particles in $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 ~TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector PRD 93 (2016) 052002 1509.07152
39 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
40 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow event reconstruction in CMS and performance for jets, taus, and $ E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}} $ CMS-PAS-PFT-09-001
41 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the particle-flow event with the first LHC collisions recorded in the CMS detector CMS-PAS-PFT-10-001
42 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
43 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
44 CMS Collaboration Missing transverse energy performance of the CMS detector JINST 6 (2011) P09001 CMS-JME-10-009
1106.5048
45 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 ~TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
46 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
47 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
48 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2008) 119 0707.1378
49 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) P11002 CMS-JME-10-011
1107.4277
50 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
51 CMS Collaboration Identification of b-quark jets with the CMS experiment JINST 8 (2013) P04013 CMS-BTV-12-001
1211.4462
52 CMS Collaboration Reconstruction and identification of $ \tau $ lepton decays to hadrons and $ \nu_{\tau} $ at CMS JINST 11 (2016) P01019 CMS-TAU-14-001
1510.07488
53 D. R. Tovey On measuring the masses of pair-produced semi-invisibly decaying particles at hadron colliders JHEP 04 (2008) 034 0802.2879
54 G. Polesello and D. R. Tovey Supersymmetric particle mass measurement with the boost-corrected contransverse mass JHEP 03 (2010) 030 0910.0174
55 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
56 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
57 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
58 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the $ POWHEG $ method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
59 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the $ POWHEG $ BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
60 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
61 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
62 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: $ s $- and $ t $-channel contributions JHEP 09 (2009) 111 0907.4076
63 E. Re Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
64 T. Melia, P. Nason, R. Rontsch, and G. Zanderighi W$ ^+ $W$ ^- $, WZ and ZZ production in the POWHEG BOX JHEP 11 (2011) 078 1107.5051
65 M. Beneke, P. Falgari, S. Klein, and C. Schwinn Hadronic top-quark pair production with NNLL threshold resummation NPB 855 (2012) 695 1109.1536
66 M. Cacciari et al. Top-pair production at hadron colliders with next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic soft-gluon resummation PLB 710 (2012) 612 1111.5869
67 P. Barnreuther, M. Czakon, and A. Mitov Percent-level-precision physics at the Tevatron: Next-to-next-to-leading order QCD corrections to $ \mathrm{q\bar{q}}\to \mathrm{t\bar{t}} + X $ PRL 109 (2012) 132001 1204.5201
68 M. Czakon and A. Mitov NNLO corrections to top-pair production at hadron colliders: the all-fermionic scattering channels JHEP 12 (2012) 054 1207.0236
69 M. Czakon and A. Mitov NNLO corrections to top pair production at hadron colliders: the quark-gluon reaction JHEP 01 (2013) 080 1210.6832
70 M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov Total top-quark pair-production cross section at hadron colliders through $ O(\alpha_S^4) $ PRL 110 (2013) 252004 1303.6254
71 R. Gavin, Y. Li, F. Petriello, and S. Quackenbush W Physics at the LHC with FEWZ 2.1 CPC 184 (2013) 208 1201.5896
72 R. Gavin, Y. Li, F. Petriello, and S. Quackenbush FEWZ 2.0: A code for hadronic Z production at next-to-next-to-leading order CPC 182 (2011) 2388 1011.3540
73 CMS Collaboration Search for top-squark pair production in the single-lepton final state in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV EPJC 73 (2013) 2677 CMS-SUS-13-011
1308.1586
74 T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 CPC 178 (2008) 852 0710.3820
75 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
76 \GEANTfour Collaboration $ GEANT4 -- a $ simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
77 S. Abdullin et al. The fast simulation of the CMS detector at LHC J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 331 (2011) 032049
78 CMS Collaboration Searches for pair production of third-generation squarks in $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV pp collisions EPJC 77 (2017) 327 CMS-SUS-16-008
1612.03877
79 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the WZ production cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PLB 766 (2017) 268 CMS-SMP-16-002
1607.06943
80 CMS Collaboration Simplified likelihood for the re-interpretation of public CMS results CDS
81 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ CL_s $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
82 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
83 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
84 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in summer 2011 CMS-NOTE-2011-005
85 B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea, and M. Rothering Gaugino production in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV JHEP 10 (2012) 081 1207.2159
86 B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea, and M. Rothering Precision predictions for electroweak superpartner production at hadron colliders with Resummino EPJC 73 (2013) 2480 1304.0790
87 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN